GoodTimeGal

What Length Of Booking Do You Like?

178 posts in this topic

I read on many different forums of guys who say they have bookings of two, three and four hours and also overnights.

There never seems to be any guys who admit to having just 30 minutes bookings or 15 minutes quickies.

Are guys ashamed to admit that they cannot afford the longer bookings and say what they think others want to hear or do the guys who do book the shorter bookings not availing themselves of the information on the forums?

I really do not have a favourite length of booking and merit each one as it comes in and adapt myself accordingly.

What are your thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do 20 minute ones all the time, just get in there and bang them then off I go. It's more to do with how cheap it is. 50 quid for a decent shag, fire-and-forget.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My limited history so far is 5 bookings - 1 hour, overnight, 2 hours, 1 hour, overnight. The overnights were with the same girl so I knew we got on well and would do it again. I quite like getting to know whoever I see, and a bit of conversation in between sessions adds to the whole experience for me. I will probably stick with 1 to 2 hour bookings next year with the occassional overnight, the 15, 30 minute sessions dont really interest me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats mostly for the parlour visit, a quick 30 minutes with someone to tease and please, and get quick sex, wait in reception with a coffee, and then round two with another sexy godess who looks like the girl you used to dream about.

The longer dates are with escorts who know more about how to relax and be sexy without having to jump on you.

I rmember once taking a parlour girl out for an overnight booking, when we got into the hotel room she undressed and leapt upon me, it took me by suprise as I was expecting a calm start, but all she was used to was 30 minute or an hour booking, so thought it was expected a lot f 30 minute sexual events, whereas I had other thoughts in my mind, we had a quiet meal in a corner where we chatted about the night ahead, and I enjoyed it with her that much we did it a few other nights as well.

I would still have been seeing her from time to time, she just was not all that comfertable with providing a service outside the parlour, as she was loyal to the parlour owner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tend to go for two hours, anything less doesn't seem worth the trouble of travelling. Although one local provider only does 1hr slots, and it's so close that it's no disadvantage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because I live where there is a large selection of WGs (500 at least) within a 15 miles radius I tend to forget guys travel for miles for a booking. I know in Ireland the guys tend to travel for hours but I dont think guys close to me would dream of doing that. But I might be wrong. I think most guys around here think they are travelling far if they drive 10 miles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read on many different forums of guys who say they have bookings of two, three and four hours and also overnights.

There never seems to be any guys who admit to having just 30 minutes bookings or 15 minutes quickies.

Are guys ashamed to admit that they cannot afford the longer bookings and say what they think others want to hear or do the guys who do book the shorter bookings not availing themselves of the information on the forums?

I really do not have a favourite length of booking and merit each one as it comes in and adapt myself accordingly.

What are your thoughts?

121 wise an hour with a newbie WG to me is what i do, if she becomes a regular i might book for 2/3 or 4 hours if i rate her enough. I wouldnt book less then an hour after finding 30 minutes wasnt enough for me to get done what i wish to get done and i tried quickies in Soho in the 80s and found them not for me, as i have got older i have much preferred longer than shorter.

Of course some punters only require half hour or a quicky and good for them. I wouldnt get out of bed for less than an hour, it wouldnt be worth my while.

Party wise 3-8 hours is my range.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will normally book an hour if the lady is within an hours drive of wherever I happen to be staying at the time. I sometimes extend the time if everything had gone ok. I've only done 30 minutes once and it was unsatisfactory. If travelling entails two or more hours then the booking would be for two hours but I would have to have a lot of confidence in the lady to do so.

Some people travel an hour or more for work and some think that ten minutes travel is too much. It depends on the individual. Everyone is different. Boring world if we were all the same.

As long as you get what you want out of the booking then what does it matter what anyone else thinks or does?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2-3 hours would be a nightmare with a new girl, so 1 hour for a new girl. I went for a long time where I wouldn't see a girl for repeat visits as to get too close myself, and it did happen eventually when I did return to a girl I'd seen before. What took me by total my surprise is how she was so into me, not the other way around.

So I'm torn between cold, inevitably quick meetings with new girls, where I'm possibly mistaking they will be as cold no matter how many times I see them, or the risk of getting attached with repeat visits to a girl I've seen before, which can only get worse with 2-3 hour bookings, although the sex will be better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I dont think it matters what length of booking you make but it still appears that the guys who make shorter bookings are still loathe to come forward. Ive often wondered if it is peer pressure or not wanting to look cheap or poor that has caused this divide.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's my first time with a girl, 30 minutes. If it's an escort, it would be whatever the minimum is (so one hour in those cases).

For the girls that I see regularly, I prefer two hours. For girls that I've seen before and liked, I would go for an hour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Same again. First time 30 minutes is enough to find out if you click and can achieve something. A couple more at 30, then consider an hour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is more about attitude. The type of client who writes on a forum, is more likely to be looking to invest more time in his bookings, as he is also on a mental level connecting. The majority of clients do no invest so much time on forums or research and book purely for their physical needs. It does not make them better or worse, just different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The longer the better especially when I enjoy their company. At least 2 hours is the average time for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK so I will admit to 30 minute sessions. Suits me and that's all there is to it.

I like a mix of the variety between a few regulars and new girls and for the new girls 30 mins is likely to be long enough to enjoy and decide whether or not to see again or else not too long to be able to put up with if a bad choice, though those are rare.

With regulars I would rather see them more often than for longer times. but some regulars tend to extend the time for me themselves so best of both worlds really but if they keep to the time I can have enough fun in that time.

I also tend to find I get to be allowed to hang around with some girls or in parlour rooms (never through me muscling my way in unwanted of course) and I get the unhurried chat that way and they have no concerns I am looking for anything free.

That's just how it works with me and anyone else is free to fashion their own experiences obviously.

I don't want to come out of longer appts feeling concern I spent as much money as it would often cost and regretting it and then thinking of how much of the time I was paying for pretty well nothing much happening.

Here ends the confession of short-arse short-timer with shallow pockets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vivluvsme, Ill be totally honest I myself prefer shorter bookings myself.

If I wanted to spend a long time (one hour or over) with one guy I would have stayed married. Longer bookings to me are just a boring nightmare.

I dont see you as a short-arse short-timer with shallow pockets. And your honesty is refreshing.

I do realise that some guys do "want to do a bit of investigating" before they book a female and like to "invest in a booking" and that is ok too but I find it rather sad that some guys feel pressured into not admitting they can only afford a shorter booking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I almost always go for an hour. This means that I have a chance of pacing myself and partaking in a variety of activities. If I cum too quickly - this happens more that I'd like - I have a chance of round two, though I don't cum a second time. If I've had a good time - I don't mind leaving early, provided I'm not kicked out. It's just a whole lot less rushed. In addition, I can only get away 12 - 15 times per year so can usually save up for the hour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I almost always go for an hour. This means that I have a chance of pacing myself and partaking in a variety of activities. If I cum too quickly - this happens more that I'd like - I have a chance of round two, though I don't cum a second time. If I've had a good time - I don't mind leaving early, provided I'm not kicked out. It's just a whole lot less rushed. In addition, I can only get away 12 - 15 times per year so can usually save up for the hour.

Couldn't have summed it better myself. Sometimes I too can cum a bit quick on occasions,so it's nice you can partake in other activities until the ol chap recovers. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you guys 'go' more than once in the hour-long sessions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First meet: 1 or 2 hrs (never less then 1).

Subsequent meets: longer and longer, working up to overnight for stable regulars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the last few years I've only done 30 minute parlour punts - I pay £40 - £60 for these sessions.

At that price I can afford to punt every week and occasionally have 2 punts a week.

Works for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

30 mins too short if it's good, 1 hour too long if it's bad, but I go for 1 hour. 1:30 if I know I get on well with the girl, but 2 hrs can be stretching it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this question is aimed at punters but as a WG I would never offer 'quickes' I find them so impersonal and they do tend to attract the more undesirable client. At the very least I offer 30mins but I very rarely do them, I much prefer longer bookings and overnights. I do a lot of overnights and love them but I don't do non-stop sex ones either, it's about the whole experience.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do anything from 15 mins to 2 hrs ddepending on time I have available and how I feel. Sometimes a longer booking to relax and stuff, sometimes a shorter one. With the right girl a 15 minute one - pants down wham bang - is such good fun.

quite often i think a half hour is good as it leaves funds for another half hour later. Cos sometimes 2 half hours in a day is better than 1 hour! doing 2 punts in a day is great fun! One thing i have to try is seeing the same girl twice in the same day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now