Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Thurson

There Are Three Of Us In This Marriage...

42 posts in this topic

... and it's a bit crowded.

 

 

A few of you will probably recall me mentioning on other threads that I have a regular girl who 'retired' as an escort back in February.

 

Despite retiring, she said she would still meet me, and she does, charging me about half the rate that applied during her short, but illustrious, career.

 

She has a boyfriend she has met since retiring, although he is unaware, apparently, of her seeing me.  From her comments, there isn't anyone other than me paying for her intimate services at this time.  This last point isn't something that would bother me one way or the other, but obviously it might be more concerning to the boyfriend.

 

Anyway, in a brief interlude during a lovely three hours we spent together yesterday, I asked her whether she had any notion of when she would eventually call our arrangement off.  To my eternal disappointment, she said "Yes.  In October".

 

Doing my best to hide my disappointment I ask her "Why October?"

 

"Because my boyfriend has asked me to marry him in October, and I have said yes" she states, but then continues "although he does spend plenty of time away in different parts of the country on business, and we could always get together then."  After a pause she expresses a doubt as to whether she really should see me at these times.

 

"Of course, why not?" I ask "I am married and I am seeing you.  What you don't know, doesn't hurt you."  We let the subject drop. 

 

By the time we have finished our liaison we have agreed to meet again later this month and to have an overnighter in June.

 

So she is engaged to be married and happily being unfaithful to her fiance with me.  She plans to get married, but seems unsure as to whether this means that she will be faithful or not.  When you guys and girls read this what issues of morality / immorality do you find in this tale?

 

Is she the mother of abomination for her infidelity now and/or for the contemplation of infidelity in her impending marriage?  Is she just the same as the rest of us, who want our cake and eat it too?  Am I terribly wicked for trying to persuade her to continue seeing me after her nuptials?

 

 

P.S. Certain minor facts have been altered in this tale to prevent her identity being deduced, particularly in case her fiance should ever stumble across this thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... and it's a bit crowded.

 

 

A few of you will probably recall me mentioning on other threads that I have a regular girl who 'retired' as an escort back in February.

 

Despite retiring, she said she would still meet me, and she does, charging me about half the rate that applied during her short, but illustrious, career.

 

She has a boyfriend she has met since retiring, although he is unaware, apparently, of her seeing me.  From her comments, there isn't anyone other than me paying for her intimate services at this time.  This last point isn't something that would bother me one way or the other, but obviously it might be more concerning to the boyfriend.

 

Anyway, in a brief interlude during a lovely three hours we spent together yesterday, I asked her whether she had any notion of when she would eventually call our arrangement off.  To my eternal disappointment, she said "Yes.  In October".

 

Doing my best to hide my disappointment I ask her "Why October?"

 

"Because my boyfriend has asked me to marry him in October, and I have said yes" she states, but then continues "although he does spend plenty of time away in different parts of the country on business, and we could always get together then."  After a pause she expresses a doubt as to whether she really should see me at these times.

 

"Of course, why not?" I ask "I am married and I am seeing you.  What you don't know, doesn't hurt you."  We let the subject drop. 

 

By the time we have finished our liaison we have agreed to meet again later this month and to have an overnighter in June.

 

So she is engaged to be married and happily being unfaithful to her fiance with me.  She plans to get married, but seems unsure as to whether this means that she will be faithful or not.  When you guys and girls read this what issues of morality / immorality do you find in this tale?

 

Is she the mother of abomination for her infidelity now and/or for the contemplation of infidelity in her impending marriage?  Is she just the same as the rest of us, who want our cake and eat it too?  Am I terribly wicked for trying to persuade her to continue seeing me after her nuptials?

 

 

P.S. Certain minor facts have been altered in this tale to prevent her identity being deduced, particularly in case her fiance should ever stumble across this thread.

Some punters start relationships, become engaged, get married and carrying punting despite thinking they'll become monogamous at some stage. In fact scrap punter and replace with "some people" and swap punting and replace with "having sex with different partners", and you have just, err people and life. Don't however try and influence her just because you do it.

Edited by Strawberry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No she isnt...if you push her though on the subject of seeing you again after she is married and persuade her that its a good idea "because you see her and your married" then you are!

 

The girl has clearly decided to stop seeing you once married. She agreed she would have opportunity to see you but clearly doesnt want to going by what you have said. 

 

Yes you are terribly wicked to try to persuade her to see you after she is married even though she doesnt seem to want too. Let her alone to start her married life as a fresh start for her. If she contacts you afterwards then fair enough, dont try to persuade her though as all you may end up doing is sullying your memories 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... and it's a bit crowded.

 

 

A few of you will probably recall me mentioning on other threads that I have a regular girl who 'retired' as an escort back in February.

 

Despite retiring, she said she would still meet me, and she does, charging me about half the rate that applied during her short, but illustrious, career.

 

She has a boyfriend she has met since retiring, although he is unaware, apparently, of her seeing me.  From her comments, there isn't anyone other than me paying for her intimate services at this time.  This last point isn't something that would bother me one way or the other, but obviously it might be more concerning to the boyfriend.

 

Anyway, in a brief interlude during a lovely three hours we spent together yesterday, I asked her whether she had any notion of when she would eventually call our arrangement off.  To my eternal disappointment, she said "Yes.  In October".

 

Doing my best to hide my disappointment I ask her "Why October?"

 

"Because my boyfriend has asked me to marry him in October, and I have said yes" she states, but then continues "although he does spend plenty of time away in different parts of the country on business, and we could always get together then."  After a pause she expresses a doubt as to whether she really should see me at these times.

 

"Of course, why not?" I ask "I am married and I am seeing you.  What you don't know, doesn't hurt you."  We let the subject drop. 

 

By the time we have finished our liaison we have agreed to meet again later this month and to have an overnighter in June.

 

So she is engaged to be married and happily being unfaithful to her fiance with me.  She plans to get married, but seems unsure as to whether this means that she will be faithful or not.  When you guys and girls read this what issues of morality / immorality do you find in this tale?

 

Is she the mother of abomination for her infidelity now and/or for the contemplation of infidelity in her impending marriage?  Is she just the same as the rest of us, who want our cake and eat it too?  Am I terribly wicked for trying to persuade her to continue seeing me after her nuptials?

 

 

P.S. Certain minor facts have been altered in this tale to prevent her identity being deduced, particularly in case her fiance should ever stumble across this thread.

If thats what SHE decides to do then thats her business, i want my cake and to eat it and have been doing so for 30 years having no intention of ever stopping. I am a selfish sod though which helps. You cant persuade someone who isnt at all interested, so it is down to her ultimately. You might be tempting her but she can always say no and stick only with fiance.

 

As to her only seeing you, who knows, you cant be definite about that of course, as ever i would take it with a pinch of salt and lap her service up while i could, as much as i could until i got bored as i always do sooner or later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....until i got bored as i always do sooner or later.

 

The 11 words that conclusively sum up the male sex life :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't like the idea of being called as "the other party" in a divorce case, especially if I was married.

CB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... and it's a bit crowded.

 

 

A few of you will probably recall me mentioning on other threads that I have a regular girl who 'retired' as an escort back in February.

 

Despite retiring, she said she would still meet me, and she does, charging me about half the rate that applied during her short, but illustrious, career.

 

She has a boyfriend she has met since retiring, although he is unaware, apparently, of her seeing me.  From her comments, there isn't anyone other than me paying for her intimate services at this time.  This last point isn't something that would bother me one way or the other, but obviously it might be more concerning to the boyfriend.

 

Anyway, in a brief interlude during a lovely three hours we spent together yesterday, I asked her whether she had any notion of when she would eventually call our arrangement off.  To my eternal disappointment, she said "Yes.  In October".

 

Doing my best to hide my disappointment I ask her "Why October?"

 

"Because my boyfriend has asked me to marry him in October, and I have said yes" she states, but then continues "although he does spend plenty of time away in different parts of the country on business, and we could always get together then."  After a pause she expresses a doubt as to whether she really should see me at these times.

 

"Of course, why not?" I ask "I am married and I am seeing you.  What you don't know, doesn't hurt you."  We let the subject drop. 

 

By the time we have finished our liaison we have agreed to meet again later this month and to have an overnighter in June.

 

So she is engaged to be married and happily being unfaithful to her fiance with me.  She plans to get married, but seems unsure as to whether this means that she will be faithful or not.  When you guys and girls read this what issues of morality / immorality do you find in this tale?

 

Is she the mother of abomination for her infidelity now and/or for the contemplation of infidelity in her impending marriage?  Is she just the same as the rest of us, who want our cake and eat it too?  Am I terribly wicked for trying to persuade her to continue seeing me after her nuptials?

 

 

P.S. Certain minor facts have been altered in this tale to prevent her identity being deduced, particularly in case her fiance should ever stumble across this thread.

 

 

the fact that you take seriously even a word which comes out of this liar's mouth is questionable in and of itself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have no right to judge her on her morality considering you are married yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the fact that you take seriously even a word which comes out of this liar's mouth is questionable in and of itself.

Blimey willsmith.  The sunny weather hasn't done much for your disposition! :lol:

 

 

You have no right to judge her on her morality considering you are married yourself.

Are you referring to me Joker?  I'm perfectly happy with her morality whether she keeps seeing me or not. 

 

I don't think that any of my comments were judgemental.  I will think none the less of her whichever route she chooses, just glad for all the brilliant times she has given me.  I am, however, curious as to how others might view this.

 

Of course, if your point wasn't directed at me, then you may need to clarify who else it was aimed at. :mellow:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Because my boyfriend has asked me to marry him in October, and I have said yes" she states, but then continues "although he does spend plenty of time away in different parts of the country on business, and we could always get together then."  After a pause she expresses a doubt as to whether she really should see me at these times.

 

"Of course, why not?" I ask "I am married and I am seeing you.  What you don't know, doesn't hurt you."  We let the subject drop. 

I have not the life experiences to even think to offer any opinion but I think one's response might be influenced from having actually been there to hear this part of the conversation.

 

I think tone of voice, expression of face and such like are crucial in being able to make any sort of judgement about what she might really want to do and how pushy or completely unpushy you actually were.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's one thing guys seeing WGs when sex has dried up at home and feel they've tried everything, or a wife having an affair after marital problems for some time, but it's another thing to be sleeping around and accepting a proposal at the same time.  She is either very selfish or after a visa or gold digging.  Marriage means nothing to her and is for show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey willsmith.  The sunny weather hasn't done much for your disposition! :lol:

 

 

Are you referring to me Joker?  I'm perfectly happy with her morality whether she keeps seeing me or not. 

 

I don't think that any of my comments were judgemental.  I will think none the less of her whichever route she chooses, just glad for all the brilliant times she has given me.  I am, however, curious as to how others might view this.

 

Of course, if your point wasn't directed at me, then you may need to clarify who else it was aimed at. :mellow:

 

 

Firstly, I prefer winter.

 

Seriously, read your post again.

 

"From her comments, there isn't anyone other than me paying for her intimate services at this time"

 

Aww let me guess, you're her "special one"...  doing this behind her boyfriends back......but only with you  of course. 

 

Let's get this straight even if she is telling the truth, she is lying to the man she plan's on marrying, so my guess is she is a typical mercenary type, I wouldn't get too attached. 

 

 

 "although he does spend plenty of time away in different parts of the country on business, and we could always get together then." 

 

Sounds like a keeper, wow what a lucky guy.

 

Women have it so easy because a little ego boost is all most men need to be blindsided, but hey your getting special rates. Answer me this guy, what exactly are her rates supposed to be considering she's retired and not working as an escort? No agency, no advertising, nowt...

 

This is the curious case of a friend with benefits and a guy paying a lady for sex even though she's not working as an escort.

 

Some old advice...This girl = mercenary + Nutjob = Avoid

Edited by willsmith

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, I prefer winter.

 

Seriously, read your post again.

 

"From her comments, there isn't anyone other than me paying for her intimate services at this time"

 

Aww let me guess, you're her "special one"...  doing this behind her boyfriends back......but only with you  of course. 

 

Let's get this straight even if she is telling the truth, she is lying to the man she plan's on marrying, so my guess is she is a typical mercenary type, I wouldn't get too attached. 

 

 

 "although he does spend plenty of time away in different parts of the country on business, and we could always get together then." 

 

Sounds like a keeper, wow what a lucky guy.

 

Women have it so easy because a little ego boost is all most men need to be blindsided, but hey your getting special rates. Answer me this guy, what exactly are her rates supposed to be considering she's retired and not working as an escort? No agency, no advertising, nowt...

 

This is the curious case of a friend with benefits and a guy paying a lady for sex even though she's not working as an escort.

 

Some old advice...This girl = mercenary + Nutjob = Avoid

 

*News Flash*!!!.. 

 

This is one woman playing the field that's being talked about here by how many married men????

 

Oh by the way.. I'M GETTING MARRIED!..  Yay he proposed over the weekend, and what's more I won't be pinching his money or withholding sex...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, I prefer winter.

 

Seriously, read your post again.

 

"From her comments, there isn't anyone other than me paying for her intimate services at this time"

 

Aww let me guess, you're her "special one"...  doing this behind her boyfriends back......but only with you  of course. 

 

Let's get this straight even if she is telling the truth, she is lying to the man she plan's on marrying, so my guess is she is a typical mercenary type, I wouldn't get too attached. 

 

 

 "although he does spend plenty of time away in different parts of the country on business, and we could always get together then." 

 

Sounds like a keeper, wow what a lucky guy.

 

Women have it so easy because a little ego boost is all most men need to be blindsided, but hey your getting special rates. Answer me this guy, what exactly are her rates supposed to be considering she's retired and not working as an escort? No agency, no advertising, nowt...

 

This is the curious case of a friend with benefits and a guy paying a lady for sex even though she's not working as an escort.

 

Some old advice...This girl = mercenary + Nutjob = Avoid

Love it willsmith. :lol:  :lol:

 

Really put a smile on my face, although I do understand from your tone that you think that you're being serious. 

 

Firstly, as I said in my post, it wouldn't bother me if she were seeing others.  Doh!  I did meet her when she was a full time escort, after all.  The point was to raise the context of her cheating on her fiancé.  Aww, sorry if you think you scored a point on this one.

 

Your point about her rates is rather a 'non' point.  All I am saying is that I am still paying her, as opposed to not paying her, so the fact that it is less than her previous standard rates is just like, what's the word, oh yes, obvious. :wacko:

 

So, if we get to the nub of your position, you're just trying to be moralistic about her cheating on her fiancé, right?  Your own high moral positions stemming from, what, exactly?

 

Your conclusion that I should avoid her ignores just a few minor issues A) she is gorgeous, B) she is a total nymphomaniac like no other girl I've come across, and C) I love spending time with her, full stop.

 

Other than that, you're just bang on! :lol:  :lol: :lol:  

 

 

*News Flash*!!!.. 

 

This is one woman playing the field that's being talked about here by how many married men????

Exactly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

*News Flash*!!!.. 

 

This is one woman playing the field that's being talked about here by how many married men????

 

Oh by the way.. I'M GETTING MARRIED!..  Yay he proposed over the weekend, and what's more I won't be pinching his money or withholding sex...

 

 

what a lucky  guy... but  most men don't share your husband's peculier cuckoldry fetish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what a lucky  guy... but  most men don't share your husband's peculier cuckoldry fetish

 

My future hubbie Cuckold...  Lol are you mad?  He's a professional Domme/master and bloody good at it he is too.  Ha he's going to crease when I read this one to him.  Not that there's anything wrong with being Cuckold either come to think about it, many are and quite happy with it too.

 

Do you really think because my partner allows me to be my own person that he's cuckold, can you not see that its actually the exact opposite?  Sweets I feel so sorry for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what a lucky  guy... but  most men don't share your husband's peculier cuckoldry fetish

My guess is fewer and fewer women appreciate your hypocritical, mysoginistic BS, either. IMHO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... and it's a bit crowded.

 

 

A few of you will probably recall me mentioning on other threads that I have a regular girl who 'retired' as an escort back in February.

 

Despite retiring, she said she would still meet me, and she does, charging me about half the rate that applied during her short, but illustrious, career.

 

She has a boyfriend she has met since retiring, although he is unaware, apparently, of her seeing me.  From her comments, there isn't anyone other than me paying for her intimate services at this time.  This last point isn't something that would bother me one way or the other, but obviously it might be more concerning to the boyfriend.

 

Anyway, in a brief interlude during a lovely three hours we spent together yesterday, I asked her whether she had any notion of when she would eventually call our arrangement off.  To my eternal disappointment, she said "Yes.  In October".

 

Doing my best to hide my disappointment I ask her "Why October?"

 

"Because my boyfriend has asked me to marry him in October, and I have said yes" she states, but then continues "although he does spend plenty of time away in different parts of the country on business, and we could always get together then."  After a pause she expresses a doubt as to whether she really should see me at these times.

 

"Of course, why not?" I ask "I am married and I am seeing you.  What you don't know, doesn't hurt you."  We let the subject drop. 

 

By the time we have finished our liaison we have agreed to meet again later this month and to have an overnighter in June.

 

So she is engaged to be married and happily being unfaithful to her fiance with me.  She plans to get married, but seems unsure as to whether this means that she will be faithful or not.  When you guys and girls read this what issues of morality / immorality do you find in this tale?

 

Is she the mother of abomination for her infidelity now and/or for the contemplation of infidelity in her impending marriage?  Is she just the same as the rest of us, who want our cake and eat it too?  Am I terribly wicked for trying to persuade her to continue seeing me after her nuptials?

 

 

P.S. Certain minor facts have been altered in this tale to prevent her identity being deduced, particularly in case her fiance should ever stumble across this thread.

 

As soon as you cheat on your spouse you forfeit the right to any morality in this regard and certainly any credibility in judging another’s IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Love it willsmith. :lol:  :lol:

 

Really put a smile on my face, although I do understand from your tone that you think that you're being serious. 

 

Firstly, as I said in my post, it wouldn't bother me if she were seeing others.  Doh!  I did meet her when she was a full time escort, after all.  The point was to raise the context of her cheating on her fiancé.  Aww, sorry if you think you scored a point on this one.

 

Your point about her rates is rather a 'non' point.  All I am saying is that I am still paying her, as opposed to not paying her, so the fact that it is less than her previous standard rates is just like, what's the word, oh yes, obvious. :wacko:

 

So, if we get to the nub of your position, you're just trying to be moralistic about her cheating on her fiancé, right?  Your own high moral positions stemming from, what, exactly?

 

Your conclusion that I should avoid her ignores just a few minor issues A) she is gorgeous, :cool: she is a total nymphomaniac like no other girl I've come across, and C) I love spending time with her, full stop.

 

Other than that, you're just bang on! :lol:  :lol: :lol:  

 

 

Exactly.

 

 

The story proceeds in two Acts, In Act 1 Will Smith will demonstrate Thurson's logical fallacy. In Act 2 our hero Will Smith will expose Thurson for the charlatan that he is. 

 

Act 1) No. Get this through your head - My point is I think you're a moron for believing anything she tells you, her actions to her fiancée are deceitful so I deem her untrustworthy. It has nothing to do with morals, I'm just talking about her behaviour. It's a judgement based on information and facts that you have shared, morals don't come into it.

 

Act 2) You wrote:-

 

"So, if we get to the nub of your position, you're just trying to be moralistic about her cheating on her fiancé, right?  Your own high moral positions stemming from, what, exactly?

 

 

I'm sure you're aware that escorts have boyfriends, husbands. So what was the point of point of this thread?

 

You wrote...

 

"Is she the mother of abomination for her infidelity now and/or for the contemplation of infidelity in her impending marriage Is she just the same as the rest of us, who want our cake and eat it too?  Am I terribly wicked for trying to persuade her to continue seeing me after her nuptials?"

 

What is the point of this thread other than inviting others to judge the morals of the escort in question? 

 

Even if my position had been based on criticizing her morality, (which was debunked in Act 1) in light of  the questions you asked, on a thread that you started, my falsely deemed moralistic position would have been a perfectly logical response to the parameters of the discussion which you, yourself set, which makes your own grossly negligent critique of it all the more absurd, even by your own standards.

Edited by willsmith
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As soon as you cheat on your spouse you forfeit the right to any morality in this regard and certainly any credibility in judging another’s IMO.

Good to see you back Spok, spouting your moralistic nonsense, and as ever thanks for the chuckle, i have missed it from you. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My future hubbie Cuckold...  Lol are you mad?  He's a professional Domme/master and bloody good at it he is too.  Ha he's going to crease when I read this one to him.  Not that there's anything wrong with being Cuckold either come to think about it, many are and quite happy with it too.

 

Do you really think because my partner allows me to be my own person that he's cuckold, can you not see that its actually the exact opposite?  Sweets I feel so sorry for you.

 

 

Cuckold .."A man married to an unfaithful wife"
 
Don't blame me, blame the dictionary.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The story proceeds in two Acts, In Act 1 Will Smith will demonstrate Thurson's logical fallacy. In Act 2 our hero Will Smith will expose Thurson for the charlatan that he is. 

 

Act 1) No. Get this through your head - My point is I think you're a moron for believing anything she tells you, her actions to her fiancée are deceitful so I deem her untrustworthy. It has nothing to do with morals, I'm just talking about her behaviour. It's a judgement based on information and facts that you have shared, morals don't come into it.

 

Act 2) You wrote:-

 

"So, if we get to the nub of your position, you're just trying to be moralistic about her cheating on her fiancé, right?  Your own high moral positions stemming from, what, exactly?

 

 

I'm sure you're aware that escorts have boyfriends, husbands. So what was the point of point of this thread?

 

You wrote...

 

"Is she the mother of abomination for her infidelity now and/or for the contemplation of infidelity in her impending marriage Is she just the same as the rest of us, who want our cake and eat it too?  Am I terribly wicked for trying to persuade her to continue seeing me after her nuptials?"

 

What is the point of this thread other than inviting others to judge the morals of the escort in question? 

 

Even if my position had been based on criticizing her morality, (which was debunked in Act 1) in light of  the questions you asked, on a thread that you started, my falsely deemed moralistic position would have been a perfectly logical response to the parameters of the discussion which you, yourself set, which makes your own grossly negligent critique of it all the more absurd, even by your own standards.

At what point in your logic, willsmith, does the fact that I invite comments mean that I am supposed to approve of them?  Unfortunately, this glaring error in your diatribe rather weakens your argument don't you think?

 

Morality, the definition of which is the quality of being in accord with standards of right and wrong, is exactly what you are trying to establish when you use terms like 'untrustworthy', 'a typical mercenary' etc.  Your judgement is that her behaviour is flawed, wrong, not meeting your standards.  Thus your hypocrisy simply increases every time you hit your keypad.

 

Don't worry willsmith, I can tell by your posts on other threads today as well as this that your just feeling very grumpy today, so I don't take you too seriously.  In fact, you have entertained me no end.  My reason for placing this post was to see what opinion was out there and you have certainly amused me with some wonderful drivel this evening.  It doesn't particularly show you in a good light, but yes, quite entertaining thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At what point in your logic, willsmith, does the fact that I invite comments mean that I am supposed to approve of them?  Unfortunately, this glaring error in your diatribe rather weakens your argument don't you think?

 

Morality, the definition of which is the quality of being in accord with standards of right and wrong, is exactly what you are trying to establish when you use terms like 'untrustworthy', 'a typical mercenary' etc.  Your judgement is that her behaviour is flawed, wrong, not meeting your standards.  Thus your hypocrisy simply increases every time you hit your keypad.

 

Don't worry willsmith, I can tell by your posts on other threads today as well as this that your just feeling very grumpy today, so I don't take you too seriously.  In fact, you have entertained me no end.  My reason for placing this post was to see what opinion was out there and you have certainly amused me with some wonderful drivel this evening.  It doesn't particularly show you in a good light, but yes, quite entertaining thank you.

 

Firstly don't worry about me worrying.

 

The fact that you don't approve of my comments it is irrelevant to my point. You will should also note that I mentioned even if I did make a moral judgement that it would be perfectly acceptable for me to do so after all according to you:-

 

"Morality, the definition of which is the quality of being in accord with standards of right and wrong, is exactly what you are trying to establish"

 

You asked for moral judgements, they have been given to you by other people on this forum post too. You are now being wilfully ignorant so I'm just going to spell it out.

 

You then went on to write:-

 

"So, if we get to the nub of your position, you're just trying to be moralistic about her cheating on her fiancé, right?  Your own high moral positions stemming from, what, exactly?"

 

There are 2 problems with this:-

 

1)You have asked for essentially moralistic judgements, you then criticised what you though was a moralistic judgement.

 

2)You're criticism of the judgement was idiotic. If you have a moral code, religious, personal, organisational you can still make judgements on other people's actions in relation to that code without adhering to it yourself. Simply put you do not need to be a personal of high moral stature (which I do not claim to be) in order to cast a judgement about morals. Your argument is just simply that I am a "moral authority" which can be dismissed through a charge of hypocrisy. This is as absurd as saying that a murderer cannot rebuke another murderer for his immorality, he may be a hypocrite, but his judgement  is correct.

 

3) Lying to a person you are going to marry about working as an escort, and then telling a punter that she would get together with him when her fiancée is out of the country is deceit whatever you think unless you want to redefine the word. My judgement simply donesn't need to come into it.  You used the word "untrustworthy"

 

let's find a dictionary definition for synonyms

 

"deceitful  means intended to deceive or cheat while deceptive  means causing one to believe what is not true or likely to mislead someone" 

 

Oh no look Thurson!, the damn internet dictionary is making MORAL JUDGEMENTS, oh no!  Who is this internet dictionary and what are it's "High" moral credentials to be able to make these judgements!

 

silly buffoon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So, now you're saying you don't agree that her behaviour is immoral

Edited by willsmith
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's one thing guys seeing WGs when sex has dried up at home and feel they've tried everything, or a wife having an affair after marital problems for some time, but it's another thing to be sleeping around and accepting a proposal at the same time.  She is either very selfish or after a visa or gold digging.  Marriage means nothing to her and is for show.

Did you read the initial post?She was a full time escort when he first booked her.She's still working part time.Where the hell did you then deduce gold digger,selfish,or my favourite,visa hunter from the information given?As for sleeping around.FFS.Surely on here of all places you'd think people would understand the concept of business.

So marriage means nothing to her?Thats why she's stopping once she's married.If you want to go to that backwoods outdated moralistic bull then that makes her a far more moral person than most of the board

 

 

Firstly, I prefer winter.

 

Seriously, read your post again.

 

"From her comments, there isn't anyone other than me paying for her intimate services at this time"

 

Aww let me guess, you're her "special one"...  doing this behind her boyfriends back......but only with you  of course. 

 

Let's get this straight even if she is telling the truth, she is lying to the man she plan's on marrying, so my guess is she is a typical mercenary type, I wouldn't get too attached. 

 

 

 "although he does spend plenty of time away in different parts of the country on business, and we could always get together then." 

 

Sounds like a keeper, wow what a lucky guy.

 

Women have it so easy because a little ego boost is all most men need to be blindsided, but hey your getting special rates. Answer me this guy, what exactly are her rates supposed to be considering she's retired and not working as an escort? No agency, no advertising, nowt...

 

This is the curious case of a friend with benefits and a guy paying a lady for sex even though she's not working as an escort.

 

Some old advice...This girl = mercenary + Nutjob = Avoid

She might have a couple more on the go for all he knows.From his posts however that doesnt seem to be a problem or an issue.As for judging her for doing it behind her bf's back,youre definately in the wrong place to be playing that tune.How many people on here do you reckon are doing things behind their partners backs.I'm going to hazard a guess and say you only have a problem because of her gender.

As for retired,i think semi retired fits the bill.Thats generally the case where you continue doing limited work,in her case with a view to full retirement,and it seems both parties understand fully the concept of paying and escorting.Your posts here are full of unecessary venom and more cobblers than a Brothers Grimm elf story

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Despite retiring, she said she would still meet me, and she does, charging me about half the rate that applied during her short, but illustrious, career."

 

She's still charging you then - it's not an affair it is a commercial arrangement however your ego might want to see it and whatever she might say. For all you know she has a dozen guys just like you, "special ones". So she halved her rate - you're a reliable customer. But it is still paid sex. As for what she will do after marriage (if that is the truth) you will have to wait and see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0