Btd

Services Available For Clients

52 posts in this topic

I have read a few times that some escorts may be happy to offer one client certain services, but not be happy to offer another client those services.  Now as long as both clients have good hygiene standards and are polite why would the same services possibly 'not' be offered to the other client?  Also both clients are paying the same amount of money.  I do understand some clients may be too big for a girl to accept anal from them.

 

I would like to hear your thoughts on this.  

 

Thanks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I could understand not wanting to DFK someone who you didn't find attractive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think to a large extent you answered your own question in the second sentence... Also, there may be certain services that are only available to regulars, once the SP has got used to them and established a bit of trust (such as, if I DT this guy, will he suddenly thrust hard, or CIM without warning). At the end of the day SPs are human (thank God) and also have likes and dislikes, and some of the services they offer are also at the edge of their personal comfort zones. I'd hate to think that there are punters who turn up saying "my mate says you did X with him, so you have to do it with me otherwise you're not being fair and I'll sue, call the anti-discrimination board, etc.

I see plenty of WGs profiles saying that they don't accept business from men under 30, or black/Asian men. While my terribly PC side winces slightly at the second of those, I'm not going to moralise since I don't know what that girl's experience has been with younger or non-white men.

Edited by hotdogburger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read a few times that some escorts may be happy to offer one client certain services, but not be happy to offer another client those services.  Now as long as both clients have good hygiene standards and are polite why would the same services possibly 'not' be offered to the other client?  Also both clients are paying the same amount of money.  I do understand some clients may be too big for a girl to accept anal from them.

 

I would like to hear your thoughts on this.  

 

Thanks :)

if the client is of good personal  hygiene, health and is police i see no reason why he wouldnt be offered the same services that another has recieved. Unless of course the girl is withholding services because of her own personal reason in which case this should be stated and it should apply to all xxx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think to a large extent you answered your own question in the second sentence... Also, there may be certain services that are only available to regulars, once the SP has got used to them and established a bit of trust (such as, if I DT this guy, will he suddenly thrust hard, or CIM without warning). At the end of the day SPs are human (thank God) and also have likes and dislikes, and some of the services they offer are also at the edge of their personal comfort zones. I'd hate to think that there are punters who turn up saying "my mate says you did X with him, so you have to do it with me otherwise you're not being fair and I'll sue, call the anti-discrimination board, etc.

I see plenty of WGs profiles saying that they don't accept business from men under 30, or black/Asian men. While my terribly PC side winces slightly at the second of those, I'm not going to moralise since I don't know what that girl's experience has been with younger or non-white men.

I dont see guys under 21 anylonger though, thats a recent change brought on by the fact that whilst lay on my bed with an 18 year old I suddenly felt like a dirty old peodo and a wave of nausea hit me. It wasnt actually his fault, it was a realisation that came over me and to do with my own childrens ages. Obviously i didnt let him see how i suddenly felt but Im not in this job to be so mercenary over every pound that  I will fuck up my own head in the process, im in it for a nice living for a nice life for me and mine and thats it x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing I have experienced with regards to this topic is agency's putting certain services on the girls likes list and then on meeting the girl finding that she doesn't actually offer all services listed on the site. Not sure whether this is the agency trying to draw the people in or the girls just not feeling like performing certain services. Either way, I have found independents liked tend to be more accurate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me sex is a two way 'dance' and the pleasure of my partner is everything for me and the source of my greatest arousal. Thus what any particular partner would enjoy at any moment on any day is of interest to me and I wouldn't push beyond that.

There's no particular service that I 'need' other than good kissing and a willingness to direct me towards what will arouse the lady. Like any good dance, sex changes and likely improves with mutual experience and practice.

I would rather be with a WG who is honest with me about her likes/dislikes than one who went through a formulaic set of services although not preferring many/some of them.

WGs must set the menu of services to the limit of their comfort to ensure a wide client base/income, but I would rather find out the core of services which she most loves and work with those!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I could understand not wanting to DFK someone who you didn't find attractive.

Not from a service provider !  Perhaps the other way around if you find the lady unattractive ( there are some hum-dingers in this industry..LOl)  but never from a SP.  Looks are superficial and mean nothing to a decent working girl.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if the client is of good personal  hygiene, health and is police i see no reason why he wouldnt be offered the same services that another has recieved. Unless of course the girl is withholding services because of her own personal reason in which case this should be stated and it should apply to all xxx

I would never give the police a different service to any other punter Chloe :)

 

LOL at your typo.  It made me burst out laughing x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read a few times that some escorts may be happy to offer one client certain services, but not be happy to offer another client those services.  Now as long as both clients have good hygiene standards and are polite why would the same services possibly 'not' be offered to the other client?  Also both clients are paying the same amount of money.  I do understand some clients may be too big for a girl to accept anal from them.

 

I would like to hear your thoughts on this.  

 

Thanks :)

Yes, you probably read it right.  Why should any girl have her bottom invaded by a submarine when she feels perfectly willing to accept a tug boat?  The anus is a delicate thing.

 

I saw a man as a regular client for a long time and 'put up' with his bad breath because he was nice to me.  However, the last time I saw him and we kissed deeply, I felt the vomit coming up my throat and knew I could never kiss him again like that so I stopped seeing him full stop.  before anyone pulls me on bad communication - he knew his breath was foul and commented on it every time he came here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sarah's post is why I don't advertise kissing as standard.

As for the OP - are you saying you'd expect us to do something we don't enjoy just so you don't feel short-changed? I don't like FRs because some guys go into ridiculous detail and like bragging about things they got that weren't advertised, such as, in my case, kissing or anal. This then leads to a stream of pointless exchanges with unknown men asking if those services are guaranteed. No, they are not. I don't advertise any more but when I did, it was just for the bare bones service I can guarantee everyone, the rest is up to how things go and how long the booking is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sarah's post is why I don't advertise kissing as standard.

As for the OP - are you saying you'd expect us to do something we don't enjoy just so you don't feel short-changed? I don't like FRs because some guys go into ridiculous detail and like bragging about things they got that weren't advertised, such as, in my case, kissing or anal. This then leads to a stream of pointless exchanges with unknown men asking if those services are guaranteed. No, they are not. I don't advertise any more but when I did, it was just for the bare bones service I can guarantee everyone, the rest is up to how things go and how long the booking is.

Or do as I do and do not advertise any services at all, and then the punt's your lobster :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would never give the police a different service to any other punter Chloe :)

 

LOL at your typo.  It made me burst out laughing x

hahaha yes I have just noticed it myself. Glad I made you smile  ^_^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Attitude has a lot to do with it.

 

I know that one gentleman used to come in all the time to a place I worked, and all the girls hated him, he was a miserable bugger, never smiled.

 

Anyway, Juliet saw him one day and ended up having a cracking time, but she had to re-start the appointment, as it didn't start off well, and it was down to the gents attitude.

 

Once they'd had a chat and re-started, they both had  great time.

 

She gave him the advice that when he met the ladies, smile and be a bit more friendly and you'll end up with a great service.

 

And since then the gent has had everything he asked for from all the ladies, and all because he changed one small thing, his smile.

 

 

At the end of the day, even if you are nervous, a smile, a joke, or just a bit of a personality goes a long way.

 

Nobody wants to fuck a dead fish, either from the clients perspective, or the girls.

 

It can be very hard from a WG's POV if she has to draw blood from a stone. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very helpful answers guys and girls.

 

Thanks ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing I have experienced with regards to this topic is agency's putting certain services on the girls likes list and then on meeting the girl finding that she doesn't actually offer all services listed on the site. Not sure whether this is the agency trying to draw the people in or the girls just not feeling like performing certain services. Either way, I have found independents liked tend to be more accurate.

 

Agencies put services on the website, after confirming it with girl. I dont think for agency is so important to say for example Nata does  A-level, but she doesn't... what is the point, there is always so many other girls on the website who does..

 

Sometimes girls doesn't even bother to call the agency, to let them know if she stopped to do some services. 

 

 

I have read a few times that some escorts may be happy to offer one client certain services, but not be happy to offer another client those services. 

 

Sometimes clients dont ever bother to have a shower after a long day, they think if they came to see an escort, she must to love him as he is.... I think it must be on each profile page - All services at the girl discretion only.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You sure? Is a WG really going to snog a Wayne Rooney lookalike with the same gusto as Cristian Ronaldo? I just cant see a WG being that professsional no matter how much she would like to think she is.

Not from a service provider !  Perhaps the other way around if you find the lady unattractive ( there are some hum-dingers in this industry..LOl)  but never from a SP.  Looks are superficial and mean nothing to a decent working girl.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then i would not book you as to me it smaacks of scammer who wwill not deliver what is promised. I understand in your opinion you see why you feel you are perfectly reasonable to say what you said, but just take a step back to see how it would look to the average punter.

 

As for field reports, punters should not turn them into a porn blog, it makes it look to me as there may be a scam going on, sometimes less is more

Sarah's post is why I don't advertise kissing as standard.

As for the OP - are you saying you'd expect us to do something we don't enjoy just so you don't feel short-changed? I don't like FRs because some guys go into ridiculous detail and like bragging about things they got that weren't advertised, such as, in my case, kissing or anal. This then leads to a stream of pointless exchanges with unknown men asking if those services are guaranteed. No, they are not. I don't advertise any more but when I did, it was just for the bare bones service I can guarantee everyone, the rest is up to how things go and how long the booking is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me sex is a two way 'dance' and the pleasure of my partner is everything for me and the source of my greatest arousal...........There's no particular service that I 'need' other than good kissing and a willingness to direct me towards what will arouse the lady..........I would rather be with a WG who is honest with me about her likes/dislikes than one who went through a formulaic set of services although not preferring many/some of them.

!

JamesRichards. You will never know how familiar those words are too me. I could have written exactly the same words (and probably have but my memory fails me so much I can't remember) as they express my feelings perfectly. I want to leave feeling satisfied both sexually and as regards money well spent. I also want to leave the lady happy and feeling glad that I had visited her. I know that sometimes they might just be putting on an act but hopefully only on a minority of occasions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw a man as a regular client for a long time and 'put up' with his bad breath because he was nice to me.......he knew his breath was foul and commented on it every time he came here.

That I can't understand. All of us, at one time or another, suffer from bad breath without realising it. But to know that you have bad breath and think nothing of it in circumstances where there is very intimate contact? And then have the audacity to admit that you know your breath smells? And for there to be repeated visits?

I can't think as to how to comment further. I'm actually lost for words. Which is extremely unusual for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then i would not book you as to me it smaacks of scammer who wwill not deliver what is promised. I understand in your opinion you see why you feel you are perfectly reasonable to say what you said, but just take a step back to see how it would look to the average punter.

As for field reports, punters should not turn them into a porn blog, it makes it look to me as there may be a scam going on, sometimes less is more

I definitely deliver what I advertise (except that I don't now), but I will not promise kissing in advance as I hate disappointing clients. The fact that I stopped advertising and don't take on any new clients because I don't want to increase the number of regulars I have would suggest what is delivered is not a scam; or a very good one indeed.

I guess having worked in a parlour where you didn't have much say on what you did and what was advertised next to your name made me choose never to do something that made me feel uncomfortable again. It worked out rather well for me.

Edited by randombird

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Attitude has a lot to do with it......... Nobody wants to fuck a dead fish, either from the clients perspective, or the girls.

.

Apart from giving me a big big smile that statement is exactly right. It's also more likely to stick in people's minds because of the way it's phrased.

In the last year, out of 20 plus ladies, I've only had a couple who fell in to the "dead fish" category and it wasn't enjoyable. I can understand that it must also fall a bit short if the lady has a client who needs a vitamin sandwich.

Edited by gibbs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or do as I do and do not advertise any services at all, and then the punt's your lobster :)

I definitely deliver what I advertise (except that I don't now), but I will not promise kissing in advance as I hate disappointing clients. .

Strangely enough, although I normally check that kissing is on the menu, arguably the best punt I've had was with a lady who advertised nothing and delivered just about everything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing I have experienced with regards to this topic is agency's putting certain services on the girls likes list and then on meeting the girl finding that she doesn't actually offer all services listed on the site. Not sure whether this is the agency trying to draw the people in or the girls just not feeling like performing certain services. Either way, I have found independents liked tend to be more accurate.

unfortunatley girls tell agencys that they do all sorts of stuff just to get on the books. In reality though when they get there and you confirm they "no i dont do thats" come forth. 

 

You sure? Is a WG really going to snog a Wayne Rooney lookalike with the same gusto as Cristian Ronaldo? I just cant see a WG being that professsional no matter how much she would like to think she is.

Are you trying to imply that only good looking guys are good kissers? I have had gorgeous snogs with guys who are not my version of good looking, they are all married though so to someone somewhere they are gorgeous or were once. You really dont have a clue do you...thats based on other things you have posted recently too lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunatley girls tell agencys that they do all sorts of stuff just to get on the books. In reality though when they get there and you confirm they "no i dont do thats" come forth. 

 

Are you trying to imply that only good looking guys are good kissers? I have had gorgeous snogs with guys who are not my version of good looking, they are all married though so to someone somewhere they are gorgeous or were once. You really dont have a clue do you...thats based on other things you have posted recently too lol

In my experience looks have nothing to do with performance where men are concerned. The only time I'd refuse kissing would be someone turning up with booze and fag breath, but I'd probably be getting rid of them full stop if they were drunk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now