Columbus

Pictures On Profiles

31 posts in this topic

When I am trying to select a girl and having read her profile I look at the pictures to make a decision. What I look in pictures is a clear view of face, breasts, belly, legs and most importantly bottom. I often find that many girls intentionally or otherwise cover certain parts of their bodies. I have seen it too often when the girl has one arm around her belly or breasts on few of her pictures. That indicates to me that perhaps that part of her body is not her best feature. If she does not show a view of her bottom I quickly skip her site. I mean what is the point of having naked pictures but not showing your bottom or other essential parts. I would have thought that a WG would aim to show all her assets in her pics if they are indeed attractive and if I see parts are intentionally hidden then I most likely won't make a booking.

I pay little attention to the text on WG's profile as too often it is a load of rubbish specially the write up on agency sites. I do read it to know what services she offers so that I confirm later when I book but ignore the rest like "highly intelligent, fun loving and oh so adventurous".

How do you make your decision?

Edited by Fred15

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a sucker for a pretty face but the WGs' faces are (understandably) usually obscured in their profile photos at the parlours I tend to use. However I can usually see enough of her features to determine if she' got that wow factor and will read a few FRs/ check these forums to see whether others think that she' a stunner or not, obviously this is very subjective but if several punters consider her to be particularly beautiful then I probably will concur.

Then it's a combination of whether the WG has the type of figure and offers the services that I am lusting after on that particular day. Again the photos usually give a good idea of the ladies' assets but rarely is everything on show so once again the FRs and forums are an invaluable source of info and also give the best indication of the level of service I am likely to receive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me pictures and text. I hate Photoshopped pics, if i see any in a profile it needs to be balanced with more candid home shots where i can see a lady without the aid of computer trickery if an entire profile is nothing but 'Glamour' shots then i'm not interested.

But it think what a lady says can matter more, reading lots of profiles on the purple site and it's obvious how many ladies just scan other profiles and nick sentences from each other when you come across a interesting profile it stands out immediately, many of my best punts have been with these sort of ladies. Real and honest no smoke and mirrors

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm, I've often seen this discussed on forums in the past. Basically a girl is only going to put the best photos, from her shoot on her profile. She isn't going to pop on the one that makes her look like the back-side of a bus (and there is always an angle that makes you look bad). When I was looking for a property some years ago, I soon learned that photos of the houses were all taken at clever angles and yes it was frustating. If you were selling a house however I bet you'd only use flattering photos too, concealing the odd flaw here and there.

Photographers also want the girl to have a really nice set of photos, if he pulls out all her bad bits she is very unlikely to employ his services again. If however he uses flattering poses and makes her look attractive, she is going to be all smiles and very happy. This doesn't excuse blatant excessive photoshopping, or bait and switch which in other types of business would be stopped.

It's a competitive business heavily based upon looks, image and anticipation. I very much doubt girls are ever going to line up in a standard set of poses, or show you their wobbly bits!

Edited by Strawberry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could show you my wobbly bits, but then I would have to kill you:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could show you my wobbly bits, but then I would have to kill you:)

I think you've got very nice wobbly bits Sarah! :)

I go on a combination of picture and profile. Ideally I like to see a face picture, or at least a hint of it, but as CheeseYa says, it's understandable that a lot of ladies are reluctant to provide this. A view of the breasts is quite important to me - I'm not into really big boobs, but a nice suckable pair of nipples is an attraction.

I would rarely seek to meet a girl without seeing any pictures, but if I like the profile enough I would consider it. I look for a profile that suggests intelligence, gives an idea of the person's personality, and gives me a clear idea if I like the sort of service she provides. Even if I was really impressed with a girl's photos, I would almost certainly not pursue my interest further if she'd only written a six-word profile, or if the profile was littered with foul language and obscenities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I am trying to select a girl and having read her profile I look at the pictures to make a decision. What I look in pictures is a clear view of face, breasts, belly, legs and most importantly bottom. I often find that many girls intentionally or otherwise cover certain parts of their bodies. I have seen it too often when the girl has one arm around her belly or breasts on few of her pictures. That indicates to me that perhaps that part of her body is not her best feature. If she does not show a view of her bottom I quickly skip her site. I mean what is the point of having naked pictures but not showing your bottom or other essential parts. I would have thought that a WG would aim to show all her assets in her pics if they are indeed attractive and if I see parts are intentionally hidden then I most likely won't make a booking.

I pay little attention to the text on WG's profile as too often it is a load of rubbish specially the write up on agency sites. I do read it to know what services she offers so that I confirm later when I book but ignore the rest like "highly intelligent, fun loving and oh so adventurous".

How do you make your decision?

Ideal for me are clear facial, totally naked and open leg pictures. I prefer blatant and dislike tease. Preferably i dont want any hint of words like classy, sophisticated or as you say highly intelligent, the lady doesnt have to be highly intelligent and speak 6 langagues (i only speak English) or have an in-depth knowledge of the arts, its usually marketing to charge more in my experience. I understand not wanting to show full face.

What ultimately makes me book is how the WG communicates with me on the phone when enquiring including confirming her pictures are of and like her, she offers the services i require at the price advertised. Not being prepared to discuss the detail i require ensures she doesnt get my business. I like to hear enthusiasm and warmth whether true or acted, so many WGs are virtually monosyllabic on the phone and come across as cold and unfriendly that they are immediate nevers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like to read everything they've got to say on their sites. As i'm learning, every girl is different in how she prefers to make her bookings and what kind of men she sees, age range etc. What services she enjoys/dislikes, what her rates are so it's important to read out of respect for them. I totally understand the privacy issue and blurred faces. I like to see boobs and bum. Which most girls show from what i've seen. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....

I go on a combination of picture and profile. Ideally I like to see a face picture, or at least a hint of it, but as CheeseYa says, it's understandable that a lot of ladies are reluctant to provide this. A view of the breasts is quite important to me - I'm not into really big boobs, but a nice suckable pair of nipples is an attraction.

I would rarely seek to meet a girl without seeing any pictures, but if I like the profile enough I would consider it. I look for a profile that suggests intelligence, gives an idea of the person's personality, and gives me a clear idea if I like the sort of service she provides. Even if I was really impressed with a girl's photos, I would almost certainly not pursue my interest further if she'd only written a six-word profile, or if the profile was littered with foul language and obscenities.

Agreed. I have met one or two ladies purely on the basis of their written words (profiles or posts) and the experience has been well worthwhile. I too get put off by badly-written (aka unprofessional) profiles, and also by more 'blatant' pics. But then I'm not looking for short appointments with 'a great body' but for longer ones with people who look good (in my eyes) but more especially with whom I can also natter. I guess that if I wanted a quick half hour with a BS '22year old blonde, 5'5; 36-22-34; enjoys doggy' then I'd want to see the product on offer and particularly her rear end. But I'm not, so I just try to infer things from how the lady presents herself in word and images.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a sucker for a pretty face but the WGs' faces are (understandably) usually obscured in their profile photos at the parlours I tend to use. However I can usually see enough of her features to determine if she' got that wow factor and will read a few FRs/ check these forums to see whether others think that she' a stunner or not, obviously this is very subjective but if several punters consider her to be particularly beautiful then I probably will concur.

Then it's a combination of whether the WG has the type of figure and offers the services that I am lusting after on that particular day. Again the photos usually give a good idea of the ladies' assets but rarely is everything on show so once again the FRs and forums are an invaluable source of info and also give the best indication of the level of service I am likely to receive.

I am talking mainly about the websites of the indies and established agencies where they show face and naked body. My point is that I often find that in these pictures certain features are not shown. I mean if you are an escort and happy to post naked pictures then surely you want to market every good aspect of yourself. If bits of hidden then that normally indicates that those are not the best bits and I have found the same through experience. I am a bottom man and I choose ladies who have a nice bottom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As someone who both punts and has taken photos of escorts, the following can apply:

• If most of the shots are of the girls lying on a bed, floor or settee and only show her head and shoulders, then there's a fair chance she's pear shaped or has a plump lower half.

• If the photos shows her with clothing on across her midriff or a hand/arm across, then it's a fair chance she's concealing stretchmarks.

• If she doesn't show her face, even in a private gallery, then she's not too confident about her looks, or has an issue with being recognised and outed (this applies to a one lady I've seen who is a hotel receptionist (so in the public eye), and another of Indian origin with big issues over culture & family). The girl showing no face needs to have exceptional feedback to even get me the slightest bit interested.

There are exceptions to my comments, but my philosophy is that if I cannot clearly see a selection of limbs or torso clearly in order to judge if the lady is of my preferred dress size of 8/10/12, then I move on. Failure to adhere to this rule has resulted in an outcall from a couple of right dogs.

At the end of the day it all depends on how finiky you are, and whether you just want to get your rocks off or prefer something with a degree of passion and romance from both partners.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As someone who both punts and has taken photos of escorts, the following can apply:

• If most of the shots are of the girls lying on a bed, floor or settee and only show her head and shoulders, then there's a fair chance she's pear shaped or has a plump lower half.

• If the photos shows her with clothing on across her midriff or a hand/arm across, then it's a fair chance she's concealing stretchmarks.

• If she doesn't show her face, even in a private gallery, then she's not too confident about her looks, or has an issue with being recognised and outed (this applies to a one lady I've seen who is a hotel receptionist (so in the public eye), and another of Indian origin with big issues over culture & family). The girl showing no face needs to have exceptional feedback to even get me the slightest bit interested.

There are exceptions to my comments, but my philosophy is that if I cannot clearly see a selection of limbs or torso clearly in order to judge if the lady is of my preferred dress size of 8/10/12, then I move on. Failure to adhere to this rule has resulted in an outcall from a couple of right dogs.

At the end of the day it all depends on how finiky you are, and whether you just want to get your rocks off or prefer something with a degree of passion and romance from both partners.

That is exactly how I look at it. Considering that WGs are exceedingly using technology to make themselves look artificially good it is more so important for punters to pay attention to what they are looking at. This is specially relevant for those who punt for additional fun and through greed rather than necessity :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder to what extent this thread is degrading to women. Your experience as punters and consumers should have taught you that you seldom get what is shown as it is shown. This is something I have come to accept over time and is all part of the quest for the perfect punt (if there is such a thing). It stands to reason that someone will always attempt to show themselves in their best light, it's all part of the business, any business. If they do not then they are at a disadvantage with respect to the competition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder to what extent this thread is degrading to women. Your experience as punters and consumers should have taught you that you seldom get what is shown as it is shown. This is something I have come to accept over time and is all part of the quest for the perfect punt (if there is such a thing). It stands to reason that someone will always attempt to show themselves in their best light, it's all part of the business, any business. If they do not then they are at a disadvantage with respect to the competition.

I wonder what you find degrading? The fact that ladies put their naked pictures on the web to sell their services or the punters buying those services wanting to discuss it. If former the you should ask a different question and address it to the ladies and if latter then you should not be punting. Surely following your logic buying sex from women is more degrading than discussing how they look.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Strawberry is right, it is important that we show off our best assets. I don't think that is deceptive, just good business sense!!! I think also it can be about what different people find sexy. I know some punters like it all on show in photos but I know others who think the power of suggestion is just as sexy. It is a fine line to walk I suppose. I am one of those who wouldn't show her face, although I stress it is not because I have three eyes and a crooked nose :blink: but because I wouldn't want to risk embarrassment in my future career or risk anyone being able to use it against me in any way either now or in the future. I suppose if I lose work as a result of this then that is disappointing but it is a question of managing risk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i think thats right. there are many ladies who don't show much and thats their choice. i refer to those who do but hide bits because it is not their best feature.

punters are spoiled now. it was not that long ago when u chose an escort based on a one line ad. times have chsnged now and there is much more info and choice available to punters. so why not make the most of it. physical attributes are of primary concern to me when choosing escorts. personality and charactor are the icing on the cake. i would not however visit a girl purely based on her good charactor.

I think Strawberry is right, it is important that we show off our best assets. I don't think that is deceptive, just good business sense!!! I think also it can be about what different people find sexy. I know some punters like it all on show in photos but I know others who think the power of suggestion is just as sexy. It is a fine line to walk I suppose. I am one of those who wouldn't show her face, although I stress it is not because I have three eyes and a crooked nose :blink: but because I wouldn't want to risk embarrassment in my future career or risk anyone being able to use it against me in any way either now or in the future. I suppose if I lose work as a result of this then that is disappointing but it is a question of managing risk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder what you find degrading? The fact that ladies put their naked pictures on the web to sell their services or the punters buying those services wanting to discuss it. If former the you should ask a different question and address it to the ladies and if latter then you should not be punting. Surely following your logic buying sex from women is more degrading than discussing how they look.

No Fred you miss my point, what I meant by that comment was that women might find it degrading to think of themselves being compared like prize cattle in a public market place and having every little imperfection scrutinized in detail. Surely we all know that no one is perfect. Moreover, it is often the case that those who do meet the criteria of physical perfection are often conceited and lacking in quality of service, social skills or personality. This has happened to me more than once. Some of my best punts have been with women who are far from perfect and who could even have been accused of concealing those imperfections but had that not been the case I would have missed out on some of my best experiences.

Edited by SpoksEyebrows

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever they show I like it to be honest whether they show imperfections or not.

Besides, perfection is in the eye of the beholder so what may be perfect to one person will not be to another.

All I want is to walk into a meeting and set my eyes on someone who looks like the pictures she has lured me in with.

Honesty.

If the pictures tell a lie just what else is lies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

which women will those be? the same ladies who put pictures up? sex industry is not a social network. in crude terms u can compare it with a cattle market. specially with advent of internet.

No Fred you miss my point, what I meant by that comment was that women might find it degrading to think of themselves being compared like prize cattle in a public market place and having every little imperfection scrutinized in detail. Surely we all know that no one is perfect. Moreover, it is often the case that those who do meet the criteria of physical perfection are often conceited and lacking in quality of service, social skills or personality. This has happened to me more than once. Some of my best punts have been with women who are far from perfect and who could even have been accused of concealing those imperfections but had that not been the case I would have missed out on some of my best experiences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that would be nice, wouldnt it. these days they seem able to modify everything in a picture. thare are still the lovely looking girls out there but picking them from website is becoming exceedingly challenging. the photographers are taking having imagination to a new level.

Whatever they show I like it to be honest whether they show imperfections or not.

Besides, perfection is in the eye of the beholder so what may be perfect to one person will not be to another.

All I want is to walk into a meeting and set my eyes on someone who looks like the pictures she has lured me in with.

Honesty.

If the pictures tell a lie just what else is lies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that would be nice, wouldnt it. these days they seem able to modify everything in a picture. thare are still the lovely looking girls out there but picking them from website is becoming exceedingly challenging. the photographers are taking having imagination to a new level.

What about tattoos etc.? For example, I have two small tattoo's which have been photo-shopped out (the only work done on the pics on the website I think) but it says in my profile that I do have tattoos and lists where they are. I don't display them for the same reasons I don't display my face. Is it OK as long as the lady gives an idea of the size and location of any tattoo's or piercings or would you prefer it to be full disclosure in the photos?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever they show I like it to be honest whether they show imperfections or not.

Besides, perfection is in the eye of the beholder so what may be perfect to one person will not be to another.

All I want is to walk into a meeting and set my eyes on someone who looks like the pictures she has lured me in with.

Honesty.

If the pictures tell a lie just what else is lies.

Yes we all like a little honesty don't we.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What about tattoos etc.? For example, I have two small tattoo's which have been photo-shopped out (the only work done on the pics on the website I think) but it says in my profile that I do have tattoos and lists where they are. I don't display them for the same reasons I don't display my face. Is it OK as long as the lady gives an idea of the size and location of any tattoo's or piercings or would you prefer it to be full disclosure in the photos?

I don't think this should matter. Clients are paying for a service- not to scan every inch of the body with a microscope and nit pick (although some

clients would if they get the chance). I would say if you have some personality and some nice pics which represent how you look after yourself/true likeness- good quality sevice- this is what guys are looking for.

I am just about to get some tattoos done- big *uck off one on my back and shoulders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think this should matter. Clients are paying for a service- not to scan every inch of the body with a microscope and nit pick (although some

clients would if they get the chance). I would say if you have some personality and some nice pics which represent how you look after yourself/true likeness- good quality sevice- this is what guys are looking for.

I am just about to get some tattoos done- big *uck off one on my back and shoulders.

I agree. I am quite happy to look at a website when the lady is dressed and shows her elegance and would probably admire her. I am unlikely to book as I am interested in physical attributes but that elegance suits many others. However if the ladies are marketing their flesh then I would be looking carefully to see what they are hiding to have a more realistic view of what is on offer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I am trying to select a girl and having read her profile I look at the pictures to make a decision. What I look in pictures is a clear view of face, breasts, belly, legs and most importantly bottom. I often find that many girls intentionally or otherwise cover certain parts of their bodies. I have seen it too often when the girl has one arm around her belly or breasts on few of her pictures. That indicates to me that perhaps that part of her body is not her best feature. If she does not show a view of her bottom I quickly skip her site. I mean what is the point of having naked pictures but not showing your bottom or other essential parts. I would have thought that a WG would aim to show all her assets in her pics if they are indeed attractive and if I see parts are intentionally hidden then I most likely won't make a booking.

I pay little attention to the text on WG's profile as too often it is a load of rubbish specially the write up on agency sites. I do read it to know what services she offers so that I confirm later when I book but ignore the rest like "highly intelligent, fun loving and oh so adventurous".

How do you make your decision?

Hi Fred, How to make a decision ? ir really all depends what you are looking for-

Profiles with only glam photos may not give a likeness/portray to real thing- so may be best to look for natural photos- use tineye to see if there is bate and switch scams- some profiles have duplicated pics from magazines etc,.

However, some girls only have pro pics in gallery and are very much like their pics and have excellent feedback- it all depends on individual girl.

many guys like the feedback system- it is useful tool so would say do some research beforehand- on other site- also good for girls as can see 'alias names' and any bad feedback etc,. also can see anyone that 'hides' their feedback.

Read what a girl says on her profile- some is total nonsense and crap, in which case you would know is total waste of time- or too little information is not good- some are specific in their likes/dislikes/services/ preferences, so worth to read girls profile before booking.

Use the search engine/system when looking for something specific

Hope this helps xxx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now