sadhukar

The 'elite' London Agencies

54 posts in this topic

I'm talking about agencies which have per hour prices of £400+. Does anyone have experiences with them? Their pictures look incredibly attractive, and also incredibly doctored...

 

I have done a few £400 punts in the past but have always been rather disappointed looks-wise, which is why nowadays I almost exclusively book from AW. But every now and then (especially after bonus season) I feel abit minted so should I continue thinking with my head or be abit 'adventerous' (wallet-wise)? 

 

Does anybody have any experience with parklanegirls or londonphotomodels?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't help with the question but suspect you may have more luck asking on the london subforum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't waste your money. Simple punting rule, it is never, ever , ever, worth the extra dosh. Ever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm talking about agencies which have per hour prices of £400+. Does anyone have experiences with them? Their pictures look incredibly attractive, and also incredibly doctored...

 

I have done a few £400 punts in the past but have always been rather disappointed looks-wise, which is why nowadays I almost exclusively book from AW. But every now and then (especially after bonus season) I feel abit minted so should I continue thinking with my head or be abit 'adventerous' (wallet-wise)? 

 

Does anybody have any experience with parklanegirls or londonphotomodels?

 

If you cannot see any other shades of beige on a girl's skin, nevermind seeing her pores, then you know there might be a problem in real life.....Not sure if she will send this super glamorous sister to the booking though  :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you cannot see any other shades of beige on a girl's skin, nevermind seeing her pores, then you know there might be a problem in real life.....Not sure if she will send this super glamorous sister to the booking though  :D

 

The thing is many of Hamilton's photos are like that too but the agency is very highly rated!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a photographer, it really makes me cringe just how over retouched certain 'elite' escort agencies photos are. Ok most are shot in some lovely locations and they've obviously spent money on a good photographer with good lighting, but I find most of the time they always over do it. Not saying ALL agencies do this, but a lot of the ones i've seen over the years do.

 

I personally don't trust any escort agency photos, as most of the time - apart from making their skin look like a wax work - a lot of retouchers also doctor the shape/features of the face, hips, arse & tits a lot...

 

This does not need to be done if the lady is good looking and has a great figure to justify the prices charged.

 

Ok, getting rid of pimples and a few dark eye shadows, personal tattoos and or stretch marks is one thing, but changing the shape of someone's jaw line, reducing someone's nose, or making someone's tits or arse a lot bigger, I think that goes a little too far. Some would say ANY retouching is false advertising, but hey the entertainment & modelling industry's been doing this since the dawn of visuals. Early film star portraits were softly lit and 'retouched' in the lab using a soft focus post processing, just as today we use Photoshop to soften skin and remove unwanted things. But there is a line which should not be crossed.

 

I guess, it's always a balance point between making a woman look her best and as natural as possible with good lighting and tasteful poses, whilst not falsely advertising the lady to the prospective client.

Edited by earlgreyman
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Earlgrey, it makes perfect sense what you say.  I know lots of girls who prefer to blame the photographer if they do not get clients and then going to a certain photographer known for lots of blur/distortion etc as they know they will get the jobs with the new pics.

 

Also what I find interesting is if the girl is pretty but has very touched up pictures the client might stay most of the time.  But if the girl he will meet after seeing her heavily photoshoped pictures is not good looking there are chances he might leave except if the client is after a certain kinky service, or lacking the time to see somebody else or the girl is in some lingerie and he is horny anyway.  Not the same will happen though if the girl is to travel to the guy's premises..... That is why lots of girls refuse to do outcalls, because they have been sent home on so many occasions for not matching the reality.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would hope a lot more punters are 'photoshop' savvy these days.

 

I think that goes to prove the human mind perceives things very strangely. Young girls today know that models, actors and pop stars in magazines are photoshopped, yet they strive to be perfect themselves. I've even noticed a lot of female friends using built in skin blurring apps to make their online' digital selves look more perfect on instagram or facebook too.

 

I guess, technology and the fashion press has normalised this whole thing.

 

Yeah, agreed on the incalls vs outcalls things. Tbh, when i punt these days, which is rare, I'm 100% inclined to walk away from a devious WG. I'd rather spend my dosh with someone who actually cares about their clients.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the sake of the OP and apologies for going off topic.

 

I currently would never pay £400 for an escort. Unless of course I was a millionaire and had that I just 'had to have her' moment.

 

So far, I've been perfectly happy and with ladies who's prices were half that or less, look amazing and do great services. What justifies the extra expense? Perhaps she's a porn starlet or published model. Makes no difference to me.

Edited by earlgreyman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have in the past been turned down by these so called elite agencys because my photos are not good enough and they insist on me using a photographer who will airbrush me to make me look like a doll, im not fat no skin problems etc so i believe i dont not need photoshop really pisses me off!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I lived in London (I moved 6 years ago) I used both Park Lane Girls and London Photo Models, never had an issue with London Photo Models, always found them very friendly and more than helpful, with Park Lane Girls once or twice I didn't get the lady who I had booked.  I would have no problem booking an escort from London Photo Models in the future

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would pay £400+ However I have used agencies before and simply prefer the independent experience. I find these agencies are rarely worth it- by definition you are paying the staff and admin too. I would join C69 if you dont mind fronting the money as the majority of reviews are for £300+ agency escorts. I would say the difference is only really if you want more than just a sex booking. So for example there are many girls at 150 who are a great shag, but dont have enough substance for you to want to sped the whole night with them. This is where I would consider spending more there is many a "superstar" on adultwork who you wouldnt dream of taking to dinner because they are nice enough but completely sex aimed.

 

I find the more expensive girls are classy girls who are better at the companion side of things too. As ive gotten older I now enjoy longer bookings as I dont get a chance to do this very often and the girls better at these dates tend to charge more. 

Edited by Firstpuntluck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't waste your money. Simple punting rule, it is never, ever , ever, worth the extra dosh. Ever.

Couldnt disagree more. If you are a punter who wants an in and out shag then fair enough, sex is sex. But if you want a girl who is very intelligent or can sustain your interest over dinner then frankly it is worth it because 90%of the cheaper girls cant do this so never get these kind of bookings. My punting habits and taste in women have greatly changed and I would have said it wasnt worth it maybe 5 years ago, but now i would happily pay more. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess the expensive ones rely on the truly deluded, fair enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldnt disagree more. If you are a punter who wants an in and out shag then fair enough, sex is sex. But if you want a girl who is very intelligent or can sustain your interest over dinner then frankly it is worth it because 90%of the cheaper girls cant do this so never get these kind of bookings. My punting habits and taste in women have greatly changed and I would have said it wasnt worth it maybe 5 years ago, but now i would happily pay more. 

What a load of shit! im 120 an hour and most of my bookings are longer dates ! i was also om captain 69 and in the top 5 so price means bugger all , i think you are a tad wrong!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair points above. But at £400 per hour, you're really talking nearly 2 grand for a 3 hour date, 1 hour of sex?

 

I guess that's all great if you're absolutely loaded, and £400 per hour is not a lot to you, then great go for it. I'd say these ladies would suit the oil/banking/stock broker type.

 

Each to their own indeed!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair points above. But at £400 per hour, you're really talking nearly 2 grand for a 3 hour date, 1 hour of sex?

I guess that's all great if you're absolutely loaded, and £400 per hour is not a lot to you, then great go for it. I'd say these ladies would suit the oil/banking/stock broker type.

Each to their own indeed!

3x£400 is £1200 for a 3 hour punt, not quite £2k,but still way out if my league

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair points above. But at £400 per hour, you're really talking nearly 2 grand for a 3 hour date, 1 hour of sex?

 

I guess that's all great if you're absolutely loaded, and £400 per hour is not a lot to you, then great go for it. I'd say these ladies would suit the oil/banking/stock broker type.

 

Each to their own indeed!

They well and truly fucked the economy, so it is only right and proper that they vastly overpay to get a fuck in return!
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldnt disagree more. If you are a punter who wants an in and out shag then fair enough, sex is sex. But if you want a girl who is very intelligent or can sustain your interest over dinner then frankly it is worth it because 90%of the cheaper girls cant do this so never get these kind of bookings. My punting habits and taste in women have greatly changed and I would have said it wasnt worth it maybe 5 years ago, but now i would happily pay more. 

 

Ha ha, you are so wrong.  There are plenty of girls who charge less (you might even find them charging hundreds on certain sites and half on AW with different set so pictures in order not to be 'recognised'!?????) and are super intelligent and not 'screaming' everywhere: 'look how superior I am because I try to speak posh'.  The girls who charge more do it because they can get away with it and because they get some bookings they are happy with.

 

A silly idea crossed my mind as I write.  Shall we 'price' the girls on the following:

 

- how educated she is and how many languages she speaks?

- how traveled she is with good knowledge of anything really?

- what kind of places she attends: opera, ballet etc?

- how kinky she is in terms of services and variety of outfits she has etc?

- her outlook on life and not only when meeting the clients (showing a side of her personality)?

 

And I could go on forever, yet all is tosh.  Based on the above I should charge quite a lot, yet I am 'happy' with much less.

 

We are all different and you can find your 'convenient beauty' in every corner whether she charges £100 or much more...........

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I lived in London (I moved 6 years ago) I used both Park Lane Girls and London Photo Models, never had an issue with London Photo Models, always found them very friendly and more than helpful, with Park Lane Girls once or twice I didn't get the lady who I had booked.  I would have no problem booking an escort from London Photo Models in the future

 

Did the girls look as good as they were on the website?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We go round and round this topic of price and quality. Some punters feel a higher price and a quality web site gets them a quality session. Others think a cheap and cheerful shag for under £150 is better. And never the two shall meet

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a load of shit! im 120 an hour and most of my bookings are longer dates ! i was also om captain 69 and in the top 5 so price means bugger all , i think you are a tad wrong!

why dont you charge more? If you are good you could get double...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why dont you charge more? If you are good you could get double...

Because i think 120 an hour in my location is a reasonable rate, its alot of money for some people as it is. Its easy to get carried away with sucess but you have to think about the bigger picture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find this very interesting and didnt mean to offend. I simply think that if you have a lot going for you I can see no reason why you wouldnt up your rate. doesnt have to be to 500, but  200 to 400£. I can see no reason why not. i dont know why someone in very high demand and top5 would decide to charge half or a third of what you could get? in any other industry something that is excellent is more expensive. this is great for your punters but surely its nice to increase your rate accordingly. Maybe thats why I punt slightly higher, i like a lady who is confident in her skills to charge and command a higher rate. If in my job I could get a pay increase I would, so why not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha ha, you are so wrong.  There are plenty of girls who charge less (you might even find them charging hundreds on certain sites and half on AW with different set so pictures in order not to be 'recognised'!?????) and are super intelligent and not 'screaming' everywhere: 'look how superior I am because I try to speak posh'.  The girls who charge more do it because they can get away with it and because they get some bookings they are happy with.

 

A silly idea crossed my mind as I write.  Shall we 'price' the girls on the following:

 

- how educated she is and how many languages she speaks?

- how traveled she is with good knowledge of anything really?

- what kind of places she attends: opera, ballet etc?

- how kinky she is in terms of services and variety of outfits she has etc?

- her outlook on life and not only when meeting the clients (showing a side of her personality)?

 

And I could go on forever, yet all is tosh.  Based on the above I should charge quite a lot, yet I am 'happy' with much less.

 

We are all different and you can find your 'convenient beauty' in every corner whether she charges £100 or much more.....

Sadly we pay/charge what we think we can get away with very little reference actual service looks etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now