Student S

Serious Question - Do Men (in Your Opinion) Like The Girls Who Advertise Who Show Everything?

66 posts in this topic

There is a lady on the other site who I am sure is lovely and I do not judge (how could I doing this?!) but shows photos of her face and private bits in really explicit positions, come all over her and with other men (and multiple)...

Does this attract some men? It must do as she evidently does a lot of work....does it not put you off to see "the goods" in such detail beforehand?

Or is this a selling point?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I prefer the pictures where the lady is sufficiently dressed to leave scope for the imagination. I once ran a thread on another forum on the topic of dressed versus undressed, with slightly mixed results but certainly a majority for dressed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The same stories go, it depend on individual taste and mood of the day, do you want a PSE or a GFE experience?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it does nothing for me at all. Like conwy I would much rather see photos of the lady dressed as long as it gives a good impression of her shape, maybe a few lingerie shots but I don't need to see anything explicit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like most services, I'd imagine WGs tailor their advertising according to the market they wish to attract. Is that the case, Student S?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you're spot on Grendel. I would not see a lady who showed herself giving BJ or being fucked. I don't mind fairly clear tit, fanny and bum shots however, may as well see what you're going there for. But in a soft porn sort of way, and with some clothed/undie shots as well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that with pictures, less is more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a lady on the other site who I am sure is lovely and I do not judge (how could I doing this?!) but shows photos of her face and private bits in really explicit positions, come all over her and with other men (and multiple)...

Does this attract some men? It must do as she evidently does a lot of work....does it not put you off to see "the goods" in such detail beforehand?

Or is this a selling point?

Yes blatant is always best for me, open leg pictures and seeing the WG fully naked is ideal. However, i dont exclude those that dont show everything, i wish to increase my options, not limit them. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No I hate that - in fact - I would more likely choose some girl dressed in her civvie clothes - jeans and shirt or pulloever/blouse - 1 shot only of her standing showing her face and shape of body - that's all i need to know - arses/tits/fannies etc - it would be nice to keep it secret until the meeting.

I HATE tarty explicit pictures but sadly that's what you get in 99% of cases as I suppose few guys like a bit of subtlety in this game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or is this a selling point?

It is a selling point if you consider that the purple site is a location for guys in different market segments, who may each be looking for things which are not always the same.

Some blokes may be looking for an escort to book (and think that paying for pics is nuts when there is free stuff on the Net), while other guys may be happy paying for porn (and think that paying for sex is crazy). If you can get guys on one side of the fence to cross over to the other, then bingo, you're in the money, so the rude and crude stuff will have been worthwhile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Flashing the gash, sucking a cock, showing a hard cock ramming in to a ladies pussy sells.

All profiles and pictures appeal to someone out there, what one bloke looks for the next will not.

Know your own USP, and stick to it I say.

Lucy :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No I hate that - in fact - I would more likely choose some girl dressed in her civvie clothes - jeans and shirt or pulloever/blouse - 1 shot only of her standing showing her face and shape of body - that's all i need to know - arses/tits/fannies etc - it would be nice to keep it secret until the meeting.

I HATE tarty explicit pictures but sadly that's what you get in 99% of cases as I suppose few guys like a bit of subtlety in this game.

wot eeh sed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a lady on the other site who I am sure is lovely and I do not judge (how could I doing this?!) but shows photos of her face and private bits in really explicit positions, come all over her and with other men (and multiple)...

Does this attract some men? It must do as she evidently does a lot of work....does it not put you off to see "the goods" in such detail beforehand?

Or is this a selling point?

What I am about to say is purely my own prejudices and opinions, but that's all you can rely on when judging someone on a profile pic.

I enjoy the GFE so I look for WG's I perceive to be quite sensual, sophisticated, educated/cultured and interesting to me. Because that is what I personally would hope to see in a real GF. My prejudices tell me that a girl who is not concerned about showing her face on an escort website, is probably not going to meet the above criteria. I'm aware I may well miss out on some great experiences because of this and it's not a hard and fast rule I apply, just a gut feeling factor.

I think there is a distinction between Erotica (E.g Girl on her own, photos of breasts and bum) and something much more Pornographic (Like you stated, cum on her, explicit up close vagina, penetration etc etc.)

I would be infinitely more likely to book a WG using tasteful erotic photos than those with explicit porn like shots, also I am well aware that escorts see a lot of men but I dont particularly need to be reminded of the fact that the mouth I'm going to be kissing is full of some other guys semen in the photo's (I know it's illogical).

This also carries through to the wording of the profile, if a girls opening line is "SUPER HORNY, COME F*** ME!" or similar, big turn off for me.

This is just what I personally see as "good signs" when I view a profile, I'm sure I can't be the only one either. Just because a "rival" escort is showing everything in her gallery, doesn't mean you need to in order to compete. You can occupy different niches and do just as well in my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a lady on the other site who I am sure is lovely and I do not judge (how could I doing this?!) but shows photos of her face and private bits in really explicit positions, come all over her and with other men (and multiple)...

Does this attract some men? It must do as she evidently does a lot of work....does it not put you off to see "the goods" in such detail beforehand?

Or is this a selling point?

No. An ad that consists only of some pierced flaps does not attract me. I like well taken well lit photos with without the heavy hand of photoshop..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No I hate that - in fact - I would more likely choose some girl dressed in her civvie clothes - jeans and shirt or pulloever/blouse - 1 shot only of her standing showing her face and shape of body - that's all i need to know - arses/tits/fannies etc - it would be nice to keep it secret until the meeting.

I HATE tarty explicit pictures but sadly that's what you get in 99% of cases as I suppose few guys like a bit of subtlety in this game.

I wish more girls would dress like that when you go to see them - street clothes and minimal make up rather than down market lingerie and strange orange lipstick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pics in lingerie are a nice compromise between being fully clothed and having "come all over her".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish more girls would dress like that when you go to see them - street clothes and minimal make up rather than down market lingerie and strange orange lipstick.

Then why not ask for that? I'm sure many girls would be happy to oblige.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Being more likely to be bewitched by a face I'll admit liking faces. The other stuff doesn't do anything for me but I can fall for just a pretty face.

I understand the reasons for not showing but I won't lie and say I don't get attracted to faces.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In some respects, I prefer a girl who leaves nothing to the imagination (in a classy way) and who is not afraid to show her face (or at least covers / blurs her eyes) since there have been girls I have been interested in that upon further observation (either via new pictures or unlocking her private gallery) had some off-putting physical aspects about them (enough to ruin a punt / be an erection-killer for me) I would have otherwise been ignorant of until the money was already paid and we were both naked.

That does not mean I avoid girls who are clothed (either casual, sexy, classy or tasteful) or are partially clothed enough to leave things to the imagination and can understand why quite a few girls prefer pictures that leave a air of mystery about them out of desiring privacy, it is just that from my limitied pov I sort of perceive girls who leave nothing to the imagination as being more "open" in a way that I can almost imagine her saying "this is me, take it or leave it" even if it is unjustified, since at the end of the day everything is dependent on her having good-feedback showing that her photos are accurate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks gents, some great comments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont mind either way to be honest but as long as they photos are a true reflection of what I am meeting I am happy :P

you can shove the photoshopped ones up your .......... :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing - I think an ad does need at least one full figure photo - chancing on an ad where the lady was fully clothed in all the shots has lead me to make some errors- is she fully dressed because she's classy? Or because her boobs are lobsided and she has about 50 tattoos of footballers and hells angels covering her skin?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A variety of pics from fully clothed to naked is best. Any parts covered up in profile pics makes me think they have something to hide, pussy/eyes/face excepted, nice to see these too, but I can understand that protecting identity and dignity is desirable.

Anything with another guy's cock or spunk would be off-putting, but if she wants to flash her gash, I won't complain unless it looks like the Dartford Tunnel! :blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive also noticed some girls use quite 'hardcore' pics to advertise their services....nothing against it, their choice but maybe lacking in class ? At the other end of the spectrum fully clothed pics are a waste of time , for me anyway.I need to see shots of their body to decide if she takes my fancy but there isnt a need for any close-up's of their 'regions' :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now