kembo

Failings Of Escort Feedback

47 posts in this topic

As I'm sure most of you will appreciate, positive feedback for an escort doesn't necessarily count for much. I believe most punters, myself included, will tend to give a glowing report of an escort with very, if any, negative feedback. I haven't had one punt yet that was 100% perfect, yet I've certainly not listed any of my negative feelings when I've given feedback. That's not to say that I've not wanted to, but somehow I'm unable to find it within me to write negative things.

Judging by most feedback on the purple site I'm willing to bet that most of us feel the same: we certainly have nice things to say about the escort but we find ourselves unable to be completely honest and forthcoming about the time spent with her.

For example a typical comment such as:

"A fantastic time with a lovely sexy lady."

If we were honest perhaps should have been:

"Had a good time but she was a little heavier than her photos and facial looks didn't live up to my expectations. She said she does french kissing but it was more like pecking of lips. Still she gave a decent blow job and let me fuck her, so it was alright I guess."

I've been with a few escorts that had 100+ positive raving feedback but the experience didn't live up to the expectations given by so many glowing reports. So either I have very high expectations or a lot of people are unable to write how they truly feel.

Is it because we're too polite? Or that we're afraid we'll somehow be blacklisted by all future escorts? Or that we don't want to hurt someone's feelings?

I find myself wishing that the feedback on the purple site was invisible to the escorts and that all comments would show up as anonymous, rather than be linked to the punter. What punter would write something negative/honest if they know it is linked to them and can result in negative feedback in return?

Indeed, I heard a story today of one escort who basically bribed her customers in to giving her good feedback. She was a pretty below average escort, by the sounds of things, that offered her customers money off in exchange for good comments and them writing that she offered services that she never did.

So I've devised my own set of feedback questions that would be anonymous, answered truthfully and I suspect would be more beneficial judging by how hit and miss some profiles and feedback can be:

1) Was she the same girl advertised in the profile?

2) How close would you say the escort was to her advertised age? a) Pretty close b ) A few years older c) wrong decade

3) How did you feel when you first got to see her face (presuming it wasn't shown in profile)? a) Ohh baby come to daddy b: disappointed but not a deal breaker c) run for the hills!

4) Did her body match her profile photos? a) Yes b: The camera may have been a little flattering c) bait and switch-tastic?

5) How warm and welcoming was she? a) I was putty in her hands b: Her mind was somewhere else c) I was putty under her foot.

6) Did you want the sex to... a) go on forever b: feel a little more intimate and passionate c) stop. Just make it stop!

7) When you left the escort's apartment, did you a) beg her to let you back in for more b: try to quash the "value for money?" voice in your head c) not leave the shower for three days straight.

Have I missed anything?

Edit: replaced b ) with b: to avoid this stupid smiley face B)

Edited by kembo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I agree. Though recently only give good feedback if I have a mindblowing time.

I did get stung with one lady - she looked well older than her pics and I left her good fb - only to get neutraled.

Good fb means she's not a rip off scammer - it does not necessarily testify to the quality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree with Kembo from my perspective.

Hopefully people know me enough here to see I am honest in my posts and thoughts, when they don't always make me popular, I'm sure. I can honestly say I take that view into any feedback.

In some ways I did and do think I should only offer feedback if the escort allows it, so I do think it polite to ask if the lady allows a report or feedback, but I remember mentioning this and most replies said I should do it regardless.

So far I can say all three of my reports have been genuine, I've mentioned highs, lows, mistakes and been quite detailed. Perhaps I'm lucky, easily pleased or done good research etc, but I can equally say the three ladies have been terrific. However, if things did go badly I think I would say that because it is a journey I'm on, good and bad.

It isn't my style to go out the way to be nasty to people or overly personal, and I wouldn't take that approach but I would look at positives and negatives.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can recall last year getting a message off another escort asking why I had given such good feedback on one gentleman that I had seen three times.

He had done 3 good feedbacks and a review on me.

She said she found him repulsive and that I should not make up good feedback!

Now this guy with me was just darn great.

I have only twice not left feedback, not as they were horrible guys and bad in anyway.

It was that I could not recommended them to others as they were planks of wood.

As to the comment about a lady bribing guys to write nice things about her by money off next time.......more fool the guys to play a game like that!

Lucy :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All feedback does is tell you what someone else felt was an appropriate comment about their time with a WG.

It can't tell us what a new client will experience, nor the flaws they chose to ignore out of diplomacy, or perceived insignificance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I only leave feed-back on the purple site, it means i had an average to middle-ing time. :unsure: Sorry, Southerners, Blunt Yorkshireman speaking :blink:

If I had a really good time with her, I take the time and trouble to write a full Field Report on the lady either on the Purple Site ( usually where I found her in the first place ), or more occasionally on here, as being a Dense Old Man, I find this site more difficult to access for the purpose of doing so :angry:

The last one I tried to leave on here seems to have disappeared into cyber-space, or is it just me being a D.O.M ( lol ) ?

Jack :ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I'm sure most of you will appreciate, positive feedback for an escort doesn't necessarily count for much. I believe most punters, myself included, will tend to give a glowing report of an escort with very, if any, negative feedback. I haven't had one punt yet that was 100% perfect, yet I've certainly not listed any of my negative feelings when I've given feedback. That's not to say that I've not wanted to, but somehow I'm unable to find it within me to write negative things.

Judging by most feedback on the purple site I'm willing to bet that most of us feel the same: we certainly have nice things to say about the escort but we find ourselves unable to be completely honest and forthcoming about the time spent with her.

For example a typical comment such as:

"A fantastic time with a lovely sexy lady."

If we were honest perhaps should have been:

"Had a good time but she was a little heavier than her photos and facial looks didn't live up to my expectations. She said she does french kissing but it was more like pecking of lips. Still she gave a decent blow job and let me fuck her, so it was alright I guess."

I've been with a few escorts that had 100+ positive raving feedback but the experience didn't live up to the expectations given by so many glowing reports. So either I have very high expectations or a lot of people are unable to write how they truly feel.

Is it because we're too polite? Or that we're afraid we'll somehow be blacklisted by all future escorts? Or that we don't want to hurt someone's feelings?

I find myself wishing that the feedback on the purple site was invisible to the escorts and that all comments would show up as anonymous, rather than be linked to the punter. What punter would write something negative/honest if they know it is linked to them and can result in negative feedback in return?

Indeed, I heard a story today of one escort who basically bribed her customers in to giving her good feedback. She was a pretty below average escort, by the sounds of things, that offered her customers money off in exchange for good comments and them writing that she offered services that she never did.

So I've devised my own set of feedback questions that would be anonymous, answered truthfully and I suspect would be more beneficial judging by how hit and miss some profiles and feedback can be:

1) Was she the same girl advertised in the profile?

2) How close would you say the escort was to her advertised age? a) Pretty close b ) A few years older c) wrong decade

3) How did you feel when you first got to see her face (presuming it wasn't shown in profile)? a) Ohh baby come to daddy b: disappointed but not a deal breaker c) run for the hills!

4) Did her body match her profile photos? a) Yes b: The camera may have been a little flattering c) bait and switch-tastic?

5) How warm and welcoming was she? a) I was putty in her hands b: Her mind was somewhere else c) I was putty under her foot.

6) Did you want the sex to... a) go on forever b: feel a little more intimate and passionate c) stop. Just make it stop!

7) When you left the escort's apartment, did you a) beg her to let you back in for more b: try to quash the "value for money?" voice in your head c) not leave the shower for three days straight.

Have I missed anything?

Edit: replaced b ) with b: to avoid this stupid smiley face :cool:

A good list there. Did she actually offer the services advertised and then listing them so others are aware i think is essential, it is to me anyway. Did she try to charge extra that what was not mentioned when enquiring and booking is another thing i find happens on ocassion. Its factual information like this and your points here that are important. The i wont go into details or ones where it goes into minute detail about every sexual act are not of interest to me.

The main failing with feedback is the punt overall is of course subjective to the punter giving it. I recommended a WG on a thread a while back and after he had punted with this WG i got an irate PM from a punter telling me he didnt fancy her and i owed him the cost of the punt, off was the second word of my reply to him. Fucking cheek of the man. There are few guarantees in punting, at least factual information assuming its true of course can help.

Is the feedback genuine and not from the SP or someone linked to them is another point, as is is negative feedback genuine or by a rival SP or another with a grudge against a SP. The other site has more holes in it than a string vest and i personally dont believe any feedback from a punter i dont know, it might or might not be true but i have no idea. On here a few SPs look well dodgy to my eyes, the Agency A Beautiful Amore for one which other posters have also said similar. A punter i have no reason to doubt said he was told he would get £20 off his next party with Gentlemens Parties if he gave them a positive FR and told them his nick so they could see it up online. I thought this was against the rules, i understood a discount can be offered to do a FR that is good or bad, not just good. These dishonest SPs undermine the credibility of feedback in my view, assuming they are definitely dishonest obviously.

Edited by smiths

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You really do have to take feedback and FRs for what they are, totally unsubstantiated and subjective plus flawed as in the OP's words. However if there are a large number of positive feedbacks and FRs I generally take it as a good sign.

My worst experience was a lady with several good punternet FRs and I found her to be bloody awful, not just a one-off bad punt but really nothing like the described lady in my opinion at least. I submitted a negative, but kind I hope, FR then have since read in amazement several more glowing reports. Funny old world

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the feedback on ** is only useful in terms of ensuring a girl is genuine and who she says she is. I think the fakes are easy to spot- multiple feedback from the same person or remarkable similarities in mis spellings or phases used that indicates the same person is writing them using different log ins.

I think Kembo (the OP) has it in a nutshell, even if a booking is fine, but not mind blowing it's easier to say she was lovely rather than be a bit insulting and say 'it was ok, but not great'. I do sometimes cringe when men have described me as beautiful, I know I have my appeal to men, but I'm pretty sure I'm not actually beautiful and it makes me think one day someone will say, 'but I read you were a beautiful stunner, what happened?!'

It works both ways incidentally, I have read feedback about clients I have seen that have said things like 'Gorgeous sexy hot man who drove me wild with lust'' whereas in reality they have just been fairly ordinary chaps who have nothing wrong with them at all, clean, polite and nice but not an Adonis by anyone's judgement. And this is fine because as long as they are clean and polite and not timewasters I am happy!

Also, there is only a limited number of characters you can put on an ** feedback so you're never going to get a lot of detail!

Of course there is an element of 'chemistry' that makes a good booking and we all have different tastes. One man's curvy Reubenesque is another man's podgy heffalump!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A good list there. Did she actually offer the services advertised and then listing them so others are aware i think is essential, it is to me anyway. Did she try to charge extra that what was not mentioned when enquiring and booking is another thing i find happens on ocassion. Its factual information like this and your points here that are important. The i wont go into details or ones where it goes into minute detail about every sexual act are not of interest to me.

The main failing with feedback is the punt overall is of course subjective to the punter giving it. I recommended a WG on a thread a while back and after he had punted with this WG i got an irate PM from a punter telling me he didnt fancy her and i owed him the cost of the punt, off was the second word of my reply to him. Fucking cheek of the man. There are few guarantees in punting, at least factual information assuming its true of course can help.

Is the feedback genuine and not from the SP or someone linked to them is another point, as is is negative feedback genuine or by a rival SP or another with a grudge against a SP. The other site has more holes in it than a string vest and i personally dont believe any feedback from a punter i dont know, it might or might not be true but i have no idea. On here a few SPs look well dodgy to my eyes, the Agency A Beautiful Amore for one which other posters have also said similar. A punter i have no reason to doubt said he was told he would get £20 off his next party with Gentlemens Parties if he gave them a positive FR and told them his nick so they could see it up online. I thought this was against the rules, i understood a discount can be offered to do a FR that is good or bad, not just good. These dishonest SPs undermine the credibility of feedback in my view, assuming they are definitely dishonest obviously.

Gentlemens' Parties offered me a £30 discount to write a good FR for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed - to me, feedback is only really useful to weed out the fakes and WGs who are trying to rip people off. When judging a new profile, I find it a comfort to see familiar names in her feedback from people you know punt in the same area as you ( even if you've not met them).

I must admit, I do write good feedback as a matter of course on the other site so long as the punt wasn't awful. It's a bit sad, but if I want a return visit at some point, I think leaving good feedback is more likely to ensure the lady in question is well disposed and friendly towards you, less concerned with going over time etc. It's a bit like tipping well in a bar to help get good service the next time you go there :)

However, on this board I am more blunt about what I think of a particular girl (I use a different name to on the other site too). If someone PMs me, I am generally even blunter about the gory details. Just my opinion, but I think this is the place for those more honest discussions, rather than purple site feedback

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that there are quite a lot of negative FR's on Punternet though so they are not all positive.

I agree with LondonLydia though. I too have been described as a Scandinavian Goddess by a very established reviewer and if anything it sets the bar way too high and it is difficult to live up to as I am just an average gal. So of course if somebody comes along and expects to find a stunning model they are going to be disappointed. I am a size 12 which to some is a BBW and to others slim, so it is all in the eyes of the beholder really.

I think writing fair reviews are better unless of course the meet was a huge deception or really bad. Though I do think if you had a habit of writing slightly negative things and it is accessible for girls you want to book in the future, that could perhaps mean they do now want to take a booking from you because they are worried you will do the same to them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree with the OP

I'm as honest as I can be with my reviews and while I've had fun poked at me for my tendency to be overly effusive, thats because thats exactly how I feel/felt about certain girls and the consistently wonderful sessions I have/had with them.

Conversely, I'm just as frank when it comes to negative reviews too

I was initially moved to attempt to post my first FR on PNET due to an experience involving particularly bad service and a particularly bad SP, but this never made it onto the boards for whatever reason

I post good and bad and equally candid reviews on the sites of agencies I use also, all of which have been published on the sites.

I'd also very much disagree with the OP in respect of the usefulness of FRs, which for me have significantly made the whole process of deciding whether or not to book a particular girl a whole lot easier, and far less of a 'hit n miss' affair

I would add though that the standard, unimaginative, cliched and incredibly dull 'As a gentleman I wont go into detail' type FRs are pretty worthless and as soon as I read a sentence even vaguely similar to this within any review, I immediately switch off and mentally send the offending report to the 'trash box'.

Edited by BillGoldberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too have been described as a Scandinavian Goddess by a very established reviewer and if anything it sets the bar way too high and it is difficult to live up to as I am just an average gal. So of course if somebody comes along and expects to find a stunning model they are going to be disappointed. I am a size 12 which to some is a BBW and to others slim, so it is all in the eyes of the beholder really.

I'd expect a Scandinavian Goddess to be life-sized. Goddesses are Goddesses because of what they do, not just their looks.

Seeing the best in the every-day makes people happy. I think it's more realistic than idolising airbrushed toothpicks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the feedback on ** is only useful in terms of ensuring a girl is genuine and who she says she is. I think the fakes are easy to spot- multiple feedback from the same person or remarkable similarities in mis spellings or phases used that indicates the same person is writing them using different log ins.

I think Kembo (the OP) has it in a nutshell, even if a booking is fine, but not mind blowing it's easier to say she was lovely rather than be a bit insulting and say 'it was ok, but not great'. I do sometimes cringe when men have described me as beautiful, I know I have my appeal to men, but I'm pretty sure I'm not actually beautiful and it makes me think one day someone will say, 'but I read you were a beautiful stunner, what happened?!'

It works both ways incidentally, I have read feedback about clients I have seen that have said things like 'Gorgeous sexy hot man who drove me wild with lust'' whereas in reality they have just been fairly ordinary chaps who have nothing wrong with them at all, clean, polite and nice but not an Adonis by anyone's judgement. And this is fine because as long as they are clean and polite and not timewasters I am happy!

Also, there is only a limited number of characters you can put on an ** feedback so you're never going to get a lot of detail!

Of course there is an element of 'chemistry' that makes a good booking and we all have different tastes. One man's curvy Reubenesque is another man's podgy heffalump!

Some great points in this post Lydia.

The space you get in an awork feedback window is tiny, so it is hard to get in a full review that covers both positive and negative points. The best you can do is to summarise an overall impression of the meeting, which if positive, leaves no room for any minor criticisms.

When I read the feedback on myself as a punter, I cringe. I genuinely don't recognise myself. I am indeed one of those ordinary, clean, polite chaps you describe above. To read my feedback, you'd expect a combination of David Beckham and Peter North !!!

What I do find is that the few really poor punts I have had from that site, have all been made over the telephone and there has been no booking request made to leave negative feedback against.

I tend to treat feedback on that site as a trend rather than gospel. If a lady has dozens of positive feedbacks and no negatives, then I am likely to have a good time and have few qualms in booking. If there are more than a small handful of negatives, or the feedback is hidden, I steer well clear. Zero feedback usually means either a new starter or an EE girl who moves/is moved around a lot. I occasionally take a "punt" on these, but more often than not am disappointed. This works well for me.

Finally, as has been pointed out several times, what works for one chap/lady, might not work for the rest. I know from experience that my definition of pretty is different from many other guys. When I read reviews of ladies on here, I always mentally edit out the "looks stunning/plain" comments and concentrate on the descriptions of the servive provided. I can make my own mind up from her photos as to whether I fancy her and anyway, attitude, friendliness and good service are far more important on a punt to me than model type looks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree with the OP

I'm as honest as I can be with my reviews and while I've had fun poked at me for my tendency to be overly effusive, thats because thats exactly how I feel/felt about certain girls and the consistently wonderful sessions I have/had with them.

Conversely, I'm just as frank when it comes to negative reviews too

I was initially moved to attempt to post my first FR on PNET due to an experience involving particularly bad service and a particularly bad SP, but this never made it onto the boards for whatever reason

I post good and bad and equally candid reviews on the sites of agencies I use also, all of which have been published on the sites.

I'd also very much disagree with the OP in respect of the usefulness of FRs, which for me have significantly made the whole process of deciding whether or not to book a particular girl a whole lot easier, and far less of a 'hit n miss' affair

I would add though that the standard, unimaginative, cliched and incredibly dull 'As a gentleman I wont go into detail' type FRs are pretty worthless and as soon as I read a sentence even vaguely similar to this within any review, I immediately switch off and mentally send the offending report to the 'trash box'.

I think OP raised discussion here regarding Feedback on Purple site, not Fields report and reviews on Punternet or other sites, which is completely different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd expect a Scandinavian Goddess to be life-sized. Goddesses are Goddesses because of what they do, not just their looks.

Seeing the best in the every-day makes people happy. I think it's more realistic than idolising airbrushed toothpicks!

Fairpoint Lara, I always give good reports if I have a had a great time and a not so good if bad, I think it helps the agencies decide whether to keep the girls on or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All feedback does is tell you what someone else felt was an appropriate comment about their time with a WG.

It can't tell us what a new client will experience, nor the flaws they chose to ignore out of diplomacy, or perceived insignificance.

Spot on there Lara.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am totally honest reviewing on a site like C69, but on ** there is no point.

If it is average I don't bother, there is no point misleading anyone and being selfish I don't want the negative feedback that generally comes back to negative reviewers. if it's a good meeting then I do leave feedback - probably about 50% of the bookings I have had.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the feedback on ** is only useful in terms of ensuring a girl is genuine and who she says she is. I think the fakes are easy to spot- multiple feedback from the same person or remarkable similarities in mis spellings or phases used that indicates the same person is writing them using different log ins.

Very true, but not necessarily so. Month or so ago, I seen guy, and prior arranging booking of course I looked on his feedback. (he got almost 40 and all of them from escort meeting, not from Cams).

According to his feedback he was an absolute and utter Sex God! I was a bit suspicious about it, because most of all his

was written in the very similar style. Hardly any Caps in the beginning on the sentence, few words are similarly mis-spelt, and there were always "xxx" at the end. or x x x (with spaces). There were few other clues, which gave away it was written by the same person.

I was surprised when this client turned up. He was a great guy, and I did genuinely enjoyed meeting with him. However when I gently "poked" him about his feedback, he straight away admitted that majority of the girls he never seen, and the owner of the "agency", which is his very good friend was written feedback on her girls, under his profile, and of course she and himself was writing feedback on him from theirs profiles.

He did said that he seen few other girls also, which are nothing to do with his friend's agency. Which of course its true, because he did see me after all! I did admired his innocent honesty. but I was quite surprised that he told be about it, especially on the first meeting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kantos, you can always leave feedback even if there's no booking made and confirmed

I think the most useful purple feedback you can leave if you want to be positive is to confirm that the lady's profile is accurate. That's really what we ant to know isn't it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kantos, you can always leave feedback even if there's no booking made and confirmed

No you can not. You need to put booking through the system first to able to do it. If booking was confirmed then you can submit feedback. If it was deleted or ignored, FB still can be accepted but without "negatve" or "positive" statement.

I

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are the countless out there that leave fake feedback but to my mind the worst ones are those who are genuine punters who leave misleading feedback either because they think it is gentlemanly to be vague but say nice thing about a lady or punters who confuse paid sex with romance.

If you are going to write FR then for god sake be objective and write something, at a level of detail, that is useful to other potential customers. No need to disclose information over and above what the lady publishes but a clear confirmation of that information will suffice. Avoid writing love stories as no-one is really interested in listening to the delusional ranting of others.

To my mind, good FRs also separate factual information from what is personal preference.

The system of feedback on the other site is flawed as a negative feedback on a lady results in almost guaranteed reciprocal negative comment. I don't use the site that often but when I do, as a rule I thumb, I avoid those with many positive feedback.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for starting this interesting thread as this is something that has been on my mind for some time, as someone who is new to the punting scene. I wanted to increase my profile on the other site and I decided to seek escorts with glowing feedback so that I could get feedback on my profile. With the first her body was not as it appeared on the pictures and she was not as well presented as in her pictures also. But because I had made the booking via the purple site system I was in a difficult place as if I had walked I would get negative feedback from her and as someone without any feedback this would have not been a good start. I went along with it and when I decided to write my feedback for her I was as factual as possible (“good communication when making booking and provides services as per her profile”) but did not included the negatives. With the second escort I had the same problems of presentation in addition to demeanour and she gladly took my positive feedback but gave me none in return. From the two I learned that positive feedback on the purple site has to be taken with a pinch of salt.

All in all what I've learned thus far from my experiences on the purple site is that my chosen hobby is somewhat rife with deceptive service providers (mainly on the purple site), therefore this forum and field reports are of great importance for a punter who is seeking Quality in Quantity. The good thing about field report is that they are not linked to a punter getting negative feedback for being honest and the same applies to this forum. I wish I had found out about field report and this forum earlier.

However, one also has to do good research with field reports as some providers have both negative and positive but some will only provide you with the good. This was the experience I had when having to choose my first party provider. The choice was between the party provider in Bow and the party provider in Lancaster Gate. Due to the Bow provider having field reports on their website and the one in Lancaster Gate having none, I was sucked in by the good filed reports for the Bow provider without realising that the Bow provider had been selective in the field reports shown on their site. Despite this and when I also had the choose between the party provider in Baron’s Court and party provider in Lancaster Gate I still made the same fundamental mistake of taking website reviews as being truth. Anyway I think I’ve learned much in less than a year of punting and I’m sure these things will help me enjoy my hobby more in the future. I like your list and will surely make use of it. Many Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now