out of towner

Hod Photos

27 posts in this topic

I am fed up with HOD putting old photos on their web site. I have seen 4 ladies in the past year who did not look as good as their photos because the photos were not recent. I will not name the ladies because they all were friendly and gave a good service but I could not help being disappointed when I saw they were older and heavier than I expected. They have all had excellent reviews so it seems I am alone in this complaint. One disappointed me so much I could not perform fully despite her efforts. A good example is one who no longer works there, Faye. Her initial photos must have been when she was 18, a good 10 years before I saw her I would say. After a few weeks more recent photos went up.Nothing wrong with her, a nice lady, but she was not what I expected. Please only put recent, undoctored photos on the web site HOD.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am fed up with HOD putting old photos on their web site. I have seen 4 ladies in the past year who did not look as good as their photos because the photos were not recent. I will not name the ladies because they all were friendly and gave a good service but I could not help being disappointed when I saw they were older and heavier than I expected. They have all had excellent reviews so it seems I am alone in this complaint. One disappointed me so much I could not perform fully despite her efforts. A good example is one who no longer works there, Faye. Her initial photos must have been when she was 18, a good 10 years before I saw her I would say. After a few weeks more recent photos went up.Nothing wrong with her, a nice lady, but she was not what I expected. Please only put recent, undoctored photos on the web site HOD.

I'll admit that I have had a few HoD experiences where the girl I've booked hasn't lived up to the pictures, but I won't name names. But to be fair, I think in general the pics are usually a fair reflection of the actual girl. But not always the case.

However, your post did get me thinking, and I thought I'd run throught the current list of HoD girls I've seen and name who I believe do look like their pics. In no particular order.....

Tina (looks exactly like her)

Daisy (face blurred, but definitely fair representation)

Serena (looks exactly like her)

Dita (face blurred, but definitely her body)

Diana (if the same polish girl I saw, then again definitely her body)

Aylin (actually looks better in the flesh - photographer has not done her justice)

Gemma (an accurate representation)

Jenny (face blurred out, but 100% fair pics of her)

Mira (definitely her and looks way cuter in person)

Marissa (looks as hot in real life as her pics)

Chloe (definitely her in the pics)

Jennifer (face not on show, but definitely her bod)

Monica (face not on show, but 100% her and those pics do not do her amazing ass justice)

Charlie (looks as hot as her pics, stunningly beautiful face and in great shape)

Roxy (no pics could do this girl justice, as her personality magnifies her beauty x10 - plus she fucking RIPPED right now)

Eve (killer body, definitely her in the pics)

Apple (again, definitely the same girl as you see in the pics)

Ariana (pics are a fair reflection and her ass is like 10x better in real life)

Vanessa (face not on show, but beyond cute....... like a young Denise Richards)

Gabby (face not on show, but definitely her body and what a rack she has!)

The girls I've not mentioned, I've either not seen, or can't go on record saying they look enough like their pics!

Edited by BoyMK
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As one client has said HOD are using out of date photos, then another has listed 20 girls who do look like their photos and no one is stating which girls are not fairly representing themselves then I would imagine HOD are going to struggle to rectify this.

 

The photos are the property of the girls, this is why you will see them at other agencies where they work or on AW if they work as indies. They can only advise girls to invest in new photos, if clients are unhappy this should be good leverage.

On that note I am aware that 9 girls have had photo shoots in the past 48 hours in Milton Keynes so some of them may appear over the next few days if they too work at HOD. Just got to wait for the girls to release them have editorial 'say so'. x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They also have twitter and used to show real photos of the girl working on the day but stopped and use these old

photos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They also have twitter and used to show real photos of the girl working on the day but stopped and use these old

photos.

Which girls are using old photos and we can advise Rihanna at House of Divine to speak to them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As one client has said HOD are using out of date photos, then another has listed 20 girls who do look like their photos and no one is stating which girls are not fairly representing themselves then I would imagine HOD are going to struggle to rectify this.

I know it's not helpful to other punters, but I really struggle to make negative comments about anyone's physical appearance, so I won't.

However, any girl who does have pics that fall short of her real self, will over-time, find themselves out of demand as a natural outcome of dissatisfaction results in customers not returning or recommending.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which girls are using old photos and we can advise Rihanna at House of Divine to speak to them. 

 

Just simply want HOD to show real photos on twitter tweets of the girls working on that day.

You can get them to do a selfie, whats the problem there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At least they don't put a picture of a 19 year old porn star up and you get there to find it's a totally different woman in her late 30s. Plenty of less reputable places do that all the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have spoken to House of Divine and Milton Keynes Escorts regarding the issue the OP raises which is valid. There is no magic wand solution to this so from today we will be implementing the following;

 

1. All girls are to be contacted personally to establish the date and year their current photos online were taken. This date will then been publicly displayed on their profile. This will enable the clients to make an informed decision and give some leverage to encouraging those girls with photos over 12 months old to invest in new ones. Please see Anya's profile as an example (read BIO) - http://houseofdivine.com/miltonkeynesescortandlondonescort.php?girlid=2654

 

2. All girls will be encouraged to provide two candid 'twit pics' each day they are working. It has been highlighted to House of Divine that they are seen as lacking in this area. 

 

3. The companies are offering £100 towards the cost of each girls photo shoot. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have spoken to House of Divine and Milton Keynes Escorts regarding the issue the OP raises which is valid. There is no magic wand solution to this so from today we will be implementing the following;

 

1. All girls are to be contacted personally to establish the date and year their current photos online were taken. This date will then been publicly displayed on their profile. This will enable the clients to make an informed decision and give some leverage to encouraging those girls with photos over 12 months old to invest in new ones. Please see Anya's profile as an example (read BIO) - http://houseofdivine.com/miltonkeynesescortandlondonescort.php?girlid=2654

 

2. All girls will be encouraged to provide two candid 'twit pics' each day they are working. It has been highlighted to House of Divine that they are seen as lacking in this area. 

 

3. The companies are offering £100 towards the cost of each girls photo shoot. 

That's a really refreshing innovation.  If only more independents would be upfront about the age of their pictures.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

3. The companies are offering £100 towards the cost of each girls photo shoot. 

 

As a punter what I find annoying is that establishments/agency's are in fact using professional studio shot pictures and to me that's where some of the problems stem from, fancy lighting and fantasy backdrops along with clever use of editing may end up with some cracking pictures but when the punter walks in the door what he may see in front of him at best is someone who may if you squint and have a raging hard on, look a bit like the pictures in the advert.  They say the camera never lies, but if its from some of the studios that pull these tricks then yes it does!

 

I believe a poster once said that they did not believe any picture of a WG unless she had a box of tissues and a bottle of baby oil on the side table.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a punter what I find annoying is that establishments/agency's are in fact using professional studio shot pictures and to me that's where some of the problems stem from, fancy lighting and fantasy backdrops along with clever use of editing may end up with some cracking pictures but when the punter walks in the door what he may see in front of him at best is someone who may if you squint and have a raging hard on, look a bit like the pictures in the advert.  They say the camera never lies, but if its from some of the studios that pull these tricks then yes it does!

 

I believe a poster once said that they did not believe any picture of a WG unless she had a box of tissues and a bottle of baby oil on the side table.

 

I concur with this, however we as an agency also have to take into account the girls vanity, competing with their peers and where else they are using their photos.

If we as an agency used solely candid low resolution photos taken on our premises we would then be accused of being 'downmarket' I am sure. I think perhaps a way forward is to let the girl use their professional photos and mix their galleries up with a few of their better twit pics. Roxy and Angel for instance have some truly stunning photos on their personal twitter accounts. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of BoyMk's list that I have seen I would concur. The pics of Tina, Diana, Mira and Dita are spot on. There is one other on the list that I would not agree with but I don't want to say who. However she was not as slim as the photos showed and I believe had stretch marks and a bit of a belly, I am sure the pics are several years old. Another, not on his list, that I saw recently looks about 10 years older than the pics. I am very pleased at the new procedures that are to be followed which should sort out the problem for me. I just don't want to see a new lady and as soon as she walks in the room think "oh dear, you're not as good as I thought". I am aware this is quite a subjective matter, 3 of the 4 I referred to regularly have brilliant reviews with no complaints about their looks at all. I just want to see a new lady and think "wow" for the right reasons. The last like this was Mira, hope she is back soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are quite a lot of new photos coming over the next 48 hours. I am aware that House of Divine have tweeted some previews this afternoon of Lola an Elizabeth. The profiles are being updated for all the girls over the next 7 days with the month and year their photos were taken. I think today there has been twit pics published of most of the girls working in London, I have seen Anya and Valentina on our own twitter feed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are quite a lot of new photos coming over the next 48 hours. I am aware that House of Divine have tweeted some previews this afternoon of Lola an Elizabeth. The profiles are being updated for all the girls over the next 7 days with the month and year their photos were taken. I think today there has been twit pics published of most of the girls working in London, I have seen Anya and Valentina on our own twitter feed. 

I think you need to be congratulated for getting a host of barely used accounts posting again :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it quite funny that HOD are saying their escort's photos are 'photographer verified' going on to explain and vouch that none of the photos has had no tummy tucking, leg lengthening or skin smoothing.

 

As a pro tog and retoucher, I can vouch that unless those escorts are made out of plastic, those photos, most definitely have been retouched & smoothed.

Edited by earlgreyman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have spoken to House of Divine and Milton Keynes Escorts regarding the issue the OP raises which is valid. There is no magic wand solution to this so from today we will be implementing the following;

 

1. All girls are to be contacted personally to establish the date and year their current photos online were taken. This date will then been publicly displayed on their profile. This will enable the clients to make an informed decision and give some leverage to encouraging those girls with photos over 12 months old to invest in new ones. Please see Anya's profile as an example (read BIO) - http://houseofdivine.com/miltonkeynesescortandlondonescort.php?girlid=2654

 

2. All girls will be encouraged to provide two candid 'twit pics' each day they are working. It has been highlighted to House of Divine that they are seen as lacking in this area. 

 

3. The companies are offering £100 towards the cost of each girls photo shoot. 

 

I applaud this response to the OP's concerns. I know of at least one agency that claims that their photos are no more than a year old, but the Wayback Machine begs to differ.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it quite funny that HOD are saying their escort's photos are 'photographer verified' going on to explain and vouch that none of the photos has had no tummy tucking, leg lengthening or skin smoothing.

 

As a pro tog and retoucher, I can vouch that unless those escorts are made out of plastic, those photos, most definitely have been retouched & smoothed.

I think they only mean the ones with the watermark. Like a few on the following profile 

 

http://houseofdivine.com/miltonkeynesescortandlondonescort.php?girlid=2622

 

So most of them are not verified. Just the odd one or two. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they only mean the ones with the watermark. Like a few on the following profile 

 

http://houseofdivine.com/miltonkeynesescortandlondonescort.php?girlid=2622

 

So most of them are not verified. Just the odd one or two.

I see now. yes.

 

Let me add, that there's absolutely nothing wrong with some retouching - it happens all the time in boudoir & glamour style photography in varying amounts. Yep, so an agency feels they have to keep up to compete with other agencies on the same level. Some might say that's false advertising. It is to a degree, but people are now used to seeing it that 'un' retouched photos would indeed be seen to lower standards. Even in everyday selfies, girls use phone apps to smooth their skin for instagram pics, etc.

Edited by earlgreyman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Changing the subject slightly even the most iconic historic photos were altered. There is a famous shot of some Russian troops in Berlin 1945 raising the Russian Hammer and Sickle over the Reichstag. The photographer later admitted to deleting a wrist watch on one of the soldiers to counter allegations of looting by the Russians. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed, as were many early Hollywood glamour icon portraits and war time pin up girls. The light room photo lab technician would process certain parts of the picture using a technique called dodge and burn to highlight or hide. All these techniques are used heavily today, albeit in digital version of light room and photoshop.

 

Who said, 'the camera cannot tell a lie' was, ironically, a liar :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I concur with this, however we as an agency also have to take into account the girls vanity, competing with their peers and where else they are using their photos.

If we as an agency used solely candid low resolution photos taken on our premises we would then be accused of being 'downmarket' I am sure. I think perhaps a way forward is to let the girl use their professional photos and mix their galleries up with a few of their better twit pics. Roxy and Angel for instance have some truly stunning photos on their personal twitter accounts. 

 

There is no reason to use low resolution pictures these days even a second hand Canon 350d for about £150 or less will produce usable quality pictures. one of the agency's I have used always took their own pictures at their in-call venue so you could actual see where the picture was taken and they looked real class and believable, not in some back drop of a New York loft apartment.....I'm not looking for stunning photos, I just want to see the person I am going to meet up with, nothing to do with being downmarket, I just want to see believable pictures.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never had a problem with HoD. The pictures were as close as any others in the industry and the twitter feed was great as in it gave untouched and reliable pictures of the girls at work. I cannot fault them. They are one of the best agencies/providers out there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no reason to use low resolution pictures these days even a second hand Canon 350d for about £150 or less will produce usable quality pictures. one of the agency's I have used always took their own pictures at their in-call venue so you could actual see where the picture was taken and they looked real class and believable, not in some back drop of a New York loft apartment.....I'm not looking for stunning photos, I just want to see the person I am going to meet up with, nothing to do with being downmarket, I just want to see believable pictures.

Most of pictures on our site and HOD are taken on the premises with a few exceptions. Angel's for instance were not taken at our Thames side apartment sadly. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I just add that if our photos are more then a year old, we are asked to update them and are helped out with the cost x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now