Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
lickerdave

Pn Reviews

49 posts in this topic

Are they any more reliable than those on aw?

I was looking at some reviews earlier and one dude had left his only 4 reviews on the same agency.

As I don't punt very often reviews are like gold dust to me as I have a long wait to the next one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On here? There are thousands going back years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks pollyp, not really answering the question though :)

Edited by lickerdave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they are ten times more reliable on here than AW. Galahad the board owner spends a lot of time trying as far as possible to sort out the fakes. See the Hall of Shame Board on here and check out the "Adultwork - Directory Site" thread.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks pollyp, not really answering the question though :)

Repeat after me : read the question before answering... Doh!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they are ten times more reliable on here than AW. Galahad the board owner spends a lot of time trying as far as possible to sort out the fakes. See the Hall of Shame Board on here and check out the "Adultwork - Directory Site" thread.

And sometimes, reports are rejected when they are genuine...

The price to pay, I suppose, but I was a bit peeved to have had my last one rejected without any specific reason, ho him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OP the difference on here is that you can only leave a review on the same girl every 6 months so you can't just leave streams of feedback for the same girl like you can on adult work. 

 

I can't lie, I think the actual reviews on adult work are okay, I have earned every single one of mine and they are not that easy to get as its easier for the guys to just leave that line of feedback instead. However, as previous posters have stated, Galahad is very careful that the review system on here retains its credibility so yes, the reviews hold more weight to my mind and likely always will

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OP the difference on here is that you can only leave a review on the same girl every 6 months so you can't just leave streams of feedback for the same girl like you can on adult work.

I can't lie, I think the actual reviews on adult work are okay, I have earned every single one of mine and they are not that easy to get as its easier for the guys to just leave that line of feedback instead. However, as previous posters have stated, Galahad is very careful that the review system on here retains its credibility so yes, the reviews hold more weight to my mind and likely always will

Another BIG disadvantage of the AW system is that feedback is visible on both main and android versions, field reports are only visible on the main site and as many people use android these days, they can't post or view field reports.

PN has a big advantage here.

Edited by pollyp23

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankly, I treat ALL reviews (whether on PN, AW or UK Punting) with a degree of scepticism.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that PN reports are pretty reliable, if perhaps sometimes edging into fluffiness.

 

The antidote to that fault (IF it is a fault) is the reporting on UKPunting where you risk being castigated if you post comments considered too pro-pro but where the positive reviews are not usually taken to task in the same way.

 

AW field reports carry more weight than the brief feedback as they take more time to do so only people wanting to share their experiences do them and they give more specific info.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And Bob's right to do so. After all FRs are just that bloke's thoughts. There is no absolute scale of metrics here.

I do however think there is a bit of 'flavour differential' about the different site's reviews. All I can say is that experience and usage over time will yield where best to look but it's best to seek all available help in choosing where best to spend one's hard earned cash.

Uncle Pokey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankly, I treat ALL reviews (whether on PN, AW or UK Punting) with a degree of scepticism.

I think this is wise.

Simply because of how many punters I've see exaggerate or fabricate the truth to "show off" or you see fake negative and fake positives.

All feedback/reviews should be read and taken in but don't look at them as a definite Yes or No as to whether you want to book a said girl.

Edited by TightYoungEbony

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I ignore any reviews that are done by someone who has done under 5 reviews, or all their reviews are to the same agency/ aw group.

 

I also tend to not pay much more attention to them other than did they have a good time, did they receive the services theyexpected, and were there any disasters

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do use reviews from whatever source, including AW. Mainly to get an idea if the wg's profile was accurate, and if she offered what she said she offered. I've no real interest in the blow by blow accounts of what happened in their meeting. I might also take note of whether the reviewer would see the wg again.

I suppose my reviews are pretty much all positive overall, certainly the ones I've written on here but they're an honest opinion of the booking. If I had something negative to say, I'd say it. My idea of a great punt might not be someone elses, but all I'm concerned about is reporting my experiences, what anyone makes of that is up to them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd add to the above post that the first review I ever wrote (not on here) is utterly cringeworthy and if I could delete it or get it removed I would.

Lesson learned - never, ever write a review while the bed's still warm - give yourself a little time to come back down to earth! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with AW field reports is you need a minimum 150 characters to describe your "experience". The last one i wrote ended up sounding like an extract from a crap porn mag!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankly, I treat ALL reviews (whether on PN, AW or UK Punting) with a degree of scepticism.

 

I was about to say: with a pinch of salt.  

 

We are all different, have different likes/dislikes, so it makes perfect sense if you come across a review and it makes you raise the eyebrows whereas the other guy described the SP in the best terms.  For this reason, I, extremely rarely read them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that PN reports are pretty reliable, if perhaps sometimes edging into fluffiness.

 

The antidote to that fault (IF it is a fault) is the reporting on UKPunting where you risk being castigated if you post comments considered too pro-pro but where the positive reviews are not usually taken to task in the same way.

 

AW field reports carry more weight than the brief feedback as they take more time to do so only people wanting to share their experiences do them and they give more specific info.

Have you not got this the wrong way round? Is it not the negative reviews which posters like to see rather positive ones?

 

Regards,

 

davidgood

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they any more reliable than those on aw?

I was looking at some reviews earlier and one dude had left his only 4 reviews on the same agency.

As I don't punt very often reviews are like gold dust to me as I have a long wait to the next one

To answer your question I do not think reviews on PN are necessarily more reliable. True there has been more control exercised over them which often meant that genuine reviews did not get through the process.

 

You need to look at the history of the reviewer and see if they appear to be credible and also look to see if a girl has reviews from a mix of credible reviewers not just one fan boy or possible pimp.

 

Also bear in mind full field reports on AW are not always linked to a girl's profile but can be found in the store of all reports.

 

Finally you will find that these days there are less and less FRs on PNet. Most are for parlours, agency girls or a party club.

 

Regards,

 

davidgood

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To answer your question I do not think reviews on PN are necessarily more reliable. True there has been more control exercised over them which often meant that genuine reviews did not get through the process.

 

You need to look at the history of the reviewer and see if they appear to be credible and also look to see if a girl has reviews from a mix of credible reviewers not just one fan boy or possible pimp.

 

Also bear in mind full field reports on AW are not always linked to a girl's profile but can be found in the store of all reports.

 

Finally you will find that these days there are less and less FRs on PNet. Most are for parlours, agency girls or a party club.

 

Regards,

 

davidgood

 

girls have to go onto their profile and append a new AW FR to their profile. The help is a bit shite which doesnt help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is wise.

Simply because of how many punters I've see exaggerate or fabricate the truth to "show off" or you see fake negative and fake positives.

All feedback/reviews should be read and taken in but don't look at them as a definite Yes or No as to whether you want to book a said girl.

Preach it girl x

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was about to say: with a pinch of salt.  

 

We are all different, have different likes/dislikes, so it makes perfect sense if you come across a review and it makes you raise the eyebrows whereas the other guy described the SP in the best terms.  For this reason, I, extremely rarely read them.

Gosh. I would like this comment but for some reason it's not letting me but LIKE LIKE LIKE. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gosh. I would like this comment but for some reason it's not letting me but LIKE LIKE LIKE. 

 

You haven't clocked up twenty posts yet.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You haven't clocked up twenty posts yet.

 

Ha ha ha, true

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

girls have to go onto their profile and append a new AW FR to their profile. The help is a bit shite which doesnt help.

Yes, I know that and that they cannot always follow the instructions. However, there are some, especially Hungarians, who do not like too many details published and so do not link FRs.

 

One thing I have thought about since my post is that although AW reviews are always going to be subject to some dodgy dealing, those that are done by genuine punters are sort of verified by the fact they have had to make a booking and had it confirmed.

 

From what I have seen of reports/reviews from some prolific posters on this and other sites you have to wonder if they have actually seen the girl, for example doing a review when the girl is not even in the country or being a bit vague about location or what actually went on.

 

Regards,

 

davidgood

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0