Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
brikyboy

Air Brushed Photos

37 posts in this topic

What do clients think of girls photos with overdone airbrushing?

Vanessa of MKE is a good example:-

http://www.miltonkeynesescorts.com/escort-girl.php?girlid=416

The photo set looks almost cartoon like. No one looks like that in real life.

I'm guessing she is pretty fit so there is no need for it.

I don't mind a bit of retouching here and there but personally I'd rather see photos that look real.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally agree with you on this brikyboy, I definately prefer the girls to post non photoshopped pics on their profiles. However, Im sure that in Vanessas case that she is indeed a little cracker and 100% fit. I havnt got first hand knowledge of this, as of yet, but she is definately on my 'to do' list. I would refer you to Lamoraks recent postings to explain my reasonings on this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vanessa has professional pictures, like most girls she has invested her hard earned money in a good photographer. Saying her pictures are cartoon like is ridiculous as her pictures are no more airbrushed than most girls on most sites who have professional pictures...in fact she is a whole lot less than some girls on some websites...and it helps that she is actually the girl in the picture which at least you know is a guarantee at MKE. The problem for girls is that its impossible to keep everyone happy, yes some prefer a couple of little snaps taken on their mates camera but that doesnt make a girl stand out from the crowd when she is in a gallery withe 30 or 40 other girls. Professional pictures do this simply because of the sharpness of colour and the sets in the background. When girls send me snaps of themselves there is always something undesirable in the background, an open door to the toilet, a pile of washing, a very messy bed etc, once even a child reflected in the mirror. Vanessa is a personal fitness instructor and extremely fit and toned...above that even...she gives an excellent service, so yes buddyboy, she is definatley a little cracker.

Edited by Chloe MKEscorts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What do clients think of girls photos with overdone airbrushing?

Vanessa of MKE is a good example:-

http://www.miltonkey....php?girlid=416

The photo set looks almost cartoon like. No one looks like that in real life.

I'm guessing she is pretty fit so there is no need for it.

I don't mind a bit of retouching here and there but personally I'd rather see photos that look real.

Yes she does and she is as fit as they come, so you'd better make sure you have had your weetabix if you book to see her!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vanessa has professional pictures, like most girls she has invested her hard earned money in a good photographer. Saying her pictures are cartoon like is ridiculous as her pictures are no more airbrushed than most girls on most sites who have professional pictures...in fact she is a whole lot less than some girls on some websites...and it helps that she is actually the girl in the picture which at least you know is a guarantee at MKE. The problem for girls is that its impossible to keep everyone happy, yes some prefer a couple of little snaps taken on their mates camera but that doesnt make a girl stand out from the crowd when she is in a gallery withe 30 or 40 other girls. Professional pictures do this simply because of the sharpness of colour and the sets in the background. When girls send me snaps of themselves there is always something undesirable in the background, an open door to the toilet, a pile of washing, a very messy bed etc, once even a child reflected in the mirror. Vanessa is a personal fitness instructor and extremely fit and toned...above that even...she gives an excellent service, so yes buddyboy, she is definatley a little cracker.

Sorry to disagree on this one Chloe, but as a photographer myself, although I think Vanessas photographs look great in terms of lighting, background, poses etc. I still think the retouching is WAY overdone. Your reply seems to imply that I'm having a go at Vanessa in some way. That's absolutely not the case. I'm not even having a go at the photographer - I just think he needs to reduce the airbrushing and make the photos look more realistic. Maybe I'm just too fussy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I'd much rather have photo's that tell the real story. Take Sara (Li) of MKE/AB she is not the same shape as in the photos on the website and her ass is MUCH different. So it can be a bit of a let down when you meet as I did with this girl last week. At the least it affects your ability to recommend MKE and AB when you feel misled.

I'm not saying this girl is not the one in the photo but I've got some cacking photos of when I was 25 good looking and slim. How things change when your 50 bald and fat BUT I'M THE SAME BLOKE AS IN THE PHOTO!!!!!!!

Explain to me how a professional photo that is not airbrushed does not keep everybody happy? What you see is what you get - simples

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to disagree on this one Chloe, but as a photographer myself, although I think Vanessas photographs look great in terms of lighting, background, poses etc. I still think the retouching is WAY overdone. Your reply seems to imply that I'm having a go at Vanessa in some way. That's absolutely not the case. I'm not even having a go at the photographer - I just think he needs to reduce the airbrushing and make the photos look more realistic. Maybe I'm just too fussy.

Hi, no I didnt think you were having a go at Vanessa or MKE, I was just putting a point of view aross thats all and attempting to discuss the issue of your post. I understand that a lot of guys dont trust photos nowadays which is why we offer a walk in service so that you can come and meet the girl and then decide if you still want to spend some times with her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I'd much rather have photo's that tell the real story. Take Sara (Li) of MKE/AB she is not the same shape as in the photos on the website and her ass is MUCH different. So it can be a bit of a let down when you meet as I did with this girl last week. At the least it affects your ability to recommend MKE and AB when you feel misled.

I'm not saying this girl is not the one in the photo but I've got some cacking photos of when I was 25 good looking and slim. How things change when your 50 bald and fat BUT I'M THE SAME BLOKE AS IN THE PHOTO!!!!!!!

Explain to me how a professional photo that is not airbrushed does not keep everybody happy? What you see is what you get - simples

Its getting a bit over the top now that you keep banging on that Sara is older than her pictures suggest. She is not. I understand that you were pissed off that the bookings you made fell through on the day and rather than call it a day you chose other girls instead, fair enough, thats your perogative but at the end of the day I have seen Saras ass wiggling around a lot more than you and I see no difference in her ass in the pictures size and shape wise than on the real girl. I also know that the attire Sara walked into the room wearing would have clearly displayed her ass as I know the style of clothing she wears to work and you could at that moment have said that you didnt want to see her but you chose to carry on and then moan about her. Often in the past when this situation has happened the guy is not happy with the girl he is with as he had built up his expectations on the girl or girls he has pre booked and is already feeling disappointed when his last minute choice walks into the room. I am sorry that your booking with Jade fell through, she has only let me down twice ever in over a year of working for me so is one of the most reliable girls out there but its not fair to take it out on Sara in this way.

Edited by Chloe MKEscorts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm talking here about airbrushing and its affect on punters. I am stating my opinion. Just to keep it objective:- I believe that the pictures of the girl mentioned were airbrushed enough to cause me to be misled as to the shape of the girl I was to meet? No names as this could get out of hand an I want to stay on thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm talking here about airbrushing and its affect on punters. I am stating my opinion. Just to keep it objective:- I believe that the pictures of the girl mentioned were airbrushed enough to cause me to be misled as to the shape of the girl I was to meet? No names as this could get out of hand an I want to stay on thread.

What shape are you looking for?

I expect that the girls wish they could airbrush some of the punters they have to see.

Perhaps they should have a 'ladies choose day' once a year.

The punter arrives, he look's at the girls, make his choice and then the girl chosen has the option to say 'no thanks, your': (girl selects applicable) 'overweight, uncooth, smelly, bad breath, etc, so not today, choose another girl'. And then the next girl he chooses has the same option.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What do clients think of girls photos with overdone airbrushing?

Vanessa of MKE is a good example:-

http://www.miltonkey....php?girlid=416

The photo set looks almost cartoon like. No one looks like that in real life.

I'm guessing she is pretty fit so there is no need for it.

I don't mind a bit of retouching here and there but personally I'd rather see photos that look real.

Totally agree, especially with the first 2 pictures. They do look ridiculous imo.

I expect that the girls wish they could airbrush some of the punters they have to see.

I expect you're right but the fact is that the punters are paying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What shape are you looking for?

I expect that the girls wish they could airbrush some of the punters they have to see.

Perhaps they should have a 'ladies choose day' once a year.

The punter arrives, he look's at the girls, make his choice and then the girl chosen has the option to say 'no thanks, your': (girl selects applicable) 'overweight, uncooth, smelly, bad breath, etc, so not today, choose another girl'. And then the next girl he chooses has the same option.

Correct, but it's your crisp £20s that ensure you (and all of us) don't get rejected! ;):)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What do clients think of girls photos with overdone airbrushing?

Vanessa of MKE is a good example:-

http://www.miltonkey....php?girlid=416

The photo set looks almost cartoon like. No one looks like that in real life.

I'm guessing she is pretty fit so there is no need for it.

I don't mind a bit of retouching here and there but personally I'd rather see photos that look real.

I don't personally think the retouching that has been done is overstated.

I have never met the girl, but from the look of the first picture you can clearly see the skin wrinkle in the bend of her arm, also the lines on the elbow under her breast, and where the hip meets the leg, and on her neck.

I think what you are getting at is that the photographer has smoothed the skin, I know from personal experience with the photographer I use that my skin looks more 'glossy' if that would be the right term, than it did in the untouched photo, but that doesn't mean I have my pictures airbrushed to a large extent because I don't and never have done as I don't like it.

I remember in one particular shoot I leaned my ass against the wall and turned side on, now before the picture was edited I looked like I had a massive bubble butt which I don't have so the photographer pushed it in, to be more in proportion to what my body actually looks like when you meet me, but if I had posted the un-edited shot on my site I would have been accused of mis-leading or not the same girl in the picture, but that un-edited shot was exactly me on that day in that particular pose, it just looked odd because of the angle and lights so my ass looked larger than it was in RL, so should I then have put the un-photoshopped picture up and been branded a fake or otherwise, or do what I did and allowed my photographer to do his job and do what I paid him for?

Answer is I had the photo re-touched/photoshopped etc, because it needed to be done in order to represent the more RL version of myself that a client books.

Her skin has been smoothed over and not by much I would say, as when you mess about with it too much you end up with no real characteristics on the picture, and those are still there.

I know several ladies who's skin looks like that in RL, and better in some cases, and since you haven't met her can you really say if her skin is that smooth?

Btw smoothing over a few cellulite dimples is not a crime, and it makes the ladies feel a lot more confident, no girl wants to look un-pretty or feel like the guy booking her is checking out the dimples on her ass from cellulite, and no matter how fit and sexy the girl there will always be one.

But then we don't judge you on yours either :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What shape are you looking for?

I expect that the girls wish they could airbrush some of the punters they have to see.

Perhaps they should have a 'ladies choose day' once a year.

The punter arrives, he look's at the girls, make his choice and then the girl chosen has the option to say 'no thanks, your': (girl selects applicable) 'overweight, uncooth, smelly, bad breath, etc, so not today, choose another girl'. And then the next girl he chooses has the same option.

I daresay some WGs do think this on occassion, however a WG doesnt "have" to see anyone she doesnt wish to unless being forced, its her free choice, if that bothered she has the choice to say no. As has been pointed out its the punter that is paying of course, only if the WGs were doing the paying to the punters on this fantasy "ladies choose a day" once a year would it be relevant to my mind. For some of us at least punting isnt dating, what i look like isnt relevant, thats why i am paying so my looks arent the point. The point is being clean, respectful having the agreed cash, in exchange for her offering me an honest good or better service. Honest including accurate up to date photos of what the WG looks like now.

Air brushed photos are endemic in punting sadly, i just want to see an accurate photo of the WG i will be punting with, that is certainly not too much to ask, if a WG doesnt look like her photos upon meeting she risks me at least walking if i dont fancy the real her, and then informing other punters. Honesty is always the best policy in these days of punting sites in my opinion. In reality i rarely walk due to photos, its bad attitude immediately or not actually offering the services the WG confirmed were definitely on offer on the phone when i confirm them with her in person, basically getting me their by lying and relying on me staying thinking with my dick anyway. Fortunately this is also rare overall and most WGs want my return custom so offer whats been agreed.

Edited by smiths

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Retouching is endemic in our society unfortunately, I haven't retouched any of mine so far as I am what I am in these pics, if you don't like it then you're free to walk away. :)

If I had a pro doing them, then I'd expect them to retouch - but that's something that has always gone on, way before digital, you strive for perfection so edit the photos to achieve it.

Edited by London Pin Up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd prefer to see pics that show the honest truth, a bit of smoothing is acceptable to ease the lady's body-image sensibilities but if someone looks like a plastic Barbie doll it puts me right off booking her because it becomes impossible to quantify how different she will be from the pics.

How does the girl feel when she sees the punter's face drop when he meets her in the flesh because she looks nothing like as good as her retouched pics?? What if he walks?? That's a lot of wasted effort for nothing!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I expect that the girls wish they could airbrush some of the punters they have to see.

Perhaps they should have a 'ladies choose day' once a year.

The punter arrives, he look's at the girls, make his choice and then the girl chosen has the option to say 'no thanks, your': (girl selects applicable) 'overweight, uncooth, smelly, bad breath, etc, so not today, choose another girl'. And then the next girl he chooses has the same option.

When I posted this, I couldn't find a smiley for........

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.....'said with tongue in cheek'

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd prefer to see pics that show the honest truth, a bit of smoothing is acceptable to ease the lady's body-image sensibilities but if someone looks like a plastic Barbie doll it puts me right off booking her because it becomes impossible to quantify how different she will be from the pics.

How does the girl feel when she sees the punter's face drop when he meets her in the flesh because she looks nothing like as good as her retouched pics?? What if he walks?? That's a lot of wasted effort for nothing!

The only thing that dropped when I saw Vanessa 'in the flesh' was my jaw.

Another part of my body did the opposite!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vanessa now has new pictures and I think anyone who has met her would agree..they look just like her

Edited by Chloe MKEscorts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vanessa now has new pictures and I think anyone who has met her would agree..they look just like her

then she must be a honey....another goes top of my list!

Edited by dt1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I'd rather see a few pictures of a girl that 'may' have had a little bit of retouching done as opposed to booking to see a girl and then finding out that the pictures weren't even her at all.

Recently I was looking through various photographers sites on behalf of a friend who'd like some photos done and the prices I saw quoted only included minimal 'touching up' on maybe two to four out of maybe thirty or forty pics

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too prefer amateur photos. I'd assume these professional photos are more preferable when drawing in the new punters. It's not really an issue of whether the proportions are as they are in real life, the real problem for me is not being able to judge a girl's skin complexion both in tone and general appearance.

I can vouch for Vanessa's appearance though :wub:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vanessa now has new pictures and I think anyone who has met her would agree..they look just like her

Yes indeed - I think they look much better.

Marks out of 10? I'd give her one ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm talking here about airbrushing and its affect on punters. I am stating my opinion. Just to keep it objective:- I believe that the pictures of the girl mentioned were airbrushed enough to cause me to be misled as to the shape of the girl I was to meet? No names as this could get out of hand an I want to stay on thread.

I agree, its one thing to post a flattering picture with soft lighting etc but another to substantially enhance the figure with airbrushing. With rare exceptions, I'm usually disappointed at MKE / ABE (not that this issue is unique to them at all). With experience I've learned to manage my expectations but still its hard not to feel misled. To Chloe's point that a walk-in service is available, its a shame to have to come all the way and meet a girl first just to verify whether she actually does have a great booty when more honest pictures would save the trouble - and the discomfort of rejecting her if she doesn't meet expectation. But still, I'm grateful that the walk-in is offered and I'm never disappointed by the lovely personalities of the girls and the quality of service.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no discomfort in our walk in system. You do not tell the girl to her face if you want to see her or not. I come in afterwards and then ask you , if you want to leave then you do so without any kind of walk of shame past the girls.

As covered in other threads to great length, if we tell the girls they cannot use the pictures they have usually spent several hundred pounds on they will probably just not bother coming to milton keynes at all so there will not be the fantastic choice that there is now. I personally know all my girls and I know that there are god knows how many guys out there who would not have had the fantastic punts they have had if these girls had not bothered coming. As I said, covered at great extent on the other mk threads so Im ducking out now.

Edited by Chloe MKEscorts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0