pollyp23

Members Names

15 posts in this topic

I'll probably get flamed, but amongst the new members names, I see 'slapthewhore' has appeared.

Can't help but thinking that this is not the sort of activity that we should be encouraging on this forum?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with you there...

(unless this is some interesting reversion to middle english? Is/was not a "slapper" a whore?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll probably get flamed, but amongst the new members names, I see 'slapthewhore' has appeared.

Can't help but thinking that this is not the sort of activity that we should be encouraging on this forum?

Sounds ok to me provided the member takes the name in jest. . Isnt slapping/spanking a service openly provided by many girls anyway ? Never sought it myself, just dont see anything in it per se, although a young WG did bring a soft whip to a punt last year and kept asking me to whip her repeatedly , and hard, during doggy position sex. It was wild !! :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll probably get flamed, but amongst the new members names, I see 'slapthewhore' has appeared.

Can't help but thinking that this is not the sort of activity that we should be encouraging on this forum?

+1. Agree entirely.

B

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It has been noted and I am not particularly happy with it either. It has been brought to Galahad's attention.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll probably get flamed, but amongst the new members names, I see 'slapthewhore' has appeared.

Can't help but thinking that this is not the sort of activity that we should be encouraging on this forum?

That type of name has been attempted before, and on being spotted, the relevant poster has been banned. I assume this poster to whom you refer is a newbie?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The user in question has been banned. I was just going to require him to choose a different username, but in the process of examining his account found that he had created two user accounts (the other username was almost as offensive) on the same computer. Creating multiple IDs is considered proof of dishonest intentions and results in an automatic, permanent ban.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The user in question has been banned. I was just going to require him to choose a different username, but in the process of examining his account found that he had created two user accounts (the other username was almost as offensive) on the same computer. Creating multiple IDs is considered proof of dishonest intentions and results in an automatic, permanent ban.

A very good decision there. Probably someone from mumsnet, (see off topic).

Edited by Joanna Manchester

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent, at last soemthing that other forum members agree with me about! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want to add my agreement to the decision to ban that creep. Well done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds ok to me provided the member takes the name in jest.

The member may have taken the name in jest, but for many others this type of name helps to reinforce the notion that its OK to use violence against women.

It was right to ban him, if only for the name alone, if not for using multiple ID's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The member may have taken the name in jest, but for many others this type of name helps to reinforce the notion that its OK to use violence against women.

It was right to ban him, if only for the name alone, if not for using multiple ID's.

Also imagine the image that gives to those just visiting the forum?hardly a positive one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll probably get flamed, but amongst the new members names, I see 'slapthewhore' has appeared.

Can't help but thinking that this is not the sort of activity that we should be encouraging on this forum?

Quite right, not at all what we need on here,deserved to be banned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The member may have taken the name in jest, but for many others this type of name helps to reinforce the notion that its OK to use violence against women.

It was right to ban him, if only for the name alone, if not for using multiple ID's.

Yes, you are all right . I accept my laissez faire attitude was wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also imagine the image that gives to those just visiting the forum?hardly a positive one.

Harriet Harman would have been quite upset!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now