Harry007

Is a GFE to do with GF type attitude or just a set of tick-box of physical acts ?

111 posts in this topic

The other threads about what is a GFE have just gone on and on and on .. and then some more .. about the physical acts that constitute a GFE.

Is this all that a GFE means ? Then maybe with technology advancing even a robotic doll could provide the physical services required :confused:

A GFE to most people is more than a mere tick box of physical acts.

Would you rather be a BF (boyfriend !) to a GF (girlfriend !) that is foul mouthed, ugly, miserable etc etc BUT who still provides all the tick box PHYSICAL services that some consider are a pre-requisite for they consider a GFE ?

OR .....

Would you rather be a BF (boyfriend !) to a GF (girlfriend !) that is attentive, good company, classy, elegant and a Kelly Brooke lookalike (!) etc etc BUT who does NOT provide all the PHYSICAL tick box services that some consider are a pre-requisite for a GFE ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An awful lot of it is down to personality and manner, yes the kissing etc, but in my opinion a lot more than just the physical stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing about a GF is - she loves you (or ought to) - and that is the point. When you meet your GF - you don't start with mish straight away - titty fuck, reverse oral, anal etc etc etc orrible porn sex.

For me that is not GFE even if it is what most want.

If you were ever lucky enough to have a GF so special it's enough just to be close to her and chat, cuddle, nuzzle, whisper nice things and so on - then you know what GFE should be. It does not exist in paid form of course - it is 1 way traffic when you pay - but no matter - because if you can find someone who you find sexy and lovely, and open to the experience - it can be close to GFE in the way that it feels for you and all you need yourself is the desire, attraction and some imagination for it to happen.

And it is on a higher level than all that nonsense you have ogled and jerked over on porn tube.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
An awful lot of it is down to personality and manner, yes the kissing etc, but in my opinion a lot more than just the physical stuff.

Your so right Mike52(good Mike)

I do not allow touching but have an amazing personality.

Touching as you know is dirty but I absolutely love facials and cim if you promise not to get it in my silky hair. You will have a great time but as your paying in advance its not really an issue.:confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When you meet your GF - you don't start with mish straight away - titty fuck, reverse oral, anal etc etc etc orrible porn sex.

For me that is not GFE even if it is what most want.

Then surely the term GFE as offered by WG's is a misnomer, oxymoron or other such descriptive ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your so right Mike52(good Mike)

I do not allow touching but have an amazing personality.

Touching as you know is dirty but I absolutely love facials and cim if you promise not to get it in my silky hair. You will have a great time but as your paying in advance its not really an issue.:confused:

The difficult bit is trying to cum in your mouth without touching you, that's why we have always had to be in seperate rooms, well towns actually. Paypal is working okay isn't it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once upon a time (twenty year or more ago) I dropped in on my then lover at lunch time - she said "You can have me, or lunch. There isn't time for both."

She was (still is, I assume) a brilliant cook, but I chose to go hungry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The other threads about what is a GFE have just gone on and on and on .. and then some more .. about the physical acts that constitute a GFE.

Is this all that a GFE means ? Then maybe with technology advancing even a robotic doll could provide the physical services required :confused:

A GFE to most people is more than a mere tick box of physical acts.

Would you rather be a BF (boyfriend !) to a GF (girlfriend !) that is foul mouthed, ugly, miserable etc etc BUT who still provides all the tick box PHYSICAL services that some consider are a pre-requisite for they consider a GFE ?

OR .....

Would you rather be a BF (boyfriend !) to a GF (girlfriend !) that is attentive, good company, classy, elegant and a Kelly Brooke lookalike (!) etc etc BUT who does NOT provide all the PHYSICAL tick box services that some consider are a pre-requisite for a GFE ?

A pleasant demeanor and some mandatory physical services is as far as GFE should need to go IMO, otherwise you're playing in dangerous territory.

Just how real do you want it? If you want an actual girlfriend then get the real thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Once upon a time (twenty year or more ago) I dropped in on my then lover at lunch time - she said "You can have me, or lunch. There isn't time for both."

She was (still is, I assume) a brilliant cook, but I chose to go hungry.

I wish the same options could be accepted as GFE.

1) I will kiss, suck, fuck and hug you to death!

or...

2) I can make you a sardine sarnie instead.

I am sure the most would choose option 1: to die! Still: the ones who would choose option 2, will follow the same fate. (those sardines now, its not what they used to be)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh THAT'S what a Girl Friend Experience is... I guess that's why the chap I entertained the other night in my old dressing gown, hair in a towel, no make-up, painting my toenails, and bitching about him not taking the trash out whilst I watched Eastenders didn't do me positive FR.

:confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh THAT'S what a Girl Friend Experience is... I guess that's why the chap I entertained the other night in my old dressing gown, hair in a towel, no make-up, painting my toenails, and bitching about him not taking the trash out whilst I watched Eastenders didn't do me positive FR.

:confused:

Some people would pay good money for that level of authenticity. Though I'm not one of them :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you were ever lucky enough to have a GF so special it's enough just to be close to her and chat, cuddle, nuzzle, whisper nice things and so on - then you know what GFE should be. It does not exist in paid form of course - it is 1 way traffic when you pay - but no matter - because if you can find someone who you find sexy and lovely, and open to the experience - it can be close to GFE in the way that it feels for you and all you need yourself is the desire, attraction and some imagination for it to happen.

And it is on a higher level than all that nonsense you have ogled and jerked over on porn tube.

Spot on. I think older punters tend to prefer this version and I think that is one reason that many WGs seem to prefer them. Okay, it's easier to kiss 'n cuddle and make love tenderly than try to complete the entire porno fitness circuit in one hour, especially if she has a rather full day of bookings scheduled (and the rates are the same). When repeat visits are involved, the tempo can build up or slow down depending on the moods of both people on the day - just like it does with real girlfriends (or did, eons ago, within my recollection).:confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...the entire porno fitness circuit in one hour...

This seems to be the tick the box expectation of many posters on this forum. A fixed and rigid set number of routines/positions/acts that they expect.

That is fine, they are perfectly entitled to hold that narrow view and have that narrow expectation, but they fail to comprehend that their view is by no means a universal view.

Its that lack of empathy and understanding that others are also entitled to their own viewpoints, especially if they are the ones providing the "GFE service".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you want an actual girlfriend then get the real thing.

And if you want more money, just win the lottery.:confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to think in my case it's an unhurried approach where everything that happens feels very natural, sort of go with the flow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The other threads about what is a GFE have just gone on and on and on .. and then some more .. about the physical acts that constitute a GFE.

Is this all that a GFE means ? Then maybe with technology advancing even a robotic doll could provide the physical services required :confused:

A GFE to most people is more than a mere tick box of physical acts.

Would you rather be a BF (boyfriend !) to a GF (girlfriend !) that is foul mouthed, ugly, miserable etc etc BUT who still provides all the tick box PHYSICAL services that some consider are a pre-requisite for they consider a GFE ?

OR .....

Would you rather be a BF (boyfriend !) to a GF (girlfriend !) that is attentive, good company, classy, elegant and a Kelly Brooke lookalike (!) etc etc BUT who does NOT provide all the PHYSICAL tick box services that some consider are a pre-requisite for a GFE ?

In this punting world, I would not pay for being a BF (boyfriend !) to a GF (girlfriend !) that is foul mouthed, ugly, miserable etc etc BUT who still provides all the tick box PHYSICAL services that some consider are a pre-requisite for they consider a GFE.

I would not pay for being a BF (boyfriend !) to a GF (girlfriend !) that is attentive, good company, classy, elegant and a Kelly Brooke lookalike (!) etc etc BUT who does NOT provide all the PHYSICAL tick box services that some consider are a pre-requisite for a GFE either!

There are so many options out there, so why restrict yourself?

If I want a GFE, I will only pay for being a BF (boyfriend !) to a GF (girlfriend !) that is attentive, good company, classy, elegant and a Kelly Brooke lookalike (!) etc etc AND provides all the PHYSICAL tick box services that some consider are a pre-requisite for a GFE either.

If you are looking for Indian/Pakistani girls (as this thread is a spin off from the Indian Palace one), here are my 2 suggestions:

Jayna

http://www.princessjayna.co.uk/gallery.php

Zara from Temptations, Uxbridge

http://www.temptationsuk.com/gallery.html

A pleasant demeanor and some mandatory physical services is as far as GFE should need to go IMO, otherwise you're playing in dangerous territory.

Just how real do you want it? If you want an actual girlfriend then get the real thing.

This is so true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And if you want more money, just win the lottery.:confused:

If your chances of getting a girlfriend are 14 million to 1 you probably should stick to punting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not think a GFE has anything to do with the services offered, although it is probably impossible to have one without proper kissing.

A girl that provides all the PSE trimmings, cim, facials,anal etc does that then mean it cannot be a GFE.....I most certainly don't think so.

It is about level of connection between the two of you, sexually, physically, mentaly, verbaly. Fundamentaly the two people in the room have to get on and like each other. Certainly the guy has to be sexually attracted to the girl, how much the girl needs to be also sexualy attracted I honestly don't know. A girl 20 - 30 years your junior cannot be sexualy attracted to you, can she? Maybe it is some other form of intimacy that is enjoyed on her side?

Whatever it is, a GFE is not what is used when it is advertised, the advertised version means Kissing plus Oral (covered or uncovered) and no specialist services. A true GFE for me is not about the services, it is about whether I genuinly feel like both people in the room want to enjoy themselves and would enjoy themselves socially should the circumstances have been different.:confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Then surely the term GFE as offered by WG's is a misnomer, oxymoron or other such descriptive ?

No not really, the clue is in the word "experience".

The WG is not and never will be our girlfriend but she will act like a girlfriend for the duration of the booking -------- what services she provides is open to debate but the very minimum should be french kissing, not too sure about OWO --------- I would guess there are some real girlfriends who are not comfortable with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I allways say "Yes i provide a Full GFE",

And when i say yes this is what i percieve as what iam offering,Iam happy to lay on a bed and cuddle you Intemately and iam happy for kisses with Tongue's and to get to know you and apreciate you spending your time with me.

And if it was just a tick of a box i would mean "Yes iam happy to let you kiss me while i close my eyes and pretend of Brad pitt,Allso cuddle me but dont look at the silly face and scrunched up nose i pull behond your back".

So Yes in my opinion there is a massive massive differnce in saying and what you actually offer.

Ohhh and P.s no i cannot cook iam rubbish so would be Mcdonalds Breakfast in the Morning lol. xxxx .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No not really, the clue is in the word "experience".

The WG is not and never will be our girlfriend but she will act like a girlfriend for the duration of the booking -------- what services she provides is open to debate but the very minimum should be french kissing, not too sure about OWO --------- I would guess there are some real girlfriends who are not comfortable with that.

Nice sensible post Jimmy. And would you not say that this is exactly what has been happening (i.e. the debate :confused:)

Everyone has their own definition for their own personal " minimum".

Some posters (not you) have stated that because because they have xxx number of FR's to their name (or should that be who gives a f*** how many FR's you have under your name :D) that fact somehow implicitly gives them the right to define everyone else's "minimum" (post 280 on the infamous other thread)

http://http://www.punternet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=20670

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nice sensible post Jimmy. And would you not say that this is exactly what has been happening (i.e. the debate :D)

Everyone has their own definition for their own personal " minimum".

That may be true -------- however anything less than french kissing could not possibly be considered a GFE ------- in my opinion that is. :confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If your chances of getting a girlfriend are 14 million to 1 you probably should stick to punting.

The odds probably differ slightly between the two cases, but you've grasped the principle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The odds probably differ slightly between the two cases, but you've grasped the principle.

Grasp yes, endorse no.:D

Look Barry I'm not trying to impose my view but merely to express it. The GFE IMO is a term that has been appropriated my marketers to take the edge off of the FPS.

I've been with girls who offer FPS but turns out to be GFE and vice versa.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your so right Mike52(good Mike)

I do not allow touching but have an amazing personality.

Touching as you know is dirty but I absolutely love facials and cim if you promise not to get it in my silky hair. You will have a great time but as your paying in advance its not really an issue.:D

So not up your viva then? :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now