Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
rocket48

Reviews

10 posts in this topic

Some reviewers of girls they have seen give very little detail, sometimes saying it is out of respect for the girls or not wanting to be pornographic but what is the point of such reviews beyond confirming the girls actually exist?

As a punter surely it is the detail in the reviews that help decide if the girl is going to be the right one for you and if the agency or profile is accurate about the services offered. It is surely possible to give some valuable detail without being offensive.

Perhaps some girls concerned really don't like such reviews but others surely do. I would be interested to hear views, particularly from the girls. I do post reviews on the other site but would not want to gratuitously offend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed.

Another things that gets my goat is girls or agencies that have a high percentage of first time user reports who then never go onto the write another report. To me that indicates a fake report IMHO. I think if an author does not write another report within 6 months of his initial report then they and their reports should be deleted from the system. The report has lost any relevance it did have and the word of the author is of no value anyway if he only has a view on one girl then never writes a report again. How do you as the client know where he sets his bar and to whom or what he makes his comparisons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some reviewers of girls they have seen give very little detail, sometimes saying it is out of respect for the girls or not wanting to be pornographic but what is the point of such reviews beyond confirming the girls actually exist?

As a punter surely it is the detail in the reviews that help decide if the girl is going to be the right one for you and if the agency or profile is accurate about the services offered. It is surely possible to give some valuable detail without being offensive.

Perhaps some girls concerned really don't like such reviews but others surely do. I would be interested to hear views, particularly from the girls. I do post reviews on the other site but would not want to gratuitously offend.

This has been discussed in great detail in the past.

I fully take your point but my answer is always that it is the writer's report and, as long as he is not simply offensive and/or unfairly untruthful, it is entirely up to him how much or how little he writes and how much detail is given.

I personally ask the girl if she minds a report and I always avoid overmuch anatomical detail - and if that's not enough for the reader ... tough!

I happen to dislike the reports which use strange terms or over-used terms for bits of bodies or for actions ('on with the old macintosh' sort of thing) but it's up to the writer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This has been discussed in great detail in the past.

I fully take your point but my answer is always that it is the writer's report and, as long as he is not simply offensive and/or unfairly untruthful, it is entirely up to him how much or how little he writes and how much detail is given.

I personally ask the girl if she minds a report and I always avoid overmuch anatomical detail - and if that's not enough for the reader ... tough!

I happen to dislike the reports which use strange terms or over-used terms for bits of bodies or for actions ('on with the old macintosh' sort of thing) but it's up to the writer.

I dont give a great amount of detail in my reports but I like to think that I am at least a bit descriptive of the girl. The particularly vague reports are of no use to me particularly so if they are from a first-time reporter. Yes, they are their reports and they have every right to be as brief as they like, but they serve little purpose.

Mr DivineMk makes a very good point about deleting reports if the reporter hasnt added more in the following six months. Who would seriously take any notice of a report written two years ago (especially if it's a two sentence thing) when that reporter hasnt contributed a single thing since?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is that a guy may believe that a wg offered such a good service that she deserves and indeed earned the extra credit a good review brings. He may though not wish to divulge what HE actually gets up to, which would be abundantly obvious if he went into too much detail about the girl.

Review,s are letting other,s into the secret side of yourself for the benefit of another person. I guess some guys review to brag, some review for basic info, others though do review for the reasons above and do not review on every common or garden punt they have just for the hell of it.

Do you really need a porno narrative to get the gist of wether a girl is worth seeing, do you really need to know if the cum dribbled over her lips or just splashed straight in her eye. If you are going to believe every last minute detail of a positive review, why disbelieve when a guy withholds the dirty bits and just says..she is danmed good!

Its the voyeur in us all that wants to know the nitty gritty little details which, lets face it, are none of our business really no matter how desperate we are to know them.

Just because its paid for doesnt mean its not private.xx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont want to know the minute details at all. I dont want a, pardon the pun, blow by commentary of the punt either. I just want to know the reporters opinions of the girl with some reasoning behind that view and the services she offered on that day and if any were declined.

For example it's annoying when a reporter talks about the girl giving oral but doesnt state whether it is OWO or OW, and if so, at whose request it was at. There is no need for the minutiae and I dont tend to read, in full, reports that do a commentary, but reporters should at least give some insight into the punt and what another punter can expect based on his experience.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is that a guy may believe that a wg offered such a good service that she deserves and indeed earned the extra credit a good review brings. He may though not wish to divulge what HE actually gets up to, which would be abundantly obvious if he went into too much detail about the girl.

Yup, I dont want to know the nitty gritty. Just some confirmation that shes as advertised before I take time to book, prepare for the punt, and part with my money and time. When theres a number of girls available and hundreds of pounds at stake I dont want to waste it

But when theres glowing reviews and I end up with a bad punt I do remeber who those reviewers were.

Which does mean that even if someone gives postive reviews but Ive then had numerous disappointments where advertised was not available, blah, blah, then for me even a postive (from certain reviewers) I would class a negative purely because of the reviewer.

I just put what happened.

If she was a disappointemnt, then I take note of the reviewers who post postives, and who theyve seen. And take those reviews with a pinch of salt.

And before you ask, yes I do have a list of reviewers I dont trust.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And before you ask, yes I do have a list of reviewers I dont trust.

Don't worry OW, I'm not going to ask who they are :D .

Your comment does give me an idea though. Wouldn't it be good if we could have some kind of "did you find the review helpful" type of feature on the FR system, something like they do on many mainstream review sites. This way, we could "applaud" the accurate reviews from the trusted reviewers and "boo" the ones that belong on Jackanory (X rated version).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed.

Another things that gets my goat is girls or agencies that have a high percentage of first time user reports who then never go onto the write another report. To me that indicates a fake report IMHO. I think if an author does not write another report within 6 months of his initial report then they and their reports should be deleted from the system. The report has lost any relevance it did have and the word of the author is of no value anyway if he only has a view on one girl then never writes a report again. How do you as the client know where he sets his bar and to whom or what he makes his comparisons.

I agree and include party providers along with WGs and Agencies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some reviewers of girls they have seen give very little detail, sometimes saying it is out of respect for the girls or not wanting to be pornographic but what is the point of such reviews beyond confirming the girls actually exist?

As a punter surely it is the detail in the reviews that help decide if the girl is going to be the right one for you and if the agency or profile is accurate about the services offered. It is surely possible to give some valuable detail without being offensive.

Perhaps some girls concerned really don't like such reviews but others surely do. I would be interested to hear views, particularly from the girls. I do post reviews on the other site but would not want to gratuitously offend.

A FR should IMO include factual information, was the WG a true likeness of her pictures, did she offer the services advertised and was she friendly and enthusiastic. A confirmation of cost and local location is helpful. The "i wont go into any details" FRs are of zero help or use in my view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0