Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Thurson

Punternerd

25 posts in this topic

Yup, that's me. :unsure:

 

I say punternerd because I just can't help but keep all sorts of records and statistics on my punts.  How many girls I've seen, how much I've spent, what nationality, what did we get up to, and most importantly, how did she rate!

 

I can't be doing with this simplified marks out of ten for looks and marks out of ten for performance.  I've had to develop my own rating system with a weighted scoring method on different criteria so as to provide a total score out of 100.

 

So each girl I see can gain the following maximum score in each category:

 

Category                                                                                  Max score

Looks (face, bum, legs etc)                                                           50

Range of services (OWO, DFK, A+, CIM, COF etc -                                        

score may also be affected by how readily they are offered)          8

Skill (not what services are offered, but how, what techniques)       8

Passion (enthusiasm, nymphmaniacal tendencies)                       10

Social skills (charm, friendliness, empathy)                                     8

Conversation (intelligence, humour etc)                                          5

Professionalism (no clockwatching, time wasting, arguing,

attentiveness, cleanliness)                                                              6

Style (clothing, accommodation, music)                                          5

                                                                                                     ___

TOTAL                                                                                          100

 

The beauty of the system is that the individual punter can change the weightings provided to each category according to their punting priorities.  Personally, being fairly straightforward in my punting tastes, I am not sure that I shouldn't allocate even more marks to the looks, rather than the service related categories, but there you go.

 

The highest score I have ever given is 95 and the lowest 34.

 

I proclaim this system to the punting world as the Thurson Rating system, and if it takes off, I may need to apply for licencing restrictions with attendant royalty payments due.  You have been warned. :angry:

 

So, how far do you go in your record keeping?  Are you a punternerd too?

Edited by Thurson
4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, that's me. :unsure:

 

I say punternerd because I just can't help but keep all sorts of records and statistics on my punts.  How many girls I've seen, how much I've spent, what nationality, what did we get up to, and most importantly, how did she rate!

 

I can't be doing with this simplified marks out of ten for looks and marks out of ten for performance.  I've had to develop my own rating system with a weighted scoring method on different criteria so as to provide a total score out of 100.

 

So each girl I see can gain the following maximum score in each category:

 

Category                                                                                  Max score

Looks (face, bum, legs etc)                                                           50

Range of services (OWO, DFK, A+, CIM, COF etc -                                        

score may also be affected by how readily they are offered)          8

Skill (not what services are offered, but how, what techniques)       8

Passion (enthusiasm, nymphmaniacal tendencies)                       10

Social skills (charm, friendliness, empathy)                                     8

Conversation (intelligence, humour etc)                                          5

Professionalism (no clockwatching, time wasting, arguing,

attentiveness, cleanliness)                                                              6

Style (clothing, accommodation, music)                                          5

                                                                                                     ___

TOTAL                                                                                          100

 

The beauty of the system is that the individual punter can change the weightings provided to each category according to their punting priorities.  Personally, being fairly straightforward in my punting tastes, I am not sure that I shouldn't allocate even more marks to the looks, rather than the service related categories, but there you go.

 

The highest score I have ever given is 95 and the lowest 34.

 

I proclaim this system to the punting world as the Thurson Rating system, and if it takes off, I may need to apply for licencing restrictions with attendant royalty payments due.  You have been warned. :angry:

 

So, how far do you go in your record keeping?  Are you a punternerd too?

 

used to keep a spreadsheet but gave up cos looking at the total cost was too scary :)   But really, I dont regret a penny of the cash.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thurson- Do you have a little notepad and pen with you during the punt to keep notes?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, how far do you go in your record keeping?  Are you a punternerd too?

 

I just rely on my ever-failing memory.  I'm an unscientific "what did the overall experience feel like" kinda person.

 

That's why when I write reviews I'm pretty vague!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An assistant present to take the minutes would be ideal but perhaps not altogether practical.

 

Your method is impressive if a little worrying though.  Assuming you get home straight after the meeting and make your notes before it all becomes a blur...... it could encroach on your serious and more sensible activities.............. which I guess involves collecting matchboxes and thimbles and beermats.  

 

(that last piece of sarcasm was intended purely to make you smile...... and I meant no offence whatsoever)

 

My own method of differentiation in these things involves a large week -to-view diary and a selection of coloured highlighters........... making the markings on my pages very striking and instantly noticable when I need to back check any dubious dealings.

 

You would be proud of me.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, that's me. :unsure:

 

I say punternerd because I just can't help but keep all sorts of records and statistics on my punts.  How many girls I've seen, how much I've spent, what nationality, what did we get up to, and most importantly, how did she rate!

 

I can't be doing with this simplified marks out of ten for looks and marks out of ten for performance.  I've had to develop my own rating system with a weighted scoring method on different criteria so as to provide a total score out of 100.

 

So each girl I see can gain the following maximum score in each category:

 

Category                                                                                  Max score

Looks (face, bum, legs etc)                                                           50

Range of services (OWO, DFK, A+, CIM, COF etc -                                        

score may also be affected by how readily they are offered)          8

Skill (not what services are offered, but how, what techniques)       8

Passion (enthusiasm, nymphmaniacal tendencies)                       10

Social skills (charm, friendliness, empathy)                                     8

Conversation (intelligence, humour etc)                                          5

Professionalism (no clockwatching, time wasting, arguing,

attentiveness, cleanliness)                                                              6

Style (clothing, accommodation, music)                                          5

                                                                                                     ___

TOTAL                                                                                          100

 

The beauty of the system is that the individual punter can change the weightings provided to each category according to their punting priorities.  Personally, being fairly straightforward in my punting tastes, I am not sure that I shouldn't allocate even more marks to the looks, rather than the service related categories, but there you go.

 

The highest score I have ever given is 95 and the lowest 34.

 

I proclaim this system to the punting world as the Thurson Rating system, and if it takes off, I may need to apply for licencing restrictions with attendant royalty payments due.  You have been warned. :angry:

 

So, how far do you go in your record keeping?  Are you a punternerd too?

 

 

If I were seeing a variety of escorts, your rating system would work well if you were inclined to book her again. (90+ category).

 

I have a regular who could be retiring soon, so I may be needing something to help rate a replacement. I think there's one escort on here, who I haven't met yet, who I'm sure would score in the high 90's.  <_<

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thurson- Do you have a little notepad and pen with you during the punt to keep notes?!

 

An assistant present to take the minutes would be ideal but perhaps not altogether practical.

 

These are all excellent ideas!

 

(fastidiously making notes for future reference whilst wondering where his highlighter has got to :mellow: )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well what have I been doing wasting all these post-coital years punting when I could have been writing everything up...

 

I will start your system straightaway although running through my 1000 or so pleasured ladies might be a bit of a strain on my non-existent memory.

 

IF I did something similar to you already, I sure as heck will not be admitting it on a national forum to have my manly, hunky even, image rubbished by my devotees thank you very much.

 

:o

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely you know whether a girl blows your socks off or not??? :ph34r:

 

You could get home, fill in the stats, and realise she was brilliant..... only 3 hours too late to enjoy it  ^_^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it is a process.

at first you make careful notes, and you learn.

after about 400 punts, you revert to just the name of lady + max 80 characters notes.

And the sweet memories will always be always there...

(and you still learn)

 

PS: Do use encrypted USB stick.

PS: do only use 1 specific mail account, change password regularly, and logout each time.

PS: and DO NOT take any Risk!

Fallouts will appear, often for no reason. remain very discreet. dont ask, dont inquire, dont hesitate, dont Judge.

Stay respectful. Dont Judge.

Appearances are just that. Things are rarely what they seem... Nothing is simple.

Any doubt = break contact. (with respect, and without judgement!)

Fox Mulder applies: "trust no 1"  (there are no 2nds)

 

Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

one more thing:

if you are in a relationship with a DP or a SO: go nerd around MN for educational purposes.

 

AIBU ??

naaah. OTT maybe, but not U.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

one more thing:

if you are in a relationship with a DP or a SO: go nerd around MN for educational purposes.

 

AIBU ??

naaah. OTT maybe, but not U.

I got the first part of the first sentence but struggled with the second part of the first part. Then the third part over the naaah gave me trouble so I quickly went to the fourth part which was less confusing but not for long.

 

:wacko:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as a scrablle + crossword geek, I had expected you to get it.

 

here goes

DP = Dear Partner

SO = Significant Other

MN = Misogyny Net, aka "the other site"

AIBU = Am I Being Unreasonable

OTT = Over The Top

U = Unreasonable

 

It was my way of saying: check Mumsnet to get the opinions and modus operandi of the nerdettes from "the other side" (and maybe have a laff or a cry as well)

 

sorry, just in one of those moods.

Wont do it again - for a while.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as a scrablle + crossword geek, I had expected you to get it.

 

here goes

DP = Dear Partner  WASN'T SURE

SO = Significant Other KNEW

MN = Misogyny Net, aka "the other site" DIDN'T KNOW BUT DO NOW

AIBU = Am I Being Unreasonable A NEW ONE ON ME

OTT = Over The Top ANY FOOL KNOWS THAT

U = Unreasonable AHHH I SEE

 

It was my way of saying: check Mumsnet to get the opinions and modus operandi of the nerdettes from "the other side" (and maybe have a laff or a cry as well)

 

sorry, just in one of those moods.

Wont do it again - for a while.

I gave up on Mumsnet..... haven't the time to trawl through all that stuff.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I gave up on Mumsnet..... haven't the time to trawl through all that stuff.   

TBH, I only learned about MN and AIBU on that other site.. 

they have a list of abbrevs somewhere. I used to have the link.

I trawled it some year ago when I sat bored in some far and lonely place where PN was barred, but MN wasnt ...

 

We need to play scrabble sometime..

Edited by ptrleeds

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry about a notepad and pen, get yourself a little dictaphone to prop on the bedside table.  Much less intrusive and you can keep up a running commentary throughout the action.  The heaviness of your breathing and your tone of voice (from relaxed through to strangulated) will also serve as an aide memoire for post-punt records

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if you're going to keep notes to compare and return to your favourites, or to keep memoreis, you may as well do it well!  Well done sir!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, that's me. :unsure:

 

I say punternerd because I just can't help but keep all sorts of records and statistics on my punts.  How many girls I've seen, how much I've spent, what nationality, what did we get up to, and most importantly, how did she rate!

 

I can't be doing with this simplified marks out of ten for looks and marks out of ten for performance.  I've had to develop my own rating system with a weighted scoring method on different criteria so as to provide a total score out of 100.

 

So each girl I see can gain the following maximum score in each category:

 

Category                                                                                  Max score

Looks (face, bum, legs etc)                                                           50

Range of services (OWO, DFK, A+, CIM, COF etc -                                        

score may also be affected by how readily they are offered)          8

Skill (not what services are offered, but how, what techniques)       8

Passion (enthusiasm, nymphmaniacal tendencies)                       10

Social skills (charm, friendliness, empathy)                                     8

Conversation (intelligence, humour etc)                                          5

Professionalism (no clockwatching, time wasting, arguing,

attentiveness, cleanliness)                                                              6

Style (clothing, accommodation, music)                                          5

                                                                                                     ___

TOTAL                                                                                          100

 

The beauty of the system is that the individual punter can change the weightings provided to each category according to their punting priorities.  Personally, being fairly straightforward in my punting tastes, I am not sure that I shouldn't allocate even more marks to the looks, rather than the service related categories, but there you go.

 

The highest score I have ever given is 95 and the lowest 34.

 

I proclaim this system to the punting world as the Thurson Rating system, and if it takes off, I may need to apply for licencing restrictions with attendant royalty payments due.  You have been warned. :angry:

 

So, how far do you go in your record keeping?  Are you a punternerd too?

Don't you destroy something when you start breaking it down into its component parts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wow some detailed record keeping there, impressive

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are forgetting, Thurson, to allow for metric and imperial scores when comparing and contrasting EE girls and British beauties. Thai girls need a handicap to allow for their tiny boobs but probably get a negative one for their fabulous hair.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't you destroy something when you start breaking it down into its component parts.

 

Sad as it is, I have a truly awful memory.  If I didn't find ways of recording all these details I would soon start to forget.  Memories of entire punts and girls would just gradually float away.  My records keep them alive for me far longer than they othewise would.  Punting costs a lot of money for a short stint of pleasure.  Value for me comes from how long I can remember the pleasure for.

 

I keep various records, including photos and descriptions, but as a part of this, the Thurson rating system helps me think about the punts I've had, what I liked about a particular punt / girl, and why it is that I am so fond of some girls I have seen, more than others.

 

I know that not every punter would be inclined to take the same approach. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My memory is terrible. Whenever I leave a Punt I do the "old man pat down" trying to remember if I packed my wallet, phone, glasses, watch, and underpants!

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sad as it is, I have a truly awful memory.  If I didn't find ways of recording all these details I would soon start to forget.  Memories of entire punts and girls would just gradually float away.  My records keep them alive for me far longer than they othewise would.

 

For me, that's just part of life - wabi sabi - nothing lasts.  There are some ladies where I have forgotten completely about them, some where a memory gets triggered by something (in some Proustian fashion) and some that I do remember.  That's my rating system right there - the ones which stick in my memory are the good ones.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im in my early sixties and I too have trouble with my ......, you know thingy, remembering things.

I've been punting for 5 years now but I remember every girl, good or bad and I remember every failed punt 4, each bait and switch 2, and the number of girls I've tried and failed to arrange a punt with 8, Adele being the last one, 2 weeks ago, what a busy lady she is.

Punting? No it doesn't mean anything to me at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

most importantly, how did she rate!

Yes, that's the bottom line.

Next question: Why do you want to know? I can think of two answers.

First, to remind yourself about it. For that, you need a personalised method. Therefore my own may not make much sense to someone else, and vice versa.

I don't have any opinion about systems, like the one in the first post here, because I rely just on memory. Fortunately it's a good one, at least for punts. I probably trained it on punts anyway. When I was a lustful but poor young punter I needed something to fill the gaps when lust was there but money wasn't.

The only problem with the memory method is that it's too easy to remember the bad punts along with the others. I'm still working on a method for forgetting those.

The second answer to the basic question is: To pass your knowledge helpfully over to other punters or people interested in trying a punt or two.

For that you need a system that's objective (as far as you can manage it - never 100% because punting isn't objective) and simple. The system in the original post has its points but it isn't objective or simple.

It happens that we had a philosophical debate about this exact question among experts a while ago. I came in in the middle of it. That was at the bar of a House of ill repute I visit whenever I'm in the city where it is. Not in the UK, folks, sad to say.  UK would be a better place with Houses like that.

I thought there might have been different ideas and no quick agreement, but I was wrong. Here's the bar's agreed system now, for what it's worth.

There are four types of punt.

A: Fine punt, and you'd make a positive effort to set up a repeat visit.

B: Quite OK and you could imagine conditions where you might want to return.

C: Acceptable punt, but you couldn't imagine any.

D: No way, just plain No, bad punt, Aarggh! etc.

After more talking we thought of an optional add-on:  + and - symbols to carry more information occasionally, mostly about C punts.

B+: You got the impression the WG was trying hard enough to do an A class job but couldn't manage it (sometimes because of things she wouldn't have been able to correct about her treatment or about herself).

C+: Same wording as for B+ except for "an A class" being replaced by "a B class".

C-: Defects (again not necessarily because of anything the WG could correct) that would normally have made a Bad Punt but you couldn't quite bring yourself to call it bad.

Nobody saw any need for a B- in there.

They also agreed that the + and - meant just footnotes and not a rating. So, C+ shouldn't mean a better punt than C and C wouldn't be better than C-. For punt quality, all of them would simply be C class.

Can anyone suggest a better simple system for giving other people useful information about your punts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0