Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
NIK

Another total timewaster on **

32 posts in this topic

I had a trip to London last week - not been able to say much about is owing to being in pre mod for a ridiculous, unwarrented month.

However, as I indicated I was organised, having a couple of punts lined up before I left home.

I'd had my eye on 'Darling Dawn' of ** for some time. Allegedly 18 with a nice figure and excellent reports on there, including a few FR's.

I'd contacted her a couple of times previously and each time she'd responded quickly and sensibly. However we hadn't been able to establish a convenient date.

However this time she was available. I contacted her at the weekend to allow plenty of time. I orginally wanted Wednesday so I could see the excellent Nicoletta later in the week. However Wed wasn't convenient for her at the time I wanted. She told me to check her availability. I did and was amazed to see that this seemed to be up to date. Most of the jokers on there don't bother with this and seem to be permanantely available. Again this suggested she was professional. She was only available Wed evening, and as I can't be arsed trying to find somewhere I don't know in the dark and would sooner go for a drink I changed to Thursday for the afternoon appointment I orginally wanted.

Excellent she said. Send me your phone number. I did and she texted me on Tuesday asking if I was still definite. I replied I was and texted back for the address which she instantly texted back.

All smooth so far. However alarm bells began to ring when I noticed since I'd first contacted her at the weekend she'd hidden her feedback. Why was this I thought when it was all positive?

Anyway I decided to phone her on the Thursday afternoon before I set off to the address she had given me in Limehouse. I always like to speak and hear the voice now before a punt as I was bitten last year in Derby arranging a punt just through email and text.

I phoned three hours before the appt. The phone was on answerphone. However at least I got to hear her voice, which sounded well spoken and English (makes a change!). Again all positive. I left a message. Never having been to Limehouse before I didn't know how long it would take me, so I set off expecting her to phone me back. Of course I should have had more sense at this point.

Of course she didn't and I arrived at Limehouse with over an hour and a half to spare, finding the apartment easily. I just knew as I mooched around wasting my time for 90 minutes that she wouldn't answer the intercom. So it was no surprise when at the appointed time she didn't.

It was also no surprise when I arrived home at the weekend to see that she is still regularly logging in, so unless someome else is logging in on her behalf, she hasn't suddenly expired at such a tender age.

Now unless the sound of my voice put her off there can be no reason for this totally unacceptable and unprofessional behaviour. Even if she thought from the sound of my voice that I was going to turn into 'the Limehouse Ripper' ;) she could at least have had the courtesy to cancel rather than waste my time on a wild goose chase.

Remember the name - Darling Dawn another in the honoured tradition of ** timewasters :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I had a trip to London last week - not been able to say much about is owing to being in pre mod for a ridiculous, unwarrented month.

However, as I indicated I was organised, having a couple of punts lined up before I left home.

I'd had my eye on 'Darling Dawn' of ** for some time. Allegedly 18 with a nice figure and excellent reports on there, including a few FR's.

I'd contacted her a couple of times previously and each time she'd responded quickly and sensibly. However we hadn't been able to establish a convenient date.

However this time she was available. I contacted her at the weekend to allow plenty of time. I orginally wanted Wednesday so I could see the excellent Nicoletta later in the week. However Wed wasn't convenient for her at the time I wanted. She told me to check her availability. I did and was amazed to see that this seemed to be up to date. Most of the jokers on there don't bother with this and seem to be permanantely available. Again this suggested she was professional. She was only available Wed evening, and as I can't be arsed trying to find somewhere I don't know in the dark and would sooner go for a drink I changed to Thursday for the afternoon appointment I orginally wanted.

Excellent she said. Send me your phone number. I did and she texted me on Tuesday asking if I was still definite. I replied I was and texted back for the address which she instantly texted back.

All smooth so far. However alarm bells began to ring when I noticed since I'd first contacted her at the weekend she'd hidden her feedback. Why was this I thought when it was all positive?

Anyway I decided to phone her on the Thursday afternoon before I set off to the address she had given me in Limehouse. I always like to speak and hear the voice now before a punt as I was bitten last year in Derby arranging a punt just through email and text.

I phoned three hours before the appt. The phone was on answerphone. However at least I got to hear her voice, which sounded well spoken and English (makes a change!). Again all positive. I left a message. Never having been to Limehouse before I didn't know how long it would take me, so I set off expecting her to phone me back. Of course I should have had more sense at this point.

Of course she didn't and I arrived at Limehouse with over an hour and a half to spare, finding the apartment easily. I just knew as I mooched around wasting my time for 90 minutes that she wouldn't answer the intercom. So it was no surprise when at the appointed time she didn't.

It was also no surprise when I arrived home at the weekend to see that she is still regularly logging in, so unless someome else is logging in on her behalf, she hasn't suddenly expired at such a tender age.

Now unless the sound of my voice put her off there can be no reason for this totally unacceptable and unprofessional behaviour. Even if she thought from the sound of my voice that I was going to turn into 'the Limehouse Ripper' ;) she could at least have had the courtesy to cancel rather than waste my time on a wild goose chase.

Remember the name - Darling Dawn another in the honoured tradition of ** timewasters :)

Or she had been reading all your posts on here ... :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Nik, IMHO you should not have set off until you'd had a proper reply from her in person on the day. It is unfortunate that you were messed about but you've nobody but yourself to blame.

In future try to keep the brain engaged until you know for sure that your booking is definite. Then and only then can you had over control to the testicles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.

Remember the name - Darling Dawn another in the honoured tradition of ** timewasters :eek:

NIK

If what you say is true I think we can agree she is a timewaster but can you confirm she does not advertise anywhere else and the only reason she is a time waster is because she is on Adultw0rk or even that adultw0rk even has anything to do with it.

Lou4fun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My recent experience with the above mentioned site suggests that there are quite a few spoof 'escorts' on it. After searching for ladies with the right criteria, I emailed several and a relatively large proportion did not (and have not) responded. One sent me a phone number but never answers. Whats it all about? Who gets a kick out of spoofs like that?:mad:

Edited by Kurtfifties
typos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NIK, for the benefit of anyone who wants to look her up her name is actually-

darling_dawn not Darling Dawn.

My first comment is that I doubt very much that she is 18, I would say early twenties.

Her rates are sensible for the area, no idea why she messed you about.

She is hiding her feedback, that is always a bad sign.

No private gallery so we can rule out that scam. :mad:;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I can't understand is why people go to the trouble of putting details on there if they seemingly have no intention of answering calls/emails etc - I am guessing but I would have thought you have to pay to put your profile on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She is hiding her feedback, that is always a bad sign.

:mad:;)

I've just started a topic on this very theme. I really fance meeting a WG I found 'over there' but all her pics have her face blanked out. This makes me a bit nervous, especially as she has a rather long list of 'dont's'. What do you suggest?:mad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What I can't understand is why people go to the trouble of putting details on there if they seemingly have no intention of answering calls/emails etc - I am guessing but I would have thought you have to pay to put your profile on.

Actually, it's free for anyone (working girl/boy/couple or punter) to sign up and add a profile.

From what I've heard, @w make their money from taking a percentage of revenue generated through the service providers private gallery views, phone chat and webcam sessions.

They do however charge a provider to put their mobile phone number on their profile page.

I've emailed one girl a week ago. She has no private gallery (so nothing to gain money wise) and purely provides escort services. She's logged in every day since my email enquiry, but still has not even bothered to read it.

That really makes me wonder why she is even on the site.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What I can't understand is why people go to the trouble of putting details on there if they seemingly have no intention of answering calls/emails etc - I am guessing but I would have thought you have to pay to put your profile on.

I've met 2 girls in the past who've told me that they were so pissed off with the site - stealing credits etc, that the girls put up false profiles with stolen pictures, just for annoyance purposes. Strange but allegedly true.:mad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've just started a topic on this very theme. I really fance meeting a WG I found 'over there' but all her pics have her face blanked out. This makes me a bit nervous, especially as she has a rather long list of 'dont's'. What do you suggest?:mad:

One of the best WGs I met via that site had her face blanked out - Susanait.

On the other hand I have had some nasty experiences too along with the good ones. It as not as though the other sources for WGs are super reliable. I have had agency girls who have turned out to be double booked, flat girls who are no way like they were meant to be in terms of age, size, or services offered.

As has been said many times before: the more research, the less likelihood of disappointment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've just started a topic on this very theme. I really fance meeting a WG I found 'over there' but all her pics have her face blanked out. This makes me a bit nervous, especially as she has a rather long list of 'dont's'. What do you suggest?:mad:

Don't. :mad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't. :mad:

Don't what 'o' wise one.

She does not show her face, nothing unusual about that

She has a long list of do nots. I think it would depend on what they are and if she does what he is looking for.

But thanks for you input Phil you seem to know your stuff:rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I second guess that WG's are far more savvy to a potential client than they let on here. It can't just be a co-incidence that it's the same people who are always moaning can it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've just started a topic on this very theme. I really fance meeting a WG I found 'over there' but all her pics have her face blanked out. This makes me a bit nervous, especially as she has a rather long list of 'dont's'. What do you suggest?:mad:
Don't. :mad:

With so much choice out there now I would give this advice -----

"If in doubt, leave it out" :D;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I second guess that WG's are far more savvy to a potential client than they let on here. It can't just be a co-incidence that it's the same people who are always moaning can it?

Centrino, could it be that some punters tell the truth while others live in a dream world where every punt is perfect and every prostitute has the character of the Virgin Mary ------- just a thought. :mad::rolleyes:

My allegiance is with my fellow punters, where does yours lie. :mad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nik,

You are an experienced punter and I am really surprised that you set off without having spoken to her on the day.

One of my rules on meeting any working girls is No phone contact - No go.

I have also stopped booking in advance and will only try to contact on the day I want to punt and will always have plan B and C as backup. By sticking to this rule, and just being sensible, I have had a good success rate from the other site.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nik,

You are an experienced punter and I am really surprised that you set off without having spoken to her on the day.

One of my rules on meeting any working girls is No phone contact - No go.

I have also stopped booking in advance and will only try to contact on the day I want to punt and will always have plan B and C as backup. By sticking to this rule, and just being sensible, I have had a good success rate from the other site.

Some good advice there, especially regarding a back up plan, one thing we should all have learnt and that is the fact that there are a lot of totally unreliable prostitutes out there ------ not all I hasten to add. :mad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I must second the backup plans advice. Not that I heed my own advice, but there's nothing worse than being alone, blanked, horny and with a pocket full of wedge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Centrino, could it be that some punters tell the truth while others live in a dream world where every punt is perfect and every prostitute has the character of the Virgin Mary ------- just a thought. :mad::rolleyes:

My allegiance is with my fellow punters, where does yours lie. :mad:

You could have a point there Jimmy but maybe i don't have as scientific an approach as others. I'm footlose and fancy free me. Just because we are the buyers and supposedly always correct should we expect every prostitute to have the character of the Virgin Mary? A risk assessment is about as far as i'll go but there are generally stedfast rules as to how to organise a reasonably good liaison. I do think our attitude is a key factor to a successful outcome though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NIK, for the benefit of anyone who wants to look her up her name is actually-

darling_dawn not Darling Dawn.

My first comment is that I doubt very much that she is 18, I would say early twenties.

Her rates are sensible for the area, no idea why she messed you about.

She is hiding her feedback, that is always a bad sign.

No private gallery so we can rule out that scam. :mad:;)

Her feedback was hidden weeks ago. I seem to remember there being a piece of negative feedback from somebody on the site and her feedback being hidden within a day or two of it appearing.

If my memory is correct she seems to have preferred to hide it rather than take the approach Young Bonnie in MK took of answering it publically and moving on. Make of that what you will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My allegiance is with my fellow punters, where does yours lie. :mad:

Jim your allegiance is admirable but your views are tainted.

Its very true there are many rip offs and scams and risks but with a bit of homework and with the help of review sites such as this they are greatly reduced.

Your allegiance would be better served if it was to the punting experience

which includes the whole shooting match.:mad::D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jim your allegiance is admirable but your views are tainted.

Its very true there are many rip offs and scams and risks but with a bit of homework and with the help of review sites such as this they are greatly reduced.

Lou, my little rose petal, I have the greatest respect for Punternet but I don't need to remind you that reports from ADULTW0RK girls are discouraged if not actually banned.

My allegiance will always be with punters, £150 may be chicken feed to some of you ladies but that could be a lot of money to a normal working guy.

Think how much you would earn in an ordinary job ------ and I don't mean shelf filling. :mad:;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My allegiance will always be with punters, £150 may be chicken feed to some of you ladies but that could be a lot of money to a normal working guy.

Jimmy i would say £150 is a hell of a lot of money to those ladies else they wouldn't have sex with the likes of you and me. The ladies who earn the megabucks, you are very unlikely to hear much of, but your average WG after expenses doesn't earn much more than say your average London Cabby.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0