Guest Xenia

Why Some Guys Like Protected Oral?

127 posts in this topic

I know there are quite a few guys like oral with condom. The reasons I think are:

1) The most obvious one-Safety against STDs

2) Because for some people the sensation to have it without, can be to much, and they like to prolong the pleasure.

3)Because they know, that girls who only provide oral with condom very often are an absolute aces of the job, lol, because they need to put more effort and creativity in it, oppose to the girls who do it without.

I put number 4, but decided to delete it for now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you ever had a cold sore (herpes on the lip for those unaware). Just for that reason alone would I not ever want to risk something like on my penis.

Its possible anyone could have a cold sore that is barely visible or noticeable even to its host and it is highly contagious.

Another minor reason for a blow job with a condom, is its ideal if you like to cum while there still sucking you off and they dont do normal CIM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hah also I think that oral with condom, (which I only used to do curse the bloody internet), also reduces risks of 'accidents' and a girl can go hard out without that worry!

S x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hah also I think that oral with condom, (which I only used to do curse the bloody internet), also reduces risks of 'accidents' and a girl can go hard out without that worry!

S x

Must admit, I prefer oral without the condom, but I've never understood why CIM is quite such a big thing for some guys, at the final moment as long as I do the C bit I'm not too fussed what the lady chooses to do with it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Must admit, I prefer oral without the condom, but I've never understood why CIM is quite such a big thing for some guys, at the final moment as long as I do the C bit I'm not too fussed what the lady chooses to do with it!

OW is like eating a toffee with the paper still on. I dislike it and would rather not have it. It is not the case that ladies who only offer OW are, in general, better at it.

As regards CIM, the sensation of being sucked while cumming is extraordinarily physically pleasurable. Nothing to do with where the cum goes, all about the continuation of the sucking while the sensations rise to and beyond the climax.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As regards CIM, the sensation of being sucked while cumming is extraordinarily physically pleasurable. Nothing to do with where the cum goes, all about the continuation of the sucking while the sensations rise to and beyond the climax.

+1 the sensation my naked cock pumping itself into the lady's mouth as she continues to suck hard is just indescribable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i do prefer OWO, but as somebody who has quite a tight foreskin i sense some ladies are not entirely comfortable doing OWO on me, so i just ask them to put a condom on. thinking they are a bit uncomfortable makes me a bit less relaxed. the main thing i enjoy is DFK so OWO is not the most important part of a punt for me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hah also I think that oral with condom, (which I only used to do curse the bloody internet), also reduces risks of 'accidents' and a girl can go hard out without that worry!

S x

Maybe I have picked this up wrong Sab but are you cursing the internet for forcing you to compete by offering OWO?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know there are quite a few guys like oral with condom. The reasons I think are:

1) The most obvious one-Safety against STDs

2) Because for some people the sensation to have it without, can be to much, and they like to prolong the pleasure.

3)Because they know, that girls who only provide oral with condom very often are an absolute aces of the job, lol, because they need to put more effort and creativity in it, oppose to the girls who do it without.

I put number 4, but decided to delete it for now.

Number 4 in my book [in an ideal world] could be : Because FK or DFK would be a safer and therefore more enjoyable experience. However this would only be the case where the WG sticks to the principle that she NEVER offers OWO. I personally would prefer this scenario but alas there are not many WGs who appear to strictly adhere to OWO as most profiles on the net state 'at discretion'. The other downside with playing too safe is that it means cutting out cunnilingus too unless using a dental damn - but perhaps this is for another post. I do however accept that they are under pressure to do OWO and so accept their position. As I do enjoy the kissing [when its available] then I may as well have OWO too, as she has probably had 6-10 naked cocks in her mouth before mine that day, so if she has contracted anything from them, then it is possible that it could be passed on when kissing. This is a grey area to me and one that is certainly playing on my mind before I punt. Perhaps I need to chill more, or just avoid kissing and cunnilingus [dont fancy the damn] !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a condom for everything. Oral included. The reason is simple: Safety. Yes, you can get some nasty STDs from OWO and despite what many believe, yes, HIV too. Admittedly for HIV the risks are reduced, but they are still there.

For me, I would way prefer not to use a condom. OWO is fantastic and as I was circumcised, with 90% of my sensitivity cut off, I need the stimulation more than the lucky sods who have their full penis intact.

But I won't take the risk of OWO, so it's condom use only. And that, as they say, sux.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OW is like eating a toffee with the paper still on. I dislike it and would rather not have it. It is not the case that ladies who only offer OW are, in general, better at it.

As regards CIM, the sensation of being sucked while cumming is extraordinarily physically pleasurable. Nothing to do with where the cum goes, all about the continuation of the sucking while the sensations rise to and beyond the climax.

Yes, at last, a voice of sanity !! :D

Any guy that has never had a BBBJ/CIM experience has never lived.

CBJ's are given by SP's that want to be paid for sex but do not want to

deliver. :eek:

Edited by kiwi69

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CBJ's are given by SP's that want to be paid for sex but do not want to deliver. :eek:

Bullshit. Ladies who offer OWO are taking a calculated risk and that is their choice, but I prefer my throat without chlamidya and gonhorrea. I also prefer to be safe in the knowledge my clients will leave satisfied and perhaps come back to me again, rather than catching a nasty infection they can pass on to their wife, potentially to their unborn children, to other escorts, etc. I also have my husband's health to think about. You can say that you prefer to received OWO without attacking service providers who prefer to work this way - and for the record, I do want to deliever. I offer a lot of services at a very fair price, and many of my clients choose me specifically because I don't do OWO so they know that I will not be carrying a disease and my breath won't smell of cock. :angry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I have picked this up wrong Sab but are you cursing the internet for forcing you to compete by offering OWO?

Correct, ignorance is bliss, for many years I advertised out the papers, and did very well, oral covered, no kissing, now if I want to go back to the papers then will be able to do the same, however not so easy when you decide to rely on internet advertising.

I now advertise OW with the option of me doing OWO if I decide I want to, which include, clean, non dribbling and no CIM.

S x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres still std risks with owo which is why i would never even see a girl who offers this, thus making my choice v limited!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CBJ's are given by SP's that want to be paid for sex but do not want to

deliver. :eek:

Are you serious or just trolling? :rolleyes: I imagine your view is not held by all those men who will only see ladies who only do OW and who become repeat clients :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still waiting to go ahead with my first punt, but will go with OW if the girl doesn't offer CIM, not because of any STI worries, but because I don't trust myself not to pop in her mouth. :lol:

steve7109, I share your pain, bud. We'll always be missing out somehow. :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Must admit, I prefer oral without the condom, but I've never understood why CIM is quite such a big thing for some guys, at the final moment as long as I do the C bit I'm not too fussed what the lady chooses to do with it!

I like a snowball

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct, ignorance is bliss, for many years I advertised out the papers, and did very well, oral covered, no kissing, now if I want to go back to the papers then will be able to do the same, however not so easy when you decide to rely on internet advertising.

I now advertise OW with the option of me doing OWO if I decide I want to, which include, clean, non dribbling and no CIM.

S x

Sabs

One lady I visit is very popular despite (or more appropriately because) the fact that she does not offer OWO. There definitely is a market for it plus a fair proportion of guys seem not to care one way or the other. I'm guessing though, that with you being fairly astute at running your business, you have investigated that market locally and concluded it's not big enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

also prefer to be safe in the knowledge my clients will leave satisfied and perhaps come back to me again, rather than catching a nasty infection they can pass on to their wife, potentially to their unborn children, to other escorts,

It always seems very selfish to me the way that punters who are "getting some" at home will do anything unprotected with a prostitute (or anyone for that matter). It's one thing going behind your wife's back but to take any risks at all, however small they are, is just not acceptable in my mind. From the purely self protection point of view, how do you explain your wife getting a dose of something when she knows she has only been with you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

also prefer to be safe in the knowledge my clients will leave satisfied and perhaps come back to me again, rather than catching a nasty infection they can pass on to their wife, potentially to their unborn children, to other escorts,

It always seems very selfish to me the way that punters who are "getting some" at home will do anything unprotected with a prostitute (or anyone for that matter). It's one thing going behind your wife's back but to take any risks at all, however small they are, is just not acceptable in my mind. From the purely self protection point of view, how do you explain your wife getting a dose of something when she knows she has only been with you?

Even a condom doesn't offer 100% protection against STIs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even a condom doesn't offer 100% protection against STIs.

No, but it gives a whole lot more than if you don't use a condom!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sabs

One lady I visit is very popular despite (or more appropriately because) the fact that she does not offer OWO. There definitely is a market for it plus a fair proportion of guys seem not to care one way or the other. I'm guessing though, that with you being fairly astute at running your business, you have investigated that market locally and concluded it's not big enough.

I don't mind doing it and even enjoy doing it (squeaky clean of course), it is mainly the STI niggle in the back of my mind. And to be honest when seeing on the internet most offering it might have initially started me doing so but now I am not sure that is the reason why I have not taken it off again, I think as I have a regular base again it will be hard to suddenly tell them something that has been on the menu is now off?

The market is big enough I know this, out of 10 yrs on and off probably 5/6 of them was always OW, that was just the way is was OW and no kissing, now the guys just seem to expect it all in, the internet has been the best thing for the industry and also the worst, girls feel pressured to do services that they most likely are not that comfortable with to keep up with the competition, sometimes even downright dangerous.

S x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't mind doing it and even enjoy doing it (squeaky clean of course), it is mainly the STI niggle in the back of my mind. And to be honest when seeing on the internet most offering it might have initially started me doing so but now I am not sure that is the reason why I have not taken it off again, I think as I have a regular base again it will be hard to suddenly tell them something that has been on the menu is now off?

The market is big enough I know this, out of 10 yrs on and off probably 5/6 of them was always OW, that was just the way is was OW and no kissing, now the guys just seem to expect it all in, the internet has been the best thing for the industry and also the worst, girls feel pressured to do services that they most likely are not that comfortable with to keep up with the competition, sometimes even downright dangerous.

S x

This is quite true!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OW is like eating a toffee with the paper still on. I dislike it and would rather not have it. It is not the case that ladies who only offer OW are, in general, better at it.

A nice analogy there! In my experience also, the WGs who have done OW are generally no more skilled than those who offer OWO and even though it lasts longer with the condom on the overall experience is not as pleasurable as a slightly briefer session of OWO.

As regards CIM, the sensation of being sucked while cumming is extraordinarily physically pleasurable. Nothing to do with where the cum goes, all about the continuation of the sucking while the sensations rise to and beyond the climax.

+1 the sensation my naked cock pumping itself into the lady's mouth as she continues to suck hard is just indescribable.

Absolutely agree! I hadn't realised how much CIM could improve OWO till a few months ago but the feeling of a tongue continuing to skillfully pleasure my manhood as I am ejaculating takes the experience to a whole new level of pleasure imho. Plus knowing that the WG allows CIM also means that I don't need to worry about having to pull out before I get to the point of no return and can completely relax and enjoy the OWO ^_^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You had better hope the UK does not adopt NZ's practices then:

8 Operators of businesses of prostitution must adopt and promote safer sex practices

(1) Every operator of a business of prostitution must—

(a) take all reasonable steps to ensure that no commercial sexual services are provided by a sex worker unless a prophylactic sheath or other appropriate barrier is used if those services involve vaginal, anal, or oral penetration or another activity with a similar or greater risk of acquiring or transmitting sexually transmissible infections; and

(B) take all reasonable steps to give health information (whether oral or written) to sex workers and clients; and

© if the person operates a brothel, display health information prominently in that brothel; and

(d) not state or imply that a medical examination of a sex worker means the sex worker is not infected, or likely to be infected, with a sexually transmissible infection; and

(e) take all other reasonable steps to minimise the risk of sex workers or clients acquiring or transmitting sexually transmissible infections.

(2) Every person who contravenes subsection (1) commits an offence and is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding $10,000.

(3) The obligations in this section apply only in relation to commercial sexual services provided for the business and to sex workers and clients in connection with those services.

(4) In this section, health information means information on safer sex practices and on services for the prevention and treatment of sexually transmissible infections.

Act by section

Contents › Part 2 Commercial sexual services

9 Sex workers and clients must adopt safer sex practices

(1) A person must not provide or receive commercial sexual services unless he or she has taken all reasonable steps to ensure a prophylactic sheath or other appropriate barrier is used if those services involve vaginal, anal, or oral penetration or another activity with a similar or greater risk of acquiring or transmitting sexually transmissible infections.

(2) A person must not, for the purpose of providing or receiving commercial sexual services, state or imply that a medical examination of that person means that he or she is not infected, or likely to be infected, with a sexually transmissible infection.

(3) A person who provides or receives commercial sexual services must take all other reasonable steps to minimise the risk of acquiring or transmitting sexually transmissible infections.

(4) Every person who contravenes subsection (1), subsection (2), or subsection (3) commits an offence and is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding $2,000.

The fines are pretty hefty, it appears that they believe there is a significant risk of infections via oral to include it.

S x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now