smnsays64

Photos - What Puts You Off?

107 posts in this topic

I've always only seen ladies who have photos of themselves topless or mostly undressed (less is more, literally) Recently however, I took a gamble on a WG recommended by her agency, who was a lot more covered up than the others. But my, did it pay off!

This got me thinking - how many punters live by the same rules as I, and might be missing out!

Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always only seen ladies who have photos of themselves topless or mostly undressed (less is more, literally) Recently however, I took a gamble on a WG recommended by her agency, who was a lot more covered up than the others. But my, did it pay off!

This got me thinking - how many punters live by the same rules as I, and might be missing out!

Thoughts?

What puts me off is photoshopped pictures but its endemic in punting with many including known good SPs doing it sadly, i want to see exactly who i will be punting with in reality not a fiction. I understand about no full face pictures due to discretion but things like tattoos if big and many should be mentioned on the SPs site or profile in my opinion. I like to see the WGs whole body in pictures as well.

I also want to see up to date pictures that are a true reflection of the present not of the past, i prefer blatant nude pictures myself but i know from previous threads some punters dont.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I'm drawn to a pretty face. Even with partial face photos some ladies manage to show enough to decide if the face interests me.

I'm not a fan of enhanced chests. Bad enhancements are worse. I guess topless helps with this. I'd be much happier seeing seeing an A/B cup but they seem rare these days.

Other then that I like a nice curvy bottom and nice set of hips. Boyish slim hips don't work for me. I also like nice thighs not too thin.

I don't need a naked or even near naked photo to grab my attention. Plenty of fully dressed women every day manage to enchant me. A standing photo with a dress or shortish skirt are fine with me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When the most prominent picture is a close up of her pussy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no, i actually quite like the ladies who are 'dressed to please'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cannot stand the gynaecological shots. Give me a dressed lady showing a hint of cleavage, glimpse of thigh and a sweet smile and I am likely to be on the phone at once.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, the butcher shop manuals gross me out. So do images at too high a resolution, very unprofessional pics, poor background, insufficient lighting. God I could go on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Completely the opposite, I like to see the breasts (what shape are they) and nipples (what type) and I also like to see the pussy I am hopefully going to lick and also the whole body nude. This is not a date leading to a life long commitment its about being able to enjoy a beautiful body. I don't like pix that are technically bad. I don't mind a little photo-shopping because the camera can be much worse than the eye at revealing flaws.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm also wary of photos which have clearly been heavily photoshopped or if the lady is fully dressed in all of her profile photos as it gives the impression that she has something to hide :unsure:

However I am not a fan of the gynaecological shots either, as some things are best left to the imagination.

Edited by CheeseYa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What puts me off is a lack of a face pic!

There are too many blurred faces, "headless" Escort photos where I have neither the time or Money to see if she's old, horse faced, ugly or an angel faced babe/cute stunner.

Also without a face pic (or head) it can be hard to verify if the photos were real or honest. A lot of profiles on the "other site" use stolen teen porn "my ex-girlfriend" website style pictures.

Thank god for tineye.com- but many fake profiles still slip the net.

Now I only tend to service Escorts who show everything and their face (photos featuring sexy dresses, lingerie and topless photo tick my box).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another off putting thing in photo's is the appearance in the background of a hoover, washing basket, collection of CD's on the floor, mass of wires all over a TV/DVD machine, dirty plates of half eaten food, and I could go on. Don't people ever take a look at the background before posting photo's on the web.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't stand an open leg shot, or someone with a cock or dildo shoved in a orifice. Topless can't be alright, but I usually tend to pick women wearing nice lingere, a mix of professional and amateur.

Not bothered about face pictures - maybe I've just got good intuition but I've never picked an bad un yet! Xx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another off putting thing in photo's is the appearance in the background of a hoover, washing basket, collection of CD's on the floor, mass of wires all over a TV/DVD machine, dirty plates of half eaten food, and I could go on. Don't people ever take a look at the background before posting photo's on the web.

Oh, those pics are good for a laugh. I like going through the other site sometimes and looking at the shite photos of ladies in their messy homes :D Some people have lots of interesting junk :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once in a while I see an otherwise good photo of a lady if it wasn't for the family

portraits on the wall... sometimes of children.

Bad.............. so bad.

Or the washing drying on the wall radiator..... things like that :wacko:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, i can understand for reasons of privacy -- but if i am gonna meet then a face pic is essential -- even if it's in the private gallery on **.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Biggest put offs :

-blurred/obscured face

-gynaecology text book photos

-stomach blatantly hidden/obscured (seen this a few times)

-badly done, out of focus, long distance shots, awkwardly posed in shabby looking room with ugly, busy home decor/furnishings (think 'readers wives' type shots)

-breasts hugely and obviously inflated by photoshop

-obviously silicone enhanced breasts proudly billed as 'all natural'

-c cup or smaller breasts listed as DD upwards

-anyone clad in rubber or PVC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hidden stomachs. I don't care how imaginative your method of covering it up, it's obvious what you're doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Biggest put offs :

-blurred/obscured face

-gynaecology text book photos

-stomach blatantly hidden/obscured (seen this a few times)

-badly done, out of focus, long distance shots, awkwardly posed in shabby looking room with ugly, busy home decor/furnishings (think 'readers wives' type shots)

-breasts hugely and obviously inflated by photoshop

-obviously silicone enhanced breasts proudly billed as 'all natural'

-c cup or smaller breasts listed as DD upwards

-anyone clad in rubber or PVC

Ooo why rubber/PVC? Am curious x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, i can understand for reasons of privacy -- but if i am gonna meet then a face pic is essential -- even if it's in the private gallery on **.

I don't bother with that either. Waste of Money even if the Escort says "face pic" in private section.

Usually its because she's pig ugly or some Eastern European with a head the size and shape of a shoe box on its side.

Edited by RedAlertTourist

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another off putting thing in photo's is the appearance in the background of a hoover, washing basket, collection of CD's on the floor, mass of wires all over a TV/DVD machine, dirty plates of half eaten food, and I could go on. Don't people ever take a look at the background before posting photo's on the web.

I'd rather that- than a overly soft focused "professional picture" of an EE taken on a golden couch with theatrical curtains or a Nightclub/bar in the background.

At least with shitty flat pictures you know

a) the Escort is real; and not a stolen image or stock photo (and usually a face pic is included)

B) without soft focus you can see how naturally fit the girl is

c) You know you won't be disappointing when you realise you won't be fucking her on a Edwardian Four Poster Bed in some mansion- lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd rather that- than a overly soft focused "professional picture" of an EE taken on a golden couch with theatrical curtains or a Nightclub/bar in the background.

At least with shitty flat pictures you know

a) the Escort is real; and not a stolen image or stock photo (and usually a face pic is included)

:cool: without soft focus you can see how naturally fit the girl is

c) You know you won't be disappointing when you realise you won't be fucking her on a Edwardian Four Poster Bed in some mansion- lol

Guess I'd better acquire a shitty flat for my next set of photos :unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guess I'd better acquire a shitty flat for my next set of photos :unsure:

We can't please them all Ruth. Some guys favour the white background with no bits and bobs

to detract from the subject (a sexy woman) while others like to see tasteful drapes and exotic

beds etc.....

I long ago stopped fretting over photos.

As long as we look the same in the flesh as we do in our pics, that is paramount... but we can assume some men

will approve of the layout and some won't.

I find the "shitty flat proves she is real" comments quite amusign though..... by all means have pics

taken in a modest living or bedroom but it shows a bit of professionalism if the room or background

is at least clean and clutter free.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guess I'd better acquire a shitty flat for my next set of photos :unsure:

Don't you dare young lady. Your pictures taken up in the hills are wonderful and your present escorting premises rank with the best.

You and a shitty flat go together like roast beef and custard.

Don't even think about it :wacko:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The things that put me off most when viewing photos of a WG:

- 'headless' shots which only show the body;

- when she makes an effort to cover her midriff either with her hand or by carefully choosing her clothing;

- PVC and/or leather and/or rubber fetish outfits;

- poor quality photos;

- unsexy looking underwear;

- ones that look Photoshopped - some I've seen have been a bit obvious, and some are laughably poor efforts; and

- dark lighting and/or soft focus - I like to see at least the body in plain view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooo why rubber/PVC? Am curious x

Just my personal taste

I find PVC and rubber fetish wear vomit inducingly hideous

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now