Corus Boy

The Daily Mail Again!

33 posts in this topic

I love the stereo typical red light image that the Daily Fail have used!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the daily mail group makes money from prostitution by having ads for brothels in their sister papers such as loot and metro!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cunts.  The Wail and all who sail in her.  Just cunts.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I like the Daily Mail and will continue to enjoy their crossword section.

On a more general point, please bear with me as I am a social media moron, but if you join prostitute sites on Facebook, can't all your other "friends" see that as well? Hardly discreet 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, I like the Daily Mail and will continue to enjoy their crossword section.

On a more general point, please bear with me as I am a social media moron, but if you join prostitute sites on Facebook, can't all your other "friends" see that as well? Hardly discreet 

Yes and it's surprising how many married or attached folk do. Also quite a few do it, post comments then claim they didn't know the nature of the profile - in other words they'd just add some random woman with a profile containing photos of her in suggestive poses, links to WG websites and other sexually expliciti profiles quite innocently without realising the nature of her profile. If this is true then more fool them, if not then still more fool them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Prostitutes openly using Facebook and Twitter to sell sex 'are putting children at risk'

 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270507/Fears-children-prostitutes-use-Facebook-Twitter-sell-themselves.html#ixzz2JTPO84h5

 

 

Unlike the hypocritical w**kers at the Daily Mail who actively promote paedophilia. As recently as - oh, this week!

 

http://www.themediablog.co.uk/the-media-blog/2013/01/daily-mail-turns-the-creepiness-up-a-notch.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well spotted Marky. Why does anybody buy the bloody Daily Wail. It really is a two faced rag

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well children under 13 are not allowed on arsebook. I assume same for twatter.

 

and its PARENTS responsibility to ensure their kids dont access inapropriate stuff.  They should monitor their kids internet use. No expect someone else to di it for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
and its PARENTS responsibility to ensure their kids dont access inapropriate stuff.  They should monitor their kids internet use. No expect someone else to di it for them.

 

Exactly. I use Twitter and if I had reason to believe a follower was underage I would block them, but I don't scrutinise every follower. I am an adult and my Twitter account is aimed at other adults - if a child is using social media then it is their parents' job to monitor who they are interacting with.

Edited by Stephanies Secrets

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but I feel the exact opposite to the opinions here. As most of you know by now I'm probably one of the most forward and dirtiest whores out there but I feel that Facebook in particular is not the place to be advertising these sort of activities, there is a time and place and that's not it as far as I'm concerned.

There are a lot of people out there that use Facebook as a way of staying in touch with families ect and IMHO even the age of thirteen is too young to have this stuff shoved under their noses. Its almost impossible to stop others knowing what your doing or looking at on there.

There are plenty of other places to advertise, and Cov as much as I agree that parents should be monitoring their children, sadly many don't and we do have a responsibility towards those kids whether we like it or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm sorry but I feel the exact opposite to the opinions here. As most of you know by now I'm probably one of the most forward and dirtiest whores out there but I feel that Facebook in particular is not the place to be advertising these sort of activities, there is a time and place and that's not it as far as I'm concerned.

There are a lot of people out there that use Facebook as a way of staying in touch with families ect and IMHO even the age of thirteen is too young to have this stuff shoved under their noses. Its almost impossible to stop others knowing what your doing or looking at on there.

There are plenty of other places to advertise, and Cov as much as I agree that parents should be monitoring their children, sadly many don't and we do have a responsibility towards those kids whether we like it or not.

 

Whoa holly!

I wasnt endorsing hookering on social media.  I agree its not the place.  But that doesnt remove parents responsibility for their kids internet use, cos there is bad stuff out there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoa holly!

I wasnt endorsing hookering on social media.  I agree its not the place.  But that doesnt remove parents responsibility for their kids internet use, cos there is bad stuff out there.

No its doesn't I agree, but it doesn't remove ours either.... *Smiles at Cov*. Can't access the smilies in this stupid comp....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Facebook is an inappropriate place to be advertising "hookering services", at least the Daily Mail have had the decency to reprint two of the advertisers' pages on their website. :huh:

 

I wouldn't know how best to search for prosititutes pages on FB, but now a couple of providers have been brought to my attention on the DM website it is much easier to find them and make further enquiries as to the services on offer.

 

Thanks DM! (as Penfold may once have said :D)

Edited by innocentpervert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I noticed several items in the Daily Mail referenced above that were not suitable for young children.  I see no warning. Do not leave around contains material harmful to youngsters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

well children under 13 are not allowed on arsebook. I assume same for twatter.

 

and its PARENTS responsibility to ensure their kids dont access inapropriate stuff.  They should monitor their kids internet use. No expect someone else to di it for them.

 

 

Exactly. I use Twitter and if I had reason to believe a follower was underage I would block them, but I don't scrutinise every follower. I am an adult and my Twitter account is aimed at other adults - if a child is using social media then it is their parents' job to monitor who they are interacting with.
Agree totally with both of you.Personally i'm of the opinion that a computer that children have access to should be in an area of the house,ie living room where the parents can keep an eye on what theyre doing and who they are in contact with.Too many parents,including quite a few i know have the computer in the kids room purely to keep them quiet and out the way whilst they watch telly and really dont care what they're up to.

On the fb topic.As far as i remember,fb is rather strict on what it deems adult material and if reported tends to remove such as well as either temp locking the account for minor stuff to removal for more serious breaches.It's no way near as bad as myspace was for dodgy stuff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a guy in our office who reads the Mail. He is obnoxious,rude and downright the most boring man I or anyone else in the office has ever met.

He is arrogant, always questioning his superiors requests, racist, tending to start senteces with "I,m not a racist but"....which implies he is, he is sexist always saying things like "well you know what women are like"...and yet we are certain he does,nt know what women are like as he does'nt seem to be able to talk to women, instead just standing close behind the female members of our team looking over their shoulders and creepily staring at them! Our line manager is a woman and he argues with her but not with the male members.

The female team members find him creepy, the male team members are certain he is a virgin, he has never married or even speaks of ex girlfriends, he is 45 and still lives at home with his parents, he can stop a conversation with remarks like "here's something you might find interesting"..and it is'nt because it,s an article from The Mail,

He is fat, balding, wears thick rimmed glasses, cycles to and from work in bright yellow lycra, breaks wind (loudly) in public places, keeps tripping up on flat surfaces and bumping into trees/lamposts wherever he walks. He is also an amatuer antiques dealer and even scarier has a shotgun licence and owns 2 shotguns!!

He also reads the Mail.

My point is this..as I,ve never met anyone who reads the Mail before or anyone who admits to reading it, is this a typical Mail reader??.

Edited by spartan117

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why are parents of children with access to the internet not locked down tight with net nanny and every other kind of child safe security. You can type in individual words so any pages with those word on somewhere, even once will be inaccessable to your children. I had them when mine were small and they were so good they even locked out some educational sites because reproduction was in one of the sections on there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
why are parents of children with access to the internet not locked down tight with net nanny and every other kind of child safe security. You can type in individual words so any pages with those word on somewhere, even once will be inaccessable to your children. I had them when mine were small and they were so good they even locked out some educational sites because reproduction was in one of the sections on there.

Mine never got access unless I was with them full stop and I'm with you on this one, but then like you I'm well clued up on the dangers of the net and also computer literate, sadly many are not and even I slip up from time to time.

Not so long back I was sitting with a nine year old boy and his dad on the net, the father is Dyslexic so normally gets the boy to help him. The father is a body builder and they were on the body building forums looking for diets etc. I joined them and said how about looking at the Banana diet, typed it in the search engine on the forum and opened the first post. Up popped this picture of a woman, legs akimbo and about five banana's in her fadge. I nearly died, the boy went bright red and his dad hit the roof and this was on a so called friendly forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha never heard it called a "fadge" before, what a great word "fadge" :lol:

Wow five bananas :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always have this philosophy that if you want to find me then there are certain places on the web where you have to specifically look.  Facebook is a social site.  Why on earth would a prostitute want to display herself on a site where people's children go?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Facebook: absolutely no justifiable reason that I can think of for an escort to use Facebook for business.

Twitter: absolutely no justifiable reason that I can think of for anyone to use it.

Edited by gibbs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The best place for a computer, when there are kids in the house, is in the kitchen where the screen is visible to all! No amount of "parental controls" are a perfect filter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 He is also an amatuer antiques dealer and even scarier has a shotgun licence and owns 2 shotguns!!

He also reads the Mail.

My point is this..as I,ve never met anyone who reads the Mail before or anyone who admits to reading it, is this a typical Mail reader??.

This is the sort of loner who takes his guns into a school and lets them off. Think Hungerford, Dunblane and, over the pond, the school shooting just before Christmas.

 

All the signs are there, but nobody joins up the dots and gets his guns confiscated and his licence revoked till it's too late.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is the sort of loner who takes his guns into a school and lets them off. Think Hungerford, Dunblane and, over the pond, the school shooting just before Christmas.

 

All the signs are there, but nobody joins up the dots and gets his guns confiscated and his licence revoked till it's too late.

Count yourself lucky you dont work with him, once he has read the Mail he offers it to the rest of us...funnily enough he dont get any takers but he still does,nt get the hint, still offers it to us.

One colleague once said "yeah mate i,ll have a look" and then promptly chucked it in the bin. The guy still offered it to him the next day though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now