Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
LEO

Reverse Booking On Other Site , Great Response But Wandered If You Could Help?

11 posts in this topic

Alynusha4u, Soph2012, Nat_asha2727 , alwaysfun2012, cheesecake , Nemeja, jen_s, xxxdaisyxxx,

best of all syrupwaffles and Sexyanastasia2012

Any thoughts, tin eye help etc , happy to take 1 or 2, for the boys , all offered me 200/2h or 250/3h,outcall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you really need tineye to tell you syrupwaffles is using someone else's pics when one of her photos has the Playboy logo in the corner?

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well there you go. Well spotted, Naive me, thank you, 1 down then , a few to go,,,

She emailed me too ....shame,, ,

Hence I asked the question....Leo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I'll do your homework for you just this once.

I prefer GRIS (Google Reverse Image Search) to TinEye as it seems better at finding matches.

Sexyanastasia2012 - No GRIS hits but one single blurry photo and a profile with no feedback makes me feel seeing her would be a gamble.

syrupwaffles - As discussed above, a fake. Seems to be using pics of a Playboy model, apparently called Rainy Day Jordan.

xxxdaisyxxx - No GRIS hits. A decent amount of feedback from guys with feedback themselves from known, genuine escorts. A wide range of services listed in her Likes list but not too wide (no BB, no hardsports) so she hasn't just ticked every box. Only causes for suspicion are the small number of publicly viewable pics and the fairly high priced private gallery, all "NN" (non nude) pics, and the high number of 'member not active's in the feedback for the guys who have left her feedback. Still, on balance, probably a good bet.

Jen_s - Not sure about this one. 1 GRIS hit that comes from a blog by a foreign student in London. Could feasibly be the same girl escorting on the side and not being careful enough to distinguish her working persona from her real life. Or could simply be a fake using a pic taken from the girl's blog.

Nemeja - No GRIS hits. I am always a bit suspicious of profiles using what seem to be holiday snaps as those are the sort of pictures a faker could come across and know wouldn't be checkable online but that is just my suspicious nature. Probably a genuine profile.

cheesecake - unable to find an active profile under that name.

alwaysfun2012 - No GRIS hits. Seems genuine.

Nat_asha2727 - Assuming nat_tasha2727 is meant, no GRIS hits.

Soph2012 - unable to find an active profile under that name.

Alynusha4u - Assuming alynush4u is meant, a small number of GRIS hits, a minority of those pointing to an escort in Birmingham. Could feasibly be the same girl moved location or could be fake (or the Birmingham girl could be the faker).

Edited by DanLeno
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've met Natasha - she's lovely and my go to girl for threesomes whenever I'm in London x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cheesecake and syrup waffle, ten out of ten for names, makes my old one seem very boring...I particularly like syrup waffle lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I'll do your homework for you just this once.

I prefer GRIS (Google Reverse Image Search) to TinEye as it seems better at finding matches.

Sexyanastasia2012 - No GRIS hits but one single blurry photo and a profile with no feedback makes me feel seeing her would be a gamble.

syrupwaffles - As discussed above, a fake. Seems to be using pics of a Playboy model, apparently called Rainy Day Jordan.

xxxdaisyxxx - No GRIS hits. A decent amount of feedback from guys with feedback themselves from known, genuine escorts. A wide range of services listed in her Likes list but not too wide (no BB, no hardsports) so she hasn't just ticked every box. Only causes for suspicion are the small number of publicly viewable pics and the fairly high priced private gallery, all "NN" (non nude) pics, and the high number of 'member not active's in the feedback for the guys who have left her feedback. Still, on balance, probably a good bet.

Jen_s - Not sure about this one. 1 GRIS hit that comes from a blog by a foreign student in London. Could feasibly be the same girl escorting on the side and not being careful enough to distinguish her working persona from her real life. Or could simply be a fake using a pic taken from the girl's blog.

Nemeja - No GRIS hits. I am always a bit suspicious of profiles using what seem to be holiday snaps as those are the sort of pictures a faker could come across and know wouldn't be checkable online but that is just my suspicious nature. Probably a genuine profile.

cheesecake - unable to find an active profile under that name.

alwaysfun2012 - No GRIS hits. Seems genuine.

Nat_asha2727 - Assuming nat_tasha2727 is meant, no GRIS hits.

Soph2012 - unable to find an active profile under that name.

Alynusha4u - Assuming alynush4u is meant, a small number of GRIS hits, a minority of those pointing to an escort in Birmingham. Could feasibly be the same girl moved location or could be fake (or the Birmingham girl could be the faker).

An excellent piece of work, Dan!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An excellent piece of work, Dan!

Thanks. I hope it will help some other people to think about the sort of things I reckon they should be checking when they look at a purple site profile to be sure it is genuine, on top of just checking that it isn't using stolen pics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you really need tineye to tell you syrupwaffles is using someone else's pics when one of her photos has the Playboy logo in the corner?

Guys I met her before Christmas. You are maybe right, not sure if the photos are real.

However she sent me a real face pic by email.

She's a gorgeous young lady, I would recommend her for sure. Real GFE

Edited by Vin DaLoo
removed AW Profile name

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I hope it will help some other people to think about the sort of things I reckon they should be checking when they look at a purple site profile to be sure it is genuine, on top of just checking that it isn't using stolen pics.

Can I just second that thanks as I've learnt a lot from your post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did anyone see any of these ladies?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0