vivluvsme

Pnet reports locations

34 posts in this topic

Just noticed that of the most recent 50 reports (i.e. page 1), 30 are for Milton Keynes or London.

Yes London is bound to dominate but this albeit tiny sample seemed to suggest something about other regions.

I suspect people could give valid other reasons and I would be interested to hear of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just did one for beckidevon. if you look at her aw profile she changes location daily. I saw her in Leicester but she wont be in Leicester again for months. What use is my meet location for a punter thinking of seeing her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Coventrypunter said:

I just did one for beckidevon. if you look at her aw profile she changes location daily. I saw her in Leicester but she wont be in Leicester again for months. What use is my meet location for a punter thinking of seeing her.

You could ask her not to tour other areas I guess!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it me or is the frequency of reviews falling off? I seem to recall many more each week that we see now. Is this connected to the  general lessening of interest in the forum?

 

If this is true can anyone offer any solutions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had reviews rejected because i have been frequently to the same agency. Relaxing the rules might increase number of reviews.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have less interest in posting on either.

Reviews as I am frustrated at having reviews rejected for seemingly breaking rules, when I cannot see that they did. Also, if I make more than one visit to the same escort within six months, why can't I submit reviews? It's ridiculous.

As for the forum, the restrictions on topics that are important to the world of punting are ridiculous and unrealistic.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you still hang around then polyp? Do you just enjoy having a moan?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe with time and sufficient 'moans', things will change.

Any forum on any subject should surely cover their subject as comprehensively as possible?

I'm not moanins, just making an observation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, pollyp23 said:

Maybe with time and sufficient 'moans', things will change. We currently only have 2 moaners so unlikely

Any forum on any subject should surely cover their subject as comprehensively as possible? Why? Particularly as the board owner has ruled them out from the beginning.

I'm not moanins, just making an observation. You just keep moaning about the same things.

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Moonraker said:

 

I came up with phrase 'Purple site', since weren't supposed to mention it. Now we can, a far more refreshing attitude, don't you think?

Sometimes people have to rethink their rules and sometimes these rules get changed.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure that your input had no effect on that particular change in the rules. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, pollyp23 said:

Maybe with time and sufficient 'moans', things will change.

Any forum on any subject should surely cover their subject as comprehensively as possible?

I'm not moanins, just making an observation.

 

May I become one more moaner?

"I have less interest in posting on either." Me too!

"Reviews as I am frustrated at having reviews rejected for seemingly breaking rules, when I cannot see that they did. Also, if I make more than one visit to the same escort within six months, why can't I submit reviews? It's ridiculous." Agreed!

"As for the forum, the restrictions on topics that are important to the world of punting are ridiculous and unrealistic." Agreed!

Much of the good information on this forum is exchanged by private messaging. Doesn't that defeat the point?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That depends on your definition of "good" information. If for example one were talking about the availability of bareback then one or two might classify that as good but the vast majority would not agree.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎29‎/‎02‎/‎2016 at 2:39 PM, erictheidol said:

Is it me or is the frequency of reviews falling off? I seem to recall many more each week that we see now. Is this connected to the  general lessening of interest in the forum?

 

If this is true can anyone offer any solutions?

Reviews are slightly up and the forum traffic has been rising for some time now, the members online list only shows those online for a short period unlike some forums that list for 24 hours.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, pollyp23 said:

I came up with phrase 'Purple site', since weren't supposed to mention it. Now we can, a far more refreshing attitude, don't you think?

Sometimes people have to rethink their rules and sometimes these rules get changed.

 

People have very short memories when it comes to the reasons why rules were implemented in the first place, I don't honestly think anyone really wants to return to those days?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Moonraker said:

That depends on your definition of "good" information. If for example one were talking about the availability of bareback then one or two might classify that as good but the vast majority would not agree.

We are not saying that we should discuss where to get BB, just that it should form part of this forum on the risks attached to such practices. Sweeping it under the carpet is wrong IMHO.

I had a post removed for asking if it was something we could now discuss. Pathetic. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Moonraker said:

I am sure that your input had no effect on that particular change in the rules. 

What none whatsoever? Most contributors adopted the term and it would be pretty stupid of the mods not to have noticed this and reacted?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

18 minutes ago, pollyp23 said:

We are not saying that we should discuss where to get BB, just that it should form part of this forum on the risks attached to such practices. Sweeping it under the carpet is wrong IMHO.

I had a post removed for asking if it was something we could now discuss. Pathetic. 

Why are you so desperate to discuss bareback? 

In my opinion it would attract the wrong crowd of people to come here and talk their experiences. Also anyone can look up the risks of it by googling, there are forums already around if you want to discuss those kind of things. 

Most of us (I say most because there are one WGs out their who do unprotected sex) will not risk our health to do it so what's the point in discussing it? If you want to be educated on it use a search engine. 

Or here's a great idea, form your own forum where you can freely talk about the risks of BB with other members who are interested, problem solved :)

Edited by TightYoungEbony

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Moonraker said:

I am sure that your input had no effect on that particular change in the rules. 

What none whatsoever? Most contributors adopted the term and it would be pretty stupid of the mods not to have noticed this and reacted?

This forum is about punting and escorting. Therefore, it should encompass all things punting?

The dangers, the joys, the good, the bad and the ugly.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Moonraker said:

I am sure that your input had no effect on that particular change in the rules. 

What none whatsoever? Most contributors adopted the term and it would be pretty stupid of the mods not to have noticed this and reacted?

This forum is about punting and escorting. Therefore, it should encompass all things punting?

The dangers, the joys, the good, the bad and the ugly.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back on topic.

How about having provuding a range of options, for example

complete a full review

Provide a format for a "lite" review, which provides a range of tick boxes  from very satisfied to dissatisfied

Provide escorts the opportunity to provide feedback on the reviewer (client was / was not, clean, was / was not respectful etc).

Provide an option to submit to write a very short report, eg "saw Miss Behaviour and had a good time, recommended"

Provide the opportunity to review an escort, or an agency more than once in a given period. 

I am not having a moan, I love PN, and the chance to hear views and swop opinions. I also think its always important to constantly innovate and provide different options 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, enquire said:

Back on topic.

Provide escorts the opportunity to provide feedback on the reviewer (client was / was not, clean, was / was not respectful etc).
 

Rebuttals?  I don't like that idea,  it's messy, clients are the ones paying, you leave a client open to some form of rebuttal via his own authored field report and he may think twice about leaving them and thus diminish the valuable (well I think it's valuable but have no way of knowing) service that the Field Report system seems to provide.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New to the forum, and I will try and contribute my reviews and represent the Midlands!

I do visit the south occasionally but will write up reviews as and when :))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can think of one or two sites where a wider ranger of topics (bb, TS, for example) can be discussed - but on those you can be deleted or banned for all sorts of other things without being able to know what the boundaries are.

On here, punter poster power and service provider sense have had their views taken account of at times such as the addition of Birmingham to the original list of location towns and then in the revision to a regionlly based forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even Captain69 is very London centric.  I'm not sure if that's because it's a paid site and most the the clients live in the capital too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now