Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
toonice

More creepy photos

23 posts in this topic

looks just like when I take my glasses off

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
looks just like when I take my glasses off

For heaven's sake glue 'em on!:rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure of the exact point of your post, but both of the girls you've highlighted (and I've met them), are very attractive in real life......!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not sure of the exact point of your post, but both of the girls you've highlighted (and I've met them), are very attractive in real life......!

The point is why do obvious photoshopping when they certainly dont need it.

Why make them look plastic and fake when they look much better in real life. Actually makes them worse not better..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the pics are over photoshopped, the ladies don't need their photos over done like this, but maybe someone has been playing to much with them lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People who are inexperienced with PhotShop should leave well alone.

And yes I agree, niether of these ladies need this, it can do more harm than good. I have met them both more than once.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
People who are inexperienced with PhotShop should leave well alone.

And yes I agree, niether of these ladies need this, it can do more harm than good. I have met them both more than once.

Well I've met Natasha and would happily touch her up anytime! :confused::D

Sorry, err I'll get my coat...:o:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They do look wierd

One looks like a rabbit in the headlights..... but too much PShop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

maby its the same person that done sandy escorts photos :confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One looks like a rabbit in the headlights..... but too much PShop.

my thoughts exactly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not actually photoshop itself, its an separate program. The guy doing the pix can get the pix ready in photoshop and then batch process them through the program afterwards while he is having coffee. He can set the level of smoothing, I guess he has set it quite high. Its a way of saving time instead of doing each pic individually. He probably set the level based on other girls in the batch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mr Nice. I think you have enough posts from guy's to verify how May and I look in real life.

'Creepy' is not a word that I would describe/associate with any pictures of woman that you describe in your threads..................maybe it's a word that you are used to hearing from woman yourself ??

example- I can't stand that creep :confused::P

I believe the only real thing the photographer was airbrushing that day was the cum stains out of my pink and white knickers..................well, was quite late in the day, may have been wee wee as well, good you didn't get a rear view!! haha :D xxx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I believe the only real thing the photographer was airbrushing that day was the cum stains out of my pink and white knickers..................well, was quite late in the day, may have been wee wee as well, good you didn't get a rear view!! haha :confused: xxx

Me, I don't see heavy photoshopping here, but what I DO very much see is open, honest Exif Metadata! (alright, my hobby horse, but I think it is valuable) which shows that the shot was taken at three minutes to five on the afternoon of 17 December last, and saved, after resizing, certainly, for the web-site, and maybe some improvement, the next morning at quarter past eleven, so not a great deal of time (assuming that the other shots were taken at the same session, and processed together) for mucking about.

Oh, and the photographer was, I think, a pro, although he doesn't give his name, using a Canon EOS 1D Mark III, and Photoshop CS3 for Mac.

Me, I'm not entering this shot in the other thread on the sexiest ever, but I like it, certainly wouldn't call it "creepy" and, when next in Surrey, who knows, it might bring me to your door!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Photos are enhanced everywhere, just look at the glossy models and then a photo of them getting the papers in the morning. Skin blemishes,tatooes etc all disappear. I dont see any real problems with the photos you have identified. The photos are there to entice us and they are of the actual girls shown.

I would certainly not be disappointed with the real girls. In fact one of them I will still be shagging when she is fifty two if she is still around then. Thats another 20 years honi, (That should give her nightmares, ha ha!) by then you might need the odd wrinkle photo-ironed out, at present any guy who is disappointed with the real you, is sadly lacking in judgement. (Phew got there without swearing):confused::):D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Its not actually photoshop itself, its an separate program. The guy doing the pix can get the pix ready in photoshop and then batch process them through the program afterwards while he is having coffee. He can set the level of smoothing, I guess he has set it quite high. Its a way of saving time instead of doing each pic individually. He probably set the level based on other girls in the batch.

It rather looks like the work of software called Portrait Professional, which can produce amazing results it you use it properly and with a light touch, but if you leave it to its own devices it tends to overdo it and produce horrible results like these. Lots of us use it because it is quicker than Photoshop for producing good portraits of not so good subjects.

It's a real shame because if you look behind the alterations the girls look stunning underneath it all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Mr Nice. I think you have enough posts from guy's to verify how May and I look in real life.

'Creepy' is not a word that I would describe/associate with any pictures of woman that you describe in your threads..................maybe it's a word that you are used to hearing from woman yourself ??

Sorry, I didn't mean to cause offence.

But "creepy" is, I think, justifiable on an objective basis: people find things creepy that are close to enough real life to almost pass, but differ just enough to trigger a "something's wrong" response. I don't think you or your friend are creepy, and I'm sure the original photo was not. The creepiness comes in when an over-enthusiastic use of photoshop turns the beautiful girl that's under there somewhere into something that seems halfway between human and plastic doll. I think you'd look much better as you really are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree - you can tell she is stunning in real life but the overuse of photoshop and other image inhancers just makes the person look like a barbie doll. It does make people wonder what 'flaws' have been editied out.

Both girls look cute but why hide the real them and make them look plastic-fantastic. Very off putting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CREEPY.

Causing an unpleasant feeling of fear or unease.

back to school for you my friend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0