snogman1

Too Many E-mails/texts

33 posts in this topic

I wonder if there is a point where a WG can e-mail/text so often, but seems to be always too busy to be booked, when the alarm bells start to ring? WG's always accuse punters of being timewasters if they send more than a few e-mails and texts, do guys feel the same applies to WG's?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you may have encountered a wannabe! They are out there. Girls that want to be WGs but for whatever reason don't ever make bookings. If after a reasonable amount of contact and time she is still only speaking/texting/pm-ing you, I'd cut your losses and move on. Let her know first that this is what you're doing incase there is a legitimate reason for her not being able to see you. But I certainly wouldn't put up with it.

x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This seems weird to me. I would not have thought there would be many girls who would want to waste time like this with a stranger, unlike as Rose says they are not actually working girls at all.

I find there is a cut off point with emails and after that - depending upon how many/what has been said, I will not play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I rememeber a scenario from A.W. whereby I got caught up in a series of electronic emails with a provider who is reputable - who in the end clearly did not want to meet me, once I had pushed the issue. On reflection I can't blame her :P .

So it can happen not only with 'wanabees', unless she did not 'wanabee' with me :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I rememeber a scenario from A.W. whereby I got caught up in a series of electronic emails with a provider who is reputable - who in the end clearly did not want to meet me, once I had pushed the issue. On reflection I can't blame her :P .

So it can happen not only with 'wanabees', unless she did not 'wanabee' with me :o

I like that ! The one that put the 'tin hat' on it for me was when he asked me what I was doing with '"the girls".... meaning my (.) (.)... I did not wanabee with him from that point on...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if there is a point where a WG can e-mail/text so often, but seems to be always too busy to be booked, when the alarm bells start to ring? WG's always accuse punters of being timewasters if they send more than a few e-mails and texts, do guys feel the same applies to WG's?

Not for me as i dont use email to punt, and i only use text with regulars apart from having the newbie to me address texted to me. I dont play text tennis with WGs. Its all about simplicity for me, enquire, book, confirm, turn up and punt, then leave. Very rarely i have received requests from newbies i have booked like can i buy a loaf of bread, a pint of milk, a pack of fags which has been the most popular request and once Cocaine on my way. The Cocaine request resulted in cancelling that punt, i did buy the bread, milk and fags though. I hate fag breath but the WGs didnt smoke while i was there.

If a WG is too busy to be booked i go elsewhere, i dont waste my time waiting for her, but i might try her again in the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also book with a phone call. i never text or email. I have always assumed that an SP would prefer a short, polite, to the point call as opposed to email/texts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also book with a phone call. i never text or email. I have always assumed that an SP would prefer a short, polite, to the point call as opposed to email/texts.

Precisely! It is the best method ... for me anyway!

Once I have had a meeting then a text or email booking is fine but I need to know it is a bona fide client behind the texts or emails

and I never take the chance meeting someone who has not spoken to me by telephone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Precisely! It is the best method ... for me anyway!

Once I have had a meeting then a text or email booking is fine but I need to know it is a bona fide client behind the texts or emails

and I never take the chance meeting someone who has not spoken to me by telephone.

Snap, however some can go on to pansy about by text message over future bookings after their initial appointment. It's just a big turn off for me, unrequired and a fast route into my "Probably never going to see again/don't go out of your way" list.

Edited by Strawberry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not for me as i dont use email to punt, and i only use text with regulars apart from having the newbie to me address texted to me. I dont play text tennis with WGs. Its all about simplicity for me, enquire, book, confirm, turn up and punt, then leave.

The perfect punter! That's how it should be!

There's also the case of whilst someone is sending endless emails/texts, whilst she might have been available when you started, 10 minutes later she's - irritated - or - someone else has got in touch, got straight to the point and been accepted in the time you were fannying around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Must be unique then (and definitely in the minority) as I love fannying about via text/emails....lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Must be unique then (and definitely in the minority) as I love fannying about via text/emails....lol

No you are not unique ;)

I like it too in on way, as I feel it can add to a good meeting, part of the build up etc.

However I can spot a pure typist who just wants to type to the cows com home and never actually book a meeting within one message, two if I am on a silly day!

Lucy :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

God bless you Lucy7 (or can I call you seven?) :lol:

Im glad there are ladies out there who like it too, personally feel it builds a trust level....obviously the flip side is all the timewasters but pretty sure the ladies can suss them out quite quickly as you mention...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im also in the group that like to send an e-mail enquiry in the first place, and agree a date and time the second e-mail, and if the booking is a lengthy one that involves some getting to know feedback, i will in a shortish e-mail try to say what I am like and what things I like, so the escort knows a bit about me, and hope that she does likewise.

I had a lengthy booking a few weeks ago, and the escort and I exchanged a few e-mails to understand a bit about each other, I much prefere that, than to just walk into a room and expect the escort to drop her knickers at my request and lay on the bed the whole time, there is much more of a coming together in this way i think, and im really aware not to exchange too many e-mails as escorts do get a lot of requests.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's how NOT to do it:

"HI Claire, Got ur details on the web, Are you available today around 2 for half an hour? Sorry for text, am at work."

Seems fine, as it happens I was about to make plans to go for lunch but since he seems a reasonable chap, I shelf that idea and reply:

"Yes, I can do that! Have we met before?"

"Excellent can I book? No not met before"

"Sure. What's your name?"

There follow a few texts in which we discuss directions, he checks price and services. Asks for particular outfit. I reply 'that's all fine, see you at 2 then'.

"Ok, will just see if I can get time off work and get back to you". Two mins later 'Sorry, no can do'.

:mad::wacko::mad:

Why on earth would you not make sure YOU were free before booking the girl?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I agree that for a half hour bookng, there is no need to exchange more than a brief two e-mails, anything more than are you available for a set time, where about do you work from, and do you do etc, is all that is needed.

Any more and the time waster thought kicks in.

But.

I tried to book a lady the other week, and got no reply, so I sent her a pm and again no reply, there was no phone number on her profile, as she wanted it done only by e-mail, so when I got no reply the fourth time I gave up, and wrote that she was a time waster on another forum.

Today the escort replied to me six days after the first e-mail, and said I had no reason to give her bad feedback in terms of being a time waster due to no replies!.

Sometimes you cant win whatever you do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He sounds like a prize twit, Claire. I just don't understand what gets into some men's heads.

Email exchanges are fine as long as they're concise and engaging. More than three short paragraphs is too long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's how NOT to do it:

"HI Claire, Got ur details on the web, Are you available today around 2 for half an hour? Sorry for text, am at work."

Seems fine, as it happens I was about to make plans to go for lunch but since he seems a reasonable chap, I shelf that idea and reply:

"Yes, I can do that! Have we met before?"

"Excellent can I book? No not met before"

"Sure. What's your name?"

There follow a few texts in which we discuss directions, he checks price and services. Asks for particular outfit. I reply 'that's all fine, see you at 2 then'.

"Ok, will just see if I can get time off work and get back to you". Two mins later 'Sorry, no can do'.

:mad::wacko::mad:

Why on earth would you not make sure YOU were free before booking the girl?

THis is precisely why I would have thought a SP would prefer a short, polite, to the point phone call from a person who is not a regular as opposed to text or email. But hey ho it's none of my business really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

THis is precisely why I would have thought a SP would prefer a short, polite, to the point phone call from a person who is not a regular as opposed to text or email. But hey ho it's none of my business really.

I can't answer my 'phone unless I am away from home. I accept bookings by email and I accept bookings by text if I have seen the guy before. Even they mess you about - hence the guy talking about my tits... I had seen him before and now he won't get a second chance.

If I am at my flat and someone calls I will accept a booking, but I much prefer to get an email first. It makes me feel safer and it also makes me think he is genuine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I agree that for a half hour bookng, there is no need to exchange more than a brief two e-mails, anything more than are you available for a set time, where about do you work from, and do you do etc, is all that is needed.

Any more and the time waster thought kicks in.

But.

I tried to book a lady the other week, and got no reply, so I sent her a pm and again no reply, there was no phone number on her profile, as she wanted it done only by e-mail, so when I got no reply the fourth time I gave up, and wrote that she was a time waster on another forum.

Today the escort replied to me six days after the first e-mail, and said I had no reason to give her bad feedback in terms of being a time waster due to no replies!.

Sometimes you cant win whatever you do.

Whereas i punt to suit me not the WG. No phone number no business off me, i dont care what her reason is, thats her business. I will ring a couple of times, if i dont get a reply i wont leave a message as i dont want to do that with a stranger but i will go elsewhere perhaps trying her again in the future. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This seems weird to me. I would not have thought there would be many girls who would want to waste time like this with a stranger, unlike as Rose says they are not actually working girls at all.

I find there is a cut off point with emails and after that - depending upon how many/what has been said, I will not play.

Yes, i think you and Rose are bang on the money there. I have ddone my enquiries, and these type of 'chatty' girls seem never to actually go through with bookings so i think wannabbe very accurate. Met only one timewaster on here, but there is a truck load on the purple site.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

THis is precisely why I would have thought a SP would prefer a short, polite, to the point phone call from a person who is not a regular as opposed to text or email. But hey ho it's none of my business really.

Yes, I would much prefer a call. But I accept bookings by email and text for precisely the reason he explained in his first text - he was unable to call because he was at work. There are a lot of guys who can't get away from various things to make a call!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a parlour man, but occassionally punt off piste. Possibly its an age thing, but young girls seem to prefer textiing, recently booked a young girls with a lot of pos feedback, it took two days and an awful lot of texting, she refused to answer the phone, eventually met her.But it was a load of stress for nothing. The truth is that there are plenty of timewasters on both sides, but some girls cant even be bothered to answer emails, or reply to phone messages. Some are mega busy, but others are just hopeless. With the parlour, you just phone and arrive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a parlour man, but occassionally punt off piste. Possibly its an age thing, but young girls seem to prefer textiing, recently booked a young girls with a lot of pos feedback, it took two days and an awful lot of texting, she refused to answer the phone, eventually met her.But it was a load of stress for nothing. The truth is that there are plenty of timewasters on both sides, but some girls cant even be bothered to answer emails, or reply to phone messages. Some are mega busy, but others are just hopeless. With the parlour, you just phone and arrive.

All that hassle to get hold of her in the first place would of put me off enough not to bother proceeding. In my experience younger British WGs prefer texting, sign of the times unfortunately from my point of view and EE WGs mostly prefer talking on the phone, sometimes due to the obvious, lack of English.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now