Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
mega

Sex Party Organisers Sentenced

15 posts in this topic

I hope i don't get caught with my pants down at a well known &organized party  with good reputation . 

Is there a risk after this ??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are Ok as long you do not organise it - I hope!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope i don't get caught with my pants down at a well known &organized party  with good reputation . 

Is there a risk after this ??

Yes there has always been a risk, any brothel could be raided at any time the police decide. Your not breaking the law though unless it were to be proved a WG or WGs were being coerced and/or were underage which is highly unlikely with any party that advertises for punters meaning the police know about them in my view.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes there has always been a risk, any brothel could be raided at any time the police decide. Your not breaking the law though unless it were to be proved a WG or WGs were being coerced and/or were underage which is highly unlikely with any party that advertises for punters meaning the police know about them in my view.

Thank you Smiths .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought because you were only paying an entry into the club and not to the girl directly that it wasn't an offence ?

If this is not the case, how do clubs like The Private Club and Retro Club operate so openly ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought because you were only paying an entry into the club and not to the girl directly that it wasn't an offence ?

If this is not the case, how do clubs like The Private Club and Retro Club operate so openly ?

If it were that easy all brothels would be clubs and so avoid breaking the law. They are brothels, the owner is commiting an offence, loads of brothels operate openly in that they advertise on here, in local papers etc, all places the police read for local intelligence. Those places you mention could get raided at any time. In many areas the police tolerate brothels and have for years, that could literally change overnight though if the police decide so though.

 

All the police have to do is send a guy in undercover and if he gets offered a sexual service its a brothel. POCA now means the police could decide to let a brothel operate for a while and then raid it and if POCA is successful that individual force benefits from some of the assets seized eventually.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This particular group was fairly well-known, albeit its reputation on here was mixed to say the least. By the way, now that the court case is over and the story is a matter of record, is it OK to discuss them by name? When I asked a year ago there was a brief acknowledgement that the organisation had ceased trading in a hurry, and that was pretty much that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the girls were paid more than that when I did a couple of stints there, worked out at 200 for 4 hours as the normal  parties were 400 for 2 x 4 hour parties and 500 for 2 x 4 hour alevel parties. I only did one of each though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought because you were only paying an entry into the club and not to the girl directly that it wasn't an offence ?

If this is not the case, how do clubs like The Private Club and Retro Club operate so openly ?

This is like the Time & Companionship statement, both are a load of bollocks. Means nothing. Paying for sex and being paid for sex is not illegal however controlling prostitution or running a brothel is an offence and this is simply defined as a place where more than one woman is offering sex (doesn't matter whether she's being paid for it and the prosecution know it's sex being paid for anyway(which as stated isn't an offence so of little consequence until it comes to the POCA bit).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is like the Time & Companionship statement, both are a load of bollocks

 

As usual Strawberry is 100% right! Managing a Brothel, Assisting in the Management of a Brothel, being a Brothel's Landlord are all offences. Being a punter, or a WG isn't.

 

Several WGs of intelligence and standing assert that the "time and company" guff on their sites is to cover them against a charge of soliciting. FFS! I'm so geriatric that I remember looking out of my window across a bombed site to the Bayswater Road where, pre-Wolfenden there were always two or three birds who never seemed to catch a bus - my progressive, modern etc., mother had some difficulty in explaining what they were about! But, to come back on track, soliciting is an offence inder the Street Offences Act 1959,    "An Act to make, as respects England and Wales, further provision against loitering or soliciting in public places for the purpose of prostitution, and for the .".. - it applies only in a Street or other public place, viz pub car park, and does NOT apply on line!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having now read the report linked (might have been a better bet to read first, then pontificate later, but, hell, I'm a punter!) I see that there was "extreme porn" to which a guilty plea was offered. While not my cup of tea, is doggy (that's canine) porn (what in the good old days of the OAPA we called bestiality) really so extreme? I wonder whether CPS were trying to get a plea to support their statistics?

 

I suppose that the Circuit Judge would have lost promotion points if he hadn't said that the parties were "deplorable" !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This particular group was fairly well-known, albeit its reputation on here was mixed to say the least. By the way, now that the court case is over and the story is a matter of record, is it OK to discuss them by name? When I asked a year ago there was a brief acknowledgement that the organisation had ceased trading in a hurry, and that was pretty much that.

 

I have taken the view that once something is in the public domain and a conviction results or a court case of interest in progress that it is right to discuss them and their ramifications/repercussions here.

 

Examples of this are brothel owners convictions, POCA hearings and serious trafficking cases.  Other items that seem appropriate to discuss are where punters have broken the law (eg the recent cases where they have stolen huge sums of money to fund their habit) or where punters have assaulted girls and been dealt with.  Similarly where punters have been assaulted or in one case blackmailed by sex workers.

 

I had a run-in with the moderators when I wanted to discuss a serious benefit fraud matter reported at length in local/regional papers which was ruled as not admissable on here.

 

I certainly wouldn't report on expose items where a well-known punter was "outed" for cash by an escort or where a parlour girl was exposed by a red-top because of her connection with a sporting celebrity.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is like the Time & Companionship statement, both are a load of bollocks. Means nothing. Paying for sex and being paid for sex is not illegal however controlling prostitution or running a brothel is an offence and this is simply defined as a place where more than one woman is offering sex (doesn't matter whether she's being paid for it and the prosecution know it's sex being paid for anyway(which as stated isn't an offence so of little consequence until it comes to the POCA bit).

It could only ever work if an escort told the guy up front "no chemistry no sex but you dont get a refund" there are sites out there that do advertise companionship only though, i stumbled up on one once or twice, the fees were very low and it was when I was bored and trawling google pages so far back they were in high double numbers x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They were not the most professional of outfits. They had an sti scare and didnt notify the girls who do the one off parties, only their regular girls and even then it was several weeks after it happened which is how I managed to find out, i knew one of the regular girls. Luckily for me my tests showed nice and clean but so did all their usual girls apparently. That means there was some poor girl going about her business somewhere who may have been infecting people unawares and they didnt bother to contact her to say "get tested". Thats pretty low in my opinion. 

 

Thats the reason I decided that parties were not for me. Its frowned upon to use a condom for oral, which I actually did with one guy but I only saw one other girl reach for a condom with him, the other girls didn't. Everyone is sucking the same cocks and licking the same fannys, its easy for an sti to run rampage through a party especially one of the large gang banger ones..all it takes is one person and half the people there are buggered.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0