Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
naughtyxing

Bad London Escort Experience

21 posts in this topic

Hi All.  I'm from New York, and this is my first time visiting London, and the escort scene here shocked me.  I arranged to see quite a few escorts.  First was Samantha (http://www.candyshop-escorts.com/samantha.htm).  Quite well reviewed, and not cheap at 250 GBP.  However, when I finally got to her flat, she was perhaps 10kg heavier than she looked in the pictures.  Not attractive at all!  I left.  

I also scheduled an appointment with Kimberley (http://www.projectpleasure.com/escort_kimberley.htm).  Also very well reviewed at various review sites, and also not cheap at 350 GBP.  Again, the girl who opened the door was 10kg heavier, and was definitely NOT the girl in the pictures.  She was also unfriendly and rude to boot.  I left again.  

The last bad experience is with Presley (http://www.agencytouchofclasslondon.co.uk/Presley_toned_brunette_earls_court_sw5.htm).  The girl who opened the door was most definitely NOT toned.  She just smoked a cigarette and it smelled on her breath.  She had stubbly legs, and was slightly chubby (maybe 5-8kg heavier than she looked in the pictures).  I didn't leave, but perhaps I should have.  The service was very very mechanical.  She seemed more concerned about getting herself off than me.  I had paid for an hour but left after 30 minutes.

My only good experience was with Diana (http://butterfly-touch.co.uk/diana.html).  She has a very pretty face, and was very willing to please.  Her body was not great, but she more than made up for it with personality and desire to do her job well.

So, my question is this: is this just bad luck on my part?  I tried to see girls who were well reviewed, but apparently a lot of reviews are just outright lies or fakes.  This happens in the US as well, but not to this degree.  Is this a case of me falling victim to bait and switch?  Or are the pictures really just that much better than what the girls will look like in person and I need to adjust my expectations accordingly?  As a comparison, here are some girls I've seen in NYC.

http://www.ginaslittlesecret.com/m/taraverve/
http://hollypaige.skipsweb.com/
http://www.evavalenti.com/introduction.php

These girls all looked like their pictures would lead you to believe, in some cases even better.  Sure, they aren't all made-up or dressed up, but you can tell that it's them.  They are in good shape, immaculately groomed, are charming and can carry a conversation.  For some reason, I haven't encountered that in London.  Now I'm afraid to believe in any pictures I see, or any reviews.  Any thoughts or recommendations here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it odd a new Yorker uses kilograms not pounds.

Most of the guys who write here and have been to new york are of the opinion punting there is difficult. Maybe it's a cultural divide, you can't get a great punt here and we can't there ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All.  I'm from New York, and this is my first time visiting London, and the escort scene here shocked me.  I arranged to see quite a few escorts.  First was Samantha (http://www.candyshop-escorts.com/samantha.htm).  Quite well reviewed, and not cheap at 250 GBP.  However, when I finally got to her flat, she was perhaps 10kg heavier than she looked in the pictures.  Not attractive at all!  I left.  

I also scheduled an appointment with Kimberley (http://www.projectpleasure.com/escort_kimberley.htm).  Also very well reviewed at various review sites, and also not cheap at 350 GBP.  Again, the girl who opened the door was 10kg heavier, and was definitely NOT the girl in the pictures.  She was also unfriendly and rude to boot.  I left again.  

The last bad experience is with Presley (http://www.agencytouchofclasslondon.co.uk/Presley_toned_brunette_earls_court_sw5.htm).  The girl who opened the door was most definitely NOT toned.  She just smoked a cigarette and it smelled on her breath.  She had stubbly legs, and was slightly chubby (maybe 5-8kg heavier than she looked in the pictures).  I didn't leave, but perhaps I should have.  The service was very very mechanical.  She seemed more concerned about getting herself off than me.  I had paid for an hour but left after 30 minutes.

My only good experience was with Diana (http://butterfly-touch.co.uk/diana.html).  She has a very pretty face, and was very willing to please.  Her body was not great, but she more than made up for it with personality and desire to do her job well.

So, my question is this: is this just bad luck on my part?  I tried to see girls who were well reviewed, but apparently a lot of reviews are just outright lies or fakes.  This happens in the US as well, but not to this degree.  Is this a case of me falling victim to bait and switch?  Or are the pictures really just that much better than what the girls will look like in person and I need to adjust my expectations accordingly?  As a comparison, here are some girls I've seen in NYC.

http://www.ginaslittlesecret.com/m/taraverve/

http://hollypaige.skipsweb.com/

http://www.evavalenti.com/introduction.php

These girls all looked like their pictures would lead you to believe, in some cases even better.  Sure, they aren't all made-up or dressed up, but you can tell that it's them.  They are in good shape, immaculately groomed, are charming and can carry a conversation.  For some reason, I haven't encountered that in London.  Now I'm afraid to believe in any pictures I see, or any reviews.  Any thoughts or recommendations here?

I thought that in USA it's risky punting - as the authorities set up stings for deperate johns and plaster their mugs all over the media

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All is not what it seems, I feel. Call me suspicious but Lessingham makes a very valid point, and, as Lancelot pints out, punting Stateside is generally far more risky.

 

I wonder how the OP did his research.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eva charges $1000 for one hour...  :eek:  :eek:  :eek:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At the present time when someone comes on with a first time post like this one does feel suspiscious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All.  I'm from New York, and this is my first time visiting London, and the escort scene here shocked me.  I arranged to see quite a few escorts.  First was Samantha (http://www.candyshop-escorts.com/samantha.htm).  Quite well reviewed, and not cheap at 250 GBP.  However, when I finally got to her flat, she was perhaps 10kg heavier than she looked in the pictures.  Not attractive at all!  I left.  

I also scheduled an appointment with Kimberley (http://www.projectpleasure.com/escort_kimberley.htm).  Also very well reviewed at various review sites, and also not cheap at 350 GBP.  Again, the girl who opened the door was 10kg heavier, and was definitely NOT the girl in the pictures.  She was also unfriendly and rude to boot.  I left again.  

The last bad experience is with Presley (http://www.agencytouchofclasslondon.co.uk/Presley_toned_brunette_earls_court_sw5.htm).  The girl who opened the door was most definitely NOT toned.  She just smoked a cigarette and it smelled on her breath.  She had stubbly legs, and was slightly chubby (maybe 5-8kg heavier than she looked in the pictures).  I didn't leave, but perhaps I should have.  The service was very very mechanical.  She seemed more concerned about getting herself off than me.  I had paid for an hour but left after 30 minutes.

My only good experience was with Diana (http://butterfly-touch.co.uk/diana.html).  She has a very pretty face, and was very willing to please.  Her body was not great, but she more than made up for it with personality and desire to do her job well.

So, my question is this: is this just bad luck on my part?  I tried to see girls who were well reviewed, but apparently a lot of reviews are just outright lies or fakes.  This happens in the US as well, but not to this degree.  Is this a case of me falling victim to bait and switch?  Or are the pictures really just that much better than what the girls will look like in person and I need to adjust my expectations accordingly?  As a comparison, here are some girls I've seen in NYC.

http://www.ginaslittlesecret.com/m/taraverve/

http://hollypaige.skipsweb.com/

http://www.evavalenti.com/introduction.php

These girls all looked like their pictures would lead you to believe, in some cases even better.  Sure, they aren't all made-up or dressed up, but you can tell that it's them.  They are in good shape, immaculately groomed, are charming and can carry a conversation.  For some reason, I haven't encountered that in London.  Now I'm afraid to believe in any pictures I see, or any reviews.  Any thoughts or recommendations here?

I have a lot of sympathy with you - I have given up on London agencies due to the excessive photoshopping tactics of most of them. Been burnt too many times. Now I stick to indies,mostly on AW. You also should go for recommendations from your fellow punters here. 

 

Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like someone is out to put down the competition  <_<

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it odd a new Yorker uses kilograms not pounds.

 

I thought that.  I also thought that it is odd they said "flat" and not "apartment".

 

Interestingly, it looks like this was first posted on a different site (not sure what the rules are about naming it here) and then cut and pasted across here (based on the grey background to the words in the post).

 

Very curious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(Taking post at face value) Were they reviewed on Punternet and had good reports? Can't see them.

I'd say unlucky (mostly) and sorry to say, not great at research. A good review from here, or a good many reliable reviews from posters on AW who in turn have good reviews, usually works out. And you dont need to pay such rates anyway.

And please post reviews about these four on here for others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought that.  I also thought that it is odd they said "flat" and not "apartment".

 

Interestingly, it looks like this was first posted on a different site (not sure what the rules are about naming it here) and then cut and pasted across here (based on the grey background to the words in the post).

 

Very curious.

 

You are right, he did posted it on U.K. Punting website.

 

I am still  can not understand why he claims that the girls he seen were "well reviewed".  Certainly not on this site, not on Adultwork, not on U.K Punting  and not on Captain69 either.

 

Rather strange to complain about 10 kilos extra weight of the girls, when its obvious that pictures are heavily photoshopped, and he should know better.

 

He sounds a full of shit anyway, so not exactly a credible first post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Photoshopping is always an issue, but the London escort scene is certainly a hell of a lot better than any other UK city, and 90% of girls I've seen do look like their pictures and even if they don't- and most importantly- I still find them attractive. The original poster sounds exceptionally picky.

 

It may be that there is an agenda behind this post. The only one of the girls he mentioned that I've seen people talk about on here is Diana at Butterfly Touch. I've never heard of the others, never mind seen anyone raving about them or giving them five star reviews.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely the giveaway is that "he" has only made one post - the one that started this thread 24 hours ago

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Standard experience seeing random girls, even if you aren't real.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the op sound like bullshit to me quite frankly

 

so he is basiclily saying all uk escorts he saw were overweight and then post 3 amercian links to petite girls around 500 an hour mark

 

an amercian tout prehaps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right, he did posted it on U.K. Punting website.

 

I am still  can not understand why he claims that the girls he seen were "well reviewed".  Certainly not on this site, not on Adultwork, not on U.K Punting  and not on Captain69 either.

 

Rather strange to complain about 10 kilos extra weight of the girls, when its obvious that pictures are heavily photoshopped, and he should know better.

 

He sounds a full of shit anyway, so not exactly a credible first post.

10 kilos is one hell of a lot of weight to have put on. I feel this OP is getting confused.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All.  I'm from New York, and this is my first time visiting London, and the escort scene here shocked me.  I arranged to see quite a few escorts.  First was Samantha (http://www.candyshop-escorts.com/samantha.htm).  Quite well reviewed, and not cheap at 250 GBP.  However, when I finally got to her flat, she was perhaps 10kg heavier than she looked in the pictures.  Not attractive at all!  I left. 

 

The pics of "Samantha" are of Playboy model Shantal Monique.  All the pictures on Candy Shop Escorts are fake.  The reason she has good reviews is because Candy Shop Escorts is one of the agencies that systematically submits fake reviews to review sites (London Sexiest is a particularly bad offender around these parts).  The OTT praise of all the reviews should have been a warning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also scheduled an appointment with Kimberley (http://www.projectpleasure.com/escort_kimberley.htm).  Also very well reviewed at various review sites, and also not cheap at 350 GBP.  Again, the girl who opened the door was 10kg heavier, and was definitely NOT the girl in the pictures.  She was also unfriendly and rude to boot.  I left again.  

 

Kimberley's pics are of Kitty S from femjoy.com.  Again, all the pictures purporting to be escorts on Project Pleasure are stolen glamour/porn model pics.  Use Google Reverse Image Search to check pics.  Again, reviews are faked and their common tone of excessive praise should have been a warning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 kilos is one hell of a lot of weight to have put on. I feel this OP is getting confused.

 

The 10 kilos of weight never was "put on" by the girls.  It was already there, but "reduced" with photoshoping.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 kilos is one hell of a lot of weight to have put on. I feel this OP is getting confused.

If he really is American then wouldnt that be a bonus,it'd be more like at home for him :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

God I used to date an American that was a vacuous moron who spent every morning in the gym at 5am for two hours, shit they are boring no personality or sex appeal what so ever..............they like women to look like they are on four thousand grams of heroine  a day, thing with looking this wasted your face looks like shit................European men like women who are firm and not flabby but with bodies like kim Kardashian (how ever you spell her name) and Jay Lo and Kelly Brooke you know that look like sexy real women, not heroine addicts........................a friend of mine once told me men who like that usually like to fantasise about having sex with girls not of the legal age....................so if you want that string bean heroine look suggest you spend your money in the good old USA.

Edited by heather

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0