Forgot your password?
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
bumsex, March 9, 2012
Posted March 9, 2012
It's just dissappeared...
someone took it down. in some ways, its just as well; massage was becoming a forbidden subject in the, erm, massage forum. the 'No Discussion List' was longer than all our schlongs combined and multiplied - it would have been easier to have 'discussion list' including all 4 ppl we were allowed to discuss! Maybe someone will start a new site. I for one will leave punternet if there is ever a massage forum, or even dedicated site elsewhere!!
Wankers ruined it for all
You know who you are
Rules broken and mods despair
That board is no more
If you want to find
A full service provider
Then this is the place
Ladies who do not
Offer escort services
Are off topic here
Mod team does not want
This to become a debate
Wise men heed warning
according to the message we get when trying to access the massage section it is not gone we have simply had our permission to view it removed.
at this time anyway, maybe later it will be deleted.
Such a shame that this has happened. There is no other site that allows information on these massage services to be discussed. I enjoy massage with HE and I also go to full service providers and as such Punternet was a great resource for me. Now it only provides information on full service providers it becomes one of the many internet sites that i can visit to get the info I need and with the competition I'm sure I'll stop visiting this site.
Bit draconnian don't you think ?
Why not just ban the people who do not obey the rules ??
Once again, the minority spoil it for the majority !!
I do think it is a shame that the SM forum has been removed. However, I must agree that it was becoming impossible to read.
Sometimes it made me angry. The service had been taken completely out of context, by a lot of people. Sensual massage should be exactly what it says on the label. It should be all about the massage, not the HE. Yet so many of those who posted on there, were so intent on telling about the extras that they had been able to push out of the service providers.
It was becoming an obsession, as opposed to the experience as a whole. It was changing something into something different. Unfortunately, instead of it being an erotic experience, it gave it a Seedy feel.
FBSM boardWankers ruined it for allYou know who you areFBSM boardRules broken and mods despairThat board is no moreIf you want to findA full service providerThen this is the placeLadies who do notOffer escort servicesAre off topic hereMod team does not wantThis to become a debateWise men heed warning
Just so I am absolutely clear on this, and this isn't a facetious comment, nor do I intend to start a debate, but am I able to understand from your post that I may fully report on the main board any providers who previously appeared on the NDL if I had a full service from them? And that providers who had previously been granted anonymity on the NDL may now openly appear in the full glare of this Public Board, if I have fucked them for money?
As I said, this is not a facetious comment. I know only too well what JKay may think of me, so I suspect I may be one of the "wankers". (If trying to keep an open forum, sensibly moderated is being a wanker, then I will admit to it.) I just want to be absolutely clear what is permitted.
There are a number of establishments that were forbidden to be discussed on the FBSM board for offering "more than massage". San Ling Baker Street, San Ling New Oxford Street, Well Health, Praed Street, the two shops in Goodge Street; these are all establishments where you were guaranteed to get a suck and a fuck as well as a good massage and all of these establishments featured on the NDL. Now there is no NDL, are we able to share our experiences? There were also a number of dishonest providers who sought shelter on the NDL and having the protection of not being discussed were able to continue their dishonest ways. Are we able to discuss them here as well?
This is your board, Galahad. You can run it exactly as you wish. But the difficulty we had on the FBSM board was that the rules were never clear and were administered with a mailed fist with no rhyme, reason or explanation of decisions. The FBSM board was a fantastic resource, that alas, was managed unsympathetically and the recent "Haiku Revolution" was a result in the sheer frustration that members had from the constant deletion of threads, perverse rulings and outright damned rudeness from the powers that be.
The vast majority of the posters were sensible guys. We would never out or embarrass any of the providers. We just wanted to share information in a sensible way and have some fun. My fear is that now the board has been closed, much of what was discussed there under controlled circumstances may now be discussed here on the main board in the full glare of the internet. And in full view of boyfriends, husbands and employers as well.
May I sincerely request that you reconsider your decision and perhaps review recent issues and look for a positive way forward.
Gave it a seedy feel ? Are we for real here ? This whole board is about sexual favours for money - A session in a pattaya back alley with a 100 baht a time hooker or a £1000 session with a porn star - its the same thing lads. Same as a full service encounter or a sensual massage with a HE - its hooking no matter how you dress it up.
I have been a regular on this board and have had some good times and shared some decent information found some gems and as said had an enjoyable time. However I think the time has come to part company. I get the impression that there were a couple of people out there that feel that they are better than the rest, so be it.
I stopped moderating the FBSM board about six months ago in despair - took my ball home and refused to play any more. Kudos to the other mods who have hung on in there this long, determined to try to make it work for you guys. Sadly it became exactly as Louisa describes above - all about the wank and 'will she, won't she - she says she doesn't but hey, you have a go, you might have more luck than me.'
Even though I wasn't moderating the board, I still watched as the other Mods wrangled and tried to find solutions. Jkay in particular has hung on right to the end, offering options, solutions, trying to find a happy medium. And all that happened was 'The mods are ruining this for us'. Well, that's the real world - you don't get to break the rules without being stopped.
I applaud this decision, because now Jkay can have a bloody rest.
. . . There is no other site that allows information on these massage services to be discussed. . . .
I enjoy massage with HE so I am migrating to http://www.forum-x.co.uk/ as they have a section Massage Plus HR
If you know where else to go let me know. I understand the job of the moderators.
What about those of us that only want FBSM and not FS? Are we just to get lost now?
Unfortunately, the original ethos of the FBSM board just did not stay. It was meant to be a forum for massage and HR only. But it became, as Louisa and Claire pointed out a forum on how to get more, how to persuade legit providers. Oral, full sex you name it. Most therapists use their real names so all this public information just was not very comfortable for some of the girls. On top of that a select little group decided to start taunting/ridiculing the rules and the Mods as often as they possibly could just to add to the difficulties of the board. And as for niceguymax, you are looking for a positive way forward now being one of the main culprits behind getting the board closed down. Please!
I was one of those who supported things like the NDL for those ladies who did not wish to be discussed on here for example - there are ways to achieve what the FBSM section wanted to do in terms or its scope and its rules - just exclude those who don't behave?
Excellent post G, and nice to see that it is not only aposite but also in the Haiku style that caused the meltdown!
Do we take it that similar explanations will now become more commonplace when threads are closed or deleted?
Punternet the saviour is
Galahad set trend
if we want to discuss massage services, we should post our messages on the 'UK & IRELAND GENERAL DISCUSSION' section.
Yes, they can just as easily be deleted from there
Errr no, Punternet is now only a place to discuss full service providers as it used to be. Massage providers are now off-topic, so if you do put it on the UK and Ireland general discussion it will be deleted and if it repeats further action will be taken.
Errr no, Punternet is now only a place to discuss full service providers. Massage providers are now off-topic, so if you do put it on the UK and Ireland general discussion it will be deleted and if it repeats further action will be taken.
As a matter of interest, if certain ladies off the now defunct NDL continue to voice opinions of whether massaging someone's testicles until emission really does make them a prostitute or not, should this be Off Topic or General Discussion?
(Love you Pia!!)
Would it be possible to have read only access to the old board (i.e. no posts allowed) - a wealth of useful information has been lost ...
That's a really good idea, maybe for 3 months or so. What do you think, G?
I enjoy massage with HE so I am migrating to http://www.forum-x.co.uk/ as they have a section Massage Plus HRIf you know where else to go let me know. I understand the job of the moderators.
Thanks Mike, I didn't know about that one.
I to would appreciate any info on other massage boards
I agree with this sentiment. Perhaps a 3 month amnesty so we can glean the info which would otherwise be lost for ever.
So if a massage provider also provides FS, can she be discussed?
"Culprit" ? "Wanker"?
I said I wasn't going to debate this, and I won't. But I feel I should set you right on a couple of things. The "select little group " or wankers or culprits or however you wish to style them, were almost all, to a man, founder members of the FBSM Board. Unlike you, Pia, they were there when it all started and it was never "meant to be a forum for massage and HR only" . It was a board intended to discuss sexual encounters where a proper massage formed a large component. There were no strictures against describing oral or full sex. So let's not presume to re-write history to suit ourselves, shall we? Certainly, the nature of the board changed over time, nobody disagrees with that. But it didn't start that way. I remember, I was there.
Would you like to give a little more detail as to why I have been named as one of the main culprits for closing the board down? I would be fascinated to learn why.