prelox

New To Using Escorts

15 posts in this topic

I am new to using escorts or "working girls" i have used 2 from **.com one hungarian lady aged 32 and a korean girl aged 21, i only chose them cos they were dirt cheap and within 25 mins walking distance,they were both ugly ,they didnt have face pics but half body shots, the hungarian lady had a very nice backside and was affectionate lots of kisses and giggling no clock watching but i would not reccomend either of these 2 i can provide names if you want to avoid them. Are there any sites that provide genuine pics of escorts and unbiased reviews? there are so many fakes and i stay away from cheap agency girls , just looking at some of the ads on ** you can clearly see which ones are forced, im looking for girls in london

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unbiased reviews you will find on this site. A handful of fakes notwithstanding.

Genuine photos are to be found on most independent sites and many agencies. Genuine unblurred face pictures, for obvious reasons, less so.

Best thing to do is cross-check your shortlist with the reports here and opinion on this very discussion board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unbiased reviews you will find on this site. A handful of fakes notwithstanding.

All reports here are the opinion of one person and therefore biased in one way or another.

The received wisdom seems to be that the reports here are more reliable, though given that no-one has actually posted any facts and figures about it means that it's just opinion again.

I've found the best way to find a good punt is to go with your gut. The only times I've had bad punt are when I've ignored the little voice in the back of my head that gives me doubts. I tend not to look at reports here because lining them up with the girls out there is just too much of a pain in the arse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All reports here are the opinion of one person and therefore biased in one way or another.

The received wisdom seems to be that the reports here are more reliable, though given that no-one has actually posted any facts and figures about it means that it's just opinion again.

I've found the best way to find a good punt is to go with your gut. The only times I've had bad punt are when I've ignored the little voice in the back of my head that gives me doubts. I tend not to look at reports here because lining them up with the girls out there is just too much of a pain in the arse.

gotta disagree on those two Tibbs - no offence, some reviews are certainly not biased (mine are though) by that I mean some people are straight enough to give factual reviews of what the lady offered as is and how so without volunteering their opinion compared to others or the emotions/sensations it brought to them ...pics accurate, clean safe place, delivers all activities on likes list etc ...mileage may vary but that's not to say it's biased (is it?)

going with your gut while flying in the face of bad or non existent feedback is surely counter the punternet mantra research, research, research? it's a gamble at the best of times and your gut may be right on occasion but at the very least you can rule out a good few or limit your risk/losses by going for feedback or recommendations first ...at least till your gut is as honed as Tibbs'

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Imagine that you're a germophobic OCD sufferer and I'm a typical male student. I visit a WG and describe her flat as 'clean and tidy'. Do you think OCD you would agree?

My definition of a luxury flat now is totally different to how I would have described it 15 years ago.

Is a friendly girl one who is chatty, or one who is affectionate? In your opinion does she need to be both?

Everything people write in FRs are governed by their own frame of reference. Someone from Moss Side is more likely to describe an area as 'safe' when compared to someone who lives on Park Lane.

Just remember - everyone who drives faster than you is a maniac, and everyone who drives slower than you is an idiot...

When I say go with your gut I don't mean guess. I mean read everything, ALL the reports & feedback as well as her profile and photos and through it all you can get an overall sense of the person you're likely to see.

I saw a WG once who was utterly stunning, but when she got here it was obvious she totally didn't want to be doing the job. I had doubts when I booked her. When I looked at her photos again I realised what I had missed - in her photos the expression I had taken in my horniness as sultry, was actually just resignation.

Edited by Tibbs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am new to using escorts or "working girls" i have used 2 from **.com one hungarian lady aged 32 and a korean girl aged 21, i only chose them cos they were dirt cheap and within 25 mins walking distance,they were both ugly ,they didnt have face pics but half body shots, the hungarian lady had a very nice backside and was affectionate lots of kisses and giggling no clock watching but i would not reccomend either of these 2 i can provide names if you want to avoid them. Are there any sites that provide genuine pics of escorts and unbiased reviews? there are so many fakes and i stay away from cheap agency girls , just looking at some of the ads on ** you can clearly see which ones are forced, im looking for girls in london

This "man" sounds like truly delightful company.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am new to using escorts or "working girls" i have used 2 from **.com one hungarian lady aged 32 and a korean girl aged 21, i only chose them cos they were dirt cheap and within 25 mins walking distance,they were both ugly ,they didnt have face pics but half body shots, the hungarian lady had a very nice backside and was affectionate lots of kisses and giggling no clock watching but i would not reccomend either of these 2 i can provide names if you want to avoid them. Are there any sites that provide genuine pics of escorts and unbiased reviews? there are so many fakes and i stay away from cheap agency girls , just looking at some of the ads on ** you can clearly see which ones are forced, im looking for girls in london

Do more research. Don't 'use' wg's.

Edited by Thepacifist

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am new to using escorts or "working girls" i have used 2 from **.com one hungarian lady aged 32 and a korean girl aged 21, i only chose them cos they were dirt cheap and within 25 mins walking distance,they were both ugly ,they didnt have face pics but half body shots, the hungarian lady had a very nice backside and was affectionate lots of kisses and giggling no clock watching but i would not reccomend either of these 2 i can provide names if you want to avoid them. Are there any sites that provide genuine pics of escorts and unbiased reviews? there are so many fakes and i stay away from cheap agency girls , just looking at some of the ads on ** you can clearly see which ones are forced, im looking for girls in london

Over 4 years to make your first post, you have presumably been thinking about punting for a long time then. I happily use the other site myself and how you know as fact by looking at a profile which women are forced is a remarkable skill, i assume you share this remarkable skill with the police so they can help these forced women.

Back in the real world i cant tell by looking at profiles, how can you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"lara" i am speaking my mind, ugly is ugly so why hide it by being being nice and sensetive? to avoid hurting the WG feelings? you should look at some of the negative FRs, and smiths i dont kno what to say if i see a profile of a smiling bubbly gal in a clean flat im more likely to choose her, some of the profiles you can clearly see forced smiles and dirty bedsits which to me is a sign of being forced

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"lara" i am speaking my mind, ugly is ugly so why hide it by being being nice and sensetive? to avoid hurting the WG feelings? you should look at some of the negative FRs, and smiths i dont kno what to say if i see a profile of a smiling bubbly gal in a clean flat im more likely to choose her, some of the profiles you can clearly see forced smiles and dirty bedsits which to me is a sign of being forced

The point is wouldnt you think the person if they had half a brain cell forcing a woman knows that taking and then posting up forced smiles in dirty bedsits might lead to a lack of punters.

I havent experienced what you have here and thought WGs had forced smiles and dirty bedsits means its a sign of being forced, your observation and perception skills are beyond mine, and i have been punting with WGs off that site for many years and looked at very many profiles but havent reached the conclusion you have.

In my experience its impossible to know for certain by looking at a profile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The point is wouldnt you think the person if they had half a brain cell forcing a woman knows that taking and then posting up forced smiles in dirty bedsits might lead to a lack of punters.

I havent experienced what you have here and thought WGs had forced smiles and dirty bedsits means its a sign of being forced, your observation and perception skills are beyond mine, and i have been punting with WGs off that site for many years and looked at very many profiles but havent reached the conclusion you have.

In my experience its impossible to know for certain by looking at a profile.

You beat me to it, but I would have added that the local vice unit would have solved the forced smiles and dirty bedsit years ago by joining the purple site!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

prelox, "using" is a very ugly term to use in relation to working girls. You might 'visit', 'see', 'encounter', 'enjoy', or ,experience, a WG or any of a dozen other terms but dont 'use' them, they are human beings not things. And I suspect Lara's objection to your post was more to do with your use of that term than your describing the women you saw as "ugly" (though I doubt that helped).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

prelox, "using" is a very ugly term to use in relation to working girls. You might 'visit', 'see', 'encounter', 'enjoy', or ,experience, a WG or any of a dozen other terms but dont 'use' them, they are human beings not things. And I suspect Lara's objection to your post was more to do with your use of that term than your describing the women you saw as "ugly" (though I doubt that helped).

+ 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just do your research before making a decision. Check reviews on here and use common sense. If the profile of the girl seems fake/ not what it seems, then it probably is. Also, the tendancy to be dissapointed comes from women who charge dirty cheap rates. Save up and spend that extra bit on a girl that's worth it. i'm sure the people on here will be happy to help you with advice etc re: this. They are all very friendly and helpful!

All the best

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the help, in future i will spend a minimum of £80 im just angry that i met 2 bad/ fake escorts and this has put me of for a while which is not a bad thing, any suggestions of sites you can PM me ( london girls)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now