Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Feeboy

Skipping Regular Punts To Save Up For 'the Big One'.

21 posts in this topic

Hello there,

 

I was wondering if any of you would skip regular punts to save up for a crack at the "top" end of the scale, or at least the top end the price scale i.e. £600 ph?

 

To illustrate, I'm a monthly punter going for £150 hourly punts (in the London) area. This is what I'm comfortable with. I might go to £200 occasionally, but I refuse to punt at £250ph.

 

For me to take a crack at a £600 punt, that would mean me not punting for three to four months and saving up the dough. This I'd never do.

 

I look at some of these £600ph girl's profiles on LEG now and again for kicks and sometimes I admit they look hot, but would their sex be any hotter than a 150 or 200 girl? Somehow I doubt it.

 

When I have a forgettable punt at 150, I can walk away from it afterward and just say "oh well, bad choice". By to spend 600 on a hour punt and find it to be a washout (size, personality incompatibility, other setback etc) or even for it to be just plain average, I'd feel physically ill afterward.

 

So, would you forgo regular punting to save up and have a go at a "600 girl"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think from my view an easy answer no I wouldn't.  Reason being just because you think that a woman is more attractive and a better body  (Debatable I would say!)  she isn't worth £600.  Visually I have seen some women who are stunning but just didn't get on with them and seen ladies that may be regarded as less attractive and had a great time.  We have got on well, the sex is great and had a very good time so I would save your money if I were you. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've skipped "regular" punts to save funds to treat myself to something a little different / special, but it's always been for a longer type of booking. Recently had an evening 4 hour evening booking including dinner followed by an hour with the same wg early next morning, and have booked a full 24 hours with another wg, but I've never done anything like that for a shorter duration punt.

WG's are welcome to charge whatever they like, but when I can get everything I want with wg's in the £100 to £140 per hour range there's no way on earth I'm paying anything like £600 for an hour, no matter who the wg is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try once, why not? You may find the holy grail of punting, and forever after go for 'quality' or perceived quality, over quantity. Going for 4 months without punting ought to be possible in theory. I'm full of admiration for ladies who put that pricetag on their time, body and skill. It can't be easy to live up to the sky high expectation the client brings to the punt. Or they're simply beautiful women aiming just for the rich guys, who pay in order to have what not every Tom, Dick and Harry can afford. Bit like that bottle of Petrus. You can't convince me that a bottle of wine can taste that spectacular, yet there are plenty of guys who can, and do, indulge {because they're worth it? ;-) }

Edited by MatureUschi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's simple maths.

 

4 x appt £150  = 4 chances of getting it right and having copious amounts of fun when doing so.

 

1 x appt £600 = 1 chance of getting it right and having copious amounts of fun when doing so.

 

Unless you're a betting person that likes to play the long game I'd take the short odds with the

more chances and just go have some fun x 4

 

The 'big one' may very well not lead up to expectation and then you'll be on a right downer when

done.   Price in the vast majority of cases does not determine a good service.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there,

 

I was wondering if any of you would skip regular punts to save up for a crack at the "top" end of the scale, or at least the top end the price scale i.e. £600 ph?

 

To illustrate, I'm a monthly punter going for £150 hourly punts (in the London) area. This is what I'm comfortable with. I might go to £200 occasionally, but I refuse to punt at £250ph.

 

For me to take a crack at a £600 punt, that would mean me not punting for three to four months and saving up the dough. This I'd never do.

 

I look at some of these £600ph girl's profiles on LEG now and again for kicks and sometimes I admit they look hot, but would their sex be any hotter than a 150 or 200 girl? Somehow I doubt it.

 

When I have a forgettable punt at 150, I can walk away from it afterward and just say "oh well, bad choice". By to spend 600 on a hour punt and find it to be a washout (size, personality incompatibility, other setback etc) or even for it to be just plain average, I'd feel physically ill afterward.

 

So, would you forgo regular punting to save up and have a go at a "600 girl"?

I mentioned on another thread recently, the 'biggest' difference I've experienced with girls that charge @ the 'higher' price end, is they totally 'spoil' me, and it's an awesome feeling!  I do select the girls I see very 'carefully' though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I mentioned on another thread recently, the 'biggest' difference I've experienced with girls that charge @ the 'higher' price end, is they totally 'spoil' me, and it's an awesome feeling!  I do select the girls I see very 'carefully' though.

For no other reason than curiosity,  what is your idea of being spoiled?   Is it the sex or the bolt on parts such as location. ambiance of the premises (if incalls) attire worn?   or is it the sex that you're spoilt with and if so in what way?   Just for research purposes of course.

Edited by EnjoyEmily

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For no other reason than curiosity,  what is your idea of being spoiled?   Is it the sex or the bolt on parts such as location. ambiance of the premises (if incalls) attire worn?   or is it the sex that you're spoilt with and if so in what way?   Just for research purposes of course.

Good question as I'm wondering just how more spoiled it's possible to be by a couple of the wg's I've seen..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good question as I'm wondering just how more spoiled it's possible to be by a couple of the wg's I've seen..

With the greatest respect I don't think there is ANY difference whatsoever and I have expressed this before.

I think some punters have a mindset where they seem to think paying more than the average means the punt is going to be more exceptional or the girl will be better looking or somehow they are even better than a standard prices WG. When the reality is they are just the same just with a higher price tag.

Those who have a bigger disposable income will spend more in hope they will get better service. I have read many many reviews from £350 an hour WG reviews to £100 an hour WG reviews and isn't t strange how the most popular girls are in the more "normal" price range rather than at the higher end.

Of course if you have £600 an hour to spend on one girl then hey go ahead and do so its your money! But I'm pretty sure the WG won't be any better than a £150 an hour one, it's just she can charge more because punters pay it.

Edited by TightYoungEbony

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

personally is see no point in spending £600 with what one regards as a high class escort. Yea they might be extra nice looking but I prefer someone I can keep within realistic fantasy realms. I have met these girls professionally but socially,even in the prime of life, I wouldn't have  been bothered to talk with them as I know its unlikely they would give you the time of day. Its a bit like why Rachel Stevens was voted sexiest woman of all time in FHM rather than say Gisele Bundchen or Adriana Lima. Guys can dream that there is a possibility with someone who looks like Rachel ( and none with Giselle. Keep it real. fanny dont feel any different from one to another and its doubtful the skills are any different ..deep throat is deep throat  ;))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try once, why not? You may find the holy grail of punting, and forever after go for 'quality' or perceived quality, over quantity. Going for 4 months without punting ought to be possible in theory. I'm full of admiration for ladies who put that pricetag on their time, body and skill. It can't be easy to live up to the sky high expectation the client brings to the punt. Or they're simply beautiful women aiming just for the rich guys, who pay in order to have what not every Tom, Dick and Harry can afford. Bit like that bottle of Petrus. You can't convince me that a bottle of wine can taste that spectacular, yet there are plenty of guys who can, and do, indulge {because they're worth it? ;-) }

I think this is what it's all about.  Exclusiveness.  Wealthy people buy it.  Whether they get value for money is not in their thinking. it's not what they are about.

Edited by robert49

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For no other reason than curiosity,  what is your idea of being spoiled?   Is it the sex or the bolt on parts such as location. ambiance of the premises (if incalls) attire worn?   or is it the sex that you're spoilt with and if so in what way?   Just for research purposes of course.

I mentioned on another thread that I found 'no' difference in the sex.  The sex was great @ 'all' the price levels I've experienced.  The 'medium' and 'higher' priced girls 'I've' met have been far more open minded in the bedroom though. 

 

I don't visit incalls Emily, always outcalls to a hotel.

 

When I say spoil me, I mean 'their' couldn't do enough for me attitude.  The continuous 'effort' they put in is highly appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I mentioned on another thread that I found 'no' difference in the sex. The sex was great @ 'all' the price levels I've experienced. The 'medium' and 'higher' priced girls 'I've' met have been far more open minded in the bedroom though.

I don't visit incalls Emily, always outcalls to a hotel.

When I say spoil me, I mean 'their' couldn't do enough for me attitude. The continuous 'effort' they put in is highly appreciated.

So basically there's no difference. You just like to pay more because you can, nothing wrong with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I mentioned on another thread recently, the 'biggest' difference I've experienced with girls that charge @ the 'higher' price end, is they totally 'spoil' me, and it's an awesome feeling!  I do select the girls I see very 'carefully' though.

 

You are joking, right?  I do not charge £600 and I spoil every single guy I meet and according to them, no one else treated them like that.  Well, is because I hardly meet people anyway.  If I was to meet several per day maybe indeed I would not have time for all the preparations and I would be happy seeing their backside as the hour ends in order to prepare for the next guy as he arrives 15, 30min later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the replies.

 

...so I would save your money if I were you. 

 

Mate, I've no intention whatsoever of saving up for a big one. As I said earlier, I won't even put at 250. I intimated in an earlier thread that because of my very large size, punting can sometimes be a bit hit or miss. Sometimes the girl can handle it and sometimes not. As I said, with a 150 punt that doesn't work out, we can do a couple of other things to sort of make up for it and I can walk away felling a bit disappointed and be over it in an hour. If I had shelled out 600 for sex that didn't work out, I'd leave there feeling sick. I'll stick with my 150's, thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only girl I've paid £600 an hour for was a porn legend - clearly I was not paying only for the sex but to fulfil a fantasy (though the sex was mindblowing)

 

Since incredible sex is easily available at £70 at HOD, at £120-130 with a handful of AW gems and £200-£300 with some agency and independent legends, I've always assumed that £500+ is generally paid for the girls who look like catwalk models and are great at being arm candy to make friends jealous, would fit into high society gatherings inconspicuously and generally would be very hard to identify as escorts in public. 

 

They certainly could not offer anything sexually that is not already not available at 1/4-1/2 the price and I certainly would not pay £500 just for a 'regular' session, simply because I know of plenty of awesome experiences at a fraction of the cost. It would have to be something specific that is offered that is unique to the girl for me to pay that price.

 

If I'm going without punting for months to save up (which might imply I'm treading a dangerous line in terms of affordability) I doubt any experience would live up to the price.

Edited by Gandalfthewhite
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since incredible sex is easily available at £70 at HOD, at £120-130 with a handful of AW gems and £200-£300 with some agency and independent legends, I've always assumed that £500+ is generally paid for the girls who look like catwalk models and are great at being arm candy to make friends jealous, would fit into high society gatherings inconspicuously and generally would be very hard to identify as escorts in public. 

 

They certainly could not offer anything sexually that is not already not available at 1/4-1/2 the price and I certainly would not pay £500 just for a 'regular' session, simply because I know of plenty of awesome experiences at a fraction of the cost. It would have to be something specific that is offered that is unique to the girl for me to pay that price.

 

If I'm going without punting for months to save up (which might imply I'm treading a dangerous line in terms of affordability) I doubt any experience would live up to the price.

 

Judging from your insightful post along with the general consensus, it seems that punting in that echelon includes a large premium for exclusivity, looks, luxury flats/locations, sexy lingerie and all the other "bolt-ons" as they have been described.

 

I wouldn't be at all surprised if some of the "600" or even "1000" girls have a bit of a prima-donna attitude, thinking they are so high-end they don't have to "work it" as much as the more affordable girls do. :D

 

The last paragraph about affordability is very relevant. If you have to save up to punt at this price range, maybe one should not be punting in that range at all. I was just asking the question to see if anyone has done this or would consider doing it. I most def will not (even though I do have access to funds to try it once).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Judging from your insightful post along with the general consensus, it seems that punting in that echelon includes a large premium for exclusivity, looks, luxury flats/locations, sexy lingerie and all the other "bolt-ons" as they have been described.

 

Exactly, though the issue is that even there the quality cannot be guaranteed.

 

 I was just asking the question to see if anyone has done this or would consider doing it. I most def will not (even though I do have access to funds to try it once).

 

I think you are taking a very sensible approach to this. Once punting starts entering the realms of 'can I afford this' it's a bit dangerous.

 

I wouldn't be at all surprised if some of the "600" or even "1000" girls have a bit of a prima-donna attitude, thinking they are so high-end they don't have to "work it" as much as the more affordable girls do.  :D

 

You have hit the nail on the head, here's an anecdote to illustrate - I met a Brazilian girl back in 2011 at a tiny studio in Bayswater, £70 for half an hour, absolutely stunning girl in a girl next door way with an outrageously perfect body. She was very new to escorting, and generally very nervous about new punters, since she'd had a couple of bad experiences with stalking. The experience was very vanilla but she seemed so worried and vulnerable so I tried helping her by directing her to a couple of agencies and telling her that it would be safer for her to work through one.

 

A couple of years later, I came across her again on an agency website where she was charging £350 for the hour I think. I tried her old indie number and she responded and we set up a meeting. She didn't remember me but seemed perfectly happy to accept what I had paid the first time and we had an enjoyable half hour session. After that we got chatting for another 45 minutes, while she reminisced about her early days as an escort, and she said that

 

 - the agencies where all the girls charge £300+ tend to have a different client base - upper middle-class types, rich businessmen etc. She herself had charged £300-£500 at different points

 - the clients can often be much less demanding, the money is a drop in the ocean to them so they're much more interested in spending time with a beautiful woman (and eventually fucking her) than in getting pissed off that she charges £10 extra for CIM:-) So of course she was all praise for them, since it was effectively more money for less actual sex:-)

 - the girls have to be very presentable, cannot be in the least bit chavvy or skanky, preferably speak multiple languages etc. A sexually talented young Essex girl with tattoos would just not cut it.

 

Point I'm making is, despite not being particularly different or talented in terms of the actual sex, the transformation in those two years was remarkable in how confident she now was, how easily and naturally she spoke, the way she carried herself. She was the classic example of the kind of girl some rich Arab might pay a couple of thousand to spend a night and have unremarkable sex with  

Edited by Gandalfthewhite

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you are basically confirming 'unremarkable sex with', demanding more because 'she is worth it' go most of the time hand in hand.

 

Did you get the same low deal in the following meetings?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you are basically confirming 'unremarkable sex with', demanding more because 'she is worth it' go most of the time hand in hand.

 

Did you get the same low deal in the following meetings?

 

Not sure I understand your question but will try to answer -

 

In terms of purely sexual services she was definitely not worth £300, I might have paid £150 an hour purely because of how stunning she was and the fact that she was certainly not bad in bed, just nothing special - what I was saying is that there are plenty of people who are around to pay for unremarkable sex at unbelievable prices when the girl has other attributes which have nothing to do with her specific sexual services.

 

When I tried to contact her a couple of months later, as well 2-3 times in the following months, the phone number was out of service and then she completely disappeared off all the agency websites she was on, so am guessing she left the country.

 

Or maybe I woke her up to the fact that there were still clients who might want to meet her at her old rates so she disconnected the number :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I normally punt in the £100 to £140 an hour range. I am an old guy and don't see a girl for less than an hour (it takes me about 15 minutes to get my clothes off, shower & dry myself so any lesser time would be useless so far as I am concerned :D  :D . I have met some delightful Ladies in this price range, 3 of whom are members of this forum, no guesses please. These Ladies supply all that I require so far as sex is concerned and are delightful company with great personalities. Two years ago I saw an advertisement for a Lady who was charging £150 an hour so I decided to treat myself. Big mistake!! She was full of herself. She advertised the fact that she had a luxurious flat in Notting hill Gate area(turned out to be a dingy basement flat) She said that she expected her clients to have a shower at her flat, fair enough but the shower was pathetic and you had to hold on to the shower curtain to stop it falling off. Her bedroom was nothing more than a large cupboard with a bed somehow stuck in the middle. Her service wasn't bad but nothing like what she promised in her profile and, at the end, she more or less told me that she expected a good review; which incidentally she didn't get. Her profile went down soon afterwards. I am not saying that Ladies charging £150 plus per hour are not worth it; I am quite sure there are plenty who are. For example Annabel seems to me to be great and I am sure that I would have an excellent time with her (if she would have me of course :D ) I digress; I am perfectly happy with the Ladies I have already met in my price range and see no reason to go without their company for a few months in order to see a Lady at the "higher end" of the price scale. Good luck though to others who think otherwise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0