Trolley

Punters: Do You Care About Your Frs?

27 posts in this topic

The "other" site, as it is known, makes provision not just for FRs, but for something called Feedback...an abortive one line report in lieu of the fully fledged version. As I imagine most of you know, and interestingly, this Feedback works both ways...you give yours about the girl, but she gets a chance to give her feedback on you. On the assumption that at least some of you have booked girls through the other sites booking mechanism and, thus, will have both left feedback and received some of your own, any observations? I've got three items of feedback which are all personal enough in terms of the booking to suggest that the girls actually offered a genuine opinion of the time we spent together rather than executing a "great for great" trade. Anyway, anyone have any opinions on the subject? Anyone think something similar should be added to Punternet? Or would you rather not know what she thinks...or don't care regardless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The "other" site, as it is known, makes provision not just for FRs, but for something called Feedback...an abortive one line report in lieu of the fully fledged version. As I imagine most of you know, and interestingly, this Feedback works both ways...you give yours about the girl, but she gets a chance to give her feedback on you. On the assumption that at least some of you have booked girls through the other sites booking mechanism and, thus, will have both left feedback and received some of your own, any observations? I've got three items of feedback which are all personal enough in terms of the booking to suggest that the girls actually offered a genuine opinion of the time we spent together rather than executing a "great for great" trade. Anyway, anyone have any opinions on the subject? Anyone think something similar should be added to Punternet? Or would you rather not know what she thinks...or don't care regardless.

A number of "our" ladies actually keep profiles "down there" and say that the punters they get there mostly have two feet and two hands and no tail! I think that they do use the punter's feedback as a bit of their vetting process. At least twice ladies I've booked "there" have commented, approvingly, on those WGs who have given me feedback in the past.

Anything that makes a WGs life safer has to be a good thing, IMHO!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, though I look upon it more as the sort of thing you'd get from a job reference than real feedback, in that they won't say anything nasty about you, but what they do and don't say is often telling.

I'm quite proud that in my limited reverse feedback (2 so far) I've been told (unprompted by me!) both times I'm good with my tongue and that I'm fun to be around.

Edited by Tibbs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A number of "our" ladies actually keep profiles "down there" and say that the punters they get there mostly have two feet and two hands and no tail!

It's interesting, this, because clearly being present here, I have heard the same thing. Yet -- as I noted on another thread today -- last week I saw an industry veteran of, a while ago, very great reputation here and she told me the opposite...she didn't even want an FR on PN because of the quality of clientele she found here...far below that she got from the "other site".

I have to say, and I appear to be either lucky or unusual, that virtually all of my very best non-parlour punts have come from the other site.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's interesting, this, because clearly being present here, I have heard the same thing. Yet -- as I noted on another thread today -- last week I saw an industry veteran of, a while ago, very great reputation here and she told me the opposite...she didn't even want an FR on PN because of the quality of clientele she found here...far below that she got from the "other site".

I have to say, and I appear to be either lucky or unusual, that virtually all of my very best non-parlour punts have come from the other site.

I find myself in the same boat Trolley. I am also enjoying some great punts using the other site [cannot understand why so many slag it off so much]:rolleyes: , and as I mentioned on another thread, I prefer the 2-way reporting system. Having feedback left about you as a punter can be a bit daunting, but its only right and fair that WGs should say what they think as it makes their job safer, and hopefully more enjoyable. I also think that some here place too much emphasis on their performance during a punt, and would/could expect that to be reflected in the feedback, however I think that this defeats the object and that the feedback should be restricted to how the person presented and conducted themselves rather than their sexual prowess. Punters are paying for a service, and if every WG reported honestly about how the average punter performed then they may well loose a lot of customers very quickly, so there has to be a line which most on ** do not cross when writing their feedback. But yes, I think any punter would really care about what the WG writes, as its nice to feel that she was happy with you as a person, and wants you to return again, and values your custom ! On Punternet, it is possible that some WGs are using punters posts, replies and comments on this forum as a vetting process already. I personally do not think that this is a good situation but can quite beleive it, and that may be the reason why so many punters are careful not to upset anyone when posting. Sort of defeats the whole purpose of the forum. After my recent experiences here [and we all know its my fault for speaking out] I find myself detered from using many of the regular WG posters here based on their reaction to posts, so it works both ways too. I now fully understand where the name Cathouse came from.:rolleyes:

Personally I prefer the shorter 2-way reporting system on **, and there is also the option to write a fully blown report too ! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find myself in the same boat Trolley. I am also enjoying some great punts using the other site [cannot understand why so many slag it off so much]:rolleyes: , and as I mentioned on another thread, I prefer the 2-way reporting system. Having feedback left about you as a punter can be a bit daunting, but its only right and fair that WGs should say what they think as it makes their job safer, and hopefully more enjoyable. I also think that some here place too much emphasis on their performance during a punt, and would/could expect that to be reflected in the feedback, however I think that this defeats the object and that the feedback should be restricted to how the person presented and conducted themselves rather than their sexual prowess. Punters are paying for a service, and if every WG reported honestly about how the average punter performed then they may well loose a lot of customers very quickly, so there has to be a line which most on ** do not cross when writing their feedback. But yes, I think any punter would really care about what the WG writes, as its nice to feel that she was happy with you as a person, and wants you to return again, and values your custom ! On Punternet, it is possible that some WGs are using punters posts, replies and comments on this forum as a vetting process already. I personally do not think that this is a good situation but can quite beleive it, and that may be the reason why so many punters are careful not to upset anyone when posting. Sort of defeats the whole purpose of the forum. After my recent experiences here [and we all know its my fault for speaking out] I find myself detered from using many of the regular WG posters here based on their reaction to posts, so it works both ways too. I now fully understand where the name Cathouse came from.:rolleyes:

Personally I prefer the shorter 2-way reporting system on **, and there is also the option to write a fully blown report too ! ;)

A lot of the girls seem to leave boilerplate "good" feedback, which is fair enough if they are busy.

Makes it seem like ebay though.. A++++++++ Punter Would Shag Again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of the girls seem to leave boilerplate "good" feedback, which is fair enough if they are busy.

Makes it seem like ebay though.. A++++++++ Punter Would Shag Again.

I think you are right there - it's often fairly anodyne feedback too.

Having said that, with my mere two items of feedback, I must admit I felt good when one lady who I know well described me as 'passionate' in her feedback and gave me a 'highly recommended.' Flattery will get you everywhere... ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the other site feedback system is an interesting mechanism but needs to be treated with care. As far as I can see, individual feedback invariably falls into one of two types. The OTT gushing type or the Watch out for the weirdo/terrible punt type, with the former heavily outweighing the latter. I am guessing that as long as a punt isn't a disaster, then the gushing feedback item is almost a default option as both parties are keen to get good feedback on themselves. The result is a pile of data that is skewed far too much to the positive and needs to be treated with caution.

That said and done, it is useful for sorting out the time wasters and psychos.

As to my own feedback, I have managed to accumulate 25 items of the gushing variety over the past two years (including one item that I am positive was left by a WG who was thinking of a different punt :D ). Despite everything I have written above though, it is sometimes nice to scan down the feedback and refresh my mind of some pleasant times spent, so I guess a part of me does care.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The other site's feedback system works to our mutual benefit and I have to say I also enjoy basking in the afterglow of complimentary opinion. Because my requirements are very particular the feedback has to be relative to the punt so I get to avoid the eBay-style A++ responses. But they are still A++ in tone leaving me feeling warmly smug.

Edited by WhilstNeroplays

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me it is a useful "stamp of approval" that shows that I am a genuine customer, and I behave appropriately. I would like to think that if I go for a booking with a new WG it gives me higher consideration than to a complete unknown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me it is a useful "stamp of approval" that shows that I am a genuine customer, and I behave appropriately. I would like to think that if I go for a booking with a new WG it gives me higher consideration than to a complete unknown.

I agree with Vin DaLoo. Feedback on myself may or may not make a difference but if it does that's fine with me.

Uncle Pokey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing i hate about the ** rating/report system is, say i visit a WG who looked very attractive in her profile pics but when you meet her in the flesh shes not as attractive. So then id move onto the intimacy side but im not really enjoying it because i dont find her all that attractive, so i may cum quick.

Id like to leave feedback saying the pics are old, or shes a bit of a clock watcher and her GFE is slightly cold, DFK isnt passionate. Only to have her leave you bad feedback saying she never met you or whatever else. So then you message another escort for a booking only for her to ignore you because of 1 bad feedback..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never been refused service as a result of not having feedback or Fr's and have had fantastic punts with WG's that don't have feedback or Fr's. I can see an advantage for a punter to have them. If you are known to write Fr's and write them fairly without malice/collusion you could possibly be seen as a great outlet to promote one's wares. If somebody can get your phone ringing you would treat them very nicely. That's business I suppose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never been refused service as a result of not having feedback or Fr's and have had fantastic punts with WG's that don't have feedback or Fr's. I can see an advantage for a punter to have them. If you are known to write Fr's and write them fairly without malice/collusion you could possibly be seen as a great outlet to promote one's wares. If somebody can get your phone ringing you would treat them very nicely. That's business I suppose.

... are you saying that FRs are being exploited as marketing tools by agencies ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's interesting, this, because clearly being present here, I have heard the same thing. Yet -- as I noted on another thread today -- last week I saw an industry veteran of, a while ago, very great reputation here and she told me the opposite...she didn't even want an FR on PN because of the quality of clientele she found here...far below that she got from the "other site".

I have to say, and I appear to be either lucky or unusual, that virtually all of my very best non-parlour punts have come from the other site.

I'm not suggesting that the anonymous lady in question never said this to you, but surely it must be apparent what an absurd over-generalisation it would be to say that "All Punternet users are neanderthals, whilst all ** guys are angels." Particularly when a high proportion of the punters she sees probably use both sites.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... are you saying that FRs are being exploited as marketing tools by agencies ?

Wouldn't have to be an agency would it? It's just good business - if I was running a restaurant and I spot the food critic of the local paper having a meal I'd make damned sure everything went smoothly for her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me the main issue is that it is very rare that the girl leaves you feedback prior to you leaving her feedback. As a result you are risking a negative reply if you tell the truth about a bad experience. I would love to post on my last two punts "not a very good experience with someone closer to a size 18 than the advertised size 10" and "this 30 something sex siren is in her 50's" but god knows what feedback I would get in return. That is where it falls down IMHO. So I only leave feddback when I have had a good time and all my feedback (bar one) is from those dates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i only ever use the other site for girls i give the nice girls feed back and the poor ones nothing, i dont like to sound mean and maybe do the girls out of a client, i know i should so us guys can see what they might be like, and as for the girls giving feedback to use guys, its all the same great guy good tongue, all so false and i bet a lot of guys believe it, oh and i for got cant wait to see his wallet again haha,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... are you saying that FRs are being exploited as marketing tools by agencies ?

They certainly have been as previous threads have showed, but good business sense might be how the SP would describe it rather than exploited. A WG once asked could she offer a positive FR in exchange for a discount, she was told no that is not allowed but she could offer a discount for a FR good or bad and Maxes Angels used to do this according to posts by punters who had punted their. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me it is a useful "stamp of approval" that shows that I am a genuine customer, and I behave appropriately. I would like to think that if I go for a booking with a new WG it gives me higher consideration than to a complete unknown.

Agree. It's usually in your best interests to have good feedback on there. I have about 22 positive feedbacks on my profile. With some very good words from the ladies.

It usually will put you at the top of the queue when it comes to considerations. Last week i wanted to see a new girl who had stopped doing outcalls to homes because of a moron who she later told me did not have any feedback and had become very threatening over the phone when she arrived outside his flat.

After an email and then a chat with her she said she would see me because my FB was very good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me the main issue is that it is very rare that the girl leaves you feedback prior to you leaving her feedback. As a result you are risking a negative reply if you tell the truth about a bad experience. I would love to post on my last two punts "not a very good experience with someone closer to a size 18 than the advertised size 10" and "this 30 something sex siren is in her 50's" but god knows what feedback I would get in return. That is where it falls down IMHO. So I only leave feddback when I have had a good time and all my feedback (bar one) is from those dates.

A massive flaw in the system which among other reasons is why i dont give or receive feedback on their and dont trust it unless i know or at least respect the opinion of the punter giving it.

If feedback makes WGs feel safer thats a good thing but in my punting area i have never been refused as far as i know for not having any and indeed its rarely mentioned apart from a few ladies asking if i would leave them some. As i only punt with ladies with phone numbers its never been relevant to my punting after hundreds of punts off their over many years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... are you saying that FRs are being exploited as marketing tools by agencies ?

Put it this way if I was a WG at certain establishments Manmeat would be offered a freebie and treated very nicely indeed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Put it this way if I was a WG at certain establishments Manmeat would be offered a freebie and treated very nicely indeed.

Hes done 66 reports since 2003 and only submitted 2 negatives.

Thats not bad going .... for him,,,,, and the agencies concerned. :D

However it does appear that many punters are uncomfortable about submitting negatives even when warrented.:blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trouble with feedback for wg's us that the site is, for us, predominantly advertising. I would leave negative if there was question of safety, but otherwise im thinking return visits and wot prospective clients r looking at. I have turned down booking on basis of feedback b4. It was the usual no show (cant remember if her or him) boring dispute, during which he called her a bitch. I dont care how badly she,answered, i do however, care wot he said. Bit of a temper?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me the main issue is that it is very rare that the girl leaves you feedback prior to you leaving her feedback.

My last feedback (with apologies to Andrew Marvell) over there was left before I left her feedback. Go figure.

B

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now