bargepole

Uninformative FRs

23 posts in this topic

Checking though the FRs on an occasional basis, I often come across a report on a new girl or parlour which hasn't previously been reported on.

Then when I click on the link, up pops the report with a 2-line description of the event, along the lines of "I had a wonderful time with the lovely Waynetta, the details of which I'll keep between me and her".

All of which is about as useful as a chocolate fireguard, and you wonder why the punter bothered writing this Mills & Boon-esque tosh, and why I wasted two minutes of my life finding it.

Please guys, if you're going to write a report, give us the full details - what services did she offer, was the price as advertised on the website, were her pics real, etc. - that way we can make an informed judgement as to whether we want to visit that lady.

[Rant over]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Checking though the FRs on an occasional basis, I often come across a report on a new girl or parlour which hasn't previously been reported on.

Then when I click on the link, up pops the report with a 2-line description of the event, along the lines of "I had a wonderful time with the lovely Waynetta, the details of which I'll keep between me and her".

All of which is about as useful as a chocolate fireguard, and you wonder why the punter bothered writing this Mills & Boon-esque tosh, and why I wasted two minutes of my life finding it.

Please guys, if you're going to write a report, give us the full details - what services did she offer, was the price as advertised on the website, were her pics real, etc. - that way we can make an informed judgement as to whether we want to visit that lady.

[Rant over]

This topic has been covered before and I am in agreement with you. I hope field reports like that are just rejected or removed as they offer nothing or at best very little to the punter trying to gain information about a potential punt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This probably has been covered many times but still a very valid point,it can be a bit irritating looking at some FR's, fair enough if you want to keep the experience private etc But one liner's are just a waste of time,the more details the better!

On another note there are some regular punters who's FR's I have read and must commend them on the detail and content,very clear and excellent information content etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This probably has been covered many times but still a very valid point,it can be a bit irritating looking at some FR's, fair enough if you want to keep the experience private etc But one liner's are just a waste of time,the more details the better!

On another note there are some regular punters who's FR's I have read and must commend them on the detail and content,very clear and excellent information content etc[/quote

I think Man Meat should be commended on his wonderful witty reports. He knows how to be informative. They are always a fantastic read :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree - you do not have to be pornographic in your description, though there is a place for that! If someone wants it to be private, why write a field report? I agree with AnnabellasMK - I love reading ManMeat's reports - a right rivetting read, every one of them

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
you do not have to be pornographic in your description

I do!

I love reading ManMeat's reports - a right rivetting read, every one of them

I don't and no they're not! They don't inspire me to see any of the girls reviewed, I get bored half way through reading them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously some reports are more helpful than others but who is anyone to tell someone else what to do with their reports?

Good or bad I will write what I want thanks.

Yes this topic has been covered before in extreme detail so someone could go off on one criticising the OP for not searching the forum to see if this is the case and what was said.

I am not doing that because who wants to spend their time doing research before any contribution.

Perhaps ManMeat, who I agree writes great reports to read, began as a brief and nervous dipper into writing about intimate things for public consumption and was allowed to blossom at his own pace...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't stand these two line wonders either, what Is the pint of bothering to register? I wish Galahad could track down these punters, then we all could slap wet fishes at them. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Obviously some reports are more helpful than others but who is anyone to tell someone else what to do with their reports?

Good or bad I will write what I want thanks.

Yes this topic has been covered before in extreme detail so someone could go off on one criticising the OP for not searching the forum to see if this is the case and what was said.

I am not doing that because who wants to spend their time doing research before any contribution.

Perhaps ManMeat, who I agree writes great reports to read, began as a brief and nervous dipper into writing about intimate things for public consumption and was allowed to blossom at his own pace...

Agree with that. I write what I like. I used to not go into too much detail than get PMs asking whether she does this and that. Go into too much detail and she might get punters who dont know it was "at discretion" and then get peeved when they dont get something.

I just write what happened and what I would like to know if I was deciding to book.

ManMeat: I think I'm lost on why people love Man Meats reports. I wince now when his FRs pop up. Was okay the first few times but now there over the top and no different to some of the "I wont go into details" FR cos there all hidden in his style of expression. Some of them are now turning into the porn story telling that Ive seen loads of other FRs.

(And whats with the minutes seconds timings? So can we assume that we will not get the full time we paid for or always assume that we will go over a bit?)

FRs that I hate:

1. The "I wont go into details" especailly from first time reporters. Then dont. just say she looked like the photos, we did the advertised services. etc.

2. The "I'll go into such huge and weird fantasy story telling that you wont actually know what we actually did".

3. First time reporters.

4. Reporters that have been "asleep" for 3 or 4 years then suddenly pop up and give a review. (Has someone hacked the old accounts or what?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poor Man Meat, intellect obviously scares some people on here.

One thing I would say he is one of the most genuine clients to have come through our doors and the girls look forward to his company. I know one particular lady at Annabellas would love to be Mrs Meat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Poor Man Meat, intellect obviously scares some people on here.

One thing I would say he is one of the most genuine clients to have come through our doors and the girls look forward to his company. I know one particular lady at Annabellas would love to be Mrs Meat.

Well thats very nice of you but Im not Man Meat. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I know that, when Man Meat is in the house the girls all start doing weird stretches and muttering the word, "python" to one another then doing this strange thing with their hands as if their talking about the size of fish???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Always surprised at moans about "uninformative" positive reports. Assuming the reporter is honest any positive report tells you a lot by implication... that lady matches her description, that she pleased the customer, and she appears comfortable with her job.

What more is expected?? Some checklist of a dozen sexual activities to make sure they are all on the menu?? (Am I the only guy that is puzzled at number of different things some guys can apparently do in 30 mins???... I usually stick to a few favorite activities.)

On other hand... I think it is important (for fairness to lady) to be more specific about specific issues in negative reports.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I find interesting (it actually annoys me but I won't say that because as I said, they are the writers' reports so up to them) is the names people come up with for certain things like penises and condoms.

I just find that all rather odd. I knw lots of them have become familiar terms over the years but they still tend to be used as if the obvious term - e.g. on went the old mac...

Then you get reports that seem almost timid but suddenly an odd term pops up.

Interesting linguistically but odd. Would love to see someone with the time on their hands collate all these terms; perhaps they could then be matched against the authors' personal details to pin them down to certain areas, age, position in family, public school etc...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm...

You guys will be giving people marks out of 10 next, or shall we mark them like GCSE's with a C- or B for effort?

Surely if someone has taken the initiative to create a field report and it is positive, then you have the feedback you need?

The wonderful thing about punting is that it is non judgemental. People of all walks of life, shape, size, intelligence on both sides are able to participate and have opinions. Ok, it might not be such a good read, it might not fill in the gaps, but it does tell you that a particular wg has been met and has made the FR writer happy.

Bearing in mind that we are all different and that we all have different tastes in looks and sensual enjoyment, even a detailed report can be misleading, if not more so, as you will visit the wg with preconceived ideas of what to expect.

In my mind a report written by a gentleman who finds it difficult to compose a letter or message should have more clout behind it, as they have done it not because they enjoy writing pros, but because they felt the need to share their opinion of the lady met and wanted others to know she was good.

There is also the case for the 'private person' who does not like to indulge what he has been doing, but again would like people to know he was happy with his booking. It may not give away too much, but if you look at the services she offers, then I would imagine you could assume they were offered, or he would not have been happy.

Lastly, are these reports not just a guide line, a factor to your future bookings? Surely you wouldn't really book someone purely due to the opinion of another man that you have never met?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Agree with that. I write what I like. I used to not go into too much detail than get PMs asking whether she does this and that. Go into too much detail and she might get punters who dont know it was "at discretion" and then get peeved when they dont get something.

I just write what happened and what I would like to know if I was deciding to book.

ManMeat: I think I'm lost on why people love Man Meats reports. I wince now when his FRs pop up. Was okay the first few times but now there over the top and no different to some of the "I wont go into details" FR cos there all hidden in his style of expression. Some of them are now turning into the porn story telling that Ive seen loads of other FRs.

(And whats with the minutes seconds timings? So can we assume that we will not get the full time we paid for or always assume that we will go over a bit?)

FRs that I hate:

1. The "I wont go into details" especailly from first time reporters. Then dont. just say she looked like the photos, we did the advertised services. etc.

2. The "I'll go into such huge and weird fantasy story telling that you wont actually know what we actually did".

3. First time reporters.

4. Reporters that have been "asleep" for 3 or 4 years then suddenly pop up and give a review. (Has someone hacked the old accounts or what?)

Agree with everything you say, except point 4 - why does it bother you that someone who hasn't posted a FR for some time pops up with a new one? What does it matter? Either it's a good Fr or it's not - time elapsed since last FR is irrelevant, sure :confused:ly?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmm Surely you wouldn't really book someone purely due to the opinion of another man that you have never met?

Er, well , Yes ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Er, well , Yes ;)

So you don't look at her profile? You would just pick up the phone and ring that number with no further research at all?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So you don't look at her profile? You would just pick up the phone and ring that number with no further research at all?

Of course you still check her profile or site, but for me and I'm sure others, a good FR from a respected punter carries a lot more weight than a first or occasional author.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Agree with everything you say, except point 4 - why does it bother you that someone who hasn't posted a FR for some time pops up with a new one? What does it matter? Either it's a good Fr or it's not - time elapsed since last FR is irrelevant, sure :confused:ly?

Well, okay, probabaly more due to my suspicious nature.

But I read through the reports quite alot, and occasionally see a glowing report for someone and think, hang on, Im sure Ive seen that girl from another report and she had a few bad reports.

Gone to have a look and find them and then notice that the other authors had a few other recent reports but the other author with the glowing report hadnt done a report for 5 years or something.

Perhaps he was lucky that after his time away from Pnet he picked a girl, and didnt mind the bad reports or she changed her act.

Its probably nothing but its just something I've noticed more than once.

I usually look at the other reports an author's written just to know what other girls hes seen just to see if there are others I might like to visit. But obviously most girls working 5 years ago might not be working now so a 5 year gap stands out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are some punters whose tastes I have found I share. There is a good co-relation between their having enjoyed visiting a particular girl and my enjoying seeing her. So if one of them posts that he saw such and such and had a good time, I don't need the anatomical details to help me reach a decision and, if I did, I could PM him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So you don't look at her profile? You would just pick up the phone and ring that number with no further research at all?

Hi Kate, Maybe she hasn't even got a profile ? Yes, i have seen WG on recomendation of reliable members on here by PM, without seeing a photo even. I call it trust in your fellow man .;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now