Kayak

Field Report Hipocrisy - A Rant

25 posts in this topic

What is the point of honestly reviewing a working lady, if your field report can be easily removed because the lady didn't like the fact that you gave her a negative review?

I've just found that one of my f/r's has been removed because the lady requested it's removal. Yes, I did give her a negative review, but it was honest, and I wouldn't have said anything unkind or slanderous. After all, I'm sure that it wouldn't have been put up if I had said anything ridiculous.

I checked the purple site, and the lady is still working in the area, but under a new name. Feel free to PM me if you want details of at least one lady you'll regret paying to see in Slough. :angry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That means she will now be on the "No Reports" list, so she will not be able to benefit from anyone that might (unlikely though it sounds) write a positive FR on her.

AFAIK you could still say who it is on a thread though.

Edited by Vin DaLoo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That means she will now be on the "No Reports" list, so she will not be able to benefit from anyone that might (unlikely though it sounds) write a positive FR on her.

AFAIK you could still say who it is on a thread though.

Yes, but she will be on the no reports list under her old name. She's reinvented herself (still has the same pics on her profile though), so anyone can report on her under her new persona. She already has a feedback score of 14 on the purple site, so I don't buy the fact that she simply didn't wish to be reported on, she just didn't like having a negative field report on this board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but she will be on the no reports list under her old name. She's reinvented herself (still has the same pics on her profile though), so anyone can report on her under her new persona. She already has a feedback score of 14 on the purple site, so I don't buy the fact that she simply didn't wish to be reported on, she just didn't like having a negative field report on this board.

Might be worth PMing Galahad informing him that she has changed her name but still working under another explaining your experience with her. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AFAIK you could still say who it is on a thread though.

I could, but I've already complained to Galahad, (or the mods who preside over field report issues), so I probably run the risk of being banned and having this thread miraculously dissolve into the ether if I don't hold my toungue and wait for the mods to respond to my complaint.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be worth PMing Galahad informing him that she has changed her name but still working under another explaining your experience with her. :)

Cheers Smiths - done!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could, but I've already complained to Galahad, (or the mods who preside over field report issues), so I probably run the risk of being banned and having this thread miraculously dissolve into the ether if I don't hold my toungue and wait for the mods to respond to my complaint.

Only Galahad presides over FRs mate. I see no reason you would get banned for naming and shaming, you received bad service and this is a punting forum where you can give positive or negative feedback if you so wish. In your case you have also got an established posting history which helps with your credibility in my view, a member for over 3 years. :)

Edited by smiths

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only Galahad presides over FRs mate. I see no reason you would get banned for naming and shaming, you received bad service and this is a punting forum where you can give positive or negative feedback if you so wish. In your case you have also got an established posting history which helps with your credibility in my view, a member for over 3 years. :)

Weeelll...

Her name used to be "Sarah Jane", but now she calls herself "Margaret Longford", and she has an incall base in the Slough/Langley area. See you on the other side of this post, (or maybe not! :P:D )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The lady in question has chosen to go on the NR list, that means no reports good or bad. That is the only way to be fair. I cannot keep reports online about someone against their wishes, even though in this case the negative report seems to be well deserved.

This may be stating the obvious, but it should be automatically assumed that anyone who advertises solely on that other site is either not what they appear, or does not provide what they offer, or both. You have given us yet another example of that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The lady in question has chosen to go on the NR list, that means no reports good or bad. That is the only way to be fair. I cannot keep reports online about someone against their wishes, even though in this case the negative report seems to be well deserved.

This may be stating the obvious, but it should be automatically assumed that anyone who advertises solely on that other site is either not what they appear, or does not provide what they offer, or both. You have given us yet another example of that.

Thanks G.

I might have disagreed with you at another time, but I've had nothing but trouble from providers from the other site so far this year :o . Actually, I had a tremendously good experience yesterday, (not from the purple site though). Field report submitted and awaiting approval!

Edited by Kayak

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks G.

I might have disagreed with you at another time, but I've had nothing but trouble from providers from the other site so far this year :o . Actually, I had a tremendously good experience yesterday, (not from the purple site though). Field report submitted and awaiting approval!

And welcome to the other side. ;):D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you do raise an interesting point though - if she now changes her name from (in fr terms) sarah of slough to margaret of slough she could now begin to garner reports on here again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She has Henry Hoover pictures in her private gallery. :o I'm not going to pay to find out what she's doing to the poor innocent wee red guy, but I am tempted to report her to the RSPCH. :blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only Galahad presides over FRs ....

Thankyou Smiths. It's funny how many times that has to be repeated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She has Henry Hoover pictures in her private gallery. :o I'm not going to pay to find out what she's doing to the poor innocent wee red guy, but I am tempted to report her to the RSPCH. :blink:

I haven't seen the pics in her private gallery, but I can attest to the fact (as I did in my initial field report) that the pics in her free gallery and those on her profile page are not genuine pics of her either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Henry has been a loyal and trusted companion for many years now, so I am saddened to learn of his maltreatment at the hands of this 'lady'. Hang tight Henry...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She has Henry Hoover pictures in her private gallery. :o I'm not going to pay to find out what she's doing to the poor innocent wee red guy, but I am tempted to report her to the RSPCH. :blink:

Henry has been a loyal and trusted companion for many years now, so I am saddened to learn of his maltreatment at the hands of this 'lady'. Hang tight Henry...

I've just had a look at the name of the pics in her private gallery: - "sexy ironing pics" :blink: ; "close up of electrical device" :unsure: ; "glass electrode in gloved hand" :eek: ? She really is a wind up merchant!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's good we have the forum to name and shame as 'Margaret' was on my hot list but thanks to this I can save myself time and money. I also thought it odd she has a blog post which talks about customers being covertly filmed!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou Smiths. It's funny how many times that has to be repeated.

I am surprised you say that as the users of this forum must be an ever-changing population and new readers would not necessarily have the first idea how FRs are operated - and not be looking to find out the intricacies.

Also, I am surprised G hasn't chosen to bring in other people to check FRs simply to release him from such a time commitment, although I realise people have said there is an auto-approval system in operation for appropriate reporters.

So I think it's not that surprising other than to people fully involved in the workings of Punternet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just had another field report rejected, due to the establishment being "on the no reports list". The lady in question was called "Gracie", from English Roses in Walton on Thames, and it was truly dismal. Highly NOT recommended.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think the "no reports list" should be more visible in light of some of the comments here as this would allow the client to do more detailed research?

I honestly cannot find the list, do i have to be logged in to view it? Why can it not be a big link by the search form open for all to view?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think the "no reports list" should be more visible in light of some of the comments here as this would allow the client to do more detailed research?

I honestly cannot find the list, do i have to be logged in to view it? Why can it not be a big link by the search form open for all to view?

The list is not public to view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just had another field report rejected, due to the establishment being "on the no reports list". The lady in question was called "Gracie", from English Roses in Walton on Thames, and it was truly dismal. Highly NOT recommended.

Is this after the establishment owner - Danielle - said the girl had been sacked?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She has Henry Hoover pictures in her private gallery. :o I'm not going to pay to find out what she's doing to the poor innocent wee red guy, but I am tempted to report her to the RSPCH. :blink:

Snigger snigger, hang tough Henry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this after the establishment owner - Danielle - said the girl had been sacked?

Hi im the Danielle you have quoted in your post may I just say I work at English roses in walton I am not the owner. We are all independant escorts.

Danielle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now