stolenkiss

Photo Preferences - Glam Or "action Shots"

27 posts in this topic

I've noticed there's lots of chat about wg photos on the various punting sites. From outrage at overblown photo-shopped visions, to fundamental questions over privacy. My question isnt so much along those lines, but scouring the profiles, which I do now and again, I see a couple of trends:

1. WGs all glammed up, looking amazing in their sexy outfits / underwear, or

2. Shots of wgs "in play" - and this ranges from maybe a shot of them attending to a client to full on orgy / gang bang action and all the photgraphic evidence that goes with it.

As ever I guess its marketing and whatever the wg feels comfortable in doing, but my question is what is your preference punters. Do you like the action shots or more glam poses. And ladies, what type of pics attract the most attention for you...or even unwanted attention.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tbh a pic has to entice me somehow and recently good natural snaps in various locations/poses have done the trick so not really keen on either of the above you mention although if i had a gun to my head to choose it would be glamour!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've noticed there's lots of chat about wg photos on the various punting sites. From outrage at overblown photo-shopped visions, to fundamental questions over privacy. My question isnt so much along those lines, but scouring the profiles, which I do now and again, I see a couple of trends:

1. WGs all glammed up, looking amazing in their sexy outfits / underwear, or

2. Shots of wgs "in play" - and this ranges from maybe a shot of them attending to a client to full on orgy / gang bang action and all the photgraphic evidence that goes with it.

As ever I guess its marketing and whatever the wg feels comfortable in doing, but my question is what is your preference punters. Do you like the action shots or more glam poses. And ladies, what type of pics attract the most attention for you...or even unwanted attention.

 

for pix to work for me they have to convey a bit about the lady, So its nice to see some clothed pix, some in a more undressed state.  but some pic so I can see what the lady is like -i.e. body shape.  Not sure the more gynecological ones help much.

dont forget to do some outside.  always nice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've noticed there's lots of chat about wg photos on the various punting sites. From outrage at overblown photo-shopped visions, to fundamental questions over privacy. My question isnt so much along those lines, but scouring the profiles, which I do now and again, I see a couple of trends:

1. WGs all glammed up, looking amazing in their sexy outfits / underwear, or

2. Shots of wgs "in play" - and this ranges from maybe a shot of them attending to a client to full on orgy / gang bang action and all the photgraphic evidence that goes with it.

As ever I guess its marketing and whatever the wg feels comfortable in doing, but my question is what is your preference punters. Do you like the action shots or more glam poses. And ladies, what type of pics attract the most attention for you...or even unwanted attention.

All i require are pictures of how the WG looks now in the present, either including face pics or only body pics. Naked is ideal for me so i can see her whole body, but what i dont want to see are WGs shagging or sucking guys cocks whether with a condom or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm probably in the minority but I actually prefer some decent selfies taken by the wg herself. This was the case with one wg I've seen who's photos gave an idea of what she looked like (no face pics), and were good enough to make me want to see her. When I saw her 'in the flesh', wow - the most stunning girl I've ever seen in real life, and the best punts too!

Not a fan of over glammed up shots and if I want porn type shots, there's plenty to be had elsewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the girl lists her services it certainly isn't necessary to see her performing them as unbelievably, most punters do know what they are. Pics in nice underwear are great but they must show enough of the girl's body to form a judegment of what she is like. Certain poses, and the lack of others, always set alarm bells ringing with me.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Professional picture work best for me - no 'Reader's Wives' stuff please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Professional picture work best for me - no 'Reader's Wives' stuff please.

hmmmm.... On reflection think Id have to side with the readers wives stuff...ok, not too grimey and down tone, like a polaroid from the 80s but a natural shot in natural surroundings will show the sexiness in a re light.

I guess a lot of us know what know what goes on behind closed doors, especially the avid review readers / contributers and the party enthusiasts...but not sure if the action shots do it for me. Nothing against, just indifferent.

How about an opinion from the wgs???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you think back to those Readers Wives mags, you may recall how unattractive many ordinary people look without their clothes on, also how difficult it is to take good glamour shots (underlit, badly composed, ferret-eyed, distracting rubbish in the background ...)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I quite enjoy seeing what range of clothes a lady has, especially if she is prepared to dress for the meeting. The odd naked one does give us an idea of body shape.

 

I have no interest in "action" pictures. I know what shagging and sucking look like!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i like to see a good mix of Glam, naked, with lingerie, in civvies etc....basically a good overall view of what the WG maybe like as represented by her choice of different types of image she uses - and if that includes showing how she can deep throat or take a fat one up the arse so be it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sexyily dressed for photos please :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think an escort has to do what works best for her and will choose photos which fit with how she wants to convey (or brand) herself). As we all know men have a variety of tastes so you're not going to please everyone whatever you do! 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I prefer a mix of professional shots (without too mch photoshop, however) and natural candid shots (but not too explicit).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of my favourite photo shoots is of an escort walking in woodland dressed in skimpy but tasteful underwear. Stunning!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've noticed there's lots of chat about wg photos on the various punting sites. From outrage at overblown photo-shopped visions, to fundamental questions over privacy. My question isnt so much along those lines, but scouring the profiles, which I do now and again, I see a couple of trends:

1. WGs all glammed up, looking amazing in their sexy outfits / underwear, or

2. Shots of wgs "in play" - and this ranges from maybe a shot of them attending to a client to full on orgy / gang bang action and all the photgraphic evidence that goes with it.

As ever I guess its marketing and whatever the wg feels comfortable in doing, but my question is what is your preference punters. Do you like the action shots or more glam poses. And ladies, what type of pics attract the most attention for you...or even unwanted attention.

 

Neither. 

 

Just natural pictures. Please no airbrushed photos. They are an insult to our intelligence. 

 

Action pictures ?

Can be a real turn-off depending on the picture. There is really nothing enticing seeing a lady being squeezed among 2+ guys. It turns me off and I move to the next profile. Gangbang pictures make me put the lady in the blacklist so that they do not show up in the search results. 

In softcore pictures, if the SP is only using male partners that are decidedly good-looking, athletic types in the pictures, then I move on to the next profile, too. I see no reason in these photos to indicate that this lady will be passionate with average-looking guys. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find the gynae style photos rather ick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the mixed approach. It's nice to see how the girls really look but it's also good to see professional type pics.

The 'plain' type pics personally give me a bit if piece of mind the girl us real and not a con artist. But the glammed up pics show how good they do/can look - case in point is another forum posting at the moment for a WG in the W2 area (phew!! ).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've noticed there's lots of chat about wg photos on the various punting sites. From outrage at overblown photo-shopped visions, to fundamental questions over privacy. My question isnt so much along those lines, but scouring the profiles, which I do now and again, I see a couple of trends:

1. WGs all glammed up, looking amazing in their sexy outfits / underwear, or

2. Shots of wgs "in play" - and this ranges from maybe a shot of them attending to a client to full on orgy / gang bang action and all the photgraphic evidence that goes with it.

As ever I guess its marketing and whatever the wg feels comfortable in doing, but my question is what is your preference punters. Do you like the action shots or more glam poses. And ladies, what type of pics attract the most attention for you...or even unwanted attention.

What I like to see are photos which show me that a lady has stockings and ideally some sexy retro undies.

 

Regards,

 

davidgood

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If everyone hates photoshopping why do they do it? Ok I accept the removal of tats as they lead to identification and the removal of blemishes maybe. But carving pounds off bodies? Cutting and pasting head to body nakes the women look stupid.

Natural is always the best. And there are some great pictures of women revealing just enough of their faces to allure without full identity being revealed. The gyno shots are pointless, knickers on ladies!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The point of a photo is surely to try and communicate something about the lady.

mostly the body -the shape and colour,

But the photo can also give an idea about her personality, I would have thought.

 

what I find is photos which dont flatter.  I have seen 2 ladies this week and both ladies has been way more attractive than her photos, to the extent I have had to stifle a 'wow' when she walked in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Prefer the glam sexy photos personally as that wha draws me in to want to meet them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Subtle, no face pictures in the main galley.

 

Hardcore action shots in the private gallery, titled accordingly to entice one in.

 

Same with the videos.

 

Please, not 'Me fucking my boyfriend BB, I don't do this with clients', type pictures/videos: we won't believe you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

what I find is photos which dont flatter.  I have seen 2 ladies this week and both ladies has been way more attractive than her photos, to the extent I have had to stifle a 'wow' when she walked in.

This is exactly what I prefer....

I'd much rather see some ok photos that give a general idea of what the lady is like and go 'wow' when we meet than see over glammed up images which leave you disappointed when meeting in the flesh...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have 3 pro pics on my page the rest taken by me or clients and i get told often that my clients love my untouched pics as they know what they are getting!!

 

also im not the cameras best friend and often get told better than the pics which is a wonderful compliment x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now