Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
pythagoras

Sign Of The Times?

19 posts in this topic

Was trawling through another site to see what is on offer in a western suburb of London.

Surprised to see an advert with wording as follows (extract):

".... happily married but have come under some financial hardship ....doing it purely for the money.

... 5 clients per month to cover mortgage .... husband in next room for security .... husband not happy with arrangement

.... reluctantly agrees .... no GFE .... no kissing on lips .... 15 minutes £150 30 minutes £150 ....."

Perhaps some guys like this kind of situation, however, too expensive and wouldn't be comfortable with hubby next door, potential thread .....

Also a Q&A:

Q. Can I pay extra for your husband to watch? A. NO! absolutely not, he will be in the next room only for my safety not your benefit

Sign of the times I suppose!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, all I can say to that is hope that the lights are not dimmed to much for you to end up in the wrong room....now that would be interesting lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I begin with the assumption that everything on any profile, whether on the purple site, an agency site or an independent site, is considered and written with a purpose. This lady may be deliberately marketing herself to guys who like the idea of cuckolding a reluctant husband or exploiting a lady who doesn't really want to be doing what she is doing. Alternatively, she may be protecting herself by publishing the idea of a seething husband in the next room that she can then use against any client who steps out of line or, indeed, it may be setting up a con where the client visits, hands over the money, and then the husband comes in declaring he can't take it any more and forces the punter out of the house. The very last possibility that would enter my mind is that her profile gives a factual account of her situation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems to me she is telling you exactly where you stand, or about to lie! :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was trawling through another site to see what is on offer in a western suburb of London.

Surprised to see an advert with wording as follows (extract):

".... happily married but have come under some financial hardship ....doing it purely for the money.

... 5 clients per month to cover mortgage .... husband in next room for security .... husband not happy with arrangement

.... reluctantly agrees .... no GFE .... no kissing on lips .... 15 minutes £150 30 minutes £150 ....."

Perhaps some guys like this kind of situation, however, too expensive and wouldn't be comfortable with hubby next door, potential thread .....

Also a Q&A:

Q. Can I pay extra for your husband to watch? A. NO! absolutely not, he will be in the next room only for my safety not your benefit

Sign of the times I suppose!

The bit about the husband not approving but being on the premises would ensure i looked elsewhere. I agree with Dan about the cuckolding. Anyway i dont want to know about husbands in the next room and all that shit as i see it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The bit about the husband not approving but being on the premises would ensure i looked elsewhere. I agree with Dan about the cuckolding. Anyway i dont want to know about husbands in the next room and all that shit as i see it.

Quite agree!

Wouldn't touch with a barge pole even if I had one ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems a marketing ploy to me, problem is there are enough mug punters prepared to pay the daft money she wants.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, its an unusual marketing ploy... In this climate, the rates, the fact most men would not want to encounter pissed off husband or less than enthusiastic women I can't see it working!

Yes the cuckold thing has it's place but if that's your bag you get onto non paid for swinging circles!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I begin with the assumption that everything on any profile, whether on the purple site, an agency site or an independent site, is considered and written with a purpose. This lady may be deliberately marketing herself to guys who like the idea of cuckolding a reluctant husband or exploiting a lady who doesn't really want to be doing what she is doing. Alternatively, she may be protecting herself by publishing the idea of a seething husband in the next room that she can then use against any client who steps out of line or, indeed, it may be setting up a con where the client visits, hands over the money, and then the husband comes in declaring he can't take it any more and forces the punter out of the house. The very last possibility that would enter my mind is that her profile gives a factual account of her situation.

not that such a scenario would interest me, i cant think who would visit this lady, but if this was the case for a lady but it was not advertised, and upon arrival i handed over the money only to be confronted with hubby asking me to leave as he could not take it anymore, i'm afraid he would have alot more to worry about than his wife escorting if he did not give my money back!! And, no, i dont mean i would knock him out, as tempting as it would be to such a con artist, but i would not leave the house, ring the police, and report theft. While i doubt the police would charge him and her for various legal reasons, i am sure the suspicion that would be aroused about the two individuals would put an end to their little scheme, and i dare say the sight of me ringing the police would be enough to get my money back.

My real point here, is that i find it unlikely on an incall clients are in much danger of handing money over only to be asked to leave!! Bait and switch is the far more risky problem on most incalls.

That being said, has annyone had horror stories on incalls?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how enticing!!!!!

we're happily married,hate doing this,only doing it cos things are so tough,pay me lots of money with minimum physical contact(no kissing)...and hubbies in next room with the right arsehole that some other guys f*cking his other half.

The following song is dedicated to the punter known as Pythagoras-

Ace has left the building.

Edited by Ace ventura punt detective

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was trawling through another site to see what is on offer in a western suburb of London.

Surprised to see an advert with wording as follows (extract):

".... happily married but have come under some financial hardship ....doing it purely for the money.

... 5 clients per month to cover mortgage .... husband in next room for security .... husband not happy with arrangement

.... reluctantly agrees .... no GFE .... no kissing on lips .... 15 minutes £150 30 minutes £150 ....."

Perhaps some guys like this kind of situation, however, too expensive and wouldn't be comfortable with hubby next door, potential thread .....

Also a Q&A:

Q. Can I pay extra for your husband to watch? A. NO! absolutely not, he will be in the next room only for my safety not your benefit

Sign of the times I suppose!

How very, very odd!!! I am guessing neither of them are in possession of either emotional intelligence or marketing skills.... !!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is very odd, but could be true also.

If it is true (never mind theirs level of "emotional intiligence or marketing skills"), why her lazy arse of the husband sitting in home and pimping acting as "security" to his wife. He should get a semi-decent work, doing 16 hours a day of hard graft, instead of watching porn in the spare room, while his poor missus entertaining strangers to pay for the mortgage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's one of the more repellent ads I've ever heard of. "doing it purely for the money" is already enough to disqualify her in my books, but especially with a miserable husband in tow whom she's not even enjoying cuckolding... you couldn't pay me to have sex with her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The very last possibility that would enter my mind is that her profile gives a factual account of her situation.

I'm a cynic too, and you could be right. My money would be on it being the literal truth. If it is, it seems like a bad idea for her to say so, just because it sounds like a great way to attract crazies and timewasters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like a load of crap to me! No GFE, no kissing etc and with that weird "hubby in the next room" nonsense. Would any sensible person even think of paying £150 for 30 minutes of that!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps she is going on the assumption that punters are dirty pervs who would love to shag a girl they know doesnt want to be shagged by them. That good old dodgy public perception thing again.

There is also the possibility that she is aiming at the guys who love the thought of her cuckolding her husband or in reality he might be sitting in the other room having a good old wank and listening but doesnt want the guys to know they are performing for her husbands pleasure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Crackers advert on many levels and I just do wonder if under legislation the husband is potentially liable for "controlling for gain" as the wording is so explicit?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

However one could join Hubby afterwards to compare notes and swap techniques. Then the three of you could watch a DVD together, perhaps with a take-away. At the end of the evening, shake hands all round, leave on best of terms.

But who would pay for the take-away?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Crackers advert on many levels and I just do wonder if under legislation the husband is potentially liable for "controlling for gain" as the wording is so explicit?

Not now, as the definition "controlling for gain" from the spouses was changed in the Sexual Offence Act 2003.(S53).

It use to be an offence under the Sexual Offence Act 1956 though. (chapter 69, pr 30). Not anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0