tvwhore

Paid sex with pregnant mothers?

47 posts in this topic

I saw a post by Hannah in reply to Britbabes (or was it Bathbabes) about WGs offering bareback sex while pregnant.

So what do people think of WGs that offer sex while pregnant - bareback or covered?

Is it responsible?

Is it safe or are risks increased to mum, baby, punter?

Would you shag a pregnant WG?

Would you work as a WG while pregnant? And if so, at what stage would you stop working?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sex should only be had when all parties involved have consented.

I saw a post by Hannah in reply to Britbabes (or was it Bathbabes) about WGs offering bareback sex while pregnant.

So what do people think of WGs that offer sex while pregnant - bareback or covered?

Is it responsible?

Is it safe or are risks increased to mum, baby, punter?

Would you shag a pregnant WG?

Would you work as a WG while pregnant? And if so, at what stage would you stop working?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The risks of bareback are well-known. I'm fairly sure that some nasties that the mother might contract could/would be transmitted to the child, if not immediately then at birth. (I may be wrong - anyone know?)

There are also other potential risks in taking in "gentleman callers," as we all know.

Definitely a no-no, as far as I'm concerned. If a woman chooses to put herself at risk by doing BB, then that's her risk. Endangering an unborn child is well off the scale of anything I find acceptable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently, a VERY bad idea; see:

http://womenshealth.about.com/od/pregnancyrelatedissues/a/stdspregnancy.htm

"Transmission of sexually transmitted diseases from the pregnant women to her fetus, newborn, or infant can occur before, during, or after birth. Certain STDs such as syphilis are able to cross the placenta and infect the fetus-- potentially affecting fetal development. Other sexually transmitted diseases including gonorrhea, chlamydia, hepatitis B, and genital herpes can be transmitted to the infant during vaginal delivery. Women who are HIV positive can transmit the virus that causes AIDS to the fetus through the placenta during pregnancy or infection can occur during the process of birth. Unique to HIV is the fact that transmission can occur in infants as a result of breastfeeding by an infected mother.

Sexually transmitted diseases can cause devastating consequences to the baby that include:

* stillbirth

* low birth weight

* an eye infection called conjunctivitis

* pneumonia

* an infection in the blood called neonatal sepsis

* neurologic damage such as brain damage or motor function disorder

* blindness, deafness, or other congenital abnormalities

* acute hepatitis

* meningitis

* chronic liver disease

* cirrhosis

Unfortunately, not all of the possible consequences of STD infections may be apparent at birth. Some of the affects of birth-related sexually transmitted disease may not be detected for months or sometimes even years." :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The risks of bareback are well-known. I'm fairly sure that some nasties that the mother might contract could/would be transmitted to the child, if not immediately then at birth. (I may be wrong - anyone know?)

There are also other potential risks in taking in "gentleman callers," as we all know.

Definitely a no-no, as far as I'm concerned. If a woman chooses to put herself at risk by doing BB, then that's her risk. Endangering an unborn child is well off the scale of anything I find acceptable.

So it's ok if she does it covered while pregant?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming that sex is not bareback and the lady does not contract an STI or get beaten up by her punter, I see no harm in it, though I know there are men here who are a bit leary of pregnant women having sex at all. :D

*waits for explosion of self-righteousness* :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Assuming that sex is not bareback and the lady does not contract an STI or get beaten up by her punter, I see no harm in it, though I know there are men here who are a bit leary of pregnant women having sex at all. :D

*waits for explosion of self-righteousness* :D

And if the condom breaks, or the punter slips it off?

What about BBBJ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So it's ok if she does it covered while pregant?

It's far less dangerous, assuming the condom prevents any transmission of infection, which may or may not be the case. I think the risks from sex during pregnancy, assuming it's fairly "normal" sex, are low. Certainly, I had sex with my children's mothers when they were pregnant and the kids are fine. :D Humans have been shagging during pregnancy since time immoral, I mean immemorial, with few problems, as far as I'm aware.

The moral/aesthetic issues do make me feel a bit icky, I must admit, but that's just me. I don't think it's "wrong."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I saw a post by Hannah in reply to Britbabes (or was it Bathbabes) about WGs offering bareback sex while pregnant.

So what do people think of WGs that offer sex while pregnant - bareback or covered?

Is it responsible?

Is it safe or are risks increased to mum, baby, punter?

Would you shag a pregnant WG?

Would you work as a WG while pregnant? And if so, at what stage would you stop working?

Hannah is wrong. Bath Babes has never had any pregnant girls offering BB and We don't know where all this misinformation is coming from.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Women do have sex whilst being pregnant. Is this right for WG's? I think that much depends of their circumstances. If escorting is their only source of income then it may be hard to give up for at least 9 months and still be able to support yourself. What are their alternatives? Its a tough one to call and until you are in their shoes ....... ect

Personally I am not a fan of this and wouldnt see a girl who is pregnant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's far less dangerous, assuming the condom prevents any transmission of infection, which may or may not be the case. I think the risks from sex during pregnancy, assuming it's fairly "normal" sex, are low. Certainly, I had sex with my children's mothers when they were pregnant and the kids are fine. :D Humans have been shagging during pregnancy since time immoral, I mean immemorial, with few problems, as far as I'm aware.

Good point. I hadn't considered the physical aspects of sex when I asked this. I was more focussed on STIs and that punter/WG sex would now be a threesome with the baby where one might want to consider if the risks the mother accepts for herself are also acceptable to the baby.

Condoms break. That came out on the GUM Clinic thread, and WGs then sometimes get a test to check if they are ok. But now we have a baby that might get infected too, and how do babies react to the antibiotics used to treat STIs, and what about incurable infections like HIV, Hep-C and herpes?

And I haven't even got a clue how the hormonal changes might change susceptability to infection - or if they increase the probability of an infected (pregnant) WG infecting a punter.

And so on.

The moral/aesthetic issues do make me feel a bit icky, I must admit, but that's just me. I don't think it's "wrong."

Icky can be fun :D

And a good session with a lumpy mummy can be very messy and icky :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hannah is wrong. Bath Babes has never had any pregnant girls offering BB and We don't know where all this misinformation is coming from.

The question is prompted by Hannahs post, not by the veracity of it.

But didn't Annie once offer bareback? Or is Annie not one of your girls? I'm sure I saw pictures of her receiving bukkake while pregnant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Icky can be fun :D

And a good session with a lumpy mummy can be very messy and icky :D

I didn't mean that kind of icky. I mean it feels a bit too intimate or intrusive: some things are, well, sacred? Not in a religious way but "not up for sale at any price." That's my personal feeling, not a statement of objective truth or anything. I'm probably a stupid old fart but that's how I feel. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes they do.....(sussex punting)

Annie did an interview with sp and was asked a question about bareback and I quote...

Sussex Punting: You don’t do bareback then?

Annie: No way. I’m always getting asked for it. Punters are always offering me extra for bareback but I won’t do it. I get loads of work without doing it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
yes they do.....(sussex punting)

Annie did an interview with sp and was asked a question about bareback and I quote...

Sussex Punting: You don't do bareback then?

Annie: No way. I'm always getting asked for it. Punters are always offering me extra for bareback but I won't do it. I get loads of work without doing it.

But she did once.

Then she got pregnant and did bukkake while up to 7 months and there were pictures of her covered in spunk.

Then she did a lactating service after pregnant.

And at some point in that she stopped doing bareback

She advertises on a site where some of the girls still offer bareback.

She did until recently, and may still, do duos and parties with WGs that offer bareback.

She does BBBJ with punters that have done bareback with other girls on the site.

etc.

Good on her for not offering it now, but the point about Bathbabes as a whole seems spot on,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The question is prompted by Hannahs post, not by the veracity of it.

But didn't Annie once offer bareback? Or is Annie not one of your girls? I'm sure I saw pictures of her receiving bukkake while pregnant.

Yes Annie is a very popular Bath Babe and was even more popular when pregnant! Bukkake yes, BB no. And she say's she's never done an interview for ANYBODY (though she's often asked) so what the so called interview in Sussex Punting is she's no idea!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes Annie is a very popular Bath Babe and was even more popular when pregnant! Bukkake yes, BB no. And she say's she's never done an interview for ANYBODY (though she's often asked) so what the so called interview in Sussex Punting is she's no idea!

Just out of interest, how old was Annie when she first started working through you?

I see an FR on here from 1st August 2003 linked from her site (review 1).

She was already 6 months pregnant and working when she got her second review in July 2004.

But a later review on TER from September 2004 says she had only turned 18 in June of that year, and mentions she was taking part of October off, presumably to have the baby. One can infer that she worked while pregnant almost up to the point she gave birth.

Text on her site copiued from TER says that even at 8 months she was offering anal, BBBJ, and recieved bukkake and water sports.

I won't carry on, but do wonder just how old she was when the Sexual Offences Act (2003) raised the age when paid sex can be considered legal to 18.

I also wonder how any site can responsibly promote a 17 year old pregnant girl for paid sex almost up to the point the baby is born.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just out of interest, how old was Annie when she first started working through you?

I see an FR on here from 1st August 2003 linked from her site (review 1).

She was already 6 months pregnant and working when she got her second review in July 2004.

But a later review on TER from September 2004 says she had only turned 18 in June of that year, and mentions she was taking part of October off, presumably to have the baby. One can infer that she worked while pregnant almost up to the point she gave birth.

Text on her site copiued from TER says that even at 8 months she was offering anal, BBBJ, and recieved bukkake and water sports.

I won't carry on, but do wonder just how old she was when the Sexual Offences Act (2003) raised the age when paid sex can be considered legal to 18.

I also wonder how any site can responsibly promote a 17 year old pregnant girl for paid sex almost up to the point the baby is born.

You have to view working girls' stated ages with a touch of imagination! If they look young they will usually capitalise on it! Annie is & always has been totally legal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I saw a post by Hannah in reply to Britbabes (or was it Bathbabes) about WGs offering bareback sex while pregnant.

So what do people think of WGs that offer sex while pregnant - bareback or covered?

Is it responsible?

Is it safe or are risks increased to mum, baby, punter?

Would you shag a pregnant WG?

Would you work as a WG while pregnant? And if so, at what stage would you stop working?

I had covered sex with a WG who I subsequently discovered (about a week later) was pregnant at the time, but not enough to have shown yet. Not a conquest I feel proud or comfortable about. She is still advertising herself on AW as a pregnant teen, but I won't be doing that again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You have to view working girls' stated ages with a touch of imagination! If they look young they will usually capitalise on it! Annie is & always has been totally legal.

Is that right? LOL

So the 18th birthday reference in the FR wasn't her telling the truth to a punter face to face outside the context of website advertising?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I had covered sex with a WG who I subsequently discovered (about a week later) was pregnant at the time, but not enough to have shown yet. Not a conquest I feel proud or comfortable about. She is still advertising herself on AW as a pregnant teen, but I won't be doing that again!

I have very low opinion of those who offer paid sex whilst pregnant and those who pay for it. Are there no limits for some people?

I booked an escort (could not have been older than 19) who turned out to be 3-4 months pregnant with an obvious lump. Ended up giving her something to eat and paying her for nothing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have very low opinion of those who offer paid sex whilst pregnant and those who pay for it. Are there no limits for some people?

I booked an escort (could not have been older than 19) who turned out to be 3-4 months pregnant with an obvious lump. Ended up giving her something to eat and paying her for nothing.

Did you not even have a hand job? :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I for one believe it is totally up to the individual whether they wish to offer paid sex when pregnant. I would as always stress that the sex should be covered when anally or vaginally penetrative. However, I wouldn't like to see punters having to pay the WG for no pleasure whilst she was having 'maternity leave'. :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did you not even have a hand job? :D

This was abroad. When I realised that she was just a desperate young girl who was knocked up because of stupidity and foolishness, all I felt was sorrow for her and contempt for myself. The thought of having a hand job did not occur to me at the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now