NIK

Expressions that irritate in FR's

52 posts in this topic

As I say in the thread below DATY irritates me in Fr's.

And of course the immensely patronising 'Treat her with respect' together with 'I'm not going to go into details.'

I also hate the word 'raincoat' for condom. I don't know why but I do.

If a report said, 'After DATY it was on with the raincoat and I'm not going to go into any more details but treat her with respect, guys,' it would drive me round the twist. Not sure why but it would. :)

Which expressions irritate you in FR's?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As I say in the thread below DATY irritates me in Fr's.

And of course the immensely patronising 'Treat her with respect'

Surely that is when the girl is writing her own report -------- or am I being too cynical. :confused::rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If a report said, 'After DATY it was on with the raincoat and I'm not going to go into any more details but treat her with respect, guys,' it would drive me round the twist. Not sure why but it would. :rolleyes:

Which expressions irritate you in FR's?

Why ? Because you're missing on some free porn and the sordid details? :confused: Would you rather read how he banged her with his huge cock until he exploded and she could take it no more?

People so easily irritated by the way others choose to express themselves worry me a tad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why ? Because you're missing on some free porn and the sordid details? :confused: Would you rather read how he banged her with his huge cock until he exploded and she could take it no more?

People so easily irritated by the way others choose to express themselves worry me a tad.

No, that would also irritate me.

I just prefer to read a little more originality I suppose.

Just because we don't all feel the need to patronise others by saying 'treat her with respect' doesn't mean we don't do that too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dunno about irritating, but I certainly find it laughable when blokes start going on about how big their cock is or the likes. "She took my massive length" and things like that. I've seen some that sound more like the guy was just sitting having a wank rather than engaging in sex with another human being.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As I say in the thread below DATY irritates me in Fr's.

And of course the immensely patronising 'Treat her with respect' together with 'I'm not going to go into details.'

I also hate the word 'raincoat' for condom. I don't know why but I do.

If a report said, 'After DATY it was on with the raincoat and I'm not going to go into any more details but treat her with respect, guys,' it would drive me round the twist. Not sure why but it would. :confused:

Which expressions irritate you in FR's?

NIK

You really do shoot yourself in the foot sometimes.

How many FR's do you think will now include your "favorites" just for the added NIKatation factor :rolleyes::D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not much for it was great, I won't share the details. I don't need a porn-style description (although I don't complain about such, either), but it would be nice to get a general feel of the session. After all, what greatly appeals to one punter might not appeal to another. For example, if I cum 30 minutes into an hour I'm happy enough with chatting and a bit of foreplay. Maybe that's what I got and I'm totally content. Maybe the lady wouldn't be too keen about going for round 2 5 minutes later. But that's what the next fella would seek.

Then again, there's certainly some value in I saw her, she's real, I liked her. Better than no FR at all. So I won't complain too loudly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of irritating and (now) lack of originality

"31 mins 32 secs"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"after cumming for the fourth time, it seemed that we had run over time, but she said, as she poured me another glass of creme de menthe, she'd enjoyed it so much there would be no extra charge. it was an ok punt, but i wont be going back"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NIK

You really do shoot yourself in the foot sometimes.

How many FR's do you think will now include your "favorites" just for the added NIKatation factor :rolleyes::D

They wouldn't do that, honey!

Would they :confused::D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of field reports remind me of the letters page to penthouse in the seventies, improbable boasting of prowess. I only read the edinburgh ones, and cant say I have come across a poster with a memorable style, or even that useful info. I have to agree, that treat her with respect, annoys me very much. The I wont go into details,is also preposterous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you read a load of fr's, its bound to come over to some folk that this is how its done, there are few and far between fr's that really use origionality, as there are only so many ways to descibe what happens in the rooms...

Scriptwriters tend to be few amongst us, and most of the fr's seem to be about a 30 minute or so session, so its hardly going to be challanging "Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance", or the latest works of Luke Rheinheart.

So long as its honest and truthfull, and reflective of the authors view, its the best we have got.

Edited by TartanTam
Im not going into great detail...lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When you read a load of fr's, its bound to come over to some folk that this is how its done, there are few and far between fr's that really use origionality, as there are only so many ways to descibe what happens in the rooms...

Scriptwriters tend to be few amongst us, and most of the fr's seem to be about a 30 minute or so session, so its hardly going to be challanging "Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance", or the latest works of Luke Rheinheart.

So long as its honest and truthfull, and reflective of the authors view, its the best we have got.

Good post, including the edit comment, and it fits my view - always expecting to bring the house down when starting an FR but ending up with smething very mundane because of lack of willpower (not talent obviouslt - that's massive).

While always say people should be allowed to write what they want how they want, I find it odd the little expressions that get used - as with Nik's 'raincoat' example - because I have usually never heard them before or only met them once before on an FR and wonder if these are common terms my sheltered life has protected me from.

Nice to have a thread of such terms that tickle or irritate people - ah, we've got one here, but I can never remember them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As I say in the thread below DATY irritates me in Fr's.

And of course the immensely patronising 'Treat her with respect' together with 'I'm not going to go into details.'

I also hate the word 'raincoat' for condom. I don't know why but I do.

If a report said, 'After DATY it was on with the raincoat and I'm not going to go into any more details but treat her with respect, guys,' it would drive me round the twist. Not sure why but it would. :confused:

Which expressions irritate you in FR's?

All you have mentioned except raincoat and DATY dont irritate me, they are of no use to me. I require only factual information, confirmation of services offered, physical appearance and an idea of the ladies attutude, friendliness and enthusiasm.

However, an author like Manmeat is to be applauded IMO for the style and humour he injects, i look forward to his FRs with anticipation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People so easily irritated by the way others choose to express themselves worry me a tad

NIK is referring to the way they choose not to express themselves, and so render the FR useless :confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

However, an author like Manmeat is to be applauded IMO for the style and humour he injects, i look forward to his FRs with anticipation.

There was a guy called Rupert on Prestonpunters that used to have me in stitches, he could write a great fr and always had something witty and intresting to say, I remember once he was at a parlour caled Karens in whitefield, and he was as usual chasing about the place teasing and causing mayhem, he ended the report by saying he was sat in front of his keyboard, wearing only the knickers that the working girl was searching for...lol.

I met the guy a few times, and have nothing but respect for him, he more than once drove over 100 miles to do me and an escort a favour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with NIK re "DATY" and "not going into details".

I believe that FRs should be written if there's something worth saying - either good or bad. For those with time on their hands and filling out FRs for all/and/or mediocre punts are doing us all a favour by increasing the knowledge base (and for that, I've always been very grateful). Therefore, "not going into details" is such a pointless statement - might as well just say "good punt all round" or "crap punt" and be done! FRs that don't contain many facts (descriptive or mere tech spec style listing of services received/offered) are pointless - they don't help the punting community.

I don't know why DATY annoys me - hell, I might even have been guilty of using it once or twice myself but I think it may be because it's such a pretentious way of saying "eating pussy". Perhaps I'm just too crass!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As I say in the thread below DATY irritates me in Fr's.

And of course the immensely patronising 'Treat her with respect' together with 'I'm not going to go into details.'

I also hate the word 'raincoat' for condom. I don't know why but I do.

If a report said, 'After DATY it was on with the raincoat and I'm not going to go into any more details but treat her with respect, guys,' it would drive me round the twist. Not sure why but it would. :confused:

Which expressions irritate you in FR's?

With you on the 'raincoat' especially. Why the coy euphemisms? 'Raincoat', 'A-levels', 'O-levels' and so on. And then 'DATY' I've always thought very odd. 'Reverse oral' sounds unexcitingly technical, like part of some technique you'd be taught at your dentists.

'Won't go into details'? Fine, then don't. Just don't tell us you're not going into details. Try 'not going into details' silently.

And 'treat her with respect' comes up nearly as many times as the very uninspiring 'each to their own' in threads on here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
With you on the 'raincoat' especially. Why the coy euphemisms? 'Raincoat', 'A-levels', 'O-levels' and so on. And then 'DATY' I've always thought very odd. 'Reverse oral' sounds unexcitingly technical, like part of some technique you'd be taught at your dentists.

'Won't go into details'? Fine, then don't. Just don't tell us you're not going into details. Try 'not going into details' silently.

And 'treat her with respect' comes up nearly as many times as the very uninspiring 'each to their own' in threads on here.

:confused: Yeah, I don't understand why FR's get filled in and have no info whatsoever. Most agencies in the north east don't tell you the "do's and don'ts" of girls, so I'd prefer a FR with a little detail to get an idea of what is likely to be on offer.

And I hate the word "mish" with a passion. Horrible word.

Oh, and what does DATY stands for?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:Oh, and what does DATY stands for?

Muff Diving

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, would you read a book or see a film if the reviewer just said " I'm not going into details"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When you read a load of fr's, its bound to come over to some folk that this is how its done, there are few and far between fr's that really use origionality, as there are only so many ways to descibe what happens in the rooms...

Scriptwriters tend to be few amongst us, and most of the fr's seem to be about a 30 minute or so session, so its hardly going to be challanging "Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance", or the latest works of Luke Rheinheart.

This one amused me ...

http://www.punternet.com/frs/fr_view.php?recnum=93807

Clive James, maybe?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think theres nothing wrong with saying that they are not" going into the details." it shows that they are respecting the wg.

Im irritated when the man relays all the crude details towards his sexual prowess such as" she sucked the whole legth of my cock"or "her pussy was really tight" i find these expressions deragotory to the wg.

I think its good when he says" treat her with respect" i cant see anything wrong with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think theres nothing wrong with saying that they are not" going into the details." it shows that they are respecting the wg.

Im irritated when the man relays all the crude details towards his sexual prowess such as" she sucked the whole legth of my cock"or "her pussy was really tight" i find these expressions deragotory to the wg.

I think its good when he says" treat her with respect" i cant see anything wrong with it.

I am also not interested in reading about a punters prowess but i want details that confirm what the lady says on her site/profile is on offer is what is actually on offer, treat her with respect doesnt provide that, so for me personally thats whats wrong with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am also not interested in reading about a punters prowess but i want details that confirm what the lady says on her site/profile is on offer is what is actually on offer, treat her with respect doesnt provide that, so for me personally thats whats wrong with it.

I agree with Smiths.

'Treat her with respect' is a pointless comment. This is what almost all of us do naturally, and anyone who wouldn't is not going to think; oh yes that's a good idea, I'll do that then.

As for 'not going into details', this makes the report useless.

If you're not going to provide any information why waste your time doing a report?

Personally I don't care about the graphic descriptions which I think are probably written by guys having a wank, but details such as:

Does she look like the pictures.

Does she do what she says she does, and if not what doesn't she do.

Was the lady friendly or distant.

What was the flat like.

etc.

provide useful information to the reader without the 'blow by blow' stuff.

Reports which only contain these two phrases though, are almost certainly adverts from WGs.

A bit off topic I suppose, but I'm also irritated when websites don't say what services are provided, and say something like 'I refuse to discuss details of what may happen between us on the phone'.

So, you're expected to turn up without knowing if you're going to have the kind of experience you want, which is a waste of time for both parties. Could it be they think you'll stay even is she's not the lady in the pictures, and/or doesn't provide any services except relieving you of your cash? Surely not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now