BollyWood

Girls say Sorry to Colleen

39 posts in this topic

This made me laugh - the WG's who went public on Rooney saying sorry. Would have been better if thay had kept mouths shut.

http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/articles.aspx?cp-documentid=154650124

They asked for payment before seeing Rooney, he acquesed wrongly assuming that they would be discreet. It seems that assumption is becoming ever more mistaken.

What do the ladies think? As a very occassional punter I assume discretion on both sides (Adele is right http://www.punternet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=34629) yet events like this must scare some punters silly.

Aren't WG's destroying their own market as people who can afford £1.2k a night are usually people with some repute, which, whatever we think, will suffer if connected with visiting WG's.

I know Rooney is (so far) married but look what happened to the robot dancing Crouch; away from home wanting some fun yet front page news. (yes I know he had a gf but as a girl once said to me someone has to be an ex)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They only said sorry for the paper to pay more and they are sorry they had to admit they slept with Shrek......:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't believe how silly Wayne was with this. You can tell he is not a man who has had much sex with women.

He should have known the pitfalls

He should only have booked this girl once (though i think the reason he kept rebooking her is because she looks like a better looking version of Collen)

He showed he had no discretion. Acknowledging her her at a public event and holding her hand in front of teammates as well as taking her downstairs for shenanigans.

Booking her outside of her agency was the deadliest mistake that's when it crossed the line into paid booty call status and she probably got the idea that she would be the secret paid bit on the side.

Realised that was not the case and went to the papers before the world cup for maximum publicity and payment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know how close to reality this bit of reportage is.

It does show how blurred the line between "Groupie" and WG probably is.

Was the quote suggesting that Colleen has had her cut from the association and he's fair game genuine or made up?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's pretty much all true.

Makes you wonder what these footballers are doing. All that money and they pick women who don't exactly hide their intentions. But then their not exactly brains of Britain either

As for Collen she was nothing without Rooney tbh i don't think she has anything of interest to advertisers/magazines if she did break up with him she's a nonentity so she'll stay where she is.

As do most of the wife's as it said in that article Rooney earns Rooney earns £20,000 a day once you get used to that kind of lifestyle you'll turn a blind eye to anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Saw their "apologies" on tv. Found it laughable, with their crocodile tears.

Selling their stories and 'apologies' for more cash. The worst type of prostitute

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They only said sorry for the paper to pay more and they are sorry they had to admit they slept with Shrek......:D

I got the impression that it was actually the damage thats been done to their own families that was the problem and the reason for the public apology (didn't the one girls parents give a very distressed statement to the papers?).

I've slept with many many clients that are a hell of a lot uglier than Wayne Rooney. Regardless of his looks and status he is a client and should have been respected as such. Bet the silly mares soon took his money off him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Saw their "apologies" on tv. Found it laughable, with their crocodile tears.

Selling their stories and 'apologies' for more cash. The worst type of prostitute

Be more believable if they donated the fee 'earned' to charity. To me it appears to be a ruse to stay for a few more mins of fame.

S x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Saw their "apologies" on tv. Found it laughable, with their crocodile tears.

Selling their stories and 'apologies' for more cash.

The worst type of prostitute

£150 sell your body

£50,000 sell a story with maybe another £50,000 in "details"

At 21 its hardly rocket science and despite all the slating she gets here, there wont be many that don't have their price.

If your 21, selling your body to complete strangers, selling a story to a man waving a £50,000 cheque spinning you stories of fame and fortune wont be too difficult.

It may pay to remember this girl was flaunted in public and was only a matter of time before this came to light.

If there was money to be made best she got it rather than some oik of a reporter. She is just being used to further the papers circulation. I just hope she invests the money as it wont last forever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
£150 sell your body

£50,000 sell a story with maybe another £50,000 in "details"

At 21 its hardly rocket science and despite all the slating she gets here, there wont be many that don't have their price.

If your 21, selling your body to complete strangers, selling a story to a man waving a £50,000 cheque spinning you stories of fame and fortune wont be too difficult.

It may pay to remember this girl was flaunted in public and was only a matter of time before this came to light.

If there was money to be made best she got it rather than some oik of a reporter. She is just being used to further the papers circulation. I just hope she invests the money as it wont last forever.

Spot on as usual Lou

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure exposure will affect these girls earning capacity in the slightest. Everyone is getting carried away with the figure of £1200 a night. Their usual rate was £150-£200 an hour so that overnight rate doesn't make them terribly expensive pro rata.

If they do carry on escorting there will be plenty of punters who fancy following in Rooney's footsteps out of sheer curiosity. It didn't do Fiona Wright much harm years ago. Footballers or celebrities may be careful but I can't see them short of work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with many of the posts above.

The girls are really trying to spin out their 'fifteen minutes' - who can blame them really?. They will get more bookings, if they continue working. As previously stated above £1200 per night is about the going rate isnt it?. So they arent 'high class' are they?.

Would any of us know who Collen was if she wasnt married to Rooney?. In her own little way - she is 'working it' as much as anyone else!.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But most, if not all, agencies offer complete discretion. So to violate the clients (rooney) rights like that, is disgraceful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't know how close to reality this bit of reportage is.

It does show how blurred the line between "Groupie" and WG probably is.

Was the quote suggesting that Colleen has had her cut from the association and he's fair game genuine or made up?

LoL, sounds spot on to me , especially when the bar tenders are serving up "Gold Digger" cocktails.

As for the 'apologies' I think it just rubs salt in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But most, if not all, agencies offer complete discretion. So to violate the clients (rooney) rights like that, is disgraceful.

I'd never go again to any agency or place if I thought there was not complete discretion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd never go again to any agency or place if I thought there was not complete discretion.

Did these girls work for an agency?? An agency can assure complete discretion (as can indies) however money talks and does an agency have control over what their employees do?

No the ONLY way those that do not want kiss and tells is to abstain completely.

S x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
At 21 its hardly rocket science and despite all the slating she gets here, there wont be many that don't have their price.

I agree with this completely, it's simply a question of market forces. Virtually everyone who comes here understands why women go into escorting, despite the derision that it gets from some quarters. Those quarters completely ignore the financial considerations implicit in many women's decisions to escort - why should this be any different?

But most, if not all, agencies offer complete discretion. So to violate the clients (rooney) rights like that, is disgraceful.
I'd never go again to any agency or place if I thought there was not complete discretion.

Well, agencies claim to offer complete discretion. In reality, they can't do anything that is in contravention of the law of the land. They can strongly emphasise to their clients that they should be as discreet as possible, but there is absolutely nothing they can do enforce this, and they certainly can't stop a girl from going to a national newspaper, or the paper from printing a story. What are they supposed to do - take an injunction out?

In terms of never using an agency again if there was not complete discretion, there are two points to make. Firstly, unless you are hiding your fame behind an anonymous Punternet identity, it's highly unlikely that any national newspaper is going to print a story about you, so I wouldn't worry about that too much. Secondly, no agency can guarantee complete discretion. It's not possible; the only way you could do that was to get the girls to sign a contract, and it wouldn't even come close to being legally binding anyway. An agency cannot stop individual human-beings from acting in self-interest, it is one form of liberty that we still have left. The only time I foresee this being an issue for the average punter is if you book someone who knows you, or your significant other. That would be a bit of a pisser, but the odds ought to be pretty remote.

If this girl made £100,000 from this story, then she's well on the way to buying a flat or house, which is no easy feat in this insane economy. Who could seriously deny her the chance to make a better life for herself? I for one cannot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure very few ladies here would discuss it.

However, if this is a profession to a lady and then she was offered say £50k or £100k to sell her story on a client, why should any client expect this not to be the case? The lady is a professional and out to make money from clients. The client has no explicit confidentiality clause.

Surely a majority of ladies would sell a story with that amount of cash on offer, why wouldn't they, what personal relationship or loyalty do they ultimately owe a client?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still think fundementally Wayne is the one most at fault. He cheated on his wife and child, next up are the WGs whose actions and then revelations now put this marriage even more at risk, but ultimately Wayne was the one who stood up and said he would forsake all others, and evidently he is a liar.

Whatever one can "expect" in terms of discretion from WGs the buck in my opinion ultimately stops with the philanderer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As do most of the wife's as it said in that article Rooney earns Rooney earns £20,000 a day once you get used to that kind of lifestyle you'll turn a blind eye to anything.

Elin Nordegren didn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not sure exposure will affect these girls earning capacity in the slightest. Everyone is getting carried away with the figure of £1200 a night. Their usual rate was £150-£200 an hour so that overnight rate doesn't make them terribly expensive pro rata.

If they do carry on escorting there will be plenty of punters who fancy following in Rooney's footsteps out of sheer curiosity. It didn't do Fiona Wright much harm years ago. Footballers or celebrities may be careful but I can't see them short of work.

If you met Fiona Wright lately you would realise that it indeed harmed her. Not only was she 7 years ago working for us in Northampton and MK for £60 but she had completely lost the plot. She was also never able to answer her phone because of debt collectors and she had used all the money from her stories to enhance her body and face with surgery and looked like Pete Burns. She should be used as an example of just how badly things go when people sell out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
......... but ultimately Wayne was the one who stood up and said he would forsake all others, and evidently he is a liar.

If all "liars" quit punting today, there wouldn't be much left of the commercial sex industry by the weekend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If all "liars" quit punting today, there wouldn't be much left of the commercial sex industry by the weekend.

Ain't that the truth. :confused:

B

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If all "liars" quit punting today, there wouldn't be much left of the commercial sex industry by the weekend.

You are absolutely right, no question, however the Wayne rooney case illustrates the differing moral yardsticks that we implement individually to question our own and others' conduct.

Wayne should have considered the impact on his pregnant wife as even he is not thick enough NOT to have considered a kiss and tell scenario, considering from his own experiences earlier.............................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now