LLMPHD

Beauty Or Performance

41 posts in this topic

When you see a WG, is beauty or performance of the WG more important?

 

Obviously I'm not talking of extremes whereby somebody very ugly gives a memorable performance or somebody very pretty gives is poor performance....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you see a WG, is beauty or performance of the WG more important?

 

Obviously I'm not talking of extremes whereby somebody very ugly gives a memorable performance or somebody very pretty gives is poor performance....

Having a genuinely great attitude and therefore trying to deliver a great service. I've punted stunning girls, who've delivered a piss poor service (Miss Sexy, aka Sexy Kitten comes to mind) and girls, who couldn't match their beauty, but were friendly, enthusiastic and delivered a great service... performance wins.  ;)

Edited by drzhivago

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you see a WG, is beauty or performance of the WG more important?

 

Obviously I'm not talking of extremes whereby somebody very ugly gives a memorable performance or somebody very pretty gives is poor performance....

Performance every time which i define as having a good attitude and being honest, friendly and enthusiastic, giving a good or better service. In my younger days just being beautiful was enough as i was thinking with my cock in those days. Now beauty is one aspect only, i need to fancy a WG to punt with her, again in my youth this wasnt a necessity.

 

A plainer though still pretty to me WG with a good attitude is far preferable to an ice cold beauty. If a WG has both beauty and a good attitude then thats great, as long as they offer the services i require as well, the triple whammy of a good attitude, offering the services i require and being beautiful makes them ideal for me.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beauty is very nice, but without performance it can be a very hollow experience. But getting both is like winning the lottery.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Big heart surely means more than big........................ :blink:  :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Performance every time which i define as having a good attitude and being honest, friendly and enthusiastic, giving a good or better service. In my younger days just being beautiful was enough as i was thinking with my cock in those days. Now beauty is one aspect only, i need to fancy a WG to punt with her, again in my youth this wasnt a necessity.

 

A plainer though still pretty to me WG with a good attitude is far preferable to an ice cold beauty. If a WG has both beauty and a good attitude then thats great, as long as they offer the services i require as well, the triple whammy of a good attitude, offering the services i require and being beautiful makes them ideal for me.

 

I was going to write a reply, but this pretty much sums up exactly what I was going to write.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, smiffy always nails it, bang on target.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, it's just me then. :unsure:

 

I love good service, love it.  But little T seems quite insistent that he wants pretty.  Very pretty!

 

No, that's bollocks.  He wants to fuck gorgeous.  He wants stunning. 

 

I've had undeniably great service in the past and yet can't bring myself to go back or even remember why I want to go back.  I've had mediocre service from a beauty and can't forget her, and will never want to forget her. 

 

Clearly I'm shallow. :(   Clearly I lack sexual sophistication.  :angry:  

 

Having said this, I am taking account of the OP comment that we are not talking extremes.  A girl still needs to be friendly and make some sort of effort to impress, but it is just that for me beauty doesn't need to go hand in hand with OWO, CIM, A+, etc.  Even FK I will sacrifice for the right physical specimen.

 

Combine great looks and great service and I am one very happy bunny. :)

 

Of course.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Performance over looks, every day of the week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Performance/personality is by far more important,however,there are some ladies who more than encompass both

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you see a WG, is beauty or performance of the WG more important?

 

Obviously I'm not talking of extremes whereby somebody very ugly gives a memorable performance or somebody very pretty gives is poor performance....

Definitely performance is more important but a basic level of attractiveness is essential

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With good research, you should get a strong idea on how an escort will perform.

(Based on feedback, services on offer and attitude)

 

If no face picture available, and only a gallery of her body to judge her, you would be mighty unlucky to get a real munter.

 

It is possible to get a combination of beauty and performance for sure. Any punter going back for a repeat session would most likely agree.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As goes most opinions so far performance wins hands down with me. Without the sense of connection, warmth, intimacy and a good level of service then I'm left feeling hollow and would rather have a wank instead.

Saying that though there's nothing better than being naked with a stunner who would be out of my league in civvy street although I still need performance ( the holy grail :) )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Performance over looks, every day of the week.

+1 

(although "every day of the week" isnt always possible)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If by "performance" we include "attitude" than I am on to a winner. Beauty comes second or even third in my view.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If by "performance" we include "attitude" than I am on to a winner. Beauty comes second or even third in my view.

 

If I had to make a stand, instead of sitting on the fence, I'd agree with this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Performance is the key. Beauty is a bonus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me kissing is the start of any meet. If I don't find her attractive I'm not going to enjoy kissing her, so her skills / performance become irrelevant as I won't be getting hard.

 

Or put another very crude way, an ugly bird can stick her tongue in my ass and I won't get hard, a fit bird can stick her tongue in my ass and I will come on the spot!! The trick is to find the fit bird willing to do so....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Performance is the main thing for me, and appearance second.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Performance.

 

All the looks in the world don't mean diddly squat if she clearly doesn't like her job or isn't intrested in the session.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a lot of you are either mad or deceiving yourselves.

 

Why are photos so important in a girl's profiles, huh?  Let me look up a few mingers for you that offer CIM and A+.  Let's see how many of you go, oh yes, please, me first.

 

I think you guys are only saying performance is more important because you are already taking for granted that you wouldn't pick a WG you didn't fancy physically.  Which of you is going to say that they pick a girl with no photos, because she offers decent performance and has a good review from someone who says she was perfect performer but looked like an alien with leprosy.

 

Obviously I want my girl to give a decent performance, but what is a decent performance?  Some of you say this is attitude, but FFS this is the minimum I would require from a WG.  Any girl who acts like she doesn't want to be with you or is putting up with what you are doing should never be working full stop.  However, I would never be in the position to experience this if I hadn't already chosen her on looks.  Looks come first.

 

I don't see that this question should be as simple as beauty against any average performance.  It should be what would you rather have, exceptional beauty or exceptional performance?  It should be taken for granted that you will get a minimum of an attractive girl with a good and friendly attitude, with the question being which bonus is on top, beauty or exceptional performance.  That's the proper question.  Given this, then what is your choice?  Mine would be beauty... most of the time.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a lot of you are either mad or deceiving yourselves.

 

Why are photos so important in a girl's profiles, huh?  Let me look up a few mingers for you that offer CIM and A+.  Let's see how many of you go, oh yes, please, me first.

 

I think you guys are only saying performance is more important because you are already taking for granted that you wouldn't pick a WG you didn't fancy physically.  Which of you is going to say that they pick a girl with no photos,

I was that man a few weeks ago. No photos and a feedback of 2. I do like a gamble somethimes :)

In fairness I did read a field report that said the lady was attractive, but that was all I had to go on. I just had a feeling reading her profile..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a lot of you are either mad or deceiving yourselves.

 

Why are photos so important in a girl's profiles, huh?  Let me look up a few mingers for you that offer CIM and A+.  Let's see how many of you go, oh yes, please, me first.

 

I think you guys are only saying performance is more important because you are already taking for granted that you wouldn't pick a WG you didn't fancy physically.  Which of you is going to say that they pick a girl with no photos, because she offers decent performance and has a good review from someone who says she was perfect performer but looked like an alien with leprosy.

 

Obviously I want my girl to give a decent performance, but what is a decent performance?  Some of you say this is attitude, but FFS this is the minimum I would require from a WG.  Any girl who acts like she doesn't want to be with you or is putting up with what you are doing should never be working full stop.  However, I would never be in the position to experience this if I hadn't already chosen her on looks.  Looks come first.

 

I don't see that this question should be as simple as beauty against any average performance.  It should be what would you rather have, exceptional beauty or exceptional performance?  It should be taken for granted that you will get a minimum of an attractive girl with a good and friendly attitude, with the question being which bonus is on top, beauty or exceptional performance.  That's the proper question.  Given this, then what is your choice?  Mine would be beauty... most of the time.

 

I have booked several ladies based on their reviews who I believed (usually correctly) I would not find attractive in person given their pictures, not actively repellent, of course, but just not attractive.  I have had a better hit rate with such meetings than I have with those bookings inspired purely by photos that stirred my trousers and have revisited such ladies.  There are a few ladies I have seen purely for their looks who I am happy to have seen even though their performance was ordinary-to-poor, as having been in the presence of such beauty is reward enough, though such ladies have not got repeat visits from me.  So I have been happy with both performance without beauty and beauty without performance but happier with the former.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me, honestly beauty is more important. Obviously if their attitude is rotten it's going to be a put off.  But If I want a good orgasm I already have my hand and that's free.  I'm primarily interested in visual stimulation, so that's why beauty is tops for me. But I can definitely respect why other would fee differently 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a lot of you are either mad or deceiving yourselves.

 

Why are photos so important in a girl's profiles, huh?  Let me look up a few mingers for you that offer CIM and A+.  Let's see how many of you go, oh yes, please, me first.

 

I think you guys are only saying performance is more important because you are already taking for granted that you wouldn't pick a WG you didn't fancy physically.  Which of you is going to say that they pick a girl with no photos, because she offers decent performance and has a good review from someone who says she was perfect performer but looked like an alien with leprosy.

 

Obviously I want my girl to give a decent performance, but what is a decent performance?  Some of you say this is attitude, but FFS this is the minimum I would require from a WG.  Any girl who acts like she doesn't want to be with you or is putting up with what you are doing should never be working full stop.  However, I would never be in the position to experience this if I hadn't already chosen her on looks.  Looks come first.

 

I don't see that this question should be as simple as beauty against any average performance.  It should be what would you rather have, exceptional beauty or exceptional performance?  It should be taken for granted that you will get a minimum of an attractive girl with a good and friendly attitude, with the question being which bonus is on top, beauty or exceptional performance.  That's the proper question.  Given this, then what is your choice?  Mine would be beauty... most of the time.

 

 

Over the years I've put off booking, or even never even vaguely considered booking, a number of girls because the photos did nothing at all for me, put me off even

 

Then on very strong personal recommendations I've gone ahead and taken the plunge and been extremely pleased, and very surprised

 

This has happened to me in a sauna too, a girl who I thought actually looked somewhat 'ugly' (for want of a better word), she wasnt really my 'type; at all, but there was something intangible, something very sexy about her, something so magnetic and attractive about her ('chemistry' again ?) that I picked her from among a choice of around 10 other girls many of whom were far more conventionally physically attractive than she

 

What followed was a wonderful session and I was completely hooked - We just hit it off and she was my regular first choice girl at that establishment until the place closed down.

 

So I'd disagree with you. For me, given the criteria you mention: with it being 'a given' that a girl has a basic level of attractiveness and a basic level of acceptable/good service then being able to choose the added bonus of either exceptional beauty or exceptional performance, I'd absolutely pick exceptional service every time.

 

This doesnt mean I'm deluding myself, I'm just different to you in what I find most important from a paid sexual liaison (and the same would also go for an unpaid civvy world sexual liaison too)

 

I've had the experiences (in both cases both civvy and paid) of 'average looking girl- great sex' and 'great looking girl-average sex' and I know which one is more enjoyable, more exciting, more fulfilling, more surprising and more thrilling......and thats the one I'd choose over the other if I always had the choice (which of course isnt the case)

Edited by BillGoldberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now