Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
IanTurnet

Most Popular Escorts In London On Aw - (I.e. Aw Searches R Crap)

16 posts in this topic

To amuse myself tonight I had a quick search on AW to see which female escorts in London had the most escort reviews.

 

 

i fully agree that the total number of escort reviews, or even the total number in the last 3 months, does not mean the escort is the most popular, but it must be some indication of something! it does mean that they are the most recently well reported, and that must count for something!!! In some way or other they must be popular, maybe not 'thee' most popular, but "very popular" at least.....And popular suggests "Good!!"

 

 

In theory this should be quite simple, search for female escort, London, with men. Order results by "rating escort", (this last bit is on the bottom right hand corner of the page). And 1 second later up it comes, and there you have it - not. Although the escorts are vaguely ordered by rating, highest first, the ratings are not in order. Why would this be? possibly because the total rating is for all ratings, including chat and sales, while we have searched for 'escort rating'. Ok so they should be ordered by escort rating, but they are not....

 

 

I have long known that AW searches are bollocks, or more technically "wrong", but I had not realised how wrong, and that there is no obvious reason for them appearing as they do.

 

Now AW (bless em) have added a new function, click on the escorts rating number, and up pops a box, the new bit is "*NEW* Click Here to see a full breakdown of ratings by activity.". Now this shows the number or escort review ratings the escort has had in the last 3 months. I have checked this against the raw data. I then checked all the escorts that appeared on the 1st 2 pages,something like 100 escorts, (boring,,,)

 

Astonishing, the 2nd escort with the most reviews in the last 3 months does not appear to the 2nd page, how useful is that? Thanks AW for nothing.

 

There are only 5 escorts that have more that 25 escort reviews in the last 3 months. What is outstanding, is that I am already fucking 2 of them. They are in order, showing number of reviews first (in last 3 months)

 

Most Number of Escort Reports in AW in London (last 3 months)

 

65 = X Platinum Cindy X- No real surprise here, a very popular new comer, young beautiful body & face, full range of services and great value for money. (no doubt this make her 'even more popular' - damm)

53 = XX Dee XX, as was called Deepin. Always has great reviews & a keen following, great VFM, and pretty too.

46 = Alesis Taylor, a surprise, but she has been very busy these last 2 months. Not the cheapest, but lots of  loyal fans.

39 = DivaliciousUK, I lovely girl, with a stunning chest, more expensive, but full rang of services.

36 = TropicalTease. She appears at the top of the search list, but is actually 5th! Great sexy body and great tits. Least extensive of services, and comparative high price, but cute looking...

 

The above are my assessment based on the profiles, the numbers come from AW direct. I have not met all the girls. My comments should not be taken seriously. Sorry if I missed any-one...

 

Excellent news for me, the 2 at the two of the list, Cindy and Dee, I have already seen this week. 2.5 hrs with Cindy, 1.5 with hours Dee. So I guess I have excellent taste! - "I am the man" - know what I mean  ;) ..

 

IanT

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Divaliciousuk has managed to do something I previously thought was physically impossible!

She has managed to get so far up her own arse she cannott get out :eek:

She is so full of herself...Avoid! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To amuse myself tonight I had a quick search on AW to see which female escorts in London had the most escort reviews.

 

 

i fully agree that the total number of escort reviews, or even the total number in the last 3 months, does not mean the escort is the most popular, but it must be some indication of something! it does mean that they are the most recently well reported, and that must count for something!!! In some way or other they must be popular, maybe not 'thee' most popular, but "very popular" at least.....And popular suggests "Good!!"

 

 

In theory this should be quite simple, search for female escort, London, with men. Order results by "rating escort", (this last bit is on the bottom right hand corner of the page). And 1 second later up it comes, and there you have it - not. Although the escorts are vaguely ordered by rating, highest first, the ratings are not in order. Why would this be? possibly because the total rating is for all ratings, including chat and sales, while we have searched for 'escort rating'. Ok so they should be ordered by escort rating, but they are not....

 

 

I have long known that AW searches are bollocks, or more technically "wrong", but I had not realised how wrong, and that there is no obvious reason for them appearing as they do.

 

Now AW (bless em) have added a new function, click on the escorts rating number, and up pops a box, the new bit is "*NEW* Click Here to see a full breakdown of ratings by activity.". Now this shows the number or escort review ratings the escort has had in the last 3 months. I have checked this against the raw data. I then checked all the escorts that appeared on the 1st 2 pages,something like 100 escorts, (boring,,,)

 

Astonishing, the 2nd escort with the most reviews in the last 3 months does not appear to the 2nd page, how useful is that? Thanks AW for nothing.

 

There are only 5 escorts that have more that 25 escort reviews in the last 3 months. What is outstanding, is that I am already fucking 2 of them. They are in order, showing number of reviews first (in last 3 months)

 

Most Number of Escort Reports in AW in London (last 3 months)

 

65 = X Platinum Cindy X- No real surprise here, a very popular new comer, young beautiful body & face, full range of services and great value for money. (no doubt this make her 'even more popular' - damm)

53 = XX Dee XX, as was called Deepin. Always has great reviews & a keen following, great VFM, and pretty too.

46 = Alesis Taylor, a surprise, but she has been very busy these last 2 months. Not the cheapest, but lots of  loyal fans.

39 = DivaliciousUK, I lovely girl, with a stunning chest, more expensive, but full rang of services.

36 = TropicalTease. She appears at the top of the search list, but is actually 5th! Great sexy body and great tits. Least extensive of services, and comparative high price, but cute looking...

 

The above are my assessment based on the profiles, the numbers come from AW direct. I have not met all the girls. My comments should not be taken seriously. Sorry if I missed any-one...

 

Excellent news for me, the 2 at the two of the list, Cindy and Dee, I have already seen this week. 2.5 hrs with Cindy, 1.5 with hours Dee. So I guess I have excellent taste! - "I am the man" - know what I mean  ;) ..

 

IanT

There are others very close to London who have 25+ reviews. sexysabrina1711 just for one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IanT, you are predicting the order of search results based on ratings from the last 3 months and finding this is not reflected in the order that comes up. Surely when searching by escort rating this would be based on the total escort rating for each profile and not just on the last 3 months. This would favour girls who have been on the site for longer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
IanT, you are predicting the order of search results based on ratings from the last 3 months and finding this is not reflected in the order that comes up. Surely when searching by escort rating this would be based on the total escort rating for each profile and not just on the last 3 months. This would favour girls who have been on the site for longer.

Dolky,

 

Not sure I fully understand your point. What I have actually done at the end, is look at the last 3 months results, this is not a direct search, it requires you to go into each and every girls ratings and look at their escort rating - for the last 3 months, 1 did this based on the top 100 escorts ranked by Escort Rating in London.This 3 month list is not a 'prediction' this is presentation of data that already exists.

 

The search that I started with, should have just given results of escorts based on their ESCORT rating, but it did not. It gives an odd order loosely based on the escorts total rating. The flawed escort rating search, and the 3 month results are completely different searches and I have not mistaken the results of 1 for the other. That would be a dim thing to do.

 

Sorry you did not understand my original work, but 'many' of AWs searches are flawed, most of them in fact. I don't wish to bore you on the details, but I could.....

 

IanT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sterling work IanT - Cindy and Dee were on the radar already - now for the budget crisis!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another oddity noticed. When 'providers' give each other ratings,the rating is counted in the small total (that can always been seen). But if you drill down on the last 3 months, they are no longer counted, i.e they disappear completely. In fact, 1 of the counters suggest that the ratings are subtracted twice, giving a penalty to the provider because they were rated by another provider. Weird...

 

What a tangled mess AW are making of their rating system. Also it is about time I started a new job - (too much time) ..... LOL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who cares which girl is the most "popular"?

 

Surely it would be more productive to see the escort you find most attractive after informing yourself on her performance by reading the feedback?

 

I understand why people like to make and read top 10 lists but I think actually choosing a girl on the basis of the basis of "popularity" would only work if you were the sum average of London (or UK) punters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely this list measures the most prolific WGs rather than the most popular, or even the best (in everything from music, to books, to television, etc, popularity does not equal quality)? The best WGs I have seen haven't had very much reviews/rating numbers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have replies...

 

Carter: The current most popular escort, if that is what the list was, would be the most sensible place to start, because it suggest that others have already done the work for you in finding the best, and the majority of mens tastes, and requirements are similar. (Either through media/social conditioning or otherwise). of course some men will have different quirks, but you will not be alone in your tastes...

 

Pol Pot: No it is not the list of the most prolific escort, but the most often reported on AW. Some VERY busy escorts, and probably very cheap too, but that does not mean they are not great, do not take AW bookings and therefore can never get ratings, and will not appear. They are not listed in my summary, if they exist. Some girls may get booked on AW a lot, but never reported, they will not show either.

 

So as I said, this is partly a bit of fun, but it is also the only statistic we have. Although punternet does also list girls by most number of reports, it does not show the last 3 months, and neither Dee nor Cindy appear on Punternet at all - kinda weird you might think...

 

IanT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These statistics have been thrown now as Cindy has stopped work for X weeks.

 

O well, that just leaves Dee to fuck!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These statistics have been thrown now as Cindy has stopped work for X weeks.

 

O well, that just leaves Dee to fuck!!

Spoke to Cindy today and it appears she has been off for an operation and won't be back for at least another week! Sure she will start the feedback rolling again soon!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this post is inconsiderate KentAde. Cindy has posted up she is "on holiday" on the other site. I would expect anything told to you would have been in confidence. Please respect people's privacy and think before you post as it may cause upset...which I think in this case it has no doubt done.

Spoke to Cindy today and it appears she has been off for an operation and won't be back for at least another week! Sure she will start the feedback rolling again soon!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this post is inconsiderate KentAde. Cindy has posted up she is "on holiday" on the other site. I would expect anything told to you would have been in confidence. Please respect people's privacy and think before you post as it may cause upset...which I think in this case it has no doubt done.

 

Indeed, and I now regret the above. Have apologised to Cindy directly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do any of you guys know when Cindy is planning to return after her time off?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cindy and I exchanged texts yesterday and she does not yet know her return date.

 

No doubt she will broadcast her return on her AW site, once she is certain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0