Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
BobJim

Time Traveller Or Just Angry?

22 posts in this topic

This FR, assuming it is genuine is a good warning for others, but the month that is mentioned in the description of the events seems to refer to the upcoming month...I suspect that it was written before 12 pm on Sunday or the reporter was so irate that he failed to notice the timing error - any other explanations?

http://www.punternet.com/frs/fr_view.php?recnum=108455

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I noticed that as well. It happens sometimes when you've been doing a lot if paperwork connected with the new month, you forget and start inserting the new month when you really mean the old month.

However the 2 dates he mentioned; Sat 24th and Thurs 29th can only be for March 2012.

The girl sounds schizo. I personally would never have gone back the 2nd time, once bitten and all that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh My God. Unbelievable. Why on earth did he go back?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why on earth did he go back?

The siren appeal of the freebie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely, you bail when you see her coming out of the flat dressed in her bra and starts to grope and kiss you in the street?

How can that be described as "rather unusual, but neverthless good anyway"??

:confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Men do get lead by their dicks sometimes..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely, you bail when you see her coming out of the flat dressed in her bra and starts to grope and kiss you in the street?

How can that be described as "rather unusual, but neverthless good anyway"??

:confused:

There are men who actually would like this.

Edited by Strawberry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The girl's been identified on another punting forum, and if it's the right girl, the FR looks malicious. She's been online over three years and has over 100 positive feedback. Even if some of the feedback is faked, it's hard to see a girl who behaves that way lasting all that time without it being highlighted earlier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I made an appointment to see this girl some months ago but when I arrived at her post-code and parked she did not answer her phone. I hung around for half an hour alternately phoning and texting but failed to make contact. I then arranged to see another girl a few miles away and while I was on my way there, had a text from Emma to say that she would be at her flat in half an hour. I replied that I had made other arrangements.

Sounds as though I had a lucky escape. I later recounted this to another girl on a different occasion and she told me that Emma was notorious for being so coked up she was completely of her trolley and for not providing the services she advertised. I put this down to just slagging off a competitor but it now sounds as though she was telling me the truth. I don't agree with Joe Blob that the FR was just malicious as it is consistent with the above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The girl's been identified on another punting forum, and if it's the right girl, the FR looks malicious. She's been online over three years and has over 100 positive feedback. Even if some of the feedback is faked, it's hard to see a girl who behaves that way lasting all that time without it being highlighted earlier.

There is no reason why her purple site name can't be revealed here: it is (currently) Dirty Slut 21. But she regularly changes her name so punters would be better advised to remember her purple site ID of 641720.

She has previously gone by English Slut Emma and has been warned about on PN before:

http://www.punternet...e-call-herself/

Her positive feedback includes a fair bit of negatives. A lot of her positive feedback and FRs seem to be written in a similar style to each other and to her profile.

In sum, I doubt very much the FR under discussion here is malicious.

Edited by DanLeno

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So much of her feedback is from people who only have one piece of positive feedback themselves (normally from Emma herself) that along with the negative feedback I find the whole thing deeply suspicious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One does try to take a step back and look at this from all angles to make a fair assesment but the fact that there are multiple negative reports does make one wonder..no smoke without fire and all that. Why this punter went back again I dont know...I guess to 'recoup' what he had paid first time around though didnt quite work out it seems.

The FR doesnt seem malicious but parts of it are quite 'out there' for a punt...wg walking around knocking on neighbours doors with her bra on...not sure I can believe it but if she is a cokehead then anything is possible

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This FR, assuming it is genuine is a good warning for others, but the month that is mentioned in the description of the events seems to refer to the upcoming month...I suspect that it was written before 12 pm on Sunday or the reporter was so irate that he failed to notice the timing error - any other explanations?

http://www.punternet...p?recnum=108455

I assume he simply put April instead of March. As he broke FR submitting rules in regard to mentioning the purple site its fortunate for punters that it is online as a warning. She sounds dreadful. He was very foolish to go back in my view, such people dont change in the course of a short period in my experiences.

Edited by smiths

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no reason why her purple site name can't be revealed here: it is (currently) Dirty Slut 21. But she regularly changes her name so punters would be better advised to remember her purple site ID of 641720.

She has previously gone by English Slut Emma and has been warned about on PN before:

http://www.punternet...e-call-herself/

Her positive feedback includes a fair bit of negatives. A lot of her positive feedback and FRs seem to be written in a similar style to each other and to her profile.

In sum, I doubt very much the FR under discussion here is malicious.

She changed her name already. She is http://www.Adultwork.com/ViewProfile.asp?UserID=641720.

I still can't understand how this client agreed to go with her, because "she dragged him" to hunt for a coke with her!

From his FRs: "One of her excuse was that she wanted to get 'coked' up before we got down to business, and that she wanted to borrow my mobile phone to make a call to her coke dealer. I refused. As a result, she dragged me outside and spent several minutes walking around aimlessly around her neighbourhood knocking on several neighbour's doors looking for her coke dealer and shouting at passing cars (still half-naked!)"

Surely nobody in his right mind going to be dragged from the premises like am obedient brain damaged idiot, by half coked semi naked WG to buy drugs? I just can't see it, unless its a vast exaggeration, or only the half of the story was told. Even if it was true, why the hell he come back? (freebie or not) Typical case of the people who were scammed, always will return to be scammed again.

I am also surprised that experinced people like Trouncer tried to booked her? Ok, he had a lucky escape. But I stil can't understand why he even attempted to book her? Profile are badly written in all Caps, majority of services ticked (including giving and receiving hardsports), record of constantly changing names, and many others clues. Why guys get attracted to such profiles? Can anybody answer? Trouncer, can you answer at least?

Edited by Xenia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I looked up her profile when she was previously discussed, and the following text, which still remains on her profile, put me off immediately...

"RUB YOUR BARE COCK ALL OVER MY TIGHT WET JUICY ENGLISH PUSSY".

Although not necessarily offering BB, would any punters on here admit to taking her up on this offer????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thank you all for taking an interest in my review. I am the person who has written the report on Emma. Please be assured that it is genuine and not malicious.

BobJim / Bangalot - correct, I did get the months mixed up, it should have been March and not April. Also part of the report was written on Sunday (the day after the first meeting with Emma). Therefore, as BobJim mentioned, part of it may read as though it was written the day after, as I just cut and pasted the events for Saturday I had already written about her (prior to receiving the apologetic text messages from her, and deciding at that moment to hold off submitting a report).

mike52 - Absolutly right; Its a combination of being horny, and some half-naked lady coming onto you at the right moment; Any red-blooded man wouldn't resist in situations like that.

Orion - It's unusual since I have never had an escort come out of her flat building (let alone her flat) to invite me in. And for her to come onto me so passionately/eagerly there and then is why it felt so good. Though, as its now realised, it was a ruse to get my money.

Lovelyslut / DanLeno /Cole77 - Some may say it is foolish, though one of the reason I went back was to give her a second chance and, yes, maybe to recoup my losses (remember, on Sunday her text messages to me were apologetic and she was offering to 'make it up to me'). I wouldn't exactly class it as a freebie though as I have already paid £80 and received nothing but trouble from her. My second reason; I didn't want Emma to have any justification, whatsoever, to refute my negative report on her. From reading her reviews on the other site, just about all of her negative reviews have been refuted by Emma (as being fake, etc). Had I have not turned up for a second time, it would have given Emma one more reason to refute my report. I may have been foolish visiting her a second time, but my intention was to make others realise how this fraudster operates. Hopefully this report should stop anyone else from wasting their time and money on her.

Joe Blob / trouncer / DanLeno - My report is not malicious. To be honest, I don't know how she has managed to accumulate so many positive reviews. I can only imagine they are fake, or that I am the most unfortunate man. I can report honestly that my encounter with her falls in line with those few reviewers who have reported negatively about her (hence why I mentioned contrasting reviews). Unfortunately, I don't have time to spend analysing every escort profiles for every name changes they have had over months / years etc, or reading through every review (though I wish I had of done in this case). Also, I didn't mention the full name of the other purple site as I thought it may have caused my report to be unpublished / blocked (or so I thought I have read somewhere - Am I wrong?)

Xenia - "Surely nobody in his right mind going to be dragged from the premises like am obedient brain damaged idiot, by half coked semi naked WG to buy drugs?" Who is to say she is coked, or drunk? The way she has ran this operation would suggest that she has been sober troughout. And what do you propose in this case? Remember, I have already requested her several times (kindly) to uphold her end of the deal. Would you suggest I drag her to the bedroom, pin her down and have my way? And what if I refused to leave her premises? - Risk myself getting arrested on that count too?! If I leave on my own accord without a making a fuss I would not be able to report on her scheming ways, and she would have plenty of reasons to refute my review as she has done so sucessfully on the other site. Also, I did not participate in on knocking on her neighbour's doors either; I stood well away when she was up to that sh*t. Why would I come back? - For the above stated reasons. In the back of my mind I knew I was likely to have my time wasted as she's already made various excuses for not being available on Tuesday or Wednesday (she had my mobile number stored and would not answer when I called from that mobile, but answer straight away if I called from another mobile). She realised that I was persistant and eventually submitted to a Thursday evening booking. And how have I been scammed again? - Apart from the cost of travelling to her apartment, I refused to pay her £80 for the second meeting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely being around someone who may be likely to be in possession of Class A drugs is going to put you at a higher risk of bumping into plod anyway?

Edited by Strawberry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also booked her some time ago under another name. When I arrived she didn;t answer the phone to begin with. When she eventually answered the phone she said her landlord was on the way to collect the rent and she would call me later. Needless to say that did not happen. Looks like I was lucky.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi, Thank you all for taking an interest in my review. I am the person who has written the report on Emma. Please be assured that it is genuine and not malicious. BobJim / Bangalot - correct, I did get the months mixed up, it should have been March and not April. Also part of the report was written on Sunday (the day after the first meeting with Emma). Therefore, as BobJim mentioned, part of it may read as though it was written the day after, as I just cut and pasted the events for Saturday I had already written about her (prior to receiving the apologetic text messages from her, and deciding at that moment to hold off submitting a report). mike52 - Absolutly right; Its a combination of being horny, and some half-naked lady coming onto you at the right moment; Any red-blooded man wouldn't resist in situations like that. Orion - It's unusual since I have never had an escort come out of her flat building (let alone her flat) to invite me in. And for her to come onto me so passionately/eagerly there and then is why it felt so good. Though, as its now realised, it was a ruse to get my money. Lovelyslut / DanLeno /Cole77 - Some may say it is foolish, though one of the reason I went back was to give her a second chance and, yes, maybe to recoup my losses (remember, on Sunday her text messages to me were apologetic and she was offering to 'make it up to me'). I wouldn't exactly class it as a freebie though as I have already paid £80 and received nothing but trouble from her. My second reason; I didn't want Emma to have any justification, whatsoever, to refute my negative report on her. From reading her reviews on the other site, just about all of her negative reviews have been refuted by Emma (as being fake, etc). Had I have not turned up for a second time, it would have given Emma one more reason to refute my report. I may have been foolish visiting her a second time, but my intention was to make others realise how this fraudster operates. Hopefully this report should stop anyone else from wasting their time and money on her. Joe Blob / trouncer / DanLeno - My report is not malicious. To be honest, I don't know how she has managed to accumulate so many positive reviews. I can only imagine they are fake, or that I am the most unfortunate man. I can report honestly that my encounter with her falls in line with those few reviewers who have reported negatively about her (hence why I mentioned contrasting reviews). Unfortunately, I don't have time to spend analysing every escort profiles for every name changes they have had over months / years etc, or reading through every review (though I wish I had of done in this case). Also, I didn't mention the full name of the other purple site as I thought it may have caused my report to be unpublished / blocked (or so I thought I have read somewhere - Am I wrong?) Xenia - "Surely nobody in his right mind going to be dragged from the premises like am obedient brain damaged idiot, by half coked semi naked WG to buy drugs?" Who is to say she is coked, or drunk? The way she has ran this operation would suggest that she has been sober troughout. And what do you propose in this case? Remember, I have already requested her several times (kindly) to uphold her end of the deal. Would you suggest I drag her to the bedroom, pin her down and have my way? And what if I refused to leave her premises? - Risk myself getting arrested on that count too?! If I leave on my own accord without a making a fuss I would not be able to report on her scheming ways, and she would have plenty of reasons to refute my review as she has done so sucessfully on the other site. Also, I did not participate in on knocking on her neighbour's doors either; I stood well away when she was up to that sh*t. Why would I come back? - For the above stated reasons. In the back of my mind I knew I was likely to have my time wasted as she's already made various excuses for not being available on Tuesday or Wednesday (she had my mobile number stored and would not answer when I called from that mobile, but answer straight away if I called from another mobile). She realised that I was persistant and eventually submitted to a Thursday evening booking. And how have I been scammed again? - Apart from the cost of travelling to her apartment, I refused to pay her £80 for the second meeting.

Welcome to the forum. :) I have certainly learnt by my punting mistakes over the years, NEVER trust a bad WG to turn good is my advice to all, they are few in number but real scumbags. I hope you dont meet anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Strawberry - It may have done, but there again I am not dealing, or in possession of them. Also I have no records of ever brushing with the law. It is also the very reason why I kept well away, but kept my sights on Emma. If I sensed danger, I could walk away.

Smiths - Thanks, I hope no-one considers meeting this fraudster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another Time Traveller here /FR 108931 punted on May 27th 2012 .

Just how do they do it ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

   And here's one more , seems to be living life 2 weeks ahead of most of us .  FR 118214

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0