BillGoldberg

Any Experienced Punter Here Have A Punt At £500/hr+ & Notice A Genuine & Significant Positive Difference In Quality Of Experience ?

30 posts in this topic

Title speaks for itself, and I'm thinking only of 1 to 1 punts, not threesomes or more

The 'are wgs overpriced?' thread piqued my interest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Title speaks for itself, and I'm thinking only of 1 to 1 punts, not threesomes or more

The 'are wgs overpriced?' thread piqued my interest

£350 an hour is the most i have paid and these punts were in no way better including the condition of the premises than when i punted with another WG at £100 an hour. I do know a couple of punters who have paid over £500 an hour and they experienced no difference over paying in their cases £120 and £130 an hour with different WGs either.

There is sometimes a pornstar premium that some punters are prepared to pay at these rates to get to punt with pornstars they fancy. I wouldnt pay such rates but i can understand why some are prepared to pay them in this circumstance. I require VFM as i see it nowadays, i simply wouldnt pay such a rate knowing i can locate great WGs at £150 an hour or often a lot less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I wouldn't pay such a silly sum I wouldn't know. Some punters equate paying a high price to getting a quality service, IMO they're wrong, as smiths has said there's plenty of great choiceat £150 or less. To me £500 is 3 good punts with £50 change or 2 four hour parties with £20 change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not into a mechanical sex routine but yes if she was stunning I would pay £500. Like I would rather wear Armani than Primark. It's not conceptual it's about feeling good for an hour or two or three or four ......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....but price doesn't equate to quality however good it looks. If you gave some people a dog turd with Gucci stamped on it they'd wear it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In one simple word, yes. She was a really good experience, and on my "to do" list for a very long time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not into a mechanical sex routine but yes if she was stunning I would pay £500. Like I would rather wear Armani than Primark. It's not conceptual it's about feeling good for an hour or two or three or four ......

There's something to be said for your argument. I haven't tried WGs at that rate but it's been stated on here many times that you can find very good WGs who offer great service at £150/hr or less. Are the £500/hr Wgs three times as good? Doubtful, but it's perhaps something we'd all like to experience.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I wouldn't pay such a silly sum I wouldn't know. Some punters equate paying a high price to getting a quality service, IMO they're wrong, as smiths has said there's plenty of great choiceat £150 or less. To me £500 is 3 good punts with £50 change or 2 four hour parties with £20 change.

Thats exactly my opinion too, but this thread was started with the intention of discovering whether or not anyone who HAS paid upwards of £500/hr, has noticed any appreciable difference between the so called 'high class/elite' £500/hr merchants and the more typical £150/hr ladies (and thats 'typical' only in terms of rate, not quality of service)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In one simple word, yes. She was a really good experience, and on my "to do" list for a very long time.

why so vague ??

can you provide more info ?...links ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats exactly my opinion too, but this thread was started with the intention of discovering whether or not anyone who HAS paid upwards of £500/hr, has noticed any appreciable difference between the so called 'high class/elite' £500/hr merchants and the more typical £150/hr ladies (and thats 'typical' only in terms of rate, not quality of service)

I suppose it's no different from marketing many other products or services. Sometimes if you increase the price, people feel they are automatically getting a better quality of product of service. There are always those who can only value these things by the price they pay for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why so vague ??

can you provide more info ?...links ?

Because she does not like it to be known that she does.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because she does not like it to be known that she does.

Oh right

'Exclusive'

:rolleyes::rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's something to be said for your argument. I haven't tried WGs at that rate but it's been stated on here many times that you can find very good WGs who offer great service at £150/hr or less. Are the £500/hr Wgs three times as good? Doubtful, but it's perhaps something we'd all like to experience.

I can 100% confirm its not something i would like to experience, if i did i would.

Edited by smiths

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazingly no kiss and tell Wg in the papers is ever any less than a "£1000 a night high class call girl" Maybe some of the £500 hundred or £1000 ad girls believe the hype? Or maybe the odd fool with this sort of money to burn, actually exists out there even in a recession.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want a one hour punt then someone charging £500 for the hour probably isn't the type of girl you are after and you aren't the type of client she is after (unless it is a porn start punt)

Most of the girls at that level then charge significantly less for subsequent hours / dinner dates / overnights. that is the market they are targeting. As I have said before what you often paying for is to be with an immaculately turned out stunning woman who can dress for any occasion and behave impeccably at any occasion whilst making you feel ten feet tall. The sex bit maybe no better, it maybe worse, but for a lot of guys it is not just about the bit in the sack, it is about an round experience.

The good girls at all price points are always busy.

Edited by spanner2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want a one hour punt then someone charging £500 for the hour probably isn't the type of girl you are after and you aren't the type of client she is after (unless it is a porn start punt)

Most of the girls at that level then charge significantly less for subsequent hours / dinner dates / overnights. that is the market they are targeting. As I have said before what you often paying for is to be with an immaculately turned out stunning woman who can dress for any occasion and behave impeccably at any occasion whilst making you feel ten feet tall. The sex bit maybe no better, it maybe worse, but for a lot of guys it is not just about the bit in the sack, it is about an round experience.

The good girls at all price points are always busy.

yeah yeah yeah but that isnt the question and not the point of the thread !!

there are plenty of threads out there asking 'would you pay X amount to have sex with such and such', or 'is it only mugs who pay £500+ for so called 'elite' escorts'...etc etc......,

the idea wasnt to have a hypothetical thread with hypothetical answers from punters who havent even been with wgs charging £500/hr+, proclaiming that expensive escorts are 'a certain type of girl' for certain 'types of client', and that the extra money pays not just for the sex but for some other vague intangibles,

i'm really only interested in hearing from punters who have punted with girls in these upper price brackets (as well as the £120-£150/hr girls) and whether or not they

Noticed A Genuine & Significant Positive Difference In Quality Of Experience ?

.....and if they did.........what was this 'positive difference' and do they the feel that this/these positive difference/(s) justified the hefty price tag ?

So far 2 punters have answered the question:

Smiths essentially noticed no difference at all at the upper price brackets (nor did his acquaintances)

and Zzzorro who said he did notice a positive difference, but didnt elaborate on this for reasons of discretion.

Edited by BillGoldberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I book an escort in that price bracket and yes I do notice a huge difference in the overall social experience but to clarify these are multi hour / overnight bookings.

As for the sex element of the date I rate it very very highly. I have had better services elsewhere, eg deep gagging OWO, deep rimming, A levels, but as an overall sexual experience the escort I see ticks all my boxes.

I used to punt / date approx 24 times a year and have been punting for 15 years. I have punted from parlours up to the highest level. Now I punt 12 times a year at the highest level I can afford.

Does that answer you question?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I book an escort in that price bracket and yes I do notice a huge difference in the overall social experience but to clarify these are multi hour / overnight bookings.

As for the sex element of the date I rate it very very highly. I have had better services elsewhere, eg deep gagging OWO, deep rimming, A levels, but as an overall sexual experience the escort I see ticks all my boxes.

I used to punt / date approx 24 times a year and have been punting for 15 years. I have punted from parlours up to the highest level. Now I punt 12 times a year at the highest level I can afford.

Does that answer you question?

Yep !

It certainly does

Thanks for that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Somebody above said that £500 equals three punts and some change. That is quite correct.

£500 may be a better punt but in my view, that would be a case where you visit an excellent WG for the third time.

So, £500 on one girl is money well spent, but not in one hour, in my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Early in my punting days I have spent £500/hr, sure the girl was stunningly beautiful but the sex was no better than £150/hr. I felt the difference was in looks only not performance. Since then I have found some truly stunning girls at £150/hr. Now I would only spend £500 on increased time with a girl. To spend the money on 4, 5 hours or overnight with a girl is much more rewarding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

but didnt elaborate on this for reasons of discretion.

It was who it was, rather than what they did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most I've paid is £350/hr - and while she was stunning in looks (and knew it), the sex was mechanical and poor, and I rate it as one of my worst punts,

and left me feeling used...I'd not still be punting if that was one of my first punts.

Whereas I've met more than one WG at £150/hr that I'd gladly marry ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have paid £400 once. The lady had perhaps the best body I have encountered as a punter. It was a good punt with good sex but not a fantastic one. I have paid £300 a handful of times. One of my favourites has a £250 basic with £50 extra for anal and I would say she is definitely worth it. I have never had a bad punt at £300. I have had a bad punt at £250. I have had good punts with good sex at £80-£150. A higher price is not a guarantee of anything (nor a lower price a warning) but you do, in my experience, increase the probability of better sex with a better looking woman if you pay more. However, I would suggest that the main benefits of paying more are in the non-sexual side of things: you are more likely to meet a lady who speaks good English, can hold a decent conversation, is a more delightful hostess, in more comfortable surroundings, etc. Finally, the law of diminishing returns does apply: so you do have a better probability of a good punt at £300 compared to £100 but it is not three times more likely or likely to be a three times better punt.

You pays your money and you takes your choice.

Edited by DanLeno

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me to pay £500 to see an escort she would have to put a gun to my head, no one is worth that for sex how long will the sex last?

If it will last for a week then maybe! paying a girl that much is an insult to your intelligence you would have much more fun seeing maybe 5 or 6 girls with the £500 no one can tell me a £500 punt is better then a £100 the £500 escort maybe a lot more attractive but crap in the sack

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had 5 porn-star / high-end girls at £500 an hour... and several hundred much less expensive girls.

I remember all the expensive ones, and so I should... That's what I paid for. I knew of them beforehand so it was fantasy fulfillment as much as a punt.

I have a detailed list of every girl I've punted with, but doubt I recognise more than 1 in 3 if I saw them in a bar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now