curry

Higher Risk

37 posts in this topic

Today I get knocked back by a girl who I have seen regular for about three months. Her reason “ I have seen your feedback on ** and I have to protect myself as you have seen other girls” I never do unprotected of any kind. After pissing myself laughing I stopped and thought about this.

So who is the higher risk here? Me who will see 2 or max 3 girls in a 4/6 week period. Or her who will probably see 4/5 men a day. To me the answer is obvious, however my view is biased towards me.

Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, a very odd approach, Unless the girls who you have seen are well known for doing bareback, even if you don't she may decide that it's too high a risk. Silly really cos another man could be sticking his cock all over the place and not have feedback.

Most odd. Or maybe she's in a girlie huff because she thought you only saw her?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I get knocked back by a girl who I have seen regular for about three months. Her reason “ I have seen your feedback on ** and I have to protect myself as you have seen other girls” I never do unprotected of any kind. After pissing myself laughing I stopped and thought about this.

So who is the higher risk here? Me who will see 2 or max 3 girls in a 4/6 week period. Or her who will probably see 4/5 men a day. To me the answer is obvious, however my view is biased towards me.

Thoughts?

I dont get the unprotected comment. Is that because she saw feedback of yours that somehow linked you to a WG who offers BB or a punter that has practised it with a WG who is linked to your feedback or was she assuming you must do it with other WGs. If the former i can understand her view, if the latter then it makes no logical sense, you are a punter of hers not in a relationship. I have posted about a number of WGs getting jealous when i have punted with others at group flats and parlours over the years, it certainly happens.

What it does show either way in my view is a disadvantage to a punter of having any feedback on the net and not punting anonymously. A WG then only has what you tell her to go on. In my case i dont require any feedback to punt, but i am based in London so have plenty of choice and only punt with WGs with phone numbers and have no interest in reverse bookings or anything else that makes it more necessary to have feedback. Hopefully an equally as good or even better WG will come along. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont get the unprotected comment. Is that because she saw feedback of yours that somehow linked you to a WG who offers BB or a punter that has practised it with a WG who is linked to your feedback or was she assuming you must do it with other WGs. If the former i can understand her view, if the latter then it makes no logical sense, you are a punter of hers not in a relationship. I have posted about a number of WGs getting jealous when i have punted with others at group flats and parlours over the years, it certainly happens.

What it does show either way in my view is a disadvantage to a punter of having any feedback on the net and not punting anonymously. A WG then only has what you tell her to go on. In my case i dont require any feedback to punt, but i am based in London so have plenty of choice and only punt with WGs with phone numbers and have no interest in reverse bookings or anything else that makes it more necessary to have feedback. Hopefully an equally as good or even better WG will come along. :)

I agree.

Do girls expect us punters to never punt with anyone but them? Can punters never give feedback on anyone else? Unless the OP has seen BBers then I dont see what the situation really is?

If a WG wanted me to be exclusive to her and her only then she will need to say. Shes seeing anybody who books her so wheres the concern than if a punter has seen someone else. Does she advertise as only seeing punting "virgins"

I think the OP should ask the girl exactly what he did wrong. Ive got feedback on the other site but have steered clear of BB or girls of "concern". But what if one of then suddenly decides to post BB on her profile.......

Theres no "higher risk" if both a careful

Edited by Overworked

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I met a guy last year about eight times in total.

We stopped using the booking system on that site after about three times and as I deemed him a good reliable chap, I would then arrange all meets with him over the phone.

He then told me I was the only one he saw and that he was exclusive to me and would I consider going bare with him

I did not believe that (heard that many times now and I rarely believe it) and of course I said no and told him not to be so silly as I was a sex worker and saw many blokes.

I then went through my old bookings and saw that his feedback number had shot up, I checked his feedback out and clicked on to some of the ladies profiles also, it seemed he had taken a liking to a lady who advertised bare back openly in my area.

Now I have the opinion that anyone can do what the heck they like with who they want as it is not my concern to poke my nose in to their sexual business.

I use condoms for sticking it in and wiggling it about sex but not for oral.

I would not take a booking now off a guy who has a big history of seeing the bare back ladies though.

To the OP.....

Maybe she just wanted you to be exclusive to her, who knows....most strange really.

As Sarah on here always says, its punting not dating.

You seem to of been able to laugh it off though, so that is good.

Lucy :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I get knocked back by a girl who I have seen regular for about three months. Her reason “ I have seen your feedback on ** and I have to protect myself as you have seen other girls” I never do unprotected of any kind. After pissing myself laughing I stopped and thought about this.

So who is the higher risk here? Me who will see 2 or max 3 girls in a 4/6 week period. Or her who will probably see 4/5 men a day. To me the answer is obvious, however my view is biased towards me.

Thoughts?

I am not sure I have a full picture of what you are suggesting.

From what I have understood (hopefully correctly), I suspect the lady thinks you are a 'higher risk' because of acts connected to unprotected sex.

She does not seem to be interested in the other side of the equation nor its validity viz the possibility she may be in fact be a 'higher risk' to you.

QED??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t have any feedback of any girls who offers BB in fact most of them say no to BB in their questions. She kind of implied that she expected met to be exclusive to her from the impression I got however I could have got it wrong.

It does not bother me in the slightest I am free to see whoever I like I guess with my $$.

It just tickled me that she thought she was a lower risk to me than I was to her. And as fellow posters have said she could be seeing guys who have zero feedback but have had and do have a lot of BB sex with working girls. I saw a topic here a short while ago about how to much feedback is bad for you I couldn’t agree more now.

All in all it’s rather amusing I think in a weird kind of way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two of my ladies have said 'You've seen that other Woman, nnnn, haven't you'.

I did find this slightly worrying: I am perfectly entitled to see whom I want. There was no mention of BB in any of my FRs, both ladies say that they don't offer BB in their FAQ and there in mention in any of their FRs.

So, perhaps it is just jealousy? Of a money type, if nothing else?

I did feel slightly uncomfortable in that I had been checked up upon and will think twice about doing another FR on either, even if meetings do occur.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How dare you cheat on her! :o If she said that to me i'd never see her again. I like if they're playful about it, like 'oh, you naughty boy you've been cheating on me' ;) but this girl sounds weird.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How dare you cheat on her! :o If she said that to me i'd never see her again. I like if they're playful about it, like 'oh, you naughty boy you've been cheating on me' ;) but this girl sounds weird.

'Girls'.

They both made similar comments.

Agree with the playful side of things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I get knocked back by a girl who I have seen regular for about three months. Her reason “ I have seen your feedback on ** and I have to protect myself as you have seen other girls” I never do unprotected of any kind. After pissing myself laughing I stopped and thought about this.

So who is the higher risk here? Me who will see 2 or max 3 girls in a 4/6 week period. Or her who will probably see 4/5 men a day. To me the answer is obvious, however my view is biased towards me.

Thoughts?

I don’t have any feedback of any girls who offers BB in fact most of them say no to BB in their questions. She kind of implied that she expected met to be exclusive to her from the impression I got however I could have got it wrong.

It does not bother me in the slightest I am free to see whoever I like I guess with my $$.

It just tickled me that she thought she was a lower risk to me than I was to her. And as fellow posters have said she could be seeing guys who have zero feedback but have had and do have a lot of BB sex with working girls. I saw a topic here a short while ago about how to much feedback is bad for you I couldn’t agree more now.

All in all it’s rather amusing I think in a weird kind of way.

It tickles me that you assume you are not as high risk...and baffles me. We all know all it takes is one...the wrong one...and anyone in this business can catch something. Clients are not above this just because they see less girls than girls see guys. I used to offer uncovered services and if something looked right, it didnt always smell right even after the guy had just had a shower so it wasnt sucked without a condom. They always asked why the condom, I was always honest, no point in fibbing so they will then take an iffy willy onto the next girl, at least if you tell someone you dont think everything is quite right down below they have the chance to get checked out rather than bundle along in ignorant bliss because the other girls they booked were too cowardly to tell them the truth (the old dental work excuse). Sometimes I may have been wrong but better safe than sorry for all of us on that particular guys shagging journey right. Without an exception these guys insisted there was nothing wrong and some got downright shitty that I would imply they should visit the clinic...after all, they are paying for it so its not them who has to worry about catching something was their general opinion...probably the reason half of them possibly did have something. There is a certain arrogance that you come up against in the bedroom, the one described above. One guy actually burst out laughing when after a severe inquisition on when and how often I got tested I turned around and said..so your turn "when were you last tested?"... dont be ridiculous he told me, I only punt once a month and its not me who is the prostitute is it...condom on I immediately thought.

Now this girl I doubt would be too fussed if you saw other ladies, if she checks everyones feedback who books her she must have come to the conclusion that most guys see loads of different girls. Did you actually ask her which of your feedback it was that gave her concerns so you could look and see, perhaps she is being overly cautious, perhaps she knows one of the ladies you have feedback from personally or has known her and knows something about her that the average punter doesnt know. It would have been better to ask, perhaps she knows one of the ladies in your feedback does actually offer bb or USED too in the past despite not actually advertising it, perhaps she worked with one of the ladies in the past and knows she isnt so careful with her sexual health as the punters are lead to believe. Perhaps she knows one of the escorts in your feedback in real life and knows she fucks every tom dick and harry up the local snooker hall every friday night. Perhaps she knows something you wish you had known.

You have to remember that despite the god knows how many sps there are out there, this game is literally a "5 steps to Kevin Bacon" game, its surprising who knows who sometimes. I have had girls walk in on their first day to find their next door neighbour sitting there on the couch, or their neighbours daughter, or their ex boyfriends cousin...see my point.

Also your original question. If she really never offers any uncovered services and you do have uncovered services then you are more at risk despite the lower numbers so long as her version of covered also includes covered oral on her

Edited by Chloe MKEscorts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes, and so long as she offers NO kissing either

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t have any feedback of any girls who offers BB in fact most of them say no to BB in their questions. She kind of implied that she expected met to be exclusive to her from the impression I got however I could have got it wrong.

It does not bother me in the slightest I am free to see whoever I like I guess with my $$.

It just tickled me that she thought she was a lower risk to me than I was to her. And as fellow posters have said she could be seeing guys who have zero feedback but have had and do have a lot of BB sex with working girls. I saw a topic here a short while ago about how to much feedback is bad for you I couldn’t agree more now.

All in all it’s rather amusing I think in a weird kind of way.

Do you get checked out on a regular basis, at least 4 times a year and after you have any unprotected services?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you get checked out on a regular basis, at least 4 times a year and after you have any unprotected services?

Come to think of it, should that question be to ALL punters?

I doubt that many do, especially as many would not consider unprotected Oral a risk, let alone reverse O.

Are you thinking that anyone who punts and receives ANY unprotected service(s) should be tested regularly?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

'Girls'.

They both made similar comments.

Agree with the playful side of things.

I wasn't quoting you..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Come to think of it, should that question be to ALL punters?

I doubt that many do, especially as many would not consider unprotected Oral a risk, let alone reverse O.

Are you thinking that anyone who punts and receives ANY unprotected service(s) should be tested regularly?

Very much so. I know of some who get tested as the health board demonstrates but the amount of those who don't, or think once a year is sufficient or because they're married is mind boggling.

Even though the OWO risks are low, they are there - and stuff still gets passed on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very much so. I know of some who get tested as the health board demonstrates but the amount of those who don't, or think once a year is sufficient or because they're married is mind boggling.

Even though the OWO risks are low, they are there - and stuff still gets passed on.

It would make an interesting poll on here?

Something like

I have unprotected oral when I punt and I get checked at the GUM clinic regularly.

I have unprotected oral when I punt and I don't get checked regularly.

I perform unprotected reverse oral and I get checked at the gum cllinic regularly.

I perform unprotected revers oral, etc.

I have unprotected vaginal sex, etc.

Etc.

I have unprotected anal sex, etc.

Etc.

Thoughts? The latter options might get the post banned, but you know my feelings on that!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Come to think of it, should that question be to ALL punters?

I doubt that many do, especially as many would not consider unprotected Oral a risk, let alone reverse O.

Are you thinking that anyone who punts and receives ANY unprotected service(s) should be tested regularly?

I get tested quartely and partake of OWO but even if i did OW i would still get tested the same, the reason is simple, i am having sexual contact with complete and virtual strangers in punting, if i was shagging around outside punting only i would get tested just the same.

I look after my own sexual health and dont just take the unprovable word of others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It would make an interesting poll on here?

Something like

I have unprotected oral when I punt and I get checked at the GUM clinic regularly.

I have unprotected oral when I punt and I don't get checked regularly.

I perform unprotected reverse oral and I get checked at the gum cllinic regularly.

I perform unprotected revers oral, etc.

I have unprotected vaginal sex, etc.

Etc.

I have unprotected anal sex, etc.

Etc.

Thoughts? The latter options might get the post banned, but you know my feelings on that!

If it were allowed by admin i would advise ensuring it was an anonymous poll. I would also check with admin first that discussing who indulges in BB penetration is ok, i recall a thread being deleted concerning BB not long ago. It doesnt say in the forum rules it cant be discussed but i assume it cant be promoted as a good practice and praised as admin dont wish it to be. FRs cant be done on BB punts of course so clarify with admin is i think a wise move but of course up to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It tickles me that you assume you are not as high risk...and baffles me. We all know all it takes is one...the wrong one...and anyone in this business can catch something. Clients are not above this just because they see less girls than girls see guys. I used to offer uncovered services and if something looked right, it didnt always smell right even after the guy had just had a shower so it wasnt sucked without a condom. They always asked why the condom, I was always honest, no point in fibbing so they will then take an iffy willy onto the next girl, at least if you tell someone you dont think everything is quite right down below they have the chance to get checked out rather than bundle along in ignorant bliss because the other girls they booked were too cowardly to tell them the truth (the old dental work excuse). Sometimes I may have been wrong but better safe than sorry for all of us on that particular guys shagging journey right. Without an exception these guys insisted there was nothing wrong and some got downright shitty that I would imply they should visit the clinic...after all, they are paying for it so its not them who has to worry about catching something was their general opinion...probably the reason half of them possibly did have something. There is a certain arrogance that you come up against in the bedroom, the one described above. One guy actually burst out laughing when after a severe inquisition on when and how often I got tested I turned around and said..so your turn "when were you last tested?"... dont be ridiculous he told me, I only punt once a month and its not me who is the prostitute is it...condom on I immediately thought.

Now this girl I doubt would be too fussed if you saw other ladies, if she checks everyones feedback who books her she must have come to the conclusion that most guys see loads of different girls. Did you actually ask her which of your feedback it was that gave her concerns so you could look and see, perhaps she is being overly cautious, perhaps she knows one of the ladies you have feedback from personally or has known her and knows something about her that the average punter doesnt know. It would have been better to ask, perhaps she knows one of the ladies in your feedback does actually offer bb or USED too in the past despite not actually advertising it, perhaps she worked with one of the ladies in the past and knows she isnt so careful with her sexual health as the punters are lead to believe. Perhaps she knows one of the escorts in your feedback in real life and knows she fucks every tom dick and harry up the local snooker hall every friday night. Perhaps she knows something you wish you had known.

You have to remember that despite the god knows how many sps there are out there, this game is literally a "5 steps to Kevin Bacon" game, its surprising who knows who sometimes. I have had girls walk in on their first day to find their next door neighbour sitting there on the couch, or their neighbours daughter, or their ex boyfriends cousin...see my point.

Also your original question. If she really never offers any uncovered services and you do have uncovered services then you are more at risk despite the lower numbers so long as her version of covered also includes covered oral on her

The OP cant and has no way of knowing for definite what this WG might be doing with another though in reality so as thats a fact looking after your own sexual health is the course to take in my view. Never trust the word of others outside a relationship and even then it might not be 100% safe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t have any feedback of any girls who offers BB in fact most of them say no to BB in their questions. She kind of implied that she expected met to be exclusive to her from the impression I got however I could have got it wrong.

It does not bother me in the slightest I am free to see whoever I like I guess with my $$.

It just tickled me that she thought she was a lower risk to me than I was to her. And as fellow posters have said she could be seeing guys who have zero feedback but have had and do have a lot of BB sex with working girls. I saw a topic here a short while ago about how to much feedback is bad for you I couldn’t agree more now.

All in all it’s rather amusing I think in a weird kind of way.

If she is upset solely because she knows you punt with other WGs she is in the wrong business, its fucking for cash FFS not a vicars tea party unless thats the punters kink of course. ;) If i were a WG i would think there is a good chance a punter that comes to see me has and/or is still punting with other WGs as well. As she is obviously still punting with other punters as its her job her position is hypocritical to me.

In this case as you know what you do sexually but you have no way of knowing what she does she is a higher risk than you to you of course. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it were allowed by admin i would advise ensuring it was an anonymous poll. I would also check with admin first that discussing who indulges in BB penetration is ok, i recall a thread being deleted concerning BB not long ago. It doesnt say in the forum rules it cant be discussed but i assume it cant be promoted as a good practice and praised as admin dont wish it to be. FRs cant be done on BB punts of course so clarify with admin is i think a wise move but of course up to you.

Admin., what is you view on the poll I described?

Pollyp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The OP cant and has no way of knowing for definite what this WG might be doing with another though in reality so as thats a fact looking after your own sexual health is the course to take in my view. Never trust the word of others outside a relationship and even then it might not be 100% safe.

Exactly my point, he doesnt know what the other girls in his feedback do with others either, but this girl may have a clue about one of them hence the refusal as she is looking after her sexual health and hopefully that of her future clients also.

Edited by Chloe MKEscorts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If she is upset solely because she knows you punt with other WGs she is in the wrong business, its fucking for cash FFS not a vicars tea party unless thats the punters kink of course. ;) If i were a WG i would think there is a good chance a punter that comes to see me has and/or is still punting with other WGs as well. As she is obviously still punting with other punters as its her job her position is hypocritical to me.

In this case as you know what you do sexually but you have no way of knowing what she does she is a higher risk than you to you of course. :)

If she really refused him on the basis that he sees other girls then there is at least one wg in the country who is guaranteed to be available at short notice lol...she wont be too busy which is why I doubt this is her real reason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Admin., what is you view on the poll I described?

Pollyp

I would be happy to answer questions in this poll as long as its cleared by admin as being ok.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now