Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Brent Cross

Are Frs Like This Useful?

26 posts in this topic

It would get me interested if I were close to MK. OK, its not all squelchy details, but it seems honest enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I prefer these to fireguards:

http://thechocolated...late-teapot.png

but seriously...... it is a good review and assuming you are referring to the no gory details

section of the report.... then there tends to be 2 camps....men who slaver over reading the

meaty bits and men who are quite happy not to. What she got up to with Loinking may not

be what she gets up to with any other man.

To be noted though....... the reviewer is well experienced... in his own words.... and has only

reviewed this lady...who has a long list of reviews and several of them recent.... so she could

well have impressed him indeed!

This subject has been debated many times but no doubt another healthy one will emanate

from the op's question.

:)

Edited by ADELE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This review gives quite a lot of information, information often omitted from more graphic reviews. It describes her premises, facilities and confirms she is as per her photos. He may not have gone into detail re the bedroom activities, but he's covered quite a bit of ground which some guys will consider essential. She may have other reports which do detail her services, which in combination with this one will give a compete picture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like lots of gory details, but I need basic info. Did she kiss with tongue, was the oral without condom, was it come in mouth, spit or swallow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I only ever hear good things about MK Helen.

I prefer to hear a bit more detail about what services were offered and how they were performed to give me a flavour of the kind of experience on offer.

He's quite descriptive about her and her attitude so not the most useless FR I've read. Maybe he feels she wouldn't appreciate an FR with gynaecological detail and obviously wants to return again to an open welcome.

Edited by venturer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This FR looks good enough for me. Yes, it doesn't go into details, but it made me interested in Helen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

whatever you feel about the FR, have you seen her pics on her site? The ones with her dressed as a secretary like the redhead from Mad Men...wow!

She's a stunner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no problem with this FR. Personally I don't really need all the gory details. There is a link to Helen's web site & her pictures. She looks wonderful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not so bad

It does contain something alluding to the standard, 'i wont go into details, but suffice to say...etc...blah...yaaaawwwnnnn'

At least the review strongly indicates that the wg in question is an exemplary SP of the GFE variety

The only real details omitted, whose inclusion would prove very useful, are whether or not she provides the services as listed on her page

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My own take is that it is as useful as a chocolate fireguard

http://www.punternet...p?recnum=110317

Him saying she is a Courtesan rather than an Escort isnt wording that means anything to me, as its by a first time author on its own it means little to me but Helen is very well reviewed by punters i either know, respect and/or trust so if i was in the area i would punt with her. Details of services would be useful of course.

Edited by smiths

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My view is that each reviewer writes what he feels comfortable with and one should not expect him to go beyond that. I am with the "give the impression but not the precise details" approach, because it avoids the "But you did that with him, why not with me?" pressure on the WG's. All of the WG's I have asked about this issue side with the less graphic approach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i've seen worse,but wouldn't make me want to visit.

maybe too Mills & Boon to be credible,

maybe she wrote it herself.

every time i see the word courtesan i am a little sick in my mouth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i've seen worse,but wouldn't make me want to visit.

maybe too Mills & Boon to be credible,

maybe she wrote it herself.

every time i see the word courtesan i am a little sick in my mouth.

Why would a WG with 81 FRs under this name over three and a half years with just one negative FR making her the 7th most FRd WG on Pnet need to fake a FR. She has been FRd by punters who post on here who have proven track records and her forum feedback that i have read has been very good to excellent.

Edited by smiths

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And look at all the publicity she is getting now! The OPs rather negative post has probably given Helen a good (and its sounds a deserving) boost! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would a WG with 81 FRs under this name over three and a half years with just one negative FR making her the 7th most FRd WG on Pnet need to fake a FR....

my bad,didn't do my research,yup she does look like

a good sp who wouldn't need fake reviews.

i still find this sort of fr too fluffy for me,

but if they choose to write in that style that's their prerogative.

if however the objective of the reviewer in his fr is to thank the woman

and generate future business then he has failed with this punter.

but its all a matter of taste really..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And look at all the publicity she is getting now! The OPs rather negative post has probably given Helen a good (and its sounds a deserving) boost! :)

Lydia, I am sure she is probably good BUT an overgushing FR with no details by a 1st time writer is , to my mind, a waste of time and effort.

BC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But surely it is useful in that it does state that the location is safe and clean with parking, it gives a description of her in relation to her pictures, mentions she is not a clock watcher and delivers a great GFE.

I would have thought that pretty useful, I'm sure if we wanted to pick holes in an FR there are far worse ones out there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But surely it is useful in that it does state that the location is safe and clean with parking, it gives a description of her in relation to her pictures, mentions she is not a clock watcher and delivers a great GFE.

I would have thought that pretty useful, I'm sure if we wanted to pick holes in an FR there are far worse ones out there?

All that information IS useful but for me the FR left a lot to be desired> I am sure there are numerous ones far worse than this especially in the NEGATIVE reports

BC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a bad FR....he left out "Treat her well guys" :lol:

It does provide some good facts, but to say "Gives a good GFE" is meaningless given different punters and different working girls take this to mean different things!! It also depends what kind of girlfriends he's had :lol:

And the comment "Helen is the most erotic, skilful, and sensuous person I have met," is meaningless as we don't know who else he has met!!! Maybe he's a virgin and never been with a girl before :lol: Maybe he has spent his life among truly horrible people and she is only marginally less horrible, making her the nicest by being less bad rather than good :lol:

Edited by partylover

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I say it every time but for some reason people new and old don't give just a short hour or two to searching through all my posts:

The review is written by the punter and it is absolutely up to him what he writes (avoiding any slanderous stuff) and how he writes it. You don't pay him to write FRs and so have no claim on what he writes.

Helen has so many reports there is simply no need and no point complaining publicly about one you don't find that helpful - you should some of the really bad ones some of us have come across - and others find this one useful enough. Just move on!

I am in theory a very good writer and I can produce some simply dreadful FRs; disappointing to me but just tough for them if others think them rubbish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the sort of FR that would inspire me to do more research on the lady if I was in the area. I would not make a booking based on just 1 FR but take them all into consideration

It tells me what I would need to know about the establishment which can be helpful.

Wouldn't it be a shame if we all wrote exactly the same style of report.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading this FR in isolation would not encourage me to make a booking. Stating great GFE, not a clock watcher, looks better than her pictures...etc is true of 90% of my punts. These comments do not in anyway suggest that Helen is an escort I must go and see,although i know differently based on other reports. Each to their own but for newer punters who are nervous about meeting a girl may find these comments useful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like lots of gory details, but I need basic info. Did she kiss with tongue, was the oral without condom, was it come in mouth, spit or swallow.

Agreed.

The report in question isnt the worst I have ever read, but I still largely discounted it as soon as I read it. I'm not looking for the gory details either, but if the services offered are not included in the report I have no interest in reading it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I thought the report was o.k. You don't need all the gorey details IMHO. There is enough in the report to make me want to find out the details for myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0