tompunt1

The Future Of Punting/social Media

38 posts in this topic

Concidering the explosion of social media over the recent years, with Skype and smart phones and all the rest, in what ways would you like to see agencies and indipendant ladies utilise these tehcnologies the next few years to come, or use them communicate with the punters?

I would love to see a system where a girl might be able to text a good client (obviosuly with his consent and only if the girl is at ease with this) with some dirty pictures every now and then, and maybe even webchat if he can't get out to visit her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Concidering the explosion of social media over the recent years, with Skype and smart phones and all the rest, in what ways would you like to see agencies and indipendant ladies utilise these tehcnologies the next few years to come, or use them communicate with the punters?

I would love to see a system where a girl might be able to text a good client (obviosuly with his consent and only if the girl is at ease with this) with some dirty pictures every now and then, and maybe even webchat if he can't get out to visit her.

All that is readily available already.

Most will charge you for it though!

Lucy :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All that is readily available already.

Most will charge you for it though!

Lucy :)

I understand that most will charge for the service, its just that I've not seen them offered anywhere. Maybe I'm looking in the wrost places... as usual.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm just waiting for virtual punting -- where u don't have to punt lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that most will charge for the service, its just that I've not seen them offered anywhere. Maybe I'm looking in the wrost places... as usual.

The thing is ..........

I am sure a lot of us ladies get bombarded with all sorts of things to do in this world to keep a gentleman a happy chappy.

I have lost count of the number of guys who ask me to send them a saucy picture "just for them", or to send them a fruity message.to get them going after a meeting.

I duly oblige if I want to and if I have time.

It is not practical and too time consuming really, even if we were paid for it

I will send pics on, and give access to pictures as and when I feel like it, but to keep up with doing it to everyone I meet with who is a regular is never going to happen.

Us ladies know you guys want that little bit of naughtiness at times from us as well as the actual meetings, but the practicality of doing such stuff is a nightmare when we all lead busy lives already.

There are plenty of ladies out there who offer escorting/camming/text chat etc.

Best pick one of those ladies to visit in real life, and then you can carry on with the other stuff like camming and texting afterwards with her.

Ladies who just escort will probably not be overly keen to do the other stuff you see.

Lucy :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would love to see a system where a girl might be able to text a good client (obviosuly with his consent and only if the girl is at ease with this) with some dirty pictures every now and then, and maybe even webchat if he can't get out to visit her.

I think you're forgetting there is - or should be - a difference between the 'real world' and the clandestine world of punting. Respecting the privacy of clients and of service providers is crucial for both parties. Imagine your significant other seeing a text like that, or a post on facebook asking if you enjoyed the OWO and 'would you like to try anal next time?' :eek: . No, the two worlds need to be kept apart tompunt1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm just waiting for virtual punting -- where u don't have to punt lol.

Isn't it called porn?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the lack of decent security on arsebook for me means i would not touch it with a bargepole.

even more considering my hobby.

and twatter is just crass shite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you're forgetting there is - or should be - a difference between the 'real world' and the clandestine world of punting. Respecting the privacy of clients and of service providers is crucial for both parties. Imagine your significant other seeing a text like that, or a post on facebook asking if you enjoyed the OWO and 'would you like to try anal next time?' :eek: . No, the two worlds need to be kept apart tompunt1

I totally agree with you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't it called porn?

3D would be cool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Concidering the explosion of social media over the recent years, with Skype and smart phones and all the rest, in what ways would you like to see agencies and indipendant ladies utilise these tehcnologies the next few years to come, or use them communicate with the punters?

I would love to see a system where a girl might be able to text a good client (obviosuly with his consent and only if the girl is at ease with this) with some dirty pictures every now and then, and maybe even webchat if he can't get out to visit her.

Videos of WGs on their sites with or without their faces and/or identifying features like tattoos blurred out that places like HOD or Establishments connected to HOD or in MK have started to offer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't it called porn?

no. masturabtion lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Videos of WGs on their sites with or without their faces and/or identifying features like tattoos blurred out that places like HOD or Establishments connected to HOD or in MK have started to offer.

I wonder whether they are opening a can of worms with that initiative, which, as it happens, has been tried before. What happens to the girls who rely on more photoshop work to market them up to par with the more naturally eye-catching ladies who need very little making over?

It also needs to live up to what it is suggesting in terms of the way the booking system operates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder whether they are opening a can of worms with that initiative, which, as it happens, has been tried before. What happens to the girls who rely on more photoshop work to market them up to par with the more naturally eye-catching ladies who need very little making over?

It also needs to live up to what it is suggesting in terms of the way the booking system operates.

I have no idea what happens to them, thats not my concern, i concern myself with what i would like to see more of in the future as a punter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea what happens to them, thats not my concern, i concern myself with what i would like to see more of in the future as a punter.

There must be a reason why you want to see more of it or are you not concerend with that either?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Concidering the explosion of social media over the recent years, with Skype and smart phones and all the rest, in what ways would you like to see agencies and indipendant ladies utilise these tehcnologies the next few years to come, or use them communicate with the punters?

No offence, but that sounds like an interview question. Not sure what job it would be for though :confused: .

On topic, a wg who I used to see fairly regularly once tried to add me on facebook. I politely declined her friend request and it was at that point that she became a former regular.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The huge risk is the total lack of control once you have posted anything. It can go viral in hours. You can never know the circumstances in which any random text may be received.

An absolute NO NO in my book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the lack of decent security on arsebook for me means i would not touch it with a bargepole.

even more considering my hobby.

and twatter is just crass shite.

Although you may think Twitter is crass and I kind of get you, it would be the kind of thing the OP was looking for. He could follow just the girls he wanted to and most on there tweet a pic or two a day and chit chat. There are many escorts on there now.

x

Holly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is ..........

I am sure a lot of us ladies get bombarded with all sorts of things to do in this world to keep a gentleman a happy chappy.

I have lost count of the number of guys who ask me to send them a saucy picture "just for them", or to send them a fruity message.to get them going after a meeting.

I duly oblige if I want to and if I have time.

It is not practical and too time consuming really, even if we were paid for it

I will send pics on, and give access to pictures as and when I feel like it, but to keep up with doing it to everyone I meet with who is a regular is never going to happen.

Us ladies know you guys want that little bit of naughtiness at times from us as well as the actual meetings, but the practicality of doing such stuff is a nightmare when we all lead busy lives already.

There are plenty of ladies out there who offer escorting/camming/text chat etc.

Best pick one of those ladies to visit in real life, and then you can carry on with the other stuff like camming and texting afterwards with her.

Ladies who just escort will probably not be overly keen to do the other stuff you see.

Lucy :)

Great Awnser Lucy. Totally agree. ;)

Nataly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There must be a reason why you want to see more of it or are you not concerend with that either?

So i can see if i wish to drink cocoa with the WG, what a very stupid question you ask here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really equate the role of devices with the role of social media.

However, while there are many upsides for the provider in terms of marketing and business opportunities (I'm sure the site that cannot be mentioned (and some users) are making good money from cams, videos, pictures etc), indeed, we have to also consider the downside.

So for me there are so many negatives for the client on the privacy side. I think social media (and government measures) are slowly making it more difficult to remain private on the internet. I think this world is one where people wish to remain private very often.

A quick example, I know facebook has started to role out "facial recognition software", from there it would be pretty easy in tech terms to run a cross search on identifying people who use pictures elsewhere and matching usernames to real names. Also, remember, the copyright of much of the stuff on social media belongs to them, not you, so you have little say in how your material is used.

Another example I see is the government returning to legislation to oblige ISPs to retain internet activity for customers for 12 months.

I'm all for making content media rich, although I don't think that has much to do with social media. I do think as social media expands it will almost force the use of a singular identity in what people are doing and this can be positive, but it also may mean the return to close networks of a nudge and a wink on what is happening rather than the freedom the internet has given to adult services.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So i can see if i wish to drink cocoa with the WG, what a very stupid question you ask here.

Well if it's so stupid, and I assume you mean the answer is obvious, then why post it in the first place? The fact is, you don't actually know what extra benefits it will confer do you.

The whole movie clip thing is hardly new technology anyway, it's been available to service providers for years so there's obviously a reason why nobody bothers with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if it's so stupid, and I assume you mean the answer is obvious, then why post it in the first place? The fact is, you don't actually know what extra benefits it will confer do you.

The whole movie clip thing is hardly new technology anyway, it's been available to service providers for years so there's obviously a reason why nobody bothers with it.

Because i wished to, once again you try to impose YOUR thinking and views on me, i once again and hopefully for the last time tell you i will post what i wish when i wish about what i wish. Your right it is obvious, but to spell it out for you as you seem to have a lack of understanding the obvious, a film of a WG will show her whole body and perhaps face moving so is better than a still, i trust thats spelt it out clearly. If not you have my sympathy and i hope you seek the help you require.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because i wished to, once again you try to impose YOUR thinking and views on me, i once again and hopefully for the last time tell you i will post what i wish when i wish about what i wish. Your right it is obvious, but to spell it out for you as you seem to have a lack of understanding the obvious, a film of a WG will show her whole body and perhaps face moving so is better than a still, i trust thats spelt it out clearly. If not you have my sympathy and i hope you seek the help you require.

Why do you feel the need to tell me that, I couldn't give a hoot what you post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now