Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Kantos Kan

Extras - Boon Or Bane?

19 posts in this topic

I was wondering what the view out there on charging for extras was.

I can see both sides of the equation. On the one hand, for the really vanilla guys, it can keep the costs of a punt way down low. On the other hand, it can be tricky working out the final price of your punt and a real turn off if the girl keeps saying "that'll be an extra £xx please".

Some services such as anal and watersports are totally understandable as extras in my view as they involve extra prep by the WG. It's the charging for other services, especially by stealth, that sometimes gets my goat.

I suppose I am OK with the girls who are upfront about extras on their profiles, but 9 times out of ten, I'll scroll on by because to me it sends out a message that the punt might be one long session of totting up the final bill. One gorgeous EE girl near me is currently listing anal, CIM, fingering, pix, movies, prostate massage, watersports, prostate massage, receiving rimming and giving rimming as chargeable extras !! Although she starts at a very reasonable £80/ hour including OWO and kissing, if one were keen enough to opt for all of her extras, it would rack the price of the hour up to £280. Admittedly, the client would be a busy boy, but what the hey. Mind you, charging £20 for fingering is a new one on me. Daft as it may sound, if she simply advertised the vanilla service at £80 and had the rest of her services not listed, I would probably go and see her despite the zero feedback. That long list of extras puts me off big time though. Am I the only one ?

Finally though, a big bugbear of mine is the hidden extra. I got let down by a late cancellation of a punt last week. Stuck in an unfamiliar part of the country, I began to think about a Plan B. So I texted one likely looking lady at £80/hour as her profile asked clients not to call or email. She responded very promptly and was available. If I'd been thinking with the lower part of my anatomy, I would have popped round straight away. However, I persevered with the texts and eventually discovered that the base price only included protected sex. OWO was £20 extra, kissing was £20 extra and RO was £20 extra. Total price would be £140, still within my budget but a whole heap more than advertised. To be honest, the whole exchange put me right off and I declined. Spent the evening watching the football in a bar instead. If she had offered an all in package at £140, I would have gone for it. Having to wheedle the final price out of her by a series of texts drove me away.

Unadvertised extras suck! If I am not alone in detesting them, do the girls who do it (or more likely their pimps in the case of the EE ladies I suppose) not realise how much repeat business they are missing out on?

Views ?

Finally, any odd extras anyone has found to go with my fingering example above ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Extras are a bane,

but with price comparison they are becoming more and more common in civvie street. things like insurance and air tickets.

but for me I steer clear of the ryanair girls and see the ones with one price.

tho i understand anal and watersports being extra.

Edited by Coventrypunter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hate "extras". If she doesn't like doing it she shouldn't do it; and if she does like it she should price herself to fit the service and quality.

There is of course always the exception....... some years ago one of my favourite ports a of call had a nicely printed Menu that started with "massage & HR", and progressed via OWO, straight sex to Anal. Each included the lesser. As the top price was still OK I always took that so we could do what we fancied regardless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hate "extras". If she doesn't like doing it she shouldn't do it; and if she does like it she should price herself to fit the service and quality.

There is of course always the exception....... some years ago one of my favourite ports a of call had a nicely printed Menu that started with "massage & HR", and progressed via OWO, straight sex to Anal. Each included the lesser. As the top price was still OK I always took that so we could do what we fancied regardless.

A couple of years ago a few men complained about all inclusive pricing, said they 'only' wanted oral or hands on and thus thought it unfair they had to pay for 'everything'(although as we know O(or at least OWO) is actually classified as an 'extra' by those who use this type of pricing). Has the tide wind changed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no problems with extras, as long as I'm expecting them and reasonable.

£30 for OWO is excessive, IMO and it is then embarrassing to say no to the quote.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have charge extra for anything not on my 'will do' list. If I don't want to offer it then no amount of money will entice me! I don't do the extras things because it just complicates things and would spoil the flow of a booking if I had to keep stopping a man in his tracks and sending him to his wallet!

As Strawberry said it works the other way too! I get calls saying '...but I don't want full sex' and asking for a discount on my rate. I trot out the line about them 'paying for my time' regardless of what happens!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I only ask that is clear if it is OW or OWO and expect everything else that falls under the "vanilla" tab included in the price. Anal, watersports, photo/filming are perfectly adequate extras as the first one as they all require preparation to be fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i agree that understandable extra's like watersports and a levels are ok but not things that shud be included in the basic package like kissing. I personally like vanilla sex and wudnt be happy with being charged extra for the things i like doing as they are pretty bog standard. If i was interested in a levels or watersports or something similar id understand

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was wondering what the view out there on charging for extras was. I can see both sides of the equation. On the one hand, for the really vanilla guys, it can keep the costs of a punt way down low. On the other hand, it can be tricky working out the final price of your punt and a real turn off if the girl keeps saying "that'll be an extra £xx please". Some services such as anal and watersports are totally understandable as extras in my view as they involve extra prep by the WG. It's the charging for other services, especially by stealth, that sometimes gets my goat. I suppose I am OK with the girls who are upfront about extras on their profiles, but 9 times out of ten, I'll scroll on by because to me it sends out a message that the punt might be one long session of totting up the final bill. One gorgeous EE girl near me is currently listing anal, CIM, fingering, pix, movies, prostate massage, watersports, prostate massage, receiving rimming and giving rimming as chargeable extras !! Although she starts at a very reasonable £80/ hour including OWO and kissing, if one were keen enough to opt for all of her extras, it would rack the price of the hour up to £280. Admittedly, the client would be a busy boy, but what the hey. Mind you, charging £20 for fingering is a new one on me. Daft as it may sound, if she simply advertised the vanilla service at £80 and had the rest of her services not listed, I would probably go and see her despite the zero feedback. That long list of extras puts me off big time though. Am I the only one ? Finally though, a big bugbear of mine is the hidden extra. I got let down by a late cancellation of a punt last week. Stuck in an unfamiliar part of the country, I began to think about a Plan B. So I texted one likely looking lady at £80/hour as her profile asked clients not to call or email. She responded very promptly and was available. If I'd been thinking with the lower part of my anatomy, I would have popped round straight away. However, I persevered with the texts and eventually discovered that the base price only included protected sex. OWO was £20 extra, kissing was £20 extra and RO was £20 extra. Total price would be £140, still within my budget but a whole heap more than advertised. To be honest, the whole exchange put me right off and I declined. Spent the evening watching the football in a bar instead. If she had offered an all in package at £140, I would have gone for it. Having to wheedle the final price out of her by a series of texts drove me away. Unadvertised extras suck! If I am not alone in detesting them, do the girls who do it (or more likely their pimps in the case of the EE ladies I suppose) not realise how much repeat business they are missing out on? Views ? Finally, any odd extras anyone has found to go with my fingering example above ?
One all-in price for the services i require is what i look for, in my experience Extras soon mount up in comparison to a set fee. I agree it might suit vanilla punters but i am not one usually. I always very carefully and clearly seek confirmation of prices, if i turn up and its a larger amount than agreed its always because the SP has lied to me, which is thankfully rare. The ideal for me is to pay for a WGs time and within the services she offers punt as much as i can manage in that time with no talk of extras. I have found some WGs ask for a tip, i am quite happy to give one, usually saying i dont tip those that ask for a tip. I sometimes tip a great regular which in my view is fully deserved. As to an odd extra, £10 for using the WGs toilet, i declined and left.:) Edited by smiths

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i agree that understandable extra's like watersports and a levels are ok but not things that shud be included in the basic package like kissing. I personally like vanilla sex and wudnt be happy with being charged extra for the things i like doing as they are pretty bog standard. If i was interested in a levels or watersports or something similar id understand

ive never paid for an extra tho, ever. Perhaps i might just so that i can say ive done it lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have found some WGs ask for a tip, i am quite happy to give one, usually saying i dont tip those that ask for a tip. I sometimes tip a great regular which in my view is fully deserved. :)

This surprises me! I must remember that when you get round to me! 'Mr Smiths, I was very good, may I have a large tip please?'

Isn't it really cheeky to ask for a tip, surely most men would refuse, or do they do it so they don't look tight?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This surprises me! I must remember that when you get round to me! 'Mr Smiths, I was very good, may I have a large tip please?'

Isn't it really cheeky to ask for a tip, surely most men would refuse, or do they do it so they don't look tight?

I read smiths post to mean that he doesn't tip when he is asked for one Lydia. I thoroughly agree that anyone asking for one should get short shrift. Tips should be offered for good service, not for being requested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This surprises me! I must remember that when you get round to me! 'Mr Smiths, I was very good, may I have a large tip please?'

Isn't it really cheeky to ask for a tip, surely most men would refuse, or do they do it so they don't look tight?

You read my post wrongly Lydia. Basically i dont tip those asking for a tip, but i give them a tip not to ask. ;):D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read smiths post to mean that he doesn't tip when he is asked for one Lydia. I thoroughly agree that anyone asking for one should get short shrift. Tips should be offered for good service, not for being requested.

Correct Kantos. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple of years ago a few men complained about all inclusive pricing, said they 'only' wanted oral or hands on and thus thought it unfair they had to pay for 'everything'(although as we know O(or at least OWO) is actually classified as an 'extra' by those who use this type of pricing). Has the tide wind changed?

No change in my way of punting since I got the different ways of working sussed.

There is lots of argument about the usage and shades of meaning in the different words used for WGs but I am looking to experience the woman (or the aspects she choses to display professionally), in my little mind the word "escort" encapsulates this experience. That's what I pay for, what we do is down to the mood of the day

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You read my post wrongly Lydia. Basically i dont tip those asking for a tip, but i give them a tip not to ask. ;):D

Oh I seeeeeee!!!! I'm not a morning person, too early for me to spot a pun!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also in many circumstances, the extras go 100% to the girl and no cut to others.

Well that's the impression that I've got.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be easier if all extras were advertised in the first place

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I prefer all inclusive. Upselling will lose you business. I understand charging extra for the more risque jollies but not cim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0