Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Nevan

The type of duration you prefer for meetings

39 posts in this topic

Hi all

It's been a while since I posted a new thread on here but I have been doing a fair bit of reflecting with the nature of my punts and meets as of late.

Admittedly, I haven't been in this hobby for too long as I only really started to see escorts more consistently in the last three years (i.e every 6 to 8 weeks from August 2013). In my earlier years of meeting, I have usually stuck to shorter 1 hour bookings but I realised that as great as they are, these type of shorter meetings do feel limited and I've often found that I had a great time with the ladies but the time goes by very quickly and you often feel like a 2 to 3 hour meet really gets the most out of the experience without feeling the time constraints.

I have commited more to 4 hour dinner dates and longer (two to three hour) type of meets in recent months as I do like having the company of a lovely lady without feeling that the time constraints. These type of meets are great but there are pros and cons, where I do tend to cut back the volume of meets in order to save for longer 2/3 hour meeting. This has changed from the past of seeing an array of different agency ladies at shorter 1 hr bookings.

I just wondered if anyone has felt the same about the shorter 1 hour meets in the past (I.e feeling time constraints etc) or whether anyone tends to prefer longer types of meets but in less volumes.

Would be great to hear some thoughts and opinions on this.

Nevan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Nevan said:

Hi all

It's been a while since I posted a new thread on here but I have been doing a fair bit of reflecting with the nature of my punts and meets as of late.

Admittedly, I haven't been in this hobby for too long as I only really started to see escorts more consistently in the last three years (i.e every 6 to 8 weeks from August 2013). In my earlier years of meeting, I have usually stuck to shorter 1 hour bookings but I realised that as great as they are, these type of shorter meetings do feel limited and I've often found that I had a great time with the ladies but the time goes by very quickly and you often feel like a 2 to 3 hour meet really gets the most out of the experience without feeling the time constraints.

I have commited more to 4 hour dinner dates and longer (two to three hour) type of meets in recent months as I do like having the company of a lovely lady without feeling that the time constraints. These type of meets are great but there are pros and cons, where I do tend to cut back the volume of meets in order to save for longer 2/3 hour meeting. This has changed from the past of seeing an array of different agency ladies at shorter 1 hr bookings.

I just wondered if anyone has felt the same about the shorter 1 hour meets in the past (I.e feeling time constraints etc) or whether anyone tends to prefer longer types of meets but in less volumes.

Would be great to hear some thoughts and opinions on this.

Nevan

i think different length meetings have different  uses.

a 15 minute one  -something is deliciously naughty about nipping in for sex

a 30 minute one is good at lunchtime.  or when you are maybe a little skint

but as you say a longer meet allows an unrushed session which is nice too. maybe stopping for a chat

never done a dinner date.  would love an overnight sometime.  just need to organise it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We can tell you that easily over half of all booking requests we receive are for 1 hour incalls, if that's of any interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For a girl I've not seen before, usually 2 hours. Then 3 hours or longer if she's someone I want to see regularly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some interesting views here. I can say from experience, 1 hour meetings are great if you have not met the girl before, gives a good insight into what that girl is like but if its a positive visit, I always leave thinking that a 90 min or 2 hr visit would have been a good length of time for an initial encounter.

I have not branched out into many overnights, just one overnight experience so far.  I find that a 2 hr visit is the right kind of sweet spot for enjoying yourself with the lady without having to be conscious of time being too limited.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I can only achieve an orgasm once in a session, and I can do pretty much all that I want to in a one-hour booking. I want to enjoy sex every weekend with a variety of attractive young women one or even two generations my junior, and I can afford that by keeping to sixty minute sessions.

Once the booking is over then the girl is in her free time and many have encouraged me to stay on and share a shower and then chat, drink wine, browse their photo album etc. On one memorable occasion we over-ran by well over two hours, much to the extreme annoyance of the 007 agency when they found out!

The point is, I do find the socialising enjoyable, but there is no way that I am willing or able to pay for it. As far as a longer booking is concerned, the thought of compensating someone to converse with me, allow me take them out for the evening, or to actually sleep with me is totally unthinkable. If I’m really so grotesque and lacking in social skills that a girl needs £150/hour plus free food and drink to sit opposite me in a restaurant or to put up with me farting under the covers, then I’ll hold on to my dignity and my cash.

Obviously, none of the girls that I book for the first time actually want to have sex with me, they just want the money. However, most seem to find the experience quite endurable and many have positively enjoyed it, although only one has ever made a serious effort to give me my money back! Totally understandable of course, and I believe that extra time (subject to other bookings) is their usual way of showing appreciation?

I would imagine that the vast majority of punters have to exercise some control over their spending on this obby. If my disposable income was ten times greater than at present, then my above principles might well go straight out of the window and I would dabble with one or two overnight elite courtesans to see if they’re worth the time and money……but I think that I’d be disappointed.

 

Edited by Siamese Tomcat
....to make it better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

17 minutes ago, Siamese Tomcat said:

I can only achieve an orgasm once in a session, and I can do pretty much all that I want to in a one-hour booking. I want to enjoy sex every weekend with a variety of attractive young women one or even two generations my junior, and I can afford that by keeping to sixty minute sessions.

Once the booking is over then the girl is in her free time and many have encouraged me to stay on and share a shower and then chat, drink wine, browse their photo album etc. On one memorable occasion we over-ran by well over two hours, much to the extreme annoyance of the 007 agency when they found out!

The point is, I do find the socialising enjoyable, but there is no way that I am willing or able to pay for it. As far as a longer booking is concerned, the thought of compensating someone to converse with me, allow me take them out for the evening, or to actually sleep with me is totally unthinkable. If I’m really so grotesque and lacking in social skills that a girl needs £150/hour plus free food and drink to sit opposite me in a restaurant or to put up with me farting under the covers, then I’ll hold on to my dignity and my cash.

Obviously, none of the girls that I book for the first time actually want to have sex with me, they just want the money. However, most seem to find the experience quite endurable and many have positively enjoyed it, although only one has ever made a serious effort to give me my money back! Totally understandable of course, and I believe that extra time (subject to other bookings) is their usual way of showing appreciation?

I would imagine that the vast majority of punters have to exercise some control over their spending on this obby. If my disposable income was ten times greater than at present, then my above principles might well go straight out of the window and I would dabble with one or two overnight elite courtesans to see if they’re worth the time and money……but I think that I’d be disappointed.

 

Thats pretty rude.

You certainly do not have to be grotesque or lacking in social skills to want to spend time with a lady doing other than sex. Many men who want a "dinner date" or a social meet have very busy lives, demanding jobs and simply don't get the time to take a girl out on a real date, or they can't be arsed with the grafting only to not even get a peck.

Some may even be married and just miss the fun of having a date night and then going back to the room to have hours of fun. There are many reasons why punters choose to punt the way they do, and I don't think anyone should judge them or assume they are ugly or lacking in social skills, I would expect that kind of view from some outsider who has a low opinion of punters and WGs, not a regular punter. 

By paying an escort for a dinner date or a social meet, not only do they get a "date" but they also get guaranteed sex after, and it's fantastic fun, for both parties. 

Edited by TightYoungEbony
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TightYoungEbony said:

Thats pretty rude.

You certainly do not have to be grotesque or lacking in social skills to want to spend time with a lady doing other than sex. Many men who want a "dinner date" or a social meet have very busy lives, demanding jobs and simply don't get the time to take a girl out on a real date, or they can't be arsed with the grafting only to not even get a peck.

Some may even be married and just miss the fun of having a date night and then going back to the room to have hours of fun. There are many reasons why punters choose to punt the way they do, and I don't think anyone should judge them or assume they are ugly or lacking in social skills, I would expect that kind of view from some outsider who has a low opinion of punters and WGs, not a regular punter. 

By paying an escort for a dinner date or a social meet, not only do they get a "date" but they also get guaranteed sex after, and it's fantastic fun, for both parties. 

actually you have made me thonk of another facet of being in public with a wg before the naughties.

Thats because you both know that in half an hour you will be having sex.  that gives the whole thong a sort of frisson I expect.

One thing about a lunchtime punt is that you go back to the office and your colleagues have no idea what I have been up to!  But I do!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Coventrypunter said:

actually you have made me thonk of another facet of being in public with a wg before the naughties.

Thats because you both know that in half an hour you will be having sex.  that gives the whole thong a sort of frisson I expect.

One thing about a lunchtime punt is that you go back to the office and your colleagues have no idea what I have been up to!  But I do!

Ah yes! It's quite a kinky thought isn't it haha. X

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My current favoured approach to overnights is to have a quickie and then freshen up (together, preferably) before heading out to dinner, that definitely adds a certain frisson, and by the time dinner and drinks is over and we return to the hotel, I'm fully refreshed for the rest of the night's proceedings :)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Epiphone56 said:

My current favoured approach to overnights is to have a quickie and then freshen up (together, preferably) before heading out to dinner, that definitely adds a certain frisson, and by the time dinner and drinks is over and we return to the hotel, I'm fully refreshed for the rest of the night's proceedings :)

You are clearly a (wealthy) stud of the highest magnitude!

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the longer bookings, but in reality not always possible but never less than an hour...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎25‎/‎05‎/‎2016 at 2:24 PM, Nevan said:

Hi all

It's been a while since I posted a new thread on here but I have been doing a fair bit of reflecting with the nature of my punts and meets as of late.

Admittedly, I haven't been in this hobby for too long as I only really started to see escorts more consistently in the last three years (i.e every 6 to 8 weeks from August 2013). In my earlier years of meeting, I have usually stuck to shorter 1 hour bookings but I realised that as great as they are, these type of shorter meetings do feel limited and I've often found that I had a great time with the ladies but the time goes by very quickly and you often feel like a 2 to 3 hour meet really gets the most out of the experience without feeling the time constraints.

I have commited more to 4 hour dinner dates and longer (two to three hour) type of meets in recent months as I do like having the company of a lovely lady without feeling that the time constraints. These type of meets are great but there are pros and cons, where I do tend to cut back the volume of meets in order to save for longer 2/3 hour meeting. This has changed from the past of seeing an array of different agency ladies at shorter 1 hr bookings.

I just wondered if anyone has felt the same about the shorter 1 hour meets in the past (I.e feeling time constraints etc) or whether anyone tends to prefer longer types of meets but in less volumes.

Would be great to hear some thoughts and opinions on this.

Nevan

I found in the early days of meetings, that 1 hour bookings went far too fast!

I usually book meets between 2 to 4 hours long.  This allows me plenty of time for foreplay, and to explore different types of services, building up to oral and sex.  I get to 'fully' enjoy each girl with longer meets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Used to book 2 hours to start if I like them  then I move to an overnight whilst I'm in town 

I enjoy the feeling of knowing I can spend some quality time with a wonderful women who gives proper GFE and it's not rushed

if I feel like a cheeky 1 hour punt I do that from time to time - each to their own on this 

Competely agree with Nev - we all enjoy different aspects of a punt 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always go for a 2 hour punt, giving me plenty of time to recharge between pops and time to explore the womans body

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I prefer different lengths of bookings depending upon the client, my schedule, energy levels and location. It is however commonly assumed that Escorts prefer longer bookings, this isn't so. There are many times when I'd prefer 1 hour to 4 hours, and vice versa. I am not more likely to accept an overnight, or less likely to wish to see 1 hour booker. Personality, how they communicate and convenience play a much greater role.

Edited by Strawberry
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, demandred said:

I always go for a 2 hour punt, giving me plenty of time to recharge between pops and time to explore the womans body

This is what I prefer, no need to rush and feeling you have more to 'give' then only remaining with a headache....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Time and place for everything.  I sometimes call in for a 15 min oily wank at an establishment on the way back from meetings to the office, or nip out at lunch time for a 30 min fuck, or properly skive off for an hour of sex, ever so often I take time out for a couple of hours for a party.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Standard for me is 90 mins - with a few 1 hour and 2 hours sessions mixed in.  90 mins guarantees 2 pops and (on occasion) if the WG is very good then 3 (though with the passing years these are rarer and rarer....).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As stated above, I can do all that I want to do in an hour, but two of my last three punts I've walked out halfway through - despite paying the fee there was absolutely no point in hanging around to get even more pissed off with a fake list of services and crap attitude.

My favourite girl of all time is only £80/hour, i.e. half of my budget. I can only pop once, especially with her as she drains my very essence for the following three days, but I'm considering a two hour booking so that we can meet for a drink beforehand, do the usual stuff for an hour, and then have a long chat afterwards.

I'm a romantic at heart......

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a beginner (punter) and only do a "quick" 30 minute punt in between meetings/during lunch hour. Works for me currently, as I like to see different women on (what is now becoming) a regular basis. Also works for me because if the chemistry with the girl isn't there, I can make a quick exit. The downside is, if I've had a great time, I always wished I had booked for longer. I then walk away, go back to my life and when I book again, I end up booking a half hour again. Also worth pointing out that I exclusively only see the girls at Annabellas/HoD at the moment, and as great as they are, some of them don't warrant an hour or more. I'm just about to start venturing out into the independents, and I'm sure that it when I'll want to spend more money/time.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have booked 30 minute appointments before but they tend to be for ladies with little or no reviews. 1 hour appointments are ideal for girls with numerous reviews and 90 minutes  are reserved for girls I have met before who gave me really memorable experiences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I started off seeking long bookings but as time went on , shorter ones seemed more suitable. If the lady only wants to be there for the cash, then the shorter the better probably makes sense .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, cumandgo said:

I started off seeking long bookings but as time went on , shorter ones seemed more suitable. If the lady only wants to be there for the cash, then the shorter the better probably makes sense .

"only wants to be there for the cash" is the reason why the vast majority of people do any job. 

 

in fact, being there for the cash is probably be best reason for an escort to be there. good service=repeat business=more cash. better than having to be there at the behest of someone else anyway. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One hour. 30 mins is too quick if I'm having fun, and 2 hours is too long, unless I know the girl can sustain the fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0