Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Lohengrin

Photos (Question For All)

53 posts in this topic

A few weeks ago, at the start of a punt with an indie (in MK, hence the location of this thread), I was asked if I'd mind some "action" photos of our punt being taken for the ladies Twitter page/website. Subject to what I presume are the usual constraints for this sort of thing (neck down, etc.) and not being a shrinking violet I was actually fine with it so the maid came in took a few snaps at the height of the punt. My questions are:

 

To the blokes, has this request ever happened to you? Would you be ok with it if asked? And do you like seeing "action shots" on a girl's web page generally (I have to admit, you don't see them often but I do prefer them to the usual staged "solo porn shots")?

 

To the girls, have you ever put "action shots" on your website or Twitter feed? If you haven't, would you? If not, why not?

 

I think particularly on Twitter (possibly more so than on a website), they're a sound marketing idea and spice up the usual stuff a bit by providing some variety. Anyway, debate...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like fun Loh! I've never been asked to bare my flesh for the camera...but maybe I'm not quite as photogenic as you! ;)

 

I quite like seeing explicit solo pics of the lady, but I think in common with a lot of guys, I find naked photos of other guys in an obviously aroused state and especially close-ups and cumshots a bit off-putting when it comes to making the choice of where to punt.

 

I'm not terribly squeamish because at parties I'm frequently in the room with other guys going about their business, but I have heard a lot of guys cite as a reason as to why they wouldn't attend a party is because they don't want to see other guys naked.

 

I might like the idea of having some pics or footage of a punt to keep for myself as something to look back on with fond memories.

 

So, you must tell us where we can see the results of your first foray into a possible new career in porn! :)

Edited by venturer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A few weeks ago, at the start of a punt with an indie (in MK, hence the location of this thread), I was asked if I'd mind some "action" photos of our punt being taken for the ladies Twitter page/website. Subject to what I presume are the usual constraints for this sort of thing (neck down, etc.) and not being a shrinking violet I was actually fine with it so the maid came in took a few snaps at the height of the punt. My questions are:

 

To the blokes, has this request ever happened to you? Would you be ok with it if asked? And do you like seeing "action shots" on a girl's web page generally (I have to admit, you don't see them often but I do prefer them to the usual staged "solo porn shots")?

 

To the girls, have you ever put "action shots" on your website or Twitter feed? If you haven't, would you? If not, why not?

 

I think particularly on Twitter (possibly more so than on a website), they're a sound marketing idea and spice up the usual stuff a bit by providing some variety. Anyway, debate...

 

 

A few weeks ago, at the start of a punt with an indie (in MK, hence the location of this thread), I was asked if I'd mind some "action" photos of our punt being taken for the ladies Twitter page/website. Subject to what I presume are the usual constraints for this sort of thing (neck down, etc.) and not being a shrinking violet I was actually fine with it so the maid came in took a few snaps at the height of the punt. My questions are:

 

To the blokes, has this request ever happened to you? Would you be ok with it if asked? And do you like seeing "action shots" on a girl's web page generally (I have to admit, you don't see them often but I do prefer them to the usual staged "solo porn shots")?

 

To the girls, have you ever put "action shots" on your website or Twitter feed? If you haven't, would you? If not, why not?

 

I think particularly on Twitter (possibly more so than on a website), they're a sound marketing idea and spice up the usual stuff a bit by providing some variety. Anyway, debate...

I have a face and body only fit for Radio so certainly wouldnt allow myself to be filmed nowadays. Many years ago i did film myself shagging my then girlfriend, when i viewed it back i was horrified by seeing myself, never again.

 

I dont particulary want to see other men cocks on WGs site/profiles, i do like blatant naked and open leg pictures though that show the WG as she looks in the present. I do know from reading this forum for years that some punters say they prefer more subtle pictures, blatant all the way for me. However if i fancy the WG enough its not essential they have such pictures, i will walk if i dont fancy the real her due to her pictures not being a true reflection of how she looks now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

L, obviously different strokes for different folks here.

 

I have never been asked. If I were asked I would decline (For me personally it crosses some mental barrier - I'm just a casual punter looking for some intermittant fun).

 

Maybe more controversially, I absolutely do not want to see any of my favourites in action in a photo. It would have an adverse effect for me and probably put me off seeing them in future. I'll probably get criticised for that statement, but I suspect I would have some who nod in agreement as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

L, obviously different strokes for different folks here.

 

I have never been asked. If I were asked I would decline (For me personally it crosses some mental barrier - I'm just a casual punter looking for some intermittant fun).

 

Maybe more controversially, I absolutely do not want to see any of my favourites in action in a photo. It would have an adverse effect for me and probably put me off seeing them in future. I'll probably get criticised for that statement, but I suspect I would have some who nod in agreement as well.

 

 

Yes, I think It's a common feeling that guys like to maintain the illusion that they're the only one. Of course, the reality is probably mentally acknowledged, but anything that shatters the illusion so starkly would be distasteful.

 

I used to feel a bit like that, but after a few parties where you see the girl you just got your rocks off with showing another guy an equally good time, it tends to moderate somewhat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Angie George and Roxxy had me take some pictures with their camera looking towards the hedonistic duo playing with my cock. I am lead to understand that they may have put some of them on their private galleries on AW. I never paid to look, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not much of a chance, who knows where you may be in a couple of years and where pictures may emerge.

 

Taken on my camera so that I could edit out all recognisable elements might tempt me but there isn't much tempting about my looks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have put some pictures on twitter of guys who have booked me for domination. I used to see at least a third of my guys for domination at one point but then I left and they started seeing other girls. I put the pictures up so that the guys can see I am still offering those services and that I am still good at what I do, I havnt forgotten during my time out of the saddle. They can see what I have done to other guys of that persuasion, i still have the knack so to speak.

 

I do though always ask the guys permission, even if I took the pictures without permission during a humiliation session I would let him watch me delete them before he left and certainly wouldnt publish any without express consent. Birthmarks/faces are avoided and watches or identifying jewellry is hidden or blurred over if required by the guy. I only have a few on there though at the mo...dont want to go over board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

although looking at a certain ladys twitpix I can definatley tell that we do share clients lol 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Though far from being a prude, I'm not interested in seeing "action" shots on a girls profile or site / twitter feed. I know what happens in a punt thank you. My interest in the photos is seeing what the girl is like. I'm not interested in what her other clients a like.

 

JaB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was from the neck and I was comfortable with the maid I would not see this as a problem.  As for seeing a a.n.other punter with one of my favourites, it doesn't bother me.  I know the girls have a quick shower in between (at least the ones I see) and I am under no illusions that they have seen plenty of gentleman before and after me.

 

I wouldn't want another bloke in the room with me when doing the dirty though, camera or not... that is a serious turn off for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a face and body only fit for Radio so certainly wouldnt allow myself to be filmed nowadays. 

I definately fall into this category.I suppose i could get asked if they were looking for some comedy content :)

 

I have put some pictures on twitter of guys who have booked me for domination. I used to see at least a third of my guys for domination at one point but then I left and they started seeing other girls. I put the pictures up so that the guys can see I am still offering those services and that I am still good at what I do, I havnt forgotten during my time out of the saddle. They can see what I have done to other guys of that persuasion, i still have the knack so to speak.

 

I do though always ask the guys permission, even if I took the pictures without permission during a humiliation session I would let him watch me delete them before he left and certainly wouldnt publish any without express consent. Birthmarks/faces are avoided and watches or identifying jewellry is hidden or blurred over if required by the guy. I only have a few on there though at the mo...dont want to go over board.

That bit just got me sniggering like mad.This image just popped in my head of you with the fella saddled and stirruped,riding away,crop in hand trying to get him to jump over the sofa :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Though far from being a prude, I'm not interested in seeing "action" shots on a girls profile or site / twitter feed. I know what happens in a punt thank you. My interest in the photos is seeing what the girl is like. I'm not interested in what her other clients a like.

 

JaB

 

Great reply, I have to say. The last line is very funny.

 

On a more serious note, I am amazed at the notion suggested by Venturer, that some guys like to maintain the illusion that "they're the only one". On second thoughts, that's very funny too!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great reply, I have to say. The last line is very funny.

 

On a more serious note, I am amazed at the notion suggested by Venturer, that some guys like to maintain the illusion that "they're the only one". On second thoughts, that's very funny too!

 

I come from a very catholic country.  Most of my friends from there still have the stupid belief that their wives must be virgins when they get married and actually believe this :eek:  and that they are the only ones in their lives.  I've never had the heart to tell my best best friend that two years before he met his wife I had brief but comprehensive liaison with her... :ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great reply, I have to say. The last line is very funny.

 

On a more serious note, I am amazed at the notion suggested by Venturer, that some guys like to maintain the illusion that "they're the only one". On second thoughts, that's very funny too!

 

I feel obliged to reply as Venturer was responding to my comment about not wanting to see one of my favourites in a full action photo.

 

His comment sort of reflects my mindset, but not necessarily in a romantic, blissfully and fluffyly (?) naive kind of way. It's complicated. I have a humanistic relationship with most of the girls I see. I'm not just there for the sex, I like the intimacy. I believe you have a different requirement - more detached, unemotional, 'just there for the sex'. And that's absolutely fine.

 

If I see one of my favourites posting action shots then I will stop seeing her as she's crossed a personal barrier for me. I dont want a PSE and I dont want to spend time with a girl who is happy to splash her porn actions across the internet. It's purely my choice that I choose to exercise.

 

Unless, of course, you were just having a poke at Venturer, then I've wasted my time typing this ;-).

Edited by Ford Prefect

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with smiths on this, having a face and body ideally suited for radio - so it would be a no from me.

It sounds a bit of a contradiction as I've no objection to porn in any way shape or form - but personally I'm not a fan of "action shots" on wg's profiles at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel obliged to reply as Venturer was responding to my comment about not wanting to see one of my favourites in a full action photo.

 

His comment sort of reflects my mindset, but not necessarily in a romantic, blissfully and fluffyly (?) naive kind of way. It's complicated. I have a humanistic relationship with most of the girls I see. I'm not just there for the sex, I like the intimacy. I believe you have a different requirement - more detached, unemotional, 'just there for the sex'. And that's absolutely fine.

 

If I see one of my favourites posting action shots then I will stop seeing her as she's crossed a personal barrier for me. I dont want a PSE and I dont want to spend time with a girl who is happy to splash her porn actions across the internet. It's purely my choice that I choose to exercise.

 

Unless, of course, you were just having a poke at Venturer, then I've wasted my time typing this ;-).

 

No, I wasn't poking Venturer at all (clearly, if I was I'd have photographed it for posterity -- and by that I mean his posterior rather than mine :-) ). And -- perhaps oddly -- I very much like the intimacy of a punt. You're wrong in your deduction that I probably don't. In fact, I would say I've built far more "good relationships" with ladies in this industry than I've had good sex. Intimacy does count...a lot. But the fact remains, I know and am not the least bit bothered that when I've left the room, it all starts again with someone else. And looking at photos of it doesn't/wouldn't bother me. There is no rubicon there to be crossed. If you look looking at porn, say, then porn involving your favourite escort is surely no different than looking at any other form of porn. I care about my relationship with the escort when I am in the room. What she does at other times as a consenting adult is surely up to her. With all that said, I'm not denying you have every right to your own view.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of wonderful views on this thread. Another question, if the pictures of 'in action' shots are in a girl's private gallery, ie so it's not on an 'open' website, does that make you avoid her if you are put off with those kinds of pictures? The reason I'm asking this is because I have quite a few of these photosets and am still undecided wether or not to actually put them into the gallery for that exact same reason that most of you are saying, ie it puts you off seeing a particular lady. From a monetary point of view its an extra income for me without having to do any 'work' as it were. But if it means that I will lose potential clients that would actually book me, then that's a really good reason not to publish them, even if on a private gallery. What are your thoughts on this?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to disappoint Loh, but you'll need to find someone else for your gay porn fantasies! ;)

 

I suppose I had that 'only one' feeling when I was a newbie punter. Naively, I got a bit too close to a nice regular, not helped by her reciprocating and asking to meet 'off the clock'. It was definitely good medicine for me to see her in action at the parties and thereby facing the stark reality of her chosen profession. I'm a lot more sanguine now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of wonderful views on this thread. Another question, if the pictures of 'in action' shots are in a girl's private gallery, ie so it's not on an 'open' website, does that make you avoid her if you are put off with those kinds of pictures? The reason I'm asking this is because I have quite a few of these photosets and am still undecided wether or not to actually put them into the gallery for that exact same reason that most of you are saying, ie it puts you off seeing a particular lady. From a monetary point of view its an extra income for me without having to do any 'work' as it were. But if it means that I will lose potential clients that would actually book me, then that's a really good reason not to publish them, even if on a private gallery. What are your thoughts on this?

 

I'd be tempted to just include explicit solo shots, maybe toys if you want to show penetration, maybe girl-on-girl if you want to encourage duo bookings and leave the boy/girl stuff for your own collection! Oh and give a teasingly explicit pic or two on your free gallery to whet the appetite for more.

 

Just my opinion though, others may feel differently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of wonderful views on this thread. Another question, if the pictures of 'in action' shots are in a girl's private gallery, ie so it's not on an 'open' website, does that make you avoid her if you are put off with those kinds of pictures? The reason I'm asking this is because I have quite a few of these photosets and am still undecided wether or not to actually put them into the gallery for that exact same reason that most of you are saying, ie it puts you off seeing a particular lady. From a monetary point of view its an extra income for me without having to do any 'work' as it were. But if it means that I will lose potential clients that would actually book me, then that's a really good reason not to publish them, even if on a private gallery. What are your thoughts on this?

I have seen you before but seeing shots of you with another gent in action wont put me off from seeing you as for me this punting not dating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of wonderful views on this thread. Another question, if the pictures of 'in action' shots are in a girl's private gallery, ie so it's not on an 'open' website, does that make you avoid her if you are put off with those kinds of pictures? The reason I'm asking this is because I have quite a few of these photosets and am still undecided wether or not to actually put them into the gallery for that exact same reason that most of you are saying, ie it puts you off seeing a particular lady. From a monetary point of view its an extra income for me without having to do any 'work' as it were. But if it means that I will lose potential clients that would actually book me, then that's a really good reason not to publish them, even if on a private gallery. What are your thoughts on this?

I would just put them in your private gallery Adele but make sure you give the folder a name so that they guys know in advance they are going to see a man in the pix too. I dont know "Me and Mr X" or smilar perhaps. There are plenty of guys who do like to see girls in action in pictures, probably as many as don't. I would make sure you upload some shots where its clear the guy is wearing a condom though as you dont want the wrong sort turning up to book you on incorrect assumptions x

Edited by Chloe Kisses

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of wonderful views on this thread. Another question, if the pictures of 'in action' shots are in a girl's private gallery, ie so it's not on an 'open' website, does that make you avoid her if you are put off with those kinds of pictures? The reason I'm asking this is because I have quite a few of these photosets and am still undecided wether or not to actually put them into the gallery for that exact same reason that most of you are saying, ie it puts you off seeing a particular lady. From a monetary point of view its an extra income for me without having to do any 'work' as it were. But if it means that I will lose potential clients that would actually book me, then that's a really good reason not to publish them, even if on a private gallery. What are your thoughts on this?

All very simple for me, i wouldnt know they were there unless someone told me because i never pay to see Private Galleries, on principle as i view those that own and run A/W as scumbags i wont pay a penny in credits for any reason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would just put them in your private gallery Adele but make sure you give the folder a name so that they guys know in advance they are going to see a man in the pix too. I dont know "Me and Mr X" or smilar perhaps. There are plenty of guys who do like to see girls in action in pictures, probably as many as don't. I would make sure you upload some shots where its clear the guy is wearing a condom though as you dont want the wrong sort turning up to book you on incorrect assumptions x

 

That sounds like a good compromise to satisfy everyone.

 

One thing that's a big no-no in my book is creampie shots with hubby/bf...total turn-off for me as I usually like to go down on a girl.

 

Of course it may be the case with any girl that she has been doing BB with her partner before I arrive, but I'd rather be ignorant of that fact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Of course it may be the case with any girl that she has been doing BB with her partner before I arrive, but I'd rather be ignorant of that fact.

Im sorry but thats irrelevant. A working girls private relationship is just that.

 

Any punter could also have been doing BB with their partner the  night before a booking but we would rather be ignorant of that fact. There is no difference between the two. You could say that you dont want to know you are licking a fanny that a bb cock has been in the previous evening but we could also say we dont want to suck a cock that has been in a fanny bb the previous evening. What we all do away from the bookings isnt relevant and shouldnt even be in a punters head 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0