Pol Pot

How Important Is Location?

39 posts in this topic

While seeing an independent WG the other day we got talking about location. She works from a bedsit very close to a rail terminal in zone one London. The cost....an eye-watering £2,500 a month!

 

I said to her 'why don't you move slightly out of central London and save yourself a huge amount of money?' For example a similar-size place in Finsbury Park would cost £600 a month.

 

Her reply was that she wouldn't get as much business out there. But that would only be 15 minutes on the tube? Surely, gents, if a girl is worth seeing you would make the effort? And do the WGs on here think their location has a big say in how much custom they receive?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rubbush.

Some people might say I am too far out in zone 5 abd 40 mins from Waterloo but a) I get clients who travel this and further because they want to see *me* and not just any old woman and b ) there are men in the local surrounds!

I pay a fraction of what your escort said in rent and make a decent living.

If you're good at your job, advertise well and build up a good reputation you can be successful.

Saying that, I am close to Heathrow as well as being not too far from other towns.

And £600 a month for a flat in Finsbury Park???? Really?!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If men will travel there and happily return then the location is fine.

 

Some locations will cut down business because only drivers or people willing to pay for taxis would get there.

 

Some micro-locations will be off-putting such as one entry I recall from last year where you ducked through a broken door from a busy shopping street into a dark covered alley with various doors at the end and rubbish on the floor before knocking for admittance.

 

That would put many off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody should question why a lady works from any location.  It's up to her.  If it works then it works.  Only criteria I would put first is the discretion of the entry and exit.  The rest is just semantics

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do like my Paddington station but once in London I am growed up enough to use the tube. It would not be a deal breaker to go out into the leafy suburbs.

I do totally agree that it is the aporoach and street scene which are more important.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While seeing an independent WG the other day we got talking about location. She works from a bedsit very close to a rail terminal in zone one London. The cost....an eye-watering £2,500 a month!

 

I said to her 'why don't you move slightly out of central London and save yourself a huge amount of money?' For example a similar-size place in Finsbury Park would cost £600 a month.

 

Her reply was that she wouldn't get as much business out there. But that would only be 15 minutes on the tube? Surely, gents, if a girl is worth seeing you would make the effort? And do the WGs on here think their location has a big say in how much custom they receive?

 

I know some girls near South Kensington who pay roughly the amount you mentioned and charge some £150 or less.  They want to be busy and have as many clients per day when they temporarily work in London, then going back to their countries.  They choose a good area thinking they get better clients there, also because they are lazy.  I know lots of guys who would not travel to Finsbury Park, or Docklands or Fulham, so there is some truth in her words.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a time I would travel anywhere and everywhere...but more recently do stick to central London(ish) unless i have made prepaid plans to go further afield...

Heathrow was another hotspot for me but that was always outcalls...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me, the issues concerning location are that it must be reasonably discreet, have parking nearby and, above all, feel safe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think some girls see being in a certain location as a status symbol even if they have to fuck till the cows come home to pay for it. I think probably in London also the more exclusive areas are probably seen as safer and likely to encourage a more respectable type and safe type of client as it is a dangerous city to work in in this job compared to other smaller places. Some girls would rather a lovely huge apartment out of the city others are happy with a tiny well appointed little bedsit in an exclusive city location. At the end of the day I guess its up to the girl but I do wonder if some feel some kind of pressure to keep up appearances by being in the right place or that it makes them appear to be a better class of ho by being there. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heathrow is a funny place. Most of the escorts seem to work the hotels through out calls rather than incalls. I suppose that is where the trade is.

Just to toss a lighted match into a puddle of petrol, I wonder how the city escorts will fare as the islamic populations of the cities start flexing their intolerance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heathrow is a funny place. Most of the escorts seem to work the hotels through out calls rather than incalls. I suppose that is where the trade is.

Just to toss a lighted match into a puddle of petrol, I wonder how the city escorts will fare as the islamic populations of the cities start flexing their intolerance

It doesnt matter, their intolerance is their problem. I think the islamic communities flexing harassment muscles will find themselves at the foul end of the law if they keep expecting be be allowed to wander the streets of certain London areas committing offences agains law abiding citizens minding their own business. The tide will turn I think if they start thinking they can rule the streets and what people do in their own private accommodation. Plus of course half of them will be the clients anyway…religious hypocrisy is alive and well as usual no doubt.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know some girls near South Kensington who pay roughly the amount you mentioned and charge some £150 or less.  They want to be busy and have as many clients per day when they temporarily work in London, then going back to their countries.  They choose a good area thinking they get better clients there, also because they are lazy.  I know lots of guys who would not travel to Finsbury Park, or Docklands or Fulham, so there is some truth in her words.  

One moment you say they're aiming to pack as many punters into their day as possible, then you accuse them of being lazy. How does that compute? There is a difference between laziness and convenience, surely?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

   I would say the best locations are close to the main line rail terminals in central london .  a lot of guys commute daily in for work and can always be a couple hours late home when they stop off for a punt .  The money is in central london and always will be .  Just my opinion , before the MK gang come down on me .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heathrow is a funny place. Most of the escorts seem to work the hotels through out calls rather than incalls. I suppose that is where the trade is.

Just to toss a lighted match into a puddle of petrol, I wonder how the city escorts will fare as the islamic populations of the cities start flexing their intolerance

 

How would a handful of religious fun-dies flex their religious muscle? And what can they do?  If any bearded nutjob with an imaginary friend wants to chance their arm with this pork-chomping, (ex) alcohol soaked, womaniser:  molon labe.

 

In answer to the OP, location is irrelevant.  I've personally travelled miles to see a specific girl.  Distance is no object.  Once I went from south London to Manchester for a brilliant three hour punt.  The journey was exhausting but worth every last minute.  Now I stick to central London simply for convenience, but if I like the look of a girl in St. Albans, Watford or Birmingham then I'll happily make the effort.  Being retired it's a day out somewhere different and breaks up the usual routine.  Mind you it's a bugger if the booking goes tits up in an unfamiliar town.  And that has happened.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One moment you say they're aiming to pack as many punters into their day as possible, then you accuse them of being lazy. How does that compute? There is a difference between laziness and convenience, surely?

I think Annabelle meant that the clients are lazy not the WGs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As someone that cannot drive location & ease of public transport is very important.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Annabelle meant that the clients are lazy not the WGs.

Ah, of course, that would make much more sense. Apologies to Annabelle. Again, I wouldn't call it lazy, though. The window of time guys have to sneak away is often small enough, and it's not reasonable to expect them to want to waste their lunch break commuting to a punt. I noticed a big drop-off in business when I moved away from convenient Victoria Station to not so convenient Notting Hill Gate. And this in spite of it just being a 15 minute journey on the Circle Line, and a very short stagger from the tube this end. Location is absolutely crucial. If you want to be busy, you can't expect men to want to deviate from their usual rat runs by very much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i worked in kensignton when i was in london and paid 2400 a month and i charged 150 an hour but  it worked for me as was very central

now im in bristol im city centre based so clients can get to me by bus train or foot makes sence to be central but comes at a higher living cost

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bristol city center is more expensive than Kensington?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bristol city center is more expensive than Kensington?

 

 

  When you retire  don't bother applying to work at a estate agents office  . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

   I would say the best locations are close to the main line rail terminals in central london .  a lot of guys commute daily in for work and can always be a couple hours late home when they stop off for a punt .  The money is in central london and always will be .  Just my opinion , before the MK gang come down on me .

Would agree and add the stations on the main tube lines.

For me personally,the one question i always used to ask,nearest station. A combination of limited time,and lousy directional sense,coupled with buses frequently being more than a tad unreliable meant travel time being kept to a minimum so the nearer a main station the better.If someone was too far from a main station it was a no no.Luckily i got a little more adventurous,as otherwise i would have missed some great times :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you retire don't bother applying to work at a estate agents office .

Mm really and why would that be, insulting me won't take away the fact that you equated booking an escort to buying a dog lol Edited by Chloe Kisses

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesnt matter, their intolerance is their problem. I think the islamic communities flexing harassment muscles will find themselves at the foul end of the law if they keep expecting be be allowed to wander the streets of certain London areas committing offences agains law abiding citizens minding their own business. The tide will turn I think if they start thinking they can rule the streets and what people do in their own private accommodation. Plus of course half of them will be the clients anyway…religious hypocrisy is alive and well as usual no doubt.

If I had a pound for every asian gent I've seen scurrying in and out of the various parlours, it would completely cover the costs of my own punting.

However, I have no evidence of their faith, so can only assume non are muslims!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone paying that for a bedsit a bedsit ......i had a gorgeous one bedroom flat in kensington for 1,600 I think someone is taking the piss with her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now