Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
lickerdave

The Intimate Details Will Remain Private"

80 posts in this topic

Sorry if this has been covered elsewhere, but this drives me nuts when reading frs. Wtf is the point of writing a" report" if the only information imparted is a brief description of the lady?

So many frs say no intimate details are given out of respect. Ladies, correct me if im wrong but if a guy has had a great time with you, wouldn't you want him to share the details, with the end product of gaining more popularity & business?

I do understand it maybe at the request of the lady at times but I can't think why they'd want to keep it private.

I run my own business & when I receive positive feedback I use it as one of the tools to gain extra business but that wouldn't work if the feedback said "Dave was brilliant but im not going to say how"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, there is no need for a running order of what exactly happened. The explicit detailed moment by moment reports are purely wank fodder. 

 

A FR (in my opinion) should cover a bit of a physical description in relation to what was expected from the description or photos of lady.  She is prettier in real life or She is much larger than the photos show, for example.  

 

Info about the location, parking, how safean area feels, and the location ie: A lovely flat close to the station or it was a shared house which was filthy with a big dog wandering about.

 

Information about the girl in terms of her being happy, welcoming, polite (or not) etc 

 

Were the services agreed the services given. I asked her to dress smartly with heels and she looked beautifully turned out and sexy or I asked for stockings but she was wearing woolly ankle socks and had dried beans on her onesie.  OR we discussed my desire to try watersports and she was all prepared with a pint of water and a rubber mat. She said on the phone she did kissing, but refused after I paid claiming she had cold sores.. 

 

A description can be given in terms of it being fun, passionate or not very enthused ie  She kept yawning and moaning her knees hurt but really we don't need to know every position you did it in or a long detailed piece of prose about how hard your cock was! Yes say she gave a great deep, teasing, enthusiastic blow job but not a paragraph about her spitting and slobbering and how much pre cum you leaked!  

 

Additional good or bad things can be mentioned eg She asked me if I wanted a cup of tea after we had finished or She said I had come so had to leave 20 minutes before the end of the booking. 

 

Yes, its a cliched phrase and it is pointless if the writer doesn't say anything of use, but I really believe a useful report can be written without anything too intimate and salacious. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if this has been covered elsewhere, but this drives me nuts when reading frs. Wtf is the point of writing a" report" if the only information imparted is a brief description of the lady?

So many frs say no intimate details are given out of respect. Ladies, correct me if im wrong but if a guy has had a great time with you, wouldn't you want him to share the details, with the end product of gaining more popularity & business?

I do understand it maybe at the request of the lady at times but I can't think why they'd want to keep it private.

I run my own business & when I receive positive feedback I use it as one of the tools to gain extra business but that wouldn't work if the feedback said "Dave was brilliant but im not going to say how"

 

 

Yet more fluffy/white knight/'gentleman'/not like the 'others'/my reasons for punting are better than yours [delete where applicable] syndrome

 

Am generally not that interested in the fastidious intimate renderings of the physical minutiae of a booking and I skip through the majority of the 'erotic essay' type FRs (with the exception of Worldpunter's who's unique humour and instantly recognizable style I always enjoy)

 

However, if a wg states on her profile that shes a deepthroat expert/owo specialist/the best titwank in London/can accommodate any size cock in specified orifice/loves DFK, CIF, COF, COB, CIM, swallows or 'guarantees a wild and uninhibited time'..........

 

Then I'd like at least a couple of lines corroborating the wgs claims, because, incredible and utterly unbelievable as it may seem, some wgs are liars who'll say anything (while actually doing the minimum once they have your cash) to get you through the door, get your money and then get you back out the door again ASAP 

Edited by BillGoldberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it has been covered before,rather extensively.Lydia's written a good example of what FR actually needs.The part she wrote about confirming service pretty much answers what our wrestling officianado has written/asked.Judging by some i've read there are some great solo handed typists about.
I always find it odd that if you don't write some classic piece of mastubatory literature it's classed as some kind of fluffy nonsense or as stated above"My reasons for punting are better than yours".(theres more than one reason? :) ) Don't get me wrong.Nowt wrong with shaking hands with the unemployed,just don't get upset when some people refuse pander to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its been covered till the cows come home then wake up, take a shower and feck off back to where they were the day before.

 

So long as a guy adds that the services adverstised were available then so what? He isnt obligated to give a blow by blow just because he is writing a review. If that above comment isn in there then I do agree to a point but even then its not the useless review its being hailed to be by the OP. If the prices quoted for the time had match those advertised, the description matches the pictures and the premises are safe and clean then thats a lot for a guy to learn about a girl. 

 

At the end of the day Im sure if none of the advertised services were available then either the reporter would mention that even if in the nicest way possible or he just wouldnt have a left a review in the first place. He is a punter too so one would assume he wanted what was advertised too and thus received it hence the yes yes review x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet more fluffy/white knight/'gentleman'/not like the 'others'/my reasons for punting are better than yours [delete where applicable] syndrome

 

Am generally not that interested in the fastidious intimate renderings of the physical minutiae of a booking and I skip through the majority of the 'erotic essay' type FRs (with the exception of Worldpunter's who's unique humour and instantly recognizable style I always enjoy)

 

However, if a wg states on her profile that shes a deepthroat expert/owo specialist/the best titwank in London/can accommodate any size cock in specified orifice/loves DFK, CIF, COF, COB, CIM, swallows or 'guarantees a wild and uninhibited time'..........

 

Then I'd like at least a couple of lines corroborating the wgs claims, because, incredible and utterly unbelievable as it may seem, some wgs are liars who'll say anything (while actually doing the minimum once they have your cash) to get you through the door, get your money and then get you back out the door again ASAP 

and yet more proof of sense of entitlement to the nitty gritty. Perhaps some guys find the idea of guys reading their review with one hand under the table distasteful?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

At the end of the day Im sure if none of the advertised services were available then either the reporter would mention that even if in the nicest way possible or he just wouldnt have a left a review in the first place. He is a punter too so one would assume he wanted what was advertised too and thus received it hence the yes yes review x

 

Not true. Some fluffies are deluded and will be happy enough if the lady smiles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if this has been covered elsewhere, but this drives me nuts when reading frs. Wtf is the point of writing a" report" if the only information imparted is a brief description of the lady?

To confirm or otherwise to other prospective punters that the WG you visited was easy to communicate with, was ready at the appointed time, fitted her physical description and/or matched her photos, gave a good service etc. etc.

There's only so many ways to write "she sucked my cock, I licked her pussy, I fucked her" which is usually how my punts go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if this has been covered elsewhere, but this drives me nuts when reading frs. Wtf is the point of writing a" report" if the only information imparted is a brief description of the lady?

So many frs say no intimate details are given out of respect. Ladies, correct me if im wrong but if a guy has had a great time with you, wouldn't you want him to share the details, with the end product of gaining more popularity & business?

I do understand it maybe at the request of the lady at times but I can't think why they'd want to keep it private.

I run my own business & when I receive positive feedback I use it as one of the tools to gain extra business but that wouldn't work if the feedback said "Dave was brilliant but im not going to say how"

With respect, punting is like no other activity and it takes all sorts, therefore you are always going to get reviews where the writer is a bit squeamish.  Personally I am a fan of genuine reviews no matter how badly they are written.  Let's just have the truth please...............................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I'm a bit middle of the road on this one. I DO want to know what services the punter enjoyed (or didn't for that matter) so if the punt include anal (for example) then the FR should say so BUT I don't need to read something like 'I gave her a good ramming up the arse' - that's just disrespectful

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

   If I read that the intimate details will remain private between the lady and the punter , I take it that nothing happened then .  Nothing much to report ,   some guys book escorts and do not have sexual contact as we know .  My biggest surprise ever was a TG who told me [ and I believe her ]  that she saw a client 8 timeswho just came along to talk to her .   It surprises me also of the stories I have been told of guys who cannot preform when asked to do so .  That's how I see these reports , then I think well why bother to report , but I assume the punter wants to help the lady get work and feel good about himself for doing so .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and yet more proof of sense of entitlement to the nitty gritty. Perhaps some guys find the idea of guys reading their review with one hand under the table distasteful?

 

So your logic goes:

 

If a punter, in an FR, wants some sort of confirmation that a wg actually does provide the particular service he requires and that she advertises as providing, rather than the vague "I had a lovely time with a lovely girl, but being a 'gentleman....' [puke]...........then he is obviously a wanker ?

 

In fact I dont think logic enters into it, its simply a puerile, sly implication

 

If dishonest wgs didnt exist then FRs and punternet would be far less essential a resource

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I'm a bit middle of the road on this one. I DO want to know what services the punter enjoyed (or didn't for that matter) so if the punt include anal (for example) then the FR should say so BUT I don't need to read something like 'I gave her a good ramming up the arse' - that's just disrespectful

 

Whats more disrespectful, simply writing about it, or actually doing it ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

   If I read that the intimate details will remain private between the lady and the punter , I take it that nothing happened then .  Nothing much to report ,   some guys book escorts and do not have sexual contact as we know .  My biggest surprise ever was a TG who told me [ and I believe her ]  that she saw a client 8 timeswho just came along to talk to her .   It surprises me also of the stories I have been told of guys who cannot preform when asked to do so .  That's how I see these reports , then I think well why bother to report , but I assume the punter wants to help the lady get work and feel good about himself for doing so .

Oh yes they did :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If punters get anxieties about what other punters have or haven't done with the WG they can always check what feedback the WG has herself left for the punter can't they lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If punters get anxieties about what other punters have or haven't done with the WG they can always check what feedback the WG has herself left for the punter can't they lol

 

It has nothing to do with anxiety but everything to do with getting a first hand account on whether or not the said wg actually DOES provide the services she advertises, or whether she's the lying, money grabbing, get em in n out ASAP while providing the bare minimum type that weve all encountered now and then unfortunately

 

Punting is expensive, FRs that provide corroborating details vis a vis services listed are a very valuable resource

 

FRs of the type the OP is bemoaning, and perfectly justifiably, are about as valuable a resource as a £5 out of date gift voucher for Primark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FRs of the type the OP is bemoaning, and perfectly justifiably, are about as valuable a resource as a £5 out of date gift voucher for Primark

 

...says the man who has contributed just 2 FRs, both two years ago!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if this has been covered elsewhere, but this drives me nuts when reading frs. Wtf is the point of writing a" report" if the only information imparted is a brief description of the lady?

 

Can you provide a link to your FRs so we can all see how it should be done?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...says the man who has contributed just 2 FRs, both two years ago!

 

yeah, but the info in them was accurate and useful

 

besides, I post a good deal of info useful to punters with similar taste to mine either on here or in PMs

 

are you also, in the interests of balance, gonna look them up and then come back with a count of how many of my posts pertain to helpful details on ladies booked ?

 

 

(no ?.......didnt think so)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if this has been covered elsewhere, but this drives me nuts when reading frs. Wtf is the point of writing a" report" if the only information imparted is a brief description of the lady?

So many frs say no intimate details are given out of respect. Ladies, correct me if im wrong but if a guy has had a great time with you, wouldn't you want him to share the details, with the end product of gaining more popularity & business?

I do understand it maybe at the request of the lady at times but I can't think why they'd want to keep it private.

I run my own business & when I receive positive feedback I use it as one of the tools to gain extra business but that wouldn't work if the feedback said "Dave was brilliant but im not going to say how"

 

You are right but by the same token you really don't want long winded reviews that go into detail.  Using your example, say for example your a builder would you really welcome a review that went into lengthy detail as to how many screws you used, how long it took you to screw them in and so on?

 

I've always felt that FR's should be to the point and should say things like 'yes she fitted her description, yes she did all services advertised, yes she was friendly easy to find and yes I felt at ease'.  I've never thought there was a need to go into detail or provide wank fodder for others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right but by the same token you really don't want long winded reviews that go into detail.  Using your example, say for example your a builder would you really welcome a review that went into lengthy detail as to how many screws you used, how long it took you to screw them in and so on?

 

I've always felt that FR's should be to the point and should say things like 'yes she fitted her description, yes she did all services advertised, yes she was friendly easy to find and yes I felt at ease'.  I've never thought there was a need to go into detail or provide wank fodder for others.

 

yeah, but which of us bemoaning the 'i wont go into intimate details' brigade has said what we really want are detailed blow by blow accounts of all the fleshy details ?

 

none

 

just typical conclusion jumping by the usual conclusion jumpers and there loyal cohorts of white knights atop gallant steeds

 

a good alternative to the useless 'gentlemanly' FRs isnt a pornographic essay, which you lot and the fluffies seem to think is the ONLY alternative

Edited by BillGoldberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah, but the info in them was accurate and useful

 

besides, I post a good deal of info useful to punters with similar taste to mine either on here or in PMs

This thread is about FRs, not Forum Posts, so I was curious to see how the contributions from those telling the rest of us how we should write them measured up.

There have been many occasions when I have been visiting an unfamiliar town or city that probably has an active Punter/WG scene, yet when I look for Field Reports they are scarce. It should be a more efficient way to get that info than wading through Threads on here, but it requires Punters to actually make the effort to write the Report. I find it a bit galling therefore to read people like the OP bitching about the quality of what info has been provided by those altruistic punters that can be bothered. Maybe one of the subscription-only review sites would be more to his liking?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am so glad I am not a punter.  It's a minefield out there of misinformation.  Lies about just about everything !

 

A good review should tell you if the lady looks like her photos.  It should tell you if her gaff is in a discreet and safe place - good for parking etc.  It should tell you if the lady was good at her job and if the punter enjoyed himself and if he would return.

 

if the answer to either of those equestions asked at the end is a 'no' then we need to be knowing why even if it was a 'chemistry' thing other guys need the info so they can make a balanced decision if they are relying on the review when making a decision.  The intimate stuff is not essential as your/my take on intimacy may be different to anyone else's...........

 

Let's get the important stuff across and then if you are into Mills and Boon then go for it :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread is about FRs, not Forum Posts, so I was curious to see how the contributions from those telling the rest of us how we should write them measured up.

There have been many occasions when I have been visiting an unfamiliar town or city that probably has an active Punter/WG scene, yet when I look for Field Reports they are scarce. It should be a more efficient way to get that info than wading through Threads on here, but it requires Punters to actually make the effort to write the Report. I find it a bit galling therefore to read people like the OP bitching about the quality of what info has been provided by those altruistic punters that can be bothered. Maybe one of the subscription-only review sites would be more to his liking?

 

I know just what you mean

 

Who's the 'OP' ?

 

should I always refer to the OP in the 3rd person as you do ?

Edited by BillGoldberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah, but which of us bemoaning the 'i wont go into intimate details' brigade has said what we really want are detailed blow by blow accounts of all the fleshy details ?

 

none

 

just typical conclusion jumping by the usual conclusion jumpers and there loyal cohorts of white knights atop gallant steeds

 

a good alternative to the useless 'gentlemanly' FRs isnt a pornographic essay, which you lot and the fluffies seem to think is the ONLY alternative

Every time someone disagrees with you you post the same thing,so whilst we're on the topic of annoying phrases

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0