Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
derridian

Better Business Model For Wg's And Punters

3 posts in this topic

Fred15's post on "buying in bulk" and "time share" set me thinking. Is their a better business model that will work for everyone - ladies and punters alike?

I believe their is.

Let's look at the needs of the ladies first.

1) Security and protection for the WGs own personal safety, identity and health.

2) WG's constantly have to manage their limited supply of hours with variable demand. This is the waiting for a bus law. Three always come at once. Advertising can compound the problem.

3) WG's have to deal with timewasters, and worse the inevitable no- shows

which take a whole chunk of working time out for no income.

4) WG's want to maximise the money they can earn in the hours they have set aside to work.

5) WG's are looking for clean, responsible punters who respect their service provider and pay them promptly the sum agreed.

From the punters side the requirements are a little easier:

1) Punters want guaranteed great sex for as little money as possible, whenever they feel like it, with no unintended legal, health or partner consequences, from a responsible, discrete and enthusiastic, smiling provider. And complementary Jaffa cakes. Not too much to ask then?

So, how do you match the needs of both groups?

For me personally Punternet does a great job. The field reports make a huge difference to the likelihood of a good outcome.

But the real issues above are all on the WG's side. The field reports don't address any of these issues for the ladies and after reading Mrs Diva's posts can have serious negatives too.

What we do is to create a "match making" service or "Inner Circle" for Punternet members. This is almost happening already with the PMs, links, chat and board postings today, but would be more similar to a 'dating' site but with the promise you will never, ever meet Lindilala in real life.

Here is how it would work:

1) Long term punter members / poster / can register or are invited to join the "Circle". They draw up a profile with their likes and dislikes, best times to punt, best locations, requests, a little about themselves, availability at short notice.

2) Known WG's (good FRs etc.) post their profiles and links to their existing profiles / www site / blogs etc. in the "Circle" along with best times, location etc. for them.

3) Punters browse the profiles and draw up wish lists of WGs they would like see. The WG sees that she is on the wish list and can then contact or PM the punter one-to-one.

4) Our ladies get to write FRs on the punters. Just like in the forums, unacceptable behaviour results in their Circle membership being withdrawn. Punters are rated according to the standards chosen by the WG's.

5) The software matches up the calendar, time slots, location and reviews and makes matches - just like a dating site.

6) Punters and Ladies would pay a small subscription to punternet for the matching service.

Summary:

WG's get additional vetting and security because the punters are known and rated as responsible punters who show up, on time, and pay.

WG's get to PM their wishlist punters - even at short notice with messages on availability, cancellations, new locations etc. aka lastminute,cum

Good Punters like Fred15 who are highly rated get their rewards. WGs don't need to discount published prices, but can offer Fred15 only temptations to visit at slower times, short notice, or just a regular slot when they want a trusted happy punter, or on days when they need to maximise income.

For both parties the Circle is a like a trusted sub's bench. The matching software evens out the gaps, plugs, holes, and ensures higher quality, and greater time efficiency for all.

Sorry this turned into a essay, but all in the interests of Mrs. D never needing to smell a cabbage ass again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My initial reaction.

Some one some time drew up a list like the above as their 'ideal'. They called in 'the other site', sadly it was corrupted because you are dealing with powerful incentives, sex, money, greed and jealousy.

There are two many variables for it to work but it in an ideal world it would be great. What you describe is already in existence but within smaller 'networks' or 'circuits' which are not discussed outside of that group which is why they work as they are based on mutual trust.

Just my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fred15's post on "buying in bulk" and "time share" set me thinking. Is their a better business model that will work for everyone - ladies and punters alike?

I believe their is.

Let's look at the needs of the ladies first.

1) Security and protection for the WGs own personal safety, identity and health.

2) WG's constantly have to manage their limited supply of hours with variable demand. This is the waiting for a bus law. Three always come at once. Advertising can compound the problem.

3) WG's have to deal with timewasters, and worse the inevitable no- shows

which take a whole chunk of working time out for no income.

4) WG's want to maximise the money they can earn in the hours they have set aside to work.

5) WG's are looking for clean, responsible punters who respect their service provider and pay them promptly the sum agreed.

From the punters side the requirements are a little easier:

1) Punters want guaranteed great sex for as little money as possible, whenever they feel like it, with no unintended legal, health or partner consequences, from a responsible, discrete and enthusiastic, smiling provider. And complementary Jaffa cakes. Not too much to ask then?

So, how do you match the needs of both groups?

For me personally Punternet does a great job. The field reports make a huge difference to the likelihood of a good outcome.

But the real issues above are all on the WG's side. The field reports don't address any of these issues for the ladies and after reading Mrs Diva's posts can have serious negatives too.

What we do is to create a "match making" service or "Inner Circle" for Punternet members. This is almost happening already with the PMs, links, chat and board postings today, but would be more similar to a 'dating' site but with the promise you will never, ever meet Lindilala in real life.

Here is how it would work:

1) Long term punter members / poster / can register or are invited to join the "Circle". They draw up a profile with their likes and dislikes, best times to punt, best locations, requests, a little about themselves, availability at short notice.

2) Known WG's (good FRs etc.) post their profiles and links to their existing profiles / www site / blogs etc. in the "Circle" along with best times, location etc. for them.

3) Punters browse the profiles and draw up wish lists of WGs they would like see. The WG sees that she is on the wish list and can then contact or PM the punter one-to-one.

4) Our ladies get to write FRs on the punters. Just like in the forums, unacceptable behaviour results in their Circle membership being withdrawn. Punters are rated according to the standards chosen by the WG's.

5) The software matches up the calendar, time slots, location and reviews and makes matches - just like a dating site.

6) Punters and Ladies would pay a small subscription to punternet for the matching service.

Summary:

WG's get additional vetting and security because the punters are known and rated as responsible punters who show up, on time, and pay.

WG's get to PM their wishlist punters - even at short notice with messages on availability, cancellations, new locations etc. aka lastminute,cum

Good Punters like Fred15 who are highly rated get their rewards. WGs don't need to discount published prices, but can offer Fred15 only temptations to visit at slower times, short notice, or just a regular slot when they want a trusted happy punter, or on days when they need to maximise income.

For both parties the Circle is a like a trusted sub's bench. The matching software evens out the gaps, plugs, holes, and ensures higher quality, and greater time efficiency for all.

Sorry this turned into a essay, but all in the interests of Mrs. D never needing to smell a cabbage ass again.

Got to be worth joining just for that! :P

In all seriousness, as per the earlier post, there are too many variables and many of these features are indeed on the other site.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0