Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
garifto

is scala around and within £150 an hour?

12 posts in this topic

Posted (edited)

There's an escort who was on the london submissives site..called scale.  Size 4, very sweet looking.

Due to the very small tits, surely IMO not worth £200. I recall it mentioned she was available at another site for about £200 an hour.. (imagine if a man with a 4 inch boner or no or almost literally no penis at all, and worked as an escort and charged way more than average)

But she looks damn lovable.  I'd like to see her.  And you could fuck her hard and she could take it more than any athletic girl.. Unbelievable.  The most fun sex I have ever had.. 

Is she around and <= £150 an hour?

Edited by garifto

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, garifto said:

But she looks damn lovable.  I'd like to see her.  And you could fuck her hard and she could take it more than any athletic girl.. Unbelievable.  The most fun sex I have ever had..

I think you've answered your own question! She's £200 because you and possibly many others see the potential fun you could have and she can get the level of business she needs. If no one saw this then she'd probably have lower rates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

26 minutes ago, Tomorrow said:

I think you've answered your own question! She's £200 because you and possibly many others see the potential fun you could have and she can get the level of business she needs. If no one saw this then she'd probably have lower rates.

well she was amazing fun,  i'm not going to hide the truth that she was amazing fun, i.e. I won't play the kind of game that you're suggesting to try to get a lower rate. 

Edited by garifto

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Tomorrow said:

If no one saw this then she'd probably have lower rates.

garifto, I think you miss-interpreted my last sentence.

I intended to imply; "If no one saw her potential then she'd probably have lower rates"

rather then: "If no one saw this thread then she'd probably have lower rates" which is possibly how you read it.

Sorry for the confusion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, garifto said:

There's an escort who was on the london submissives site..called scale.  Size 4, very sweet looking.

Due to the very small tits, surely IMO not worth £200. I recall it mentioned she was available at another site for about £200 an hour.. (imagine if a man with a 4 inch boner or no or almost literally no penis at all, and worked as an escort and charged way more than average)

But she looks damn lovable.  I'd like to see her.  And you could fuck her hard and she could take it more than any athletic girl.. Unbelievable.  The most fun sex I have ever had.. 

Is she around and <= £150 an hour?

So in your opinion because she is small with small tits = worth less money you should take a tit scale with you and give the girls money according to the weight and size haha ;) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

.

6 hours ago, Tomorrow said:

  "If no one saw her potential then she'd probably have lower rates"

potential &/ ability, yes, Thank you for that observation. Who would have known, without you pointing that out.

Edited by garifto

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Scala is Dee on some websites. I have met her. Really nice lady. The pics are somewhat airbrushed. Her skin is not as flawless and wears alot of makeup to cover up.

She is also charging £250 ph on other sites. I am not sure that is value for money. 

http://www.saucylondon.com/girls/dee-london-escorts.htm

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen in her in her incarnation as Dee at Saucy London - a diminutive and sexy girl. Well worth seeing.

I take issue with the OP's initial premise that a hooker's 'value' is in direct proportion to their breast size. That's subjective and purely a matter of personal taste. I don't have a particular performance for large or small breasted women - I like different things in different circumstances. But I can definitively say that some small breasted women are well worth paying premium rates to see.

I have very fond memories, for example, of a Kiwi girl, Fallon, who used to work of the Wembley area a few back and had tiny breasts but was in my top ten for erotic pleasure given. I'd also give a more than honourable mention to Ariana Chevalier, who used to work around Bristol with whom I had some memorable encounters (note to self - have a look to see if she'a still around!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She's also recently started working at the London Retreat as Gina, at £200 per hour, and certainly worth the money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Questor said:

I take issue with the OP's initial premise that a hooker's 'value' is in direct proportion to their breast size.

That was not a premise.  That's a stupid statement and I never made it..

My point was that > £150 price bracket i'd expect some decent sized tits, at least a B cup.  I hope I don't need to explain how that is different from your rather cartoonish version of what I said. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, garifto said:

That was not a premise.  That's a stupid statement and I never made it..

My point was that > £150 price bracket i'd expect some decent sized tits, at least a B cup.  I hope I don't need to explain how that is different from your rather cartoonish version of what I said. 

You've just repeated it: ">£150 price bracket I'd expect some decent sized tits, at least a B cup".

That is directly correlating size with value. 

There are plenty of girls out there with sub-B cup boobs who are easily worth spending £150 and more on. It's a matter of taste and subjective judgement. I won't sink to the level of characterising your churlish response as "stupid" or "cartoonish", but I assume you are capable of discerning what my opinion of it is!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

also, B cup is not a breast size a 28B and a 38B are vastly different :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0