Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
PunterH2O

Barbara, Worth It Or Not..

16 posts in this topic

No, in my opinion. Why?

 

1. Fake, heavily photo shopped pics. She will look nothing like that, in real life. 

2. Expensive rates. No punter has to pay £150 an hour in Londo. Especially for an EE girl. 

3. Extra charges, for what I'd consider to be basic services. 

4. No unique selling point or 'hook'. London crawling with good looking and much better vfm EEs.

 

I think that punters should be helping each other find the best vfm. I'm more than happy to recommend girls I've punted, via e-mail, who are good looking, provide great services and at a hell of a lot less. ,

Edited by drzhivago

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, in my opinion. Why?

 

1. Fake, heavily photo shopped pics. She will look nothing like that, in real life. 

2. Expensive rates. No punter has to pay £150 an hour in Londo. Especially for an EE girl. 

3. Extra charges, for what I'd consider to be basic services. 

4. No unique selling point or 'hook'. London crawling with good looking and much better vfm EEs.

 

I think that punters should be helping each other find the best vfm. I'm more than happy to recommend girls I've punted, via e-mail, who are good looking, provide great services and at a hell of a lot less. ,

I've seen her.  It was a fairly sterile experience, though not too bad.  Pics are very photoshopped, though she is pretty enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting to know your perspective. I just got the distinct impression she'd be hard work, re services, rate and a bit too clinical? It's a shame that if she's pretty, as you say,they have put up those ridiculous, airbrushed pics. Perhaps that's the justification for trying to make her look 'exclusive'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting to know your perspective. I just got the distinct impression she'd be hard work, re services, rate and a bit too clinical? It's a shame that if she's pretty, as you say,they have put up those ridiculous, airbrushed pics. Perhaps that's the justification for trying to make her look 'exclusive'.

Ah - just looked at services.  I don't think we tried for A, and FK was very light.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why anyone would go for a girl with these photoshopped pics i do not know...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not just over photoshopped but wierd photographs, too! Three are taken, in various stages of undress, in front of table with meal set and served (although glass not yet filled). Either you eats or you fucks, but mixing the two up (unless you are into licking strawberries and cream off your date) just doesn't go. What about the other guests? Or do they all take turns?

 

Not for me, thank you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't even notice there was a table, let alone a meal or an empty glass. Nipples.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing how many people volunteer opinions that aren't worth the waste of a life reading them.  Hello guys?  The OP was asking for opinions from people who have seen her.

 

drzhivago, girls charge all sorts of prices according to the market they pitch to and £150 ph is by no means expensive or exclusive by Central London agency standards. 

 

Your post gives off the strong suggestion that you have no experience of these agencies, let alone the girl, which rather reduces the value of your post.  If you want to stick to the cheaper end of the market then that's ok, but it has no bearing on the quality of the girl referred to by the OP.  Your comment on how she will look 'nothing like' her photos is based on what exactly, other than your aversion to paying £150 ph?  I have seen many girls from these agencies.  Most pics have been photoshopped a degree or so, but nevertheless most girls I've seen very much look like the photos on the website, so if you haven't seen her, tell me how do you manage to put yourself over as such an authority on the subject of her looks?  Also your comment on extra charges for 'basic services'.  Erm, actually most girls charge more for anal.  Perhaps you confused the £50 extra as related to the other services listed.  £50 would be a cheek for FK, I agree. :lol:

 

Irgendeiner, I am sure you have made many a valuable post on here, but the above is not really your finest hour.  You won't see her because you're confused by her photos as to whether to fuck her or have dinner?  Really?  This is your valuable contribution?

 

There are two views I've seen on Barbara that mean anything.  One on here by flouch who seems non committal one way or the other, and one from Rada on another thread that was fairly positive.

 

Personally, I intend to carry out my own research on the matter in the coming week and will hope to give some proper feedback in due course. <_<

Edited by Thurson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing how many people volunteer opinions that aren't worth the waste of a life reading them. Hello guys? The OP was asking for opinions from people who have seen her.

drzhivago, girls charge all sorts of prices according to the market they pitch to and £150 ph is by no means expensive or exclusive by Central London agency standards.

Your post gives off the strong suggestion that you have no experience of these agencies, let alone the girl, which rather reduces the value of your post. If you want to stick to the cheaper end of the market then that's ok, but it has no bearing on the quality of the girl referred to by the OP. Your comment on how she will look 'nothing like' her photos is based on what exactly, other than your aversion to paying £150 ph? I have seen many girls from these agencies. Most pics have been photoshopped a degree or so, but nevertheless most girls I've seen very much look like the photos on the website, so if you haven't seen her, tell me how do you manage to put yourself over as such an authority on the subject of her looks? Also your comment on extra charges for 'basic services'. Erm, actually most girls charge more for anal. Perhaps you confused the £50 extra as related to the other services listed. £50 would be a cheek for FK, I agree. :lol:

Irgendeiner, I am sure you have made many a valuable post on here, but the above is not really your finest hour. You won't see her because you're confused by her photos as to whether to fuck her or have dinner? Really? This is your valuable contribution?

There are two views I've seen on Barbara that mean anything. One on here by flouch who seems non committal one way or the other, and one from Rada on another thread that was fairly positive.

Personally, I intend to carry out my own research on the matter in the coming week and will hope to give some proper feedback in due course. <_<

Here, here.

I saw her last year and had a good time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing how many people volunteer opinions that aren't worth the waste of a life reading them.  Hello guys?  The OP was asking for opinions from people who have seen her.

 

drzhivago, girls charge all sorts of prices according to the market they pitch to and £150 ph is by no means expensive or exclusive by Central London agency standards. 

Then why take the time to comment, if some opinions are 'worthless' to you? I shall gladly take you on.

 

Let me enlighten you, as you clearly have no idea what you're talking about, regarding my experience.

 

I have extensive punting experience, stretching over many years and in every sort of scenario you can think of. Hotels, ranging from 5 star to budget. Outcall agencies and brothels, Soho walkups, indies and even street girls, back in the day. I have also punted in a few countries outside of the UK, again in many different scenarios. Like a few punters on here, I've paid £20 for sex in a Soho walk up, to £250 for a single hour booking and much more for longer. My standard hourly price for a booking used to be £150, until I 'wised' up. 

 

Do you know what I have learned?

 

That the price a punter pays doesn't equate, in any way, to the quality of service that they will receive. I have many examples to back that up. As London is awash with SPs, who display a great attitude and provide fantastic vfm, there's no need for me to pay anything like £150 these days, which I consider to be very expensive. Once upon a time that was the standard hourly rate and wouldn't even include services, such French kissing and oral without, which are a must for me, but no longer.

 

Naturally, there are many different rates in London and a girl can charge what she likes. That's her business alone. You're hardly inventing the wheel with that astounding revelation! :D  You pay what you like and I'll do what I like. Are we clear? Yes, I think we are. Next time, engage your brain before making arrogant assumptions about people who you don't know.

 

All opinions are valid. And yes, that even applies to yours!

Edited by drzhivago

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I made any assumptions about you, dr zhivago, it was based on your capacity to make some fairly significant assumptions about the girl. 

 

To a degree I can agree that quality of service does not necessarily relate to price, but this is no reason for you to claim that she will look 'nothing like' her photos and that the photos are 'fake'.  Further, I still completely fail to get where you got this point about extra charges for basic services.  

 

If your argument is to say that you wish to stick to lower price alternatives, then fine, but veering off to make unwarranted accusations against this girl to try to strengthen your argument, actually just makes you look far less experienced and knowledgeable than you suggest you are.  If perhaps you engaged your brain before making arrogant assumptions about this girl, then you wouldn't get the response you got.

 

So are we clear?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw barbara last week.

 

As a newbie to punting I decided to try the agencies rather than independents due to the lack of pretty girls on adultwork.

 

Anyway, Barbara does not look like her pics.  Her face is older and slightly more skanky looking.  Overall most guys would probably say she is pretty but she didnt do it for me.  I would never have booked her if she posted real up to date pics of herself.  As for her service, I found it to be very average.  Her BJ were nothing special and she kept rushing for sex.  Once sex was over, she had no interest in any more physical contact or a second attempt but prefered to talk for the rest of the time.

 

This week I saw Vicky from the same group of agencies hoping that the quality of the girl relative to her picture would be better.

 

http://www.admiralescorts.com/escort/earls-court-sw5-brunette-vicky

 

Unfortunately, Vicky like Barbie, whilst definitely the girl in her pic was no where near as pretty.  Again I would not have picked Vicky if I had access to real non processed pics.  Vickys work ethic was great and she kept working the full 1 hour I had with her.  Because I didnt really fancy her, I couldnt cum no matter what we did.

 

Im not sure whether to use agencies anymore but the problem with not using them is that an uglier Barbara or Vicky is still prettier than most independent working girls.

 

If someone could recommend me some hot independent girls then please let me know.  I am not sure who to punt next

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the feedback. I'm actually looking for a stunner that can provide above average services and it seems that Barbara does not fit the bill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Feedback is clearly a bit mixed, so I don't blame you. 

 

However, there are a number of stunning looking girls who do look just like their profiles, but most of the best examples just aren't around at the moment.  Cherry, for example, may have just retired, Barcie from Diva likewise.  Mel has definitely retired.  Julia Brunette is a total stunner but who know when she'll be back around?

 

Best options I can come up for you at the moment, that I have experienced, are probably Electra or Jenifer at Diva.  Electra is prettier than her photos and provides excellent service.  Jenifer is more GFE but is lovely. :mellow:  :wub:

 

Alternatively, Amanda at Admiral is also lovely.

 

I'm sure that there are plenty of others who will be great.  Personally, I feel a bit behind with my research but hope to get through a few more in the near future.  Admittedly, I am inclined to switch from Barbara to Tina this week, as she has just come back to town.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw barbara last week.

 

As a newbie to punting I decided to try the agencies rather than independents due to the lack of pretty girls on adultwork.

 

Anyway, Barbara does not look like her pics.  Her face is older and slightly more skanky looking.  Overall most guys would probably say she is pretty but she didnt do it for me.  I would never have booked her if she posted real up to date pics of herself.  As for her service, I found it to be very average.  Her BJ were nothing special and she kept rushing for sex.  Once sex was over, she had no interest in any more physical contact or a second attempt but prefered to talk for the rest of the time.

 

This week I saw Vicky from the same group of agencies hoping that the quality of the girl relative to her picture would be better.

 

http://www.admiralescorts.com/escort/earls-court-sw5-brunette-vicky

 

Unfortunately, Vicky like Barbie, whilst definitely the girl in her pic was no where near as pretty.  Again I would not have picked Vicky if I had access to real non processed pics.  Vickys work ethic was great and she kept working the full 1 hour I had with her.  Because I didnt really fancy her, I couldnt cum no matter what we did.

 

Im not sure whether to use agencies anymore but the problem with not using them is that an uglier Barbara or Vicky is still prettier than most independent working girls.

 

If someone could recommend me some hot independent girls then please let me know.  I am not sure who to punt next

 

hi there

 

it's always a bit of a gamble whichever way you go. but i would say that, as far as agency girls go, the 2 prettiest i have met who are currently working are;

 

caprice/emma - stunning girl, lovely figure, really sweet nature, gfe only and does not do owo but still gives the best oral and hj i have ever had.

 

carmen - redhead - polish - great figure and a bit wilder than caprice. 

 

they are both with the usual EE agencies, i would highly recommend them for a visit.

 

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0